María L. Martino
Spanish National Research Council
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by María L. Martino.
Haematologica | 2014
Lucía López-Corral; Luis A. Corchete; María Eugenia Sarasquete; Maria Victoria Mateos; Ramón García-Sanz; Encarna Fermiñán; Juan José Lahuerta; Joan Bladé; Albert Oriol; Ana Isabel Teruel; María L. Martino; José Antonio Hernández; Jesús María Hernández-Rivas; Francisco J. Burguillo; Jesús F. San Miguel; Norma C. Gutiérrez
A multistep model has been proposed of disease progression starting in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance continuing through multiple myeloma, sometimes with an intermediate entity called smoldering myeloma, and ending in extramedullary disease. To gain further insights into the role of the transcriptome deregulation in the transition from a normal plasma cell to a clonal plasma cell, and from an indolent clonal plasma cell to a malignant plasma cell, we performed gene expression profiling in 20 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, 33 with high-risk smoldering myeloma and 41 with multiple myeloma. The analysis showed that 126 genes were differentially expressed in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, smoldering myeloma and multiple myeloma as compared to normal plasma cell. Interestingly, 17 and 9 out of the 126 significant differentially expressed genes were small nucleolar RNA molecules and zinc finger proteins. Several proapoptotic genes (AKT1 and AKT2) were down-regulated and antiapoptotic genes (APAF1 and BCL2L1) were up-regulated in multiple myeloma, both symptomatic and asymptomatic, compared to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. When we looked for those genes progressively modulated through the evolving stages of monoclonal gammopathies, eight snoRNA showed a progressive increase while APAF1, VCAN and MEGF9 exhibited a progressive downregulation. In conclusion, our data show that although monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, smoldering myeloma and multiple myeloma are not clearly distinguishable groups according to their gene expression profiling, several signaling pathways and genes were significantly deregulated at different steps of the transformation process.
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia | 2014
Jose Falantes; Cristina Calderón; Francisco J. Márquez-Malaver; Manuela Aguilar-Guisado; Almudena Martín-Peña; María L. Martino; Isabel Montero; J. A. González; Rocio Parody; José A. Pérez-Simón; Ildefonso Espigado
Incidence, etiology, and outcome of infectious episodes in patients with myeloid neoplasms receiving azacitidine are uncertain, with no prospective data available in this group of patients. The aim of the current study was to analyze the incidence and factors related to the probability of infection in a cohort of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with azacitidine who did not receive any type of antimicrobial prophylaxis. Significantly, the group of patients who received prior intensive chemotherapy had more infectious episodes (P = 10(-4)), and particularly, invasive aspergillosis (P = .015), than patients who received frontline azacitidine. Primary antifungal prophylaxis might be recommended in MDS and AML patients receiving azacitidine as salvage therapy after intensive regimens.
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia | 2013
Jose Falantes; Cristina Calderón; Francisco J. Márquez Malaver; Dora Alonso; Antonio Martín Noya; Estrella Carrillo; María L. Martino; Isabel Montero; J. A. González; Rocio Parody; Ildefonso Espigado; José A. Pérez-Simón
UNLABELLED Prognosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is an area of ongoing interest. Identification of patients with poor outcome in the categories of lower risk disease is critical. In this study, we classify a cohort of 332 lower risk MDS into 3 groups with differences in survival and risk for leukemic progression that could drive treatment approaches to improve prognosis in a fraction of these patients. BACKGROUND Prognosis of MDS and particularly in patients categorized as lower risk (< 10% blasts or low and intermediate-1 International Prognostic Scoring System [IPSS]) is very heterogeneous and includes patients with very different outcomes with current scoring systems. Recently, a new cytogenetic classification has been proposed for the revised IPSS in predicting the outcome for MDS. PATIENTS AND METHODS To evaluate the prognostic significance of multiple variables for survival and risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia, we analyzed baseline characteristics of 332 lower risk MDS patients within the lower risk cytogenetic categories by IPSS and the recent proposal for the new cytogenetic classification. RESULTS In multivariate analysis, severity of cytopenias, age > 60 years, bone marrow blasts (5%-9%) and transfusion dependency significantly influenced outcome. The combination of these variables allowed development of a model which categorizes patients in 3 different groups with median survival of 95, 44, and 13 months for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P < .001). In addition, this score also stratified patients for their risk for leukemic progression, estimated at 2 years in 3.1%, 7.6%, and 21.3% for each group (P = .024). CONCLUSION Although karyotype remains the main prognostic factor in MDS, the current study identifies clinical parameters predicting outcome among patients with the better cytogenetic profile. Degree of cytopenias, blasts 5%-9% and transfusion dependence might identify a subset of patients within the nonadverse karyotype, in which early or more aggressive approaches could possibly be required to improve survival or prevent disease progression.
