Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Maria C. Gonçalves is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Maria C. Gonçalves.


Headache | 2014

Neck Pain Disability Is Related to the Frequency of Migraine Attacks: A Cross-Sectional Study

Lidiane Lima Florencio; Thaís Cristina Chaves; Gabriela Ferreira Carvalho; Maria C. Gonçalves; Elisangela C.B. Casimiro; Fabíola Dach; Marcelo E. Bigal; Débora Bevilaqua-Grossi

Migraine and neck pain can be critical causes of disability. The contribution of neck pain for the overall disability of individuals with migraine remains unknown.


Headache | 2009

Cervical Mobility in Women With Migraine

Débora Bevilaqua-Grossi; Kátia S. Pegoretti; Maria C. Gonçalves; José Geraldo Speciali; Carlos A. Bordini; Marcelo E. Bigal

Objective.— To contrast the cervical range of motion (CROM) in women with episodic migraine (EM), transformed migraine (TM), and controls without migraine headaches.


Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia | 2013

Do women with migraine have higher prevalence of temporomandibular disorders

Maria C. Gonçalves; Lidiane Lima Florencio; Thaís Cristina Chaves; José Geraldo Speciali; Marcelo E. Bigal; Débora Bevilaqua-Grossi

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD), using the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD) in women with episodic and chronic migraine (M and CM), as well as in asymptomatic women. METHOD Sample consisted of 61 women, being 38 with M and 23 with CM, identified from a headache outpatient center; we also investigated 30 women without headaches for at least 3 months (women without headache group - WHG). Assessment of TMD was conducted by a physical therapist who was blind to the headache status. RESULTS The prevalence of TMD, assessed through the RDC, was 33.3% in the WHG, 86.8% in the M group and 91.3% of the CM group. Differences were significant when comparing M and CM groups with WHG (p<0.001), but not when comparing M and CM (p>0.05) as well as higher risk for TMD [odds ratio (OR)=3.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.73-5.71 and OR=3.97, 95%CI 1.76-8.94]. CONCLUSION Women with migraine are more likely to have muscular and articular TMD, suggesting that both disorders might be clinically associated, which demonstrate the importance of physical therapy assessment in the multidisciplinary team.


Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia | 2010

Concordância e confiabilidade de dois métodos não-invasivos para a avaliação da amplitude de movimento cervical em adultos jovens

Lidiane Lima Florencio; Patrícia A. Pereira; Elaine R. T. Silva; Kátia S. Pegoretti; Maria C. Gonçalves; Débora Bevilaqua-Grossi

BACKGROUND Cervical range of motion (CROM) is a fundamental component of the functional evaluation in physical therapy interventions. The CROM device stands out as a reliable, non-invasive and easy-to-use method, but it is a very expensive tool. In clinical practice, more affordable tools such as Fleximeters are preferred. However, the reliability of Fleximeters for the cervical spine has not been adequately tested. OBJECTIVES To compare the Fleximeters and the CROM device for the analysis of CROM, and to investigate the intra- and inter-examiner reliability of both tools. METHODS Cervical movements (flexion, extension, lateral flexion and rotation) were assessed in 20 asymptomatic young women by three examiners using both tools. The statistical analyses were performed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS The agreement between the tools was considered moderate for flexion and left rotation (0.71; 0.58) and excellent for all of the other movements (0.76-0.87). The intra-examiner reliability for the CROM device was moderate for flexion and right rotation (0.70; 0.69) and excellent for all of the other movements (0.79-0.88). For the Fleximeter, the agreement was excellent for inclination and right rotation (0.80; 0.77) and moderate for all of the other movements (0.69-0.75). The inter-examiner reliability for the CROM device was excellent for all movements (0.76-0.93) and for the Fleximeter, it was moderate for right and left rotation (0.66; 0.75) and excellent for all of the other movements (0.81-0.88). CONCLUSIONS There was agreement between the CROM assessments using the Fleximeter and the CROM device. Furthermore, both devices showed acceptable reliability for clinical practice.


Pain Medicine | 2015

Generalized Pressure Pain Hypersensitivity in the Cervical Muscles in Women with Migraine.

