Maria Appel Nissen

In search for a sociology of social problems for social work

The purpose of this article is to convey an invitation to engage in a search for a sociology of social problems for social work. The article explores the theoretical potential for and obstacles to a sociology of social problems for social work within a European context. This is done through a critical discussion of sociologies of social problems developed in the USA, as well as the sociologies of Pierre Bourdieu and Michel Foucault. Through this discussion both potentials and obstacles are identified. The latter is related to problems in understanding the complex relation between the context of society and the identifications of and solutions to social problems, and how collective action might influence this relation. It is argued that exploring this theoretical problem is important for a sociology of social problems adequate for social work embedded in different societal contexts. Therefore it is suggested that we engage in a development of sociologies of social problems more adequate for social work, and that this can be done through qualitative research exploring practical knowledge about social problems. In this respect, the article proposes an approach to qualitative research focusing on the complexity of the relationships between the context of society and the identification of and solution to social problems including the conditions for collective action. This approach involves a conceptual scheme – problem identification and problem solution – as well as a set of analytical questions which both utilize potentials and seek to transcend obstacles within current theory development. By engaging in qualitative research of this kind it might be possible to discover a new practical sociological language about social problems that can inform theory development.

Evaluering mellem forskning, profession og praksis

Nar man giver et videncenter titlen „Evaluering i praksis” ma det udlose nogle sporgsmal. Hvilken viden taenkes et sadant center at beskaeftige sig med? Der er mange forstaelser af evaluering – hvad betyder det i denne sammenhaeng? Hvad menes der med praksis? Den viden om evaluering, som centeret skal arbejde med, hvordan skal den vaere forbundet med praksis, og hvad skal den ellers vaere forbundet med? Sadanne sporgsmal vil vi prove at forholde os til i denne lille artikel. Artiklen tjener desuden det formal at placere tidsskriftet i en evalueringsteoretisk position.