Maria A. Schumacher

Crystal structure of the lactose operon repressor and its complexes with DNA and inducer.

The lac operon of Escherichia coli is the paradigm for gene regulation. Its key component is the lac repressor, a product of the lacI gene. The three-dimensional structures of the intact lac repressor, the lac repressor bound to the gratuitous inducer isopropyl-β-D-1-thiogalactoside (IPTG) and the lac repressor complexed with a 21-base pair symmetric operator DNA have been determined. These three structures show the conformation of the molecule in both the induced and repressed states and provide a framework for understanding a wealth of biochemical and genetic information. The DNA sequence of the lac operon has three lac repressor recognition sites in a stretch of 500 base pairs. The crystallographic structure of the complex with DNA suggests that the tetrameric repressor functions synergistically with catabolite gene activator protein (CAP) and participates in the quaternary formation of repression loops in which one tetrameric repressor interacts simultaneously with two sites on the genomic DNA.

Structure of the gating domain of a Ca2+-activated K+ channel complexed with Ca2+/calmodulin.

Small-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels (SK channels) are independent of voltage and gated solely by intracellular Ca2+. These membrane channels are heteromeric complexes that comprise pore-forming α-subunits and the Ca2+-binding protein calmodulin (CaM). CaM binds to the SK channel through the CaM-binding domain (CaMBD), which is located in an intracellular region of the α-subunit immediately carboxy-terminal to the pore. Channel opening is triggered when Ca2+ binds the EF hands in the N-lobe of CaM. Here we report the 1.60 Å crystal structure of the SK channel CaMBD/Ca2+/CaM complex. The CaMBD forms an elongated dimer with a CaM molecule bound at each end; each CaM wraps around three α-helices, two from one CaMBD subunit and one from the other. As only the CaM N-lobe has bound Ca2+, the structure provides a view of both calcium-dependent and -independent CaM/protein interactions. Together with biochemical data, the structure suggests a possible gating mechanism for the SK channel.

Structures of the pleiotropic translational regulator Hfq and an Hfq-RNA complex: a bacterial Sm-like protein.

In prokaryotes, Hfq regulates translation by modulating the structure of numerous RNA molecules by binding preferentially to A/U‐rich sequences. To elucidate the mechanisms of target recognition and translation regulation by Hfq, we determined the crystal structures of the Staphylococcus aureus Hfq and an Hfq–RNA complex to 1.55 and 2.71 Å resolution, respectively. The structures reveal that Hfq possesses the Sm‐fold previously observed only in eukaryotes and archaea. However, unlike these heptameric Sm proteins, Hfq forms a homo‐hexameric ring. The Hfq–RNA structure reveals that the single‐stranded hepta‐oligoribonucleotide binds in a circular conformation around a central basic cleft, whereby Tyr42 residues from adjacent subunits stack with six of the bases, and Gln8, outside the Sm motif, provides key protein–base contacts. Such binding suggests a mechanism for Hfq function.

Molecular Mechanisms of HipA-Mediated Multidrug Tolerance and Its Neutralization by HipB

Bacterial multidrug tolerance is largely responsible for the inability of antibiotics to eradicate infections and is caused by a small population of dormant bacteria called persisters. HipA is a critical Escherichia coli persistence factor that is normally neutralized by HipB, a transcription repressor, which also regulates hipBA expression. Here, we report multiple structures of HipA and a HipA-HipB-DNA complex. HipA has a eukaryotic serine/threonine kinase–like fold and can phosphorylate the translation factor EF-Tu, suggesting a persistence mechanism via cell stasis. The HipA-HipB-DNA structure reveals the HipB-operator binding mechanism, ∼70° DNA bending, and unexpected HipA-DNA contacts. Dimeric HipB interacts with two HipA molecules to inhibit its kinase activity through sequestration and conformational inactivation. Combined, these studies suggest mechanisms for HipA-mediated persistence and its neutralization by HipB.

Structural basis for cooperative DNA binding by two dimers of the multidrug-binding protein QacR

The Staphylococcus aureus multidrug‐binding protein QacR represses transcription of the qacA multidrug transporter gene and is induced by multiple structurally dissimilar drugs. QacR is a member of the TetR/CamR family of transcriptional regulators, which share highly homologous N‐terminal DNA‐binding domains connected to seemingly non‐homologous ligand‐binding domains. Unlike other TetR members, which bind ∼15 bp operators, QacR recognizes an unusually long 28 bp operator, IR1, which it appears to bind cooperatively. To elucidate the DNA‐binding mechanism of QacR, we determined the 2.90 Å resolution crystal structure of a QacR–IR1 complex. Strikingly, our data reveal that the DNA recognition mode of QacR is distinct from TetR and involves the binding of a pair of QacR dimers. In this unique binding mode, recognition at each IR1 half‐site is mediated by a complement of DNA contacts made by two helix–turn–helix motifs. The inferred cooperativity does not arise from cross‐dimer protein–protein contacts, but from the global undertwisting and major groove widening elicited by the binding of two QacR dimers.

The structure of a CREB bZIP.somatostatin CRE complex reveals the basis for selective dimerization and divalent cation-enhanced DNA binding

The cAMP responsive element-binding protein (CREB) is central to second messenger regulated transcription. To elucidate the structural mechanisms of DNA binding and selective dimerization of CREB, we determined to 3.0 Å resolution, the structure of the CREB bZIP (residues 283–341) bound to a 21-base pair deoxynucleotide that encompasses the canonical 8-base pair somatostatin cAMP response element (SSCRE). The CREB dimer is stabilized in part by ionic interactions from Arg314 to Glu319′and Glu328 to Lys333′ as well as a hydrogen bond network that links the carboxamide side chains of Gln322′-Asn321-Asn321′-Gln322. Critical to family selective dimerization are intersubunit hydrogen bonds between basic region residue Tyr307 and leucine zipper residue Glu312, which are conserved in all CREB/CREM/ATF-1 family members. Strikingly, the structure reveals a hexahydrated Mg2+ ion bound in the cavity between the basic region and SSCRE that makes a water-mediated DNA contact. DNA binding studies demonstrate that Mg2+ ions enhance CREB bZIP:SSCRE binding by more than 25-fold and suggest a possible physiological role for this ion in somatostatin cAMP response element and potentially other CRE-mediated gene expression.

Molecular mechanism by which the nucleoid occlusion factor, SlmA, keeps cytokinesis in check

In Escherichia coli, cytokinesis is orchestrated by FtsZ, which forms a Z‐ring to drive septation. Spatial and temporal control of Z‐ring formation is achieved by the Min and nucleoid occlusion (NO) systems. Unlike the well‐studied Min system, less is known about the anti‐DNA guillotining NO process. Here, we describe studies addressing the molecular mechanism of SlmA (synthetic lethal with a defective Min system)‐mediated NO. SlmA contains a TetR‐like DNA‐binding fold, and chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses show that SlmA‐binding sites are dispersed on the chromosome except the Ter region, which segregates immediately before septation. SlmA binds DNA and FtsZ simultaneously, and the SlmA–FtsZ structure reveals that two FtsZ molecules sandwich a SlmA dimer. In this complex, FtsZ can still bind GTP and form protofilaments, but the separated protofilaments are forced into an anti‐parallel arrangement. This suggests that SlmA may alter FtsZ polymer assembly. Indeed, electron microscopy data, showing that SlmA–DNA disrupts the formation of normal FtsZ polymers and induces distinct spiral structures, supports this. Thus, the combined data reveal how SlmA derails Z‐ring formation at the correct place and time to effect NO.

Structural mechanism of the simultaneous binding of two drugs to a multidrug-binding protein

The structural basis of simultaneous binding of two or more different drugs by any multidrug‐binding protein is unknown and also how this can lead to a noncompetitive, uncompetitive or cooperative binding mechanism. Here, we describe the crystal structure of the Staphylococcus aureus multidrug‐binding transcription repressor, QacR, bound simultaneously to ethidium (Et) and proflavin (Pf). The structure underscores the plasticity of the multidrug‐binding pocket and reveals an alternative, Pf‐induced binding mode for Et. To monitor the simultaneous binding of Pf and Et to QacR, as well as to determine the effects on the binding affinity of one drug when the other drug is prebound, a novel application of near‐ultraviolet circular dichroism (UVCD) was developed. The UVCD equilibrium‐binding studies revealed identical affinities of Pf for QacR in the presence or absence of Et, but significantly diminished affinity of Et for QacR when Pf is prebound, findings that are readily explicable by their structures. The principles for simultaneous binding of two different drugs discerned here are likely employed by the multidrug efflux transporters.

Mechanism of corepressor-mediated specific DNA binding by the purine repressor.

The modulation of the affinity of DNA-binding proteins by small molecule effectors for cognate DNA sites is common to both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. However, the mechanisms by which effector binding to one domain affects DNA binding by a distal domain are poorly understood structurally. In initial studies to provide insight into the mechanism of effector-modulated DNA binding of the lactose repressor family, we determined the crystal structure of the purine repressor bound to a corepressor and purF operator. To extend our understanding, we have determined the structure of the corepressor-free corepressor-binding domain of the purine repressor at 2.2 A resolution. In the unliganded state, structural changes in the corepressor-binding pocket cause each subunit to rotate open by as much as 23 degrees, the consequences of which are the disengagement of the minor groove-binding hinge helices and repressor-DNA dissociation.

Characterization of the SarA virulence gene regulator of Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus is a potent human pathogen that expresses a large number of virulence factors in a temporally regulated fashion. Two pleiotropically acting regulatory loci were identified in previous mutational studies. The agr locus comprises two operons that express a quorum‐sensing system from the P2 promoter and a regulatory RNA molecule from the P3 promoter. The sar locus encodes a DNA‐binding protein that activates the expression of both agr operons. We have cloned the sarA gene, expressed SarA in Escherichia coli and purified the recombinant protein to apparent homogeneity. The purified protein was found to be dimeric in the presence and absence of DNA and to consist mostly of α‐helices. DNase I footprinting of SarA on the putative regulatory region cis to the agr promoters revealed three high‐affinity binding sites composed of two half‐sites each. Quantitative electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) were used to derive equilibrium binding constants (KD) for the interaction of SarA with these binding sites. An unusual ladder banding pattern was observed in EMSA with a large DNA fragment including all three binding sites. Our data indicate that SarA regulation of the agr operons involves binding to multiple half‐sites and may involve other sites located downstream of the promoters.