Lidiane Lima Florencio; Maria Carolina Merli Giantomassi; Gabriela Ferreira Carvalho; Maria C. Gonçalves; Fabíola Dach; César Fernández-de-las-Peñas; Débora Bevilaqua-Grossi

OBJECTIVE To investigate the differences in pressure sensitivity in the cervical musculature including the upper trapezius, sternocleidomastoid, suboccipital, levator scapulae, and anterior scalene muscles between women with migraine and healthy controls. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS Thirty women with migraine and 30 healthy women participated. METHODS Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) were bilaterally assessed over upper trapezius, sternocleidomastoid, suboccipital, levator scapulae, and anterior scalene muscles in a blinded design. Mean values of both sides were pooled for statistical analysis. Comparison between groups was performed by unpaired Student t-test and correlation with headache features with Spearmans correlation test. RESULTS Migraine patients exhibited lower PPT in all muscles compared with controls: upper trapezius (P = 0.046); suboccipital (P < 0.001); sternocleidomastoid (P < 0.001); anterior scalene (P < 0.001), and levator scapulae (P < 0001). No associations were observed between the frequency and the intensity of migraine or years with the disease and PPT. CONCLUSION This study showed generalized pressure pain hypersensitivity in the cervical musculature in women with migraine. Our findings provide support for the physical therapy treatment and evaluation of musculoskeletal cervical spine disorders in individuals with migraine and reinforce that all cervical muscles should be evaluated.


Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia | 2014

Body posture changes in women with migraine with or without temporomandibular disorders

Mariana C. Ferreira; Débora Bevilaqua-Grossi; Fabíola Dach; José Geraldo Speciali; Maria C. Gonçalves; Thaís Cristina Chaves

Background Migraine and temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are reported to be associated. However, there are no reports on the association among migraines, TMDs and changes in body posture. Objectives To assess changes in body posture in women suffering migraines with or without TMD compared with a control group. Method Sixty-six women with a mean age of 18 to 45 years participated in this study. The groups were composed of 22 volunteers with migraine and TMD (MTMD), 22 volunteers with migraines without TMD (MG) and 22 women in the control group (CG). Static posture was assessed by photogrammetry, and 19 angles were measured. Results Postural asymmetry was observed in the face for 4 angles measured on the frontal plane in the MG group and for 4 angles of the trunk in the MG and MTMD groups with respect to CG. However, for comparisons between MTMD and CG, clinical relevance was identified for two angles of the sagittal plane (Cervical and Lumbar Lordosis, Effect Size - ES - moderate: 0.53 and 0.60). For comparisons between the MG and CG, the clinical relevance/potential was verified for three angles with moderate ES (ES>0.42). The clinical relevance when comparing MTMD and CG was identified for four angles of facial symmetry head inclination (ES>0.54) and for two angles between MG and CG (ES>0.48). Conclusion The results demonstrated the presence of postural changes compared with a control group in women with migraines with or without TMD, and there were similar clinically relevant postural changes among the patients with migraines with and without TMD.


Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics | 2014

COMPARISON BETWEEN NECK PAIN DISABILITY AND CERVICAL RANGE OF MOTION IN PATIENTS WITH EPISODIC AND CHRONIC MIGRAINE: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Gabriela Ferreira Carvalho; Thaís Cristina Chaves; Maria C. Gonçalves; Lidiane Lima Florencio; Carolina A. Braz; Fabíola Dach; Cesar Fernández de Las Peñas; Débora Bevilaqua-Grossi

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate neck pain-related disability and cervical range of motion (CROM) in patients with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) and to examine the correlation of both outcomes. METHODS This cross-sectional study consisted of 91 patients with EM and 34 with CM. Cervical range of motion was measured with the CROM device, and pain during the cervical movement was recorded. Self-reported disability related to neck pain was assessed with the Neck Disability Index. RESULTS Patients with CM showed higher Neck Disability Index scores and more moderate and severe disability (P = .01). Severe disability as a result of neck pain was associated with 7.6-fold risk of developing CM (P = .003). No significant differences in CROM were identified between groups. Moderate negative correlations between CROM and disability were found for 4 motions within the CM group (-0.60 <r < -0.39) and with 3 in the EM group (-0.48 < -0.45). Disability was positively and moderately correlated to pain evoked during CROM in both groups (0.34 <r <0.51). CONCLUSION This study found that neck pain was highly prevalent in patients with migraine. Neck pain-related disability increased with increased frequency of the migraine attacks and was associated with the risk of migraine chronicity. The correlation between CROM and neck pain disability was more evident in patients with CM and in patients with pain during cervical movement.


Headache | 2013

Influence of Migraine and of Migraine Aura on Balance and Mobility – A Controlled Study

Gabriela Ferreira Carvalho; Thaís Cristina Chaves; Fabíola Dach; Carina F. Pinheiro; Maria C. Gonçalves; Lidiane Lima Florencio; Karen Spadari Ferreira; Marcelo E. Bigal; Débora Bevilaqua-Grossi

Migraine, especially migraine with aura (MA), appears to be a risk factor for ischemic lesions in the posterior fossa. The clinical relevance of the lesions is uncertain. Accordingly, herein, we identified individuals with MA, migraine without aura (MO), and without migraine (controls) in order to investigate their balance and mobility.


Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies | 2015

Is pressure pain sensitivity over the cervical musculature associated with neck disability in individuals with migraine

Maria C. Gonçalves; Thaís Cristina Chaves; Lidiane Lima Florencio; Gabriela Ferreira Carvalho; Fabíola Dach; César Fernández-de-las-Peñas; Débora Bevilaqua-Grossi

The objective was to determine if disability due to neck pain is correlated with pressure pain sensitivity in the cervical muscles in patients with migraine. Thirty-two volunteers with migraine completed the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) over the sternocleidomastoid, upper trapezius and suboccipital muscles were also assessed. Data were analyzed using the Spearman correlation coefficient (rs) and linear regression models (α < 0.05). Moderate negative correlations between NDI and PPT were obtained for the sternocleidomastoid (rs = -0.42; p = 0.001), upper trapezius (rs = -0.33; p = 0.001) and suboccipital muscles (rs = -0.41; p = 0.001). The linear regression revealed no association between NDI and PPT of sternocleidomastoid (β = 0.01; R(2) = 0.17), upper trapezius (β = 0.01; R(2) = 0.11) and suboccipital muscles (β = 0.02; R(2) = 0.17). NDI scores and PPT of the cervical muscles correlated moderately and was inversely proportional in patients with migraine, but the association was not linear, so both outcomes should be considered in the assessment of this population.


Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | 2016

Additional Effects of a Physical Therapy Protocol on Headache Frequency, Pressure Pain Threshold, and Improvement Perception in Patients With Migraine and Associated Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Débora Bevilaqua-Grossi; Maria C. Gonçalves; Gabriela Ferreira Carvalho; Lidiane Lima Florencio; Fabíola Dach; José Geraldo Speciali; Marcelo E. Bigal; Thaís Cristina Chaves

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the additional effect provided by physical therapy in migraine treatment. DESIGN Randomized controlled trial. SETTING Tertiary university-based hospital. PARTICIPANTS Among the 300 patients approached, 50 women (age range, 18-55y) diagnosed with migraine were randomized into 2 groups: a control group (n=25) and a physiotherapy plus medication group (n=25) (N=50). INTERVENTIONS Both groups received medication for migraine treatment. Additionally, physiotherapy plus medication patients received 8 sessions of physical therapy over 4 weeks, comprised mainly of manual therapy and stretching maneuvers lasting 50 minutes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES A blinded examiner assessed the clinical outcomes of headache frequency, intensity, and self-perception of global change and physical outcomes of pressure pain threshold and cervical range of motion. Data were recorded at baseline, posttreatment, and 1-month follow-up. RESULTS Twenty-three patients experienced side effects from the medication. Both groups reported a significantly reduced frequency of headaches; however, no differences were observed between groups (physiotherapy plus medication patients showed an additional 18% improvement at posttreatment and 12% improvement at follow-up compared with control patients, P>.05). The reduction observed in the physiotherapy plus medication patients was clinically relevant at posttreatment, whereas clinical relevance for control patients was demonstrated only at follow-up. For pain intensity, physiotherapy plus medication patients showed statistical evidence and clinical relevance with reduction posttreatment (P<.05). In addition, they showed better self-perception of global change than control patients (P<.05). The cervical muscle pressure pain threshold increased significantly in the physiotherapy plus medication patients and decreased in the control patients, but statistical differences between groups were observed only in the temporal area (P<.05). No differences were observed between groups regarding cervical range of motion. CONCLUSIONS We cannot assume that physical therapy promotes additional improvement in migraine treatment; however, it can increase the cervical pressure pain threshold, anticipate clinically relevant changes, and enhance patient satisfaction.

Collaboration


Dive into the Maria C. Gonçalves's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fabíola Dach

University of São Paulo

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marcelo E. Bigal

Albert Einstein College of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge