Maria Lampinen

Identification of IL-5 and RANTES as the major eosinophil chemoattractants in the asthmatic lung.

The study was carried out to identify those molecules that are important in vivo in the attraction of eosinophil granulocytes to the lungs of patients with asthma. Asthmatic patients with birch pollen allergy had lavages performed before and during the pollen season, and the chemotactic activity of the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was tested against normal eosinophils. The activity was significantly increased during the pollen season as compared with the activity before the pollen season (p less than 0.01). Neutralizing antibodies to IL-2, IL-5 and IL-8, leukemia inhibitory factor, and to RANTES were added to the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Antibodies to IL-5 and RANTES, but not to IL-2 and IL-8 or leukemia inhibitory factor, significantly inhibited the chemotactic activity for eosinophils (p less than 0.001). It is concluded that IL-5 and RANTES are important chemoattractants in the lungs of patients with allergic asthma. The effect of IL-5 may be that of a cofactor to the chemotactic molecules, of which RANTES may be one of the most important in allergic asthma.

Intestinal Macrophage/Epithelial Cell-Derived CCL11/Eotaxin-1 Mediates Eosinophil Recruitment and Function in Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis

Clinical studies have demonstrated a link between the eosinophil-selective chemokines, eotaxins (eotaxin-1/CCL11 and eotaxin-2/CCL24), eosinophils, and the inflammatory bowel diseases, Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the cellular source and individual contribution of the eotaxins to colonic eosinophilic accumulation in inflammatory bowel diseases remain unclear. In this study we demonstrate, by gene array and quantitative PCR, elevated levels of eotaxin-1 mRNA in the rectosigmoid colon of pediatric UC patients. We show that elevated levels of eotaxin-1 mRNA positively correlated with rectosigmoid eosinophil numbers. Further, colonic eosinophils appeared to be degranulating, and the levels positively correlated with disease severity. Using the dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced intestinal epithelial injury model, we show that DSS treatment of mice strongly induced colonic eotaxin-1 and eotaxin-2 expression and eosinophil levels. Analysis of eosinophil-deficient mice defined an effector role for eosinophils in disease pathology. DSS treatment of eotaxin-2−/− and eotaxin-1/2−/− mice demonstrated that eosinophil recruitment was dependent on eotaxin-1. In situ and immunofluorescence analysis-identified eotaxin-1 expression was restricted to intestinal F4/80+CD11b+ macrophages in DSS-induced epithelial injury and to CD68+ intestinal macrophages and the basolateral compartment of intestinal epithelial cells in pediatric UC. These data demonstrate that intestinal macrophage and epithelial cell-derived eotaxin-1 plays a critical role in the regulation of eosinophil recruitment in colonic eosinophilic disease such as pediatric UC and provides a basis for targeting the eosinophil/eotaxin-1 axis in UC.

The role of interleukin‐5, interleukin‐8 and RANTES in the chemotactic attraction of eosinophils to the allergic lung

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid from patients with birch‐pollen allergy lavaged during the season showed an elevated chemotactic activity for eosinophils compared with BAL fluid from the same patients before the start of the season.

Eosinophil granulocytes are activated during the remission phase of ulcerative colitis

Aim: The aim of this study was to establish a method of investigating intestinal eosinophil and neutrophil granulocytes by flow cytometry, and to compare the distribution and activity of these cells in different stages of ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: Biopsy samples were taken from six locations of the entire colon and from the terminal ileum in 10 patients with active total UC, 10 patients with inactive total UC, eight patients with active distal UC, and 11 control subjects. Cell suspensions from biopsies and from peripheral blood were incubated with fluorophore conjugated monoclonal antibodies. The use of scatter plot-gating and specific antibodies was established in a flow cytometry assay. Results: Eosinophils were more numerous and more active in patients with active UC than in controls. Interestingly, during inactive UC, the number of activated eosinophils was even larger. Eosinophil activity was high in the rectum of patients with distal colitis but was also slightly elevated in the proximal colon. Neutrophils were increased in number and activity during active but not inactive UC. In patients with distal colitis, activated neutrophils were only found in the sigmoid colon and rectum. Conclusion: With this method, we confirm that neutrophils participate in the inflammatory process during active UC, and that they express a resting phenotype during remission. The finding of activated eosinophils in inflamed intestine strengthens the view of these cells as proinflammatory and tissue damaging. Nevertheless, our new finding of high eosinophil activation during inactive UC suggests that eosinophils play a role in repair of injured epithelium.

IL-5 and TNF-alpha participate in recruitment of eosinophils to intestinal mucosa in ulcerative colitis.