The Lancet Haematology | 2017
Manuela Aguilar-Guisado; Ildefonso Espigado; Almudena Martín-Peña; Carlota Gudiol; Cristina Royo-Cebrecos; Jose Falantes; Lourdes Vázquez-López; María Isabel Montero; Clara Rosso-Fernández; María L. Martino; Rocio Parody; José González-Campos; Sebastián Garzón-López; Cristina Calderón-Cabrera; Pere Barba; Nancy Rodríguez; Montserrat Rovira; Enrique Montero-Mateos; Jordi Carratalà; José A. Pérez-Simón; José Miguel Cisneros
BACKGROUND Continuation of empirical antimicrobial therapy (EAT) for febrile neutropenia in patients with haematological malignancies until neutrophil recovery could prolong the therapy unnecessarily. We aimed to establish whether EAT discontinuation driven by a clinical approach regardless of neutrophil recovery would optimise the duration of therapy. METHODS We did an investigator-driven, superiority, open-label, randomised, controlled phase 4 clinical trial in six academic hospitals in Spain. Eligible patients were adults with haematological malignancies or haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation recipients, with high-risk febrile neutropenia without aetiological diagnosis. An independent, computer-generated randomisation sequence was used to randomly enrol patients (1:1) to the experimental or control group. Investigators were masked to assignment only before randomisation. EAT based on an antipseudomonal β-lactam drug as monotherapy (ceftazidime or cefepime, meropenem or imipenem, or piperacillin-tazobactam) or as combination therapy (with an aminoglycoside, fluoroquinolone, or glycopeptide) was started according to local protocols and following international guidelines and recommendations. For the experimental group, EAT was withdrawn after 72 h or more of apyrexia plus clinical recovery; for the control group, treatment was withdrawn when the neutrophil count was also 0·5 × 109 cells per L or higher. The primary efficacy endpoint was the number of EAT-free days. Primary analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. Efficacy and safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population and the per-protocol population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01581333. FINDINGS Between April 10, 2012, and May 31, 2016, 157 episodes among 709 patients assessed for eligibility were included in analyses. 78 patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group and 79 to the control group. The mean number of EAT-free days was significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (16·1 [SD 6·3] vs 13·6 [7·2], absolute difference -2·4 [95% CI -4·6 to -0·3]; p=0·026). 636 adverse events were reported (341 in the experimental group vs 295 in the control group; p=0·057) and most (580 [91%]; 323 in the experimental group vs 257 in the control group) were considered mild or moderate (grade 1-2). The most common adverse events in the experimental versus the control group were mucositis (28 [36%] of 78 patients vs 20 [25%] of 79 patients), diarrhoea (23 [29%] of 78 vs 24 [30%] of 79), and nausea and vomiting (20 [26%] of 78 vs 22 [28%] of 79). 56 severe adverse events were reported, 18 in the experimental group and 38 in the control group. One patient died in the experimental group (from hepatic veno-occlusive disease after an allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation) and three died in the control group (one from multiorgan failure, one from invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, and one from a post-chemotherapy intestinal perforation). INTERPRETATION In high-risk patients with haematological malignancies and febrile neutropenia, EAT can be discontinued after 72 h of apyrexia and clinical recovery irrespective of their neutrophil count. This clinical approach reduces unnecessary exposure to antimicrobials and it is safe. FUNDING Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Economy (PI11/02674).
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia | 2018
Jose Falantes; Francisco J. Márquez-Malaver; Cristina Calderón-Cabrera; Begoña Pedrote; María L. Martino; José Antonio Moreiro González; Ildefonso Espigado; José A. Pérez-Simón
Background: The prognosis of patients with lower‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LR‐MDS) is very heterogeneous. In addition to survival estimates, identification of factors related to the probability of leukemic progression might help prognosis assessment. Patients and Methods: The present study is a retrospective analysis of 409 patients with primary LR‐MDS. The probability of leukemic progression was estimated in the competing risk framework by the cumulative incidence method considering death without acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as a competing event. Results: Sixty‐six patients (16.1%) progressed to AML. The following covariates influenced the probability of leukemic progression in a multivariate competing risk regression model: intermediate karyotype versus diploid or chromosome 5 deletion, 5% to 9% bone marrow blast percentage, platelet count <50 × 10e9/L and age younger than 75 years. Conclusion: According to these, a predictive model is proposed, which categorizes patients with different probability of leukemic progression (P < .001). Validation of these results might help prognostic refinement of patients with LR‐MDS. Micro‐Abstract Several prognostic factors such as intermediate karyotype, presence of 5% to 9% bone marrow blasts, and platelet count <50 × 10e9/L are related to the probability of leukemic progression in a cohort of patients with lower‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome.
Leukemia & Lymphoma | 2017
Jose Falantes; Francisco J. Márquez-Malaver; Teresa Knight; Cristina Calderón-Cabrera; María L. Martino; J. A. González; Isabel Montero; Ildefonso Espigado; José A. Pérez-Simón
Abstract Chronic medical diseases, evaluated by several comorbidities indexes have been reported to influence on overall survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, these studies included patients with lower and higher-risk disease by IPSS. This study retrospectively evaluates the role of comorbidities (evaluated by the MDS comorbidity index; MDS-CI) together with clinical parameters in a series of 232 patients with LR-MDS (defined as either an IPSS score of low/intermediate-1 and favorable cytogenetic categories by IPSS-R). In multivariate analysis, together with age >75 years, diabetes requiring therapy and hemoglobin <10 g/dL; the incorporation of comorbidities by the MDS-CI (HR = 2.5; p< 0.0001) were independently associated to the probability of nonleukemic death (NLD). The combination of these variables allowed development of a model, which categorizes patients in three different groups with significantly different probability of NLD overtime (p< 0.001). This integrated score confirms the importance of comorbidities at diagnosis of patients with LR-MDS.
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia | 2015
Jose Falantes; Pablo Trujillo; José I. Piruat; Cristina Calderón; Francisco J. Márquez-Malaver; Beatriz Martín-Antonio; Africa Millán; Marina Gómez; J. A. González; María L. Martino; Isabel Montero; Rocio Parody; Ildefonso Espigado; Alvaro Urbano-Ispizua; José A. Pérez-Simón
Blood | 2011
Jose Falantes; Cristina Calderón; Ildefonso Espigado; Dora Alonso; Antonio Martín Noya; Estrella Carrillo; María L. Martino; Isabel Montero; José Antonio Moreiro González; José A. Pérez-Simón
Blood | 2012
Lucía López Corral; Luis A. Corchete; Maria Victoria Mateos; Ramón García-Sanz; Encarna Fermiñán; Juan José Lahuerta; Joan Bladé; Albert Oriol; Ana Isabel Teruel; María L. Martino; José Antonio Hernández; Jesús María Hernández-Rivas; Jesús F. San Miguel; Norma C. Gutiérrez
Blood | 2012
Jose Falantes; Pablo Trujillo; Cristina Calderón; José Antonio Moreiro González; María L. Martino; Isabel Montero; Rocio Parody; Ildefonso Espigado; José A. Pérez-Simón