María I Román

Long-term follow-up of autologous pericardial valved conduits

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results of the use of an autologous pericardial valved conduit in the outflow tract of the venous ventricle in congenital heart malformations. METHODS Fifty-one patients were followed up for a period of 12 to 120 months; 30 for more than 36 months and 13 for more than 72 months. All were evaluated clinically and by two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. Eight patients were recatheterized. Postoperative evaluation included serial measurement of pressure gradients and the conduits diameter at the proximal, valvular, and distal levels. Reoperation because of stenosis was indicated when the gradient across the right ventricular outflow was greater than 50 mm Hg. The reoperation rate in relation with postoperative time, diameter of the autologous pericardial valved conduit at the time of implantation, and malformation was statistically analyzed. RESULTS In 27 patients the conduit increased its diameter 1 to 7 mm. In 20 patients the diameter remained unchanged, whereas a reduction was noted in 4. Conduit survival free of reoperation for the whole group was 89.9% at 5 years. Conduit survival free of reoperation was 100% at 5 and 7 years for conduits larger than 16 mm at the time of implantation. It was 95% (standard deviation = 4.8%) at 5 years and 72.3% at 7 years for those 16 mm or less. For patients operated after January 1, 1986 (technical modification), conduit survival free of reoperation was 95.4% at 7 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS These results compare favorably with those of other available conduits.

A comparative long-term follow-up of the results of anterior and posterior approaches in bypassing the rudimentary right ventricle in patients with tricuspid atresia

We have studied 44 patients with classical tricuspid atresia who underwent radical surgery between 1971 and 1985. Bypassing of the incomplete and rudimentary right ventricle was performed, in anterior fashion, in 17 patients operated on from 1971 to 1980. Subsequently, from 1980 to 1985, we used a technique of posterior retroaortic atriopulmonary anastomosis. This was undertaken in 27 patients. We have now compared the results in the two groups. Hospital and late mortality was 23.5 and 17.6% in those undergoing an anterior anastomosis, while it was 7.4 and 3.7% in those having a retroaortic connexion. When we compared the results in survivors, according to a previously designed clinical assessment score, we found that 41.1% of those undergoing the anterior approach were in excellent clinical status in comparison to 85.1% of those having a posterior anastomosis. The actuarial survival curve at 6 years showed 88.8% survival (70% confidence limit 44-77) for the posterior approach and 64.7% for the anterior. On the basis of our findings we felt able to remove from consideration as risk factors three of the features initially identified by Choussat and his colleagues. We conclude that better immediate and late results are obtained with the posterior retroaortic approach. We also found that those patients with excellent long-term outcome had postoperative right atrial pressures less than 14 mm Hg. Late arrhythmias were associated with increased right atrial pressures and were a relevant risk factor in both groups.