There is an increased influx of activated eosinophils to the intestinal mucosa in active ulcerative colitis, and an increased release of eosinophil-derived proteins, such as ECP, has also been observed. These findings indicate that eosinophils may contribute to tissue damage and intestinal inflammation in this disease. The relative importance of different chemotactic factors and the impact of steroid treatment on their effect in active ulcerative colitis are not known. We measured the eosinophil chemotactic activity in perfusion fluids from 11 patients with ulcerative colitis before and after steroid treatment and from 7 control patients. The effect of neutralizing antibodies to IL-5 and -8, RANTES, eotaxin, MCP-3, TNF-α, GM-CSF was investigated. The chemotactic activity was higher in perfusion fluids from patients than from controls (P = 0.0043). Anti-IL-5 (P = 0.005) and -TNF-α (P = 0.017) inhibited the activity in perfusion fluids obtained before treatment. Steroid treatment prevented the effect of all antibodies but had no significant effect on the chemotactic activity. The chemotactic activity correlated with the levels of eosinophil granule proteins in the perfusion fluids. In conclusion, in ulcerative colitis, eosinophils are attracted to the intestinal tissue by chemotactic factors, of which IL-5 and TNF-α may be the most prominent steroid-sensitive ones. The steroid-insensitive chemotactic activities remain unidentified.

Eosinophils Express Muscarinic Receptors and Corticotropin-Releasing Factor to Disrupt the Mucosal Barrier in Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS Altered intestinal barrier function has been implicated in the pathophysiology of ulcerative colitis (UC) in genetic, functional, and epidemiological studies. Mast cells and corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) regulate the mucosal barrier in human colon. Because eosinophils are often increased in colon tissues of patients with UC, we assessed interactions among mast cells, CRF, and eosinophils in the mucosal barrier of these patients. METHODS Transmucosal fluxes of protein antigens (horseradish peroxidase) and paracellular markers ((51)Cr-EDTA, fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran 4000) were studied in noninflamed, colonic mucosal biopsy samples collected from 26 patients with UC and 53 healthy volunteers (controls); samples were mounted in Ussing chambers. We also performed fluorescence and electron microscopy of human tissue samples, assessed isolated eosinophils, and performed mechanistic studies using in vitro cocultured eosinophils (15HL-60), mast cells (HMC-1), and a colonic epithelial cell line (T84). RESULTS Colon tissues from patients with UC had significant increases in permeability to protein antigens compared with controls. Permeability was blocked by atropine (a muscarinic receptor antagonist), α-helical CRF(9-41) (a CRF receptor antagonist), and lodoxamide (a mast-cell stabilizer). Eosinophils were increased in number in UC tissues (compared with controls), expressed the most M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors of any mucosal cell type, and had immunoreactivity to CRF. In coculture studies, carbachol activation of eosinophils caused production of CRF and activation of mast cells, which increased permeability of T84 epithelial cells to macromolecules. CONCLUSIONS We identified a neuroimmune intercellular circuit (from cholinergic nerves, via eosinophils to mast cells) that mediates colonic mucosal barrier dysfunction in patients with UC. This circuit might exacerbate mucosal inflammation.

Different regulation of eosinophil activity in Crohn's disease compared with ulcerative colitis

The aim of this investigation was to study the involvement of eosinophil and neutrophil granulocytes in different stages of Crohns disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Biopsy samples were taken from the right flexure of the colon and from the rectum in patients with active (n=12) and inactive colonic CD (n=7), patients with active (n=33) and inactive UC (n=24), and from control subjects (n=11). Cell suspensions from biopsies and blood were analyzed by flow cytometry with regards to activation markers and viability. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate cell number and degranulation. Blood eosinophils were cultured with Th1 and Th2 cytokines, and the expression of activity markers was assessed by flow cytometry. Eosinophil number, viability, and activity were increased during active CD and UC compared with controls. The activity, assessed as CD44 expression, tended to diminish during inactive CD but was increased further in quiescent UC. Neutrophil number and activity were increased only during inflammation in both diseases. Culture of blood eosinophils with IL‐5 and IL‐13 caused increased CD44 expression, whereas IL‐5 and IFN‐γ induced elevated CD69 expression. We observed different patterns of eosinophil activation in CD and UC, with the highest CD44 expression during quiescent UC. Our in vitro experiments with recombinant cytokines suggest that the diverse mechanisms of eosinophil activation in CD and UC are a result of different cytokine milieus (Th1 vs. Th2). In contrast, neutrophil activation reflects the disease activity in CD and UC, irrespective of Th cell skewing.

Budesonide treatment of patients with collagenous colitis restores normal eosinophil and T-cell activity in the colon.

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the activity of eosinophils, neutrophils, and CD4+ as well as CD8+ T‐cells in 11 patients with active collagenous colitis (CC) before and after 8 weeks of budesonide treatment (9 mg once daily) compared to 10 healthy individuals. Methods: Clinical symptoms were recorded and intestinal biopsy samples were taken and analyzed by flow cytometry. Eosinophils with a high surface expression of CD44 and low CD9 expression were classified as activated. Neutrophil activity was assessed by their expression of CD66b, and CD69 was used as an activation marker for T‐cells. Results: All patients responded to the treatment. The eosinophils in active CC showed increased activity compared to controls. The activity was back to control levels after treatment. Neutrophils were not activated in CC patients before or after treatment. CD8+ T‐cells from untreated CC patients had a lower activity than controls, and a tendency of lower activity was observed on CD4+ T‐cells. After treatment, the activity was increased on both types of T‐cells and was not different from controls. Conclusions: In the present study we demonstrated that the inflammation in CC is characterized by activated eosinophils but there is no neutrophil activity. CD4+ and CD8+ T‐cells are increased in numbers in active CC but, surprisingly, they had a lower grade of activity than in control subjects. The major finding of this study is that budesonide treatment restores the normal activation of eosinophils and T‐cells, accompanied by clinical remission. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2010)

Fecal eosinophil cationic protein as a marker of active disease and treatment outcome in collagenous colitis: A pilot study

Abstract Background and aims. Fecal calprotectin (FC) is used as a marker for intestinal inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) but there is no reliable marker for collagenous colitis (CC). We have previously demonstrated that the mucosal inflammation in CC is characterized by eosinophil activation, which is restored during budesonide treatment, but there is no enhanced neutrophil activity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of fecal eosinophil cationic protein (F-ECP) and eosinophil protein X (F-EPX) compared with the neutrophil-derived myeloperoxidase (F-MPO) and FC in patients treated for active CC. Methods. Patients with active CC (n = 12) were studied before and after 3, 7, 28 and 56 days of budesonide treatment. Clinical symptoms and stool frequency were recorded, fecal samples were collected, and F-ECP, F-EPX, F-MPO and FC were measured at each occasion. Results. All but one patient achieved remission. On inclusion 92%, 67%, 67% and 75% of the patients had elevated F-ECP, F-EPX, F-MPO and FC levels, respectively. All markers decreased during the treatment, particularly F-ECP and F-EPX, which decreased after only 3 days. At the end of the study 100%, 92%, 83% and 75% of the patients had normal F-ECP, F-EPX, F-MPO and FC values, respectively. Conclusion. F-ECP demonstrated the best discriminating capacity in detecting active CC. A normalized F-ECP and F-EPX may further be studied as a marker for successful treatment. During budesonide treatment there is a rapid fall in F-ECP and F-EPX, accompanied by clinical improvement, indicating an essential role for the eosinophil participating in the pathophysiology of CC.

CD14+CD33+ myeloid cell-CCL11-eosinophil signature in ulcerative colitis

This study tested the hypothesis that eotaxins (CCL11, CCL24, and CCL26) and IL‐5 contribute to eosinophil recruitment to the intestine in UC and that intestinal macrophages are important producers of CCL11 in this disease. Peripheral blood and rectal biopsy samples were obtained from patients with active (n=18) and quiescent UC (n=9), and control patients (n=7). Eosinophil and macrophage levels and activation were analyzed by flow cytometry. Rectal mRNA levels of CCL11, CCL24, CCL26, and IL‐5 were determined by qRT‐PCR. The cellular source of CCL11 was visualized by immunofluorescence analyses. Eosinophil numbers were elevated in the blood and rectum of active and quiescent UC patients compared with controls. Levels of activated eosinophils (CD66bhigh) correlated with disease severity. Rectal CCL11, CCL24, and CCL26 mRNA levels were increased in active UC, whereas only CCL11 was elevated in quiescent UC. Levels of CCL11, but not CCL24 and CCL26, positively correlated with eosinophil numbers. Numbers of CD14+CD33+ cells correlated with CCL11 and eosinophil levels. Immunofluorescence analyses revealed the presence of CD14+CCL11+ mononuclear cells in colonic biopsies in UC. These results support the hypothesis that CCL11 contributes to eosinophil recruitment in UC and that intestinal myeloid cells are a source of CCL11. Interestingly, rectal levels of CCL24, CCL26, and IL‐5 only increase during active UC, coinciding with further elevation of eosinophil numbers and with the activation of rectal eosinophils. In conclusion, there is a link among CD14+CD33+ myeloid cells, CCL11, and eosinophils in adult UC.