Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Maria Liukis is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Maria Liukis.


Seismological Research Letters | 2018

The forecasting skill of physics-based seismicity models during the 2010-2012 Canterbury, New Zealand, earthquake sequence

Camilla Cattania; M. Werner; Warner Marzocchi; Sebastian Hainzl; David A. Rhoades; Matthew C. Gerstenberger; Maria Liukis; William Savran; A. Christophersen; Agnès Helmstetter; Abigail Jiménez; Sandy Steacy; Thomas H. Jordan

1 The static Coulomb stress hypothesis is a widely known physical mechanism for 2 earthquake triggering, and thus a prime candidate for physics-based Operational Earth3 quake Forecasting (OEF). However, the forecast skill of Coulomb-based seismicity mod4 els remains controversial, especially in comparison to empirical statistical models. A 5 previous evaluation by the Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictabil6 ity (CSEP) concluded that a suite of Coulomb-based seismicity models were less in7 formative than empirical models during the aftershock sequence of the 1992 Mw7.3 8 Landers, California, earthquake. Recently, a new generation of Coulomb-based and 9 Coulomb/statistical hybrid models were developed that account better for uncertainties 10 and secondary stress sources. Here, we report on the performance of this new suite of 11 models in comparison to empirical Epidemic Type Aftershock Sequences (ETAS) mod12 els during the 2010-2012 Canterbury, New Zealand, earthquake sequence. Comprising 13 the 2010 M7.1 Darfield earthquake and three subsequent M ≥ 5.9 shocks (including 14 the February 2011 Christchurch earthquake), this sequence provides a wealth of data 15 (394 M ≥ 3.95 shocks). We assessed models over multiple forecast horizons (1-day, 16 1-month and 1-year, updated after M ≥ 5.9 shocks). The results demonstrate substan17 tial improvements in the Coulomb-based models. Purely physics-based models have a 18 performance comparable to the ETAS model, and the two Coulomb/statistical hybrids 19 perform better or as well as the corresponding statistical model. On the other hand, 20 an ETAS model with anisotropic (fault-based) aftershock zones is just as informative. 21 These results provide encouraging evidence for the predictive power of Coulomb-based 22 models. To assist with model development, we identify discrepancies between forecasts 23 and observations. 24


Archive | 2007

Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability

Thomas H. Jordan; Matthew C. Gerstenberger; Maria Liukis; Philip J. Maechling; Danijel Schorlemmer; Stefan Wiemer; Jeremy Douglas Zechar


Seismological Research Letters | 2018

Highlights from the First Ten Years of the New Zealand Earthquake Forecast Testing Center

David A. Rhoades; A. Christophersen; Matthew C. Gerstenberger; Maria Liukis; Fabio Silva; Warner Marzocchi; M. Werner; Thomas H. Jordan


Seismological Research Letters | 2018

The Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability: Achievements and Priorities

Danijel Schorlemmer; M. Werner; Warner Marzocchi; Thomas H. Jordan; Yosihiko Ogata; David D. Jackson; Sum Mak; David A. Rhoades; Matthew C. Gerstenberger; Naoshi Hirata; Maria Liukis; Philip J. Maechling; Anne Strader; Matteo Taroni; Stefan Wiemer; Jeremy Douglas Zechar; Jiancang Zhuang


Archive | 2009

Developing Performance Measures for the CISN Earthquake Early Warning Testing Center

Philip J. Maechling; Thomas H. Jordan; Maria Liukis; Sarah Callaghan


Seismological Research Letters | 2018

Prospective Evaluation of Global Earthquake Forecast Models: 2 Yrs of Observations Provide Preliminary Support for Merging Smoothed Seismicity with Geodetic Strain Rates

Anne Strader; M. Werner; José Bayona; Philip J. Maechling; Fabio Silva; Maria Liukis; Danijel Schorlemmer


Japan Geoscience Union | 2015

Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability & Global Earthquake Model - Testing Center Software Development

Thomas Beutin; Maria Liukis; Philip J. Maechling; Sum Mak; Danijel Schorlemmer; John Yu


Japan Geoscience Union | 2014

Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability - Global Activities

Danijel Schorlemmer; Matt Gerstenberger; Naoshi Hirata; Thomas H. Jordan; Maria Liukis; Warner Marzocchi; David A. Rhoades; Hiroshi Tsuruoka; M. Werner; Jeremy Douglas Zechar


Archive | 2008

Extending the CISN Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) Web Site into the CISN EEW Testing Center

Michael P. Zeleznik; Philip J. Maechling; Maria Liukis; Sarah Callaghan; Thomas H. Jordan


Archive | 2007

Hardware, Software, and Policies of the CSEP Testing Center at SCEC

Jeffrey Xu Yu; Maria Liukis; Danijel Schorlemmer; Philip J. Maechling; Thomas H. Jordan; Fabian Euchner; Jeremy Douglas Zechar; Matthew C. Gerstenberger

Collaboration


Dive into the Maria Liukis's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas H. Jordan

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philip J. Maechling

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Danijel Schorlemmer

Southern California Earthquake Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Werner

University of Bristol

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anne Strader

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge