Maria Kapritsou

Open or laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a retrospective comparative study.

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer has been used with success since 1991. During the last decade, many studies have compared laparoscopic surgery with open colectomy. The aim of this retrospective study was to present the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic and open colectomy for cancer, focusing on the postoperative care of patients. Eighty-eight consecutive patients suffering from cancer of the colon and rectum, surgically treated, were studied. They were divided into 2 groups: Group A patients (n = 48) underwent laparoscopic colectomy, and Group B patients (n = 40) were treated with an open procedure. For postoperative care of the patients, analgesia, median hospital stay, overall cost, and complications between the 2 groups were studied and statistically compared. Laparoscopic colectomy was associated with a shorter average hospital stay, fewer complications, earlier start of a normal diet, and better control of postoperative pain. Nonetheless, the cost of surgical instruments used in laparoscopic operation is higher. Laparoscopic surgery, despite its higher cost, seems to add significant advantages in the postoperative recovery of patients suffering from colorectal cancer.

Greece reports prototype intervention with first peripherally inserted central catheter: case report and literature review

Placement of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), definitely offers a clear advantage over any other method regarding central venous catheterization. Its ultrasonographic orientation enhances significantly its accuracy, safety and efficacy, making this method extremely comfortable for the patient who can continue his or her therapy even in an outpatient basis. We present the first reported case of a PICCS insertion in Greece, which has been performed by a university-degree nurse. The aim of this review of literature was to present the evolution in nursing practice in Greece. A PICC was inserted in a 77-year-old male patient suffering from a recent chemical pneumonia with a history of Alzheimers disease. A description of all the technical details of this insertion is reported, focusing on the pros and cons of the method and a thorough review of the history and advances in central venous catheterization throughout the years is also presented. PICCs provide long-term intravenous access and facilitate the delivery of extended antibiotic therapy, chemotherapy and total parenteral nutrition. We strongly believe that PICCs are the safest and most effective method of peripherally inserted central venous catheterization. Larger series are necessary to prove the above hypothesis, and they are under construction by our team.

Fast-track recovery after major liver and pancreatic resection from the nursing point of view.

Postoperative fast-track recovery protocols combine various methods to support immediate care of patients who undergo major surgery. These protocols include control of postoperative pain and early beginning of oral diet and mobilization. The combination of these approaches may reduce the rate of postoperative complications and facilitate hospital discharge. The aim of this study was to evaluate progress and parameters of fast-track recovery after major liver and pancreatic resection. A descriptive bibliographical review from 2001 to 2012 via electronic databases such as MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar was undertaken. Articles that focused on a fast-track protocol were studied. Reports focusing on the implementation of a fast-track protocol in the postoperative recovery of patients after major hepatectomy or pancreatectomy were selected. Fast-track protocols may be applicable to patients recovering after major liver or pancreatic resection. Future research should be focused on particular parameters of the fast-track protocol separately.

The impact of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication on the long-term quality of life in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is now the most common surgical procedure for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), offering promising long-term outcomes. Outcomes for 46 patients with GERD who underwent Nissen fundoplication during the last 5 years (November 2007–June 2012) were prospectively studied using a structured questionnaire that evaluated clinical symptom scores for heartburn, dysphagia, and satisfaction with clinical outcomes. Postoperative care of the patients including analgesia, median hospital stay, overall cost, and complications was also studied. Clinical follow-up data for 2 years after surgery were available for all 46 patients. Forty-two patients (91.3%) were satisfied with their quality of life and only eight patients (17.4%) continued to receive antacids after surgery. Dysphagia to solid and liquid occasionally appeared in 26.1% (N = 12) and 17.4% (N = 8) of patients, respectively. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication was an effective long-term treatment for GERD. The operation resulted in a significant reduction of symptoms and minimized the use of antacid drugs with a high degree of patient satisfaction. Although some patients may have returned to antacid treatment at late follow-up or continued to complain of mild discomfort, they were overall pleased with the outcome.

CHYLOUS ASCITES AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC LOW ANTERIOR COLORECTAL RESECTION FOR RECTOSIGMOID CARCINOMA: A CASE REPORT AND A LITERATURE REVIEW

Chylous ascites (CA) is defined as accumulation of free fluid in the peritoneal cavity, with a triglyceride concentration of greater than 110 mg/dl ( Gómez-Martín et al., 2012 ). Malignancies are the most common cause in adults, followed by postoperative complications, inflammation, trauma, and other causes such as pancreatitis and radiotherapy for cancer ( Park et al., 2012 ). In Western countries, as CHYLOUS ASCITES AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC LOW ANTERIOR COLORECTAL RESECTION FOR RECTOSIGMOID CARCINOMA: A CASE REPORT AND A LITERATURE REVIEW

Observational study of healthcare associated infections and mortality caused by carbapenem resistant Gram-negative bacteria in a Greek ICU

Maria Gamvrouli RN; BSN, MSc, Staf Nurse, General Hospital of Nikaias, Piraeus, Greece Ioanna Pavlopoulou MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Paediatrics-Infection, P & A Kyriakou Children’s Hospital; Department of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece Maria Kapritsou RN; BSN, MSc, PhD, Staf Nurse, Hellenic Anticancer Institute, Saint Savvas Hospital, Athens, Greece; Department of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece *Margarita Giannakopoulou RN, BSc, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece Maria Kalafati RN; BSN, MSc, PhD, Laboratory Teaching Staf, Clinical Instructor, Department of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece Evangelos A Konstantinou RN; BSN, MSc, PhD, Associate Professor of Nursing Anesthesiology, Department of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece Eleni Apostolopoulou RN; BSc, PhD, Professor, Department of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

Comparative Evaluation of Pain, Stress, Neuropeptide Y, ACTH, and Cortisol Levels Between a Conventional Postoperative Care Protocol and a Fast-Track Recovery Program in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery.

Background: Fast-track (FT) postoperative protocol in oncological patients after major abdominal surgery reduces complications and length of postoperative stay compared to the conventional (CON) protocol. However, stress and pain responses have not been compared between the two protocols. Objectives: To compare stress, pain, and related neuropeptidic responses (adrenocorticotropic hormone [ACTH], cortisol, and neuropeptide Y [NPY]) between FT and CON protocols. Method: A clinical trial with repeated measurements was conducted (May 2012 to May 2014) with a sample of 63 hepatectomized or pancreatectomized patients randomized into two groups: FT (n = 29) or CON (n = 34). Demographic and clinical data were collected, and pain (Visual Analog Scale [VAS] and Behavioral Pain Scale [BPS]) and stress responses (3 self-report questions) assessed. NPY, ACTH, and cortisol plasma levels were measured at T1 = day of admission, T2 = day of surgery, and T3 = prior to discharge. Results: ACTHT1 and ACTHT2 levels were positively correlated with self-reported stress levels (ρ = .43 and ρ = .45, respectively, p < .05) in the FT group. NPY levels in the FT group were higher than those in the CON group at all time points (p ≤ .004); this difference remained significant after adjusting for T1 levels through analysis of covariance for age, gender, and body mass index (F = .003, F = .149, F = .015, respectively, p > .05). Conclusions: Neuropeptidic levels were higher in the FT group. Future research should evaluate this association further, as these biomarkers might serve as objective indicators of postoperative pain and stress.

Endovascular Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms in Relation to Their Parent Artery Wall: A Single Center Study

We report our two-year experience in the endovascular treatment of brain aneurysms in relation to their parent artery wall. We prospectively recorded patients with intracranial aneurysms (107 ruptured - 38 unruptured) treated with coiling during a two-year period: 145 patients, 94 females and 51 males - mean age 56 years. The aneurysms were divided into side-wall (A) and bifurcation (B) groups. A total occlusion rate was noted in post-embolization angiograms in 101 aneurysms (70%) with a morbidity of 4%. No angiographic recurrence arose in the six-month follow-up. The two groups had a similar total occlusion rate (68.31% and 71.8% respectively), while the complication rate was 3% in group A and 4.7% in group B. Significant differences between the two groups were noted in the number of assisted coiling cases: 28 out of 60 cases (46.7%) in group A - 14 out of 85 cases (16.5%) in group B. Further statistical analysis showed strong dependencies for the type of endovascular procedure between the ruptured and unruptured aneurysms in both groups (p 0.000<0.05), but no dependencies between the aneurysm occlusion rate and the ruptured or non-ruptured aneurysms, or between the occlusion rate and the type of endovascular procedure (p 0.552 >0.05 and 0.071 >0.05 respectively). In conclusion, the anatomic relation of the aneurysm sac with the wall of the parent artery is important, as significant differences in endovascular practice, devices and techniques were noted between side-wall and bifurcation aneurysms.

A randomized double-blind trial of anesthesia provided for colonoscopy by university-degreed anesthesia nurses in Greece: s afety and efficacy

There are numerous studies in the literature of anesthesia administered during colonoscopy including various methods, drugs, and monitoring systems; however, none of them has studied whether a university-degreed nurse anesthesia provider (known as a certified registered nurse anesthetist in the United States) is skillful enough to provide safe anesthesia in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. The aim of our study was to determine whether anesthesia provided by a university-degreed nurse anesthesia provider during an endoscopic procedure is comparable in terms of safety and efficacy with routine sedation practice. This randomized, double-blind study included 100 adult patients who underwent colonoscopy conducted in the Evgenidion University Hospital during a single year. Subjects were divided into 2 groups: the first group received the usual scheme of intravenous sedation with midazolam and fentanyl administered by a member of the endoscopic team that was blind to Bispectral Index (BIS) values recordings (Group 0). The second group received intravenous bolus injection of propofol bolus by a university-degreed anesthesia registered nurse based on the BIS values (Group 1). The average of the mean BIS values of Group 0 was 85.07 (SD = 8.01) and for Group 1 was 76.1 (SD = 10.88; p = .04). The parameters of “patient memory during procedure” and the satisfaction scores (as self-assessed by the patients as well as 2 gastroenterologists) were also significantly different between the patients of the 2 groups (p = .000). Comparison between the 2 groups showed that the sedation offered by a university-degreed nurse anesthesia provider was absolutely safe and effective, offering particular comfort to the patient during the intervention and contributing significantly to its successful results.