María E. Pedreira

Protein Synthesis Subserves Reconsolidation or Extinction Depending on Reminder Duration

When learned associations are recalled from long-term memory stores by presentation of an unreinforced conditioned stimulus (CS), two processes are initiated. One, termed reconsolidation, re-activates the association between the conditioned and unconditioned stimuli and transfers it from a stable protein synthesis-independent form of storage to a more labile protein-dependent state. The other is an extinction process in which presentation of the CS alone degrades the association between CS and US. To address the mechanistic relationship between reconsolidation and extinction, we have used an invertebrate model of contextual memory, which involves an association between the learning context and a visual danger stimulus. Here, we show that re-exposure duration to the learning context acts as a switch guiding the memory course toward reconsolidation or extinction, each depending on protein synthesis. Manipulation of this variable allows findings of impaired extinction to be discriminated from those of disrupted reconsolidation.

Human reconsolidation does not always occur when a memory is retrieved: The relevance of the reminder structure

Memory reconsolidation is defined as a process in which the retrieval of a previously consolidated memory returns to a labile state which is then subject to stabilization. The reminder is the event that begins with the presentation of the learned cue and triggers the labilization-reconsolidation process. Since the early formulation of the hypothesis, several controversial items have arisen concerning the conditions that define reconsolidation. It is herein proposed that two diagnostic features characterize reconsolidation, namely: the labilization of the reactivated memory and the specificity of the reminder structure. To study this proposal, subjects received two different training sessions on verbal material on Day 1 and Day 2, respectively. Finally, they were tested for the first and second acquired memories on Day 3. It is demonstrated that the human declarative memory fulfills the two requirements that define the process. First, the reactivated memory is impaired by a new learning only when it is given closely after the reminder, revealing that the memory is labilized. Second, the omission of at least one of the reminders components prevents labilization. Therefore, results show that the new learning fails to produce an amnesic effect on the target memory either when the reminder omits the learned cue or includes the beginning of the reinforcement.

Reconsolidation in humans opens up declarative memory to the entrance of new information

A consolidated memory recalled by a reminder enters a vulnerability phase (labilization), followed by a process of stabilization (reconsolidation). Several authors have suggested that the labilization of the consolidated memory makes the incorporation of new information possible. Here, we demonstrate updating in the framework of memory declarative reconsolidation in humans by giving an opportune verbal instruction. Volunteers learn an association between five cue-syllables (L1) and their respective response-syllables. Twenty-four hours later, the paired-associate verbal memory is labilized by exposing the subjects to the reminder, and then they receive the verbal Instruction of adding three new cue-response syllables (INFO) with their respective responses to the former list of five. The new information is incorporated into the single former L1-memory and both INFO and L1 are successfully retrieved on the third day. However, when the Instruction is not preceded by a proper reminder, or when the instruction omits the order of adding the INFO into the former L1-memory, we observed interference in retrieval of both the original and the new information, suggesting that they are encoded independently and coexist as separate memories.

Context Shift and Protein Synthesis Inhibition Disrupt Long-Term Habituation after Spaced, but Not Massed, Training in the CrabChasmagnathus

An opaque screen moving overhead elicits an escape response in the crab Chasmagnathus that after a few presentations habituates for a long period (long-term habituation, LTH). Previous results suggested that spaced (15 trials separated by 171 s) and massed training (300 trials without rest interval) were correlated with two different memory components of LTH. The present experiments were aimed at further studying the mechanisms subserving these components. Results indicate that LTH acquired by spaced but not by massed training is blocked either by a training-to-testing context shift or by cycloheximide (15-25 microg) pre- or posttraining injection and that LTH after spaced training persists for longer time (5 days) than after massed training (2 days). A model based on these results that distinguishes two LTH-memory components is proposed: a (context-signal) LTH yielded by spaced training, dependent of context, sensitive to cycloheximide (CYX), and long lasting; and a (signal) LTH yielded by massed training, dependent only on the signal invariance, insensitive to CYX, and shorter lasting.

Repeated labilization-reconsolidation processes strengthen declarative memory in humans.

The idea that memories are immutable after consolidation has been challenged. Several reports have shown that after the presentation of a specific reminder, reactivated old memories become labile and again susceptible to amnesic agents. Such vulnerability diminishes with the progress of time and implies a re-stabilization phase, usually referred to as reconsolidation. To date, the main findings describe the mechanisms associated with the labilization-reconsolidation process, but little is known about its functionality from a biological standpoint. Indeed, two functions have been proposed. One suggests that destabilization of the original memory after the reminder allows the integration of new information into the background of the original memory (memory updating), and the other suggests that the labilization-reconsolidation process strengthens the original memory (memory strengthening). We have previously reported the reconsolidation of human declarative memories, demonstrating memory updating in the framework of reconsolidation. Here we deal with the strengthening function attributed to the reconsolidation process. We triggered labilization-reconsolidation processes successively by repeated presentations of the proper reminder. Participants learned an association between five cue-syllables and their respective response-syllables. Twenty-four hours later, the paired-associate verbal memory was labilized by exposing the subjects to one, two or four reminders. The List-memory was evaluated on Day 3 showing that the memory was improved when at least a second reminder was presented in the time window of the first labilization-reconsolidation process prompted by the earlier reminder. However, the improvement effect was revealed on Day 3, only when at least two reminders were presented on Day2 and not as a consequence of only retrieval. Therefore, we propose central concepts for the reconsolidation process, emphasizing its biological role and the parametrical constrains for this function to be operative.

Massed and spaced training build up different components of long-term habituation in the crabChasmagnathus

The crabChasmagnathus granulatus reacts to a shadow passing overhead with an escape response that habituates after 30 trials and for 5 days at least. The effect of a wide range of different intertrial intervals (ITIs) (0, 9, 27, 45, 81, 135, and 171 sec) on theChasmagnathus long-term habituation (LTH) was evaluated at 24 h. Memory retention was estimated separately at two phases of a six-trial testing session: at first trial (the initial testing phase) and at the subsequent block of five trials (the retraining phase). A training of 30 trials with an ITI equal to or longer than 27 sec induced LTH at both testing phases, however, with a 0- or a 9-sec ITI, training wholly failed to build up LTH. When the number of trials was increased, a massed training (ITI=0 or 9 sec) induced LTH at retraining but not at initial testing. Thus, massed training produces LTH only at retraining, whereas spaced training (ITI ≥ 27 sec) produces LTH at both initial phase and retraining. An ITI shift from training to testing diminished or abolished retention at retraining regardless of the direction of the shift, thus suggesting that crabs acquire a memory of the trial-spacing at training. According to these results, it is postulated that LTH consists of two memory components: one produced by spaced training and expressed at both initial testing and retraining, and one yielded by massed training and expressed only at retraining. The possibility that the two components of LTH were differentially affected by cycloxemide and context shift is discussed.

Angiotensin II enhances long-term memory in the crab Chasmagnathus

An opaque screen moving overhead provokes an escape response in the crab Chasmagnathus granulatus that habituates after a few presentations of the eliciting stimulus. Fifteen trials with a 180-s intertrial interval or 30 trials with a 90-s interval (strong training protocol) ensures long-term habituation (LTH) of the response for 24 h, whereas 10 trials (weak training protocol) fail to induce it. However, robust LTH is obtained when crabs are injected with human angiotensin (All; 50 pmol) immediately after a weak training protocol. This memory-enhancing effect of All is dose-dependent, reversible by saralasin (5 pmol), and vanishes either when the weak training protocol is reduced to only five trials, or when the peptide is given before training or 1 h after. LTH is impaired by saralasin (5 pmol) administered before or after the strong training protocol, but no amnestic effect is disclosed when the antagonist is given 1 h after. On the other hand, both All-like immunoreactivity and angiotensin-converting enzyme-like activity are described in diverse tissues of Chasmagnathus, namely, in gills and in both thoracic and supraesophageal ganglia. Results support the view that some components of the renin-angiotensin system and their influence on memory might have emerged early in evolution.

Effects of activation and inhibition of cAMP-dependent protein kinase on long-term habituation in the crab Chasmagnathus.

On sudden presentation of a danger stimulus, the crab Chasmagnathus elicits an escape response that habituates promptly and for a long period. We have previously reported that administration of a cAMP-permeable analog (CPT-cAMP) along with a phosphodiesterase inhibitor (IBMX) improves long-term habituation (LTH). In present experiments we studied the effect of systemic administration of the protein kinase A (PKA) activator Sp-5,6-DCl-cBIMPS and that of the PKA inhibitor Rp-8-Cl-cAMPS on LTH tested 24 h after a weak training protocol (5 trials of danger stimulus presentation) or a strong training protocol (15-30 trials), respectively. A 50 microliters pre-training injection of 75 microM Sp-5,6-DCl-cBIMPS, and to a lesser degree of 25 microM, improved retention of the habituated response but not affect short-term habituation (STH). Like pre-training injection, post-training administration of Sp-5,6-DCl-cBIMPS proved to exert a facilitatory action on retention though with 75 microM dose only. Conversely, both pre- and post-training injection of 25 microM Rp-8-Cl-cAMPS impaired LTH without affecting STH. Thus, the PKA activator Sp-5,6-DCl-cBIMPS enables a weak training to produce LTH while the PKA inhibitor Rp-8-Cl-cAMPS impairs LTH when a strong training is given. Activation of crab PKA by Sp-5,6-DCl-cBIMPS and its inhibition by Rp-8-Cl-cAMPS were assessed using an in vitro PKA activity assay. These results provide independent evidences supporting the view that PKA plays a key role in long-term memory storage in this learning paradigm.

Acute administration of a permeant analog of cAMP and a phosphodiesterase inhibitor improve long-term habituation in the crab Chasmagnathus

A shadow passing overhead acts as a danger stimulus and elicits an escape response in the crab Chasmagnathus that habituates promptly and for a long period. Robust retention is shown at 24 h after 15 trials of shadow presentation or at 120 h after 30 trials, but no significant retention is disclosed at 24 h after 5 trials or at 72 h after 15. A cocktail of the cAMP membrane permeable analog 8-(4-chlorophenylthio)-cAMP (CPT-cAMP), plus the phosphodiesterase inhibitor isobutyl methylxanthine (IBMX), was given by systemic administration. Pretraining injection of the cocktail (25 or 50 microM, 15 min before a 5-trial session) failed to affect short-term habituation, but induced significant retention when tested at 24 h. This facilitatory effect was not shown when a lower dose (5 microM) was used. A post-training injection of 25 microM, immediately after a 5- or 15-trial session, induced retention when tested at 24 or 72 h, respectively. Thus, the administration of CPT-cAMP + IBMX during acquisition of a habituated response or immediately after, improves long-term habituation, a result supporting the view that an increase in the cAMP level is one of the steps in long-term memory consolidation.

MEMORY CONSOLIDATION AND RECONSOLIDATION IN AN INVERTEBRATE MODEL : THE ROLE OF THE GABAergic SYSTEM

Consolidation theory assumes that memories are labile during a limited time window after acquisition, but as time passes, memories become stable and resistant to amnesic agents. However, the vision of immutable memories after consolidation has been challenged. Thus, after the presentation of a reminder, the reactivated old memories become labile and again susceptible to amnesic treatments. This process implies a re-stabilization phase, usually referred to as reconsolidation. Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter both in the Central nervous system (CNS) and in the periphery. A considerable amount of evidence has arisen from different studies regarding the role of the GABA(A) receptor in diverse behavioral paradigms and tasks. Here, we investigate the role of the GABAergic system on both memory consolidation and reconsolidation phases by using the memory paradigm of the crab Chasmagnathus. In order to achieve such a goal, we design pharmacological-behavioral experiments, which include the administration of classic agonist (muscimol) and antagonist (bicuculline) of the mammals GABA(A) receptors. The current results show that the systemic administration of muscimol impairs the consolidation and reconsolidation processes. In contrast, the administration of bicuculline improves the consolidation and reconsolidation processes. Furthermore, the co-administration of both drugs blocks the agonist amnesic effect on the consolidation phase. The ubiquity of the neurotransmitter and its receptors in the animal taxa allows us to use the classic agonist-and-antagonist administration procedure in this invertebrate. Thus, all the results reported in this paper can be judged as a result of the modulation exerted by the functional state of the GABAergic system in the CNS. To conclude, the results obtained in this report with an invertebrate model represent additional evidences supporting the view that some molecular mechanisms subserving different memory phases could be the basic tools employed by phylogenetically disparate animals.