María López-Gil

Radiofrequency ablation of the inferior vena cava-tricuspid valve isthmus in common atrial flutter

Endocardial mapping has suggested that common atrial flutter (AF) is based on right atrial reentry surrounding the inferior vena cava (IVC). The isthmus between the IVC and the tricuspid valve (TV) appears essential to close the circuit. To test this hypothesis, radiofrequency was applied to the IVC-TV isthmus, with catheter electrodes, in 9 patients with AF. Mapping confirmed a right atrial circuit surrounding the IVC in all. In 4 patients another type of AF was induced that followed the circuit in the opposite direction. Radiofrequency interrupted AF in all patients. Multiple endocardial recordings showed that interruption was due to activation block at the point of application. Radiofrequency produced very brief or sustained, atrial fibrillation in 2 patients, which resulted in sinus rhythm. AF recurred in 4 patients with the same activation pattern and was interrupted again with radiofrequency in the IVC-TV isthmus in 3. AF was noninducible in 7 patients after 1 to 4 sessions. AF-free periods of 2 to 18 months without drugs were observed after radiofrequency, but 2 patients had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. These results confirm that the IVC-TV isthmus is an essential part of the AF circuit. Ablation of this area may be of therapeutic value, but technical improvements are needed. Long-term efficacy of the procedure is uncertain.

Catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drug treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial (SARA study)

Background Catheter ablation (CA) is a highly effective therapy for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) when compared with antiarrhythmic drug therapy (ADT). No randomized studies have compared the two strategies in persistent AF. The present randomized trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of CA vs. ADT in treating persistent AF. Methods and results Patients with persistent AF were randomly assigned to CA or ADT (excluding patients with long-standing persistent AF). Primary endpoint at 12-month follow-up was defined as any episode of AF or atrial flutter lasting >24 h that occurred after a 3-month blanking period. Secondary endpoints were any atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting >30 s, hospitalization, and electrical cardioversion. In total, 146 patients were included (aged 55 ± 9 years, 77% male). The ADT group received class Ic (43.8%) or class III drugs (56.3%). In an intention-to-treat analysis, 69 of 98 patients (70.4%) in the CA group and 21 of 48 patients (43.7%) in the ADT group were free of the primary endpoint (P = 0.002), implying an absolute risk difference of 26.6% (95% CI 10.0–43.3) in favour of CA. The proportion of patients free of any recurrence (>30 s) was higher in the CA group than in the ADT group (60.2 vs. 29.2%; P < 0.001) and cardioversion was less frequent (34.7 vs. 50%, respectively; P = 0.018). Conclusion Catheter ablation is superior to medical therapy for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent AF at 12-month follow-up. Clinical Trial Registration Information NCT00863213 (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00863213).

Fragmented electrograms and continuous electrical activity in atrial flutter

Multiple endocardial bipolar electrograms were recorded in 13 patients with atrial flutter (AF) to locate areas of fragmented electrical activity. Stable fragmentation patterns were found in each case, covering between 36% and 100% of the flutter cycle. Double or triple spike patterns were common. The direction of atrial activation was approximately defined in 11 patients, and in all of them at least part of the areas showing fragmentation was included in the circuit. In 1 patient an area of continuous electrical activity was found. AF circuits appeared to be included in the right atrium in 12 patients and in the left atrium in 1 patient. During atrial stimulation changes in fragmented electrograms coincided with changes in AF pattern before its interruption, while restoration of stable AF after stimulation was accompanied by reappearance of previous stable fragmented electrograms. In 6 patients electrograms were recorded after sinus rhythm was reestablished, and all showed marked decreases or disappearance of fragmentation. It is concluded that fragmented electrograms are often found in AF and may be related to abnormal local conduction in relation to the reentrant activation circuits.

Atrial flutter mapping and ablation. I. Studying atrial flutter mechanisms by mapping and entrainment.

Endocardial mapping has led to a detailed knowledge of reentry mechanisms in atrial flutter. Multipolar and deflecting tip catheters allow recording local electrograms from multiple areas of the right atrium, and from the coronary sinus. In common flutter, with the typical “sawtooth” pattern, there is circular activation of the right atrium in a “counterclockwise” direction, descending in the anterior and lateral walls, and ascending in the septum and posterior wall. Superior and inferior vena cava, linked by a “line” of functional block in the posterolateral wall, make the central obstacle for circular activation. The cranial and caudal turning points are the atrial “roof,” and the isthmus between the inferior vena cava and the tricuspid valve. Complex conduction patterns, probably including slow conduction are detectable in the low septal area, around the coronary sinus. Atypical flutter, without the sharp negative deflections of common flutter, sometimes shows circular activation in the right atrium, rotating in the opposite direction of common flutter (clockwise). Other atypical flutters show no circular right atrial activation, and only partial data from coronary sinus activation, combined with the response to atrial stimulation (entrainment) allow the diagnosis of left atrial reentry, without a precise delimitation of the circuits. In patients having undergone cardiac surgery, atypical flutter may be based on reentry around surgical scars. To our knowledge, the mechanism of type II flutter has not been disclosed in humans.

RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION OF ATRIAL FLUTTER

RF Ablation of Atrial Flutter. Activation mapping in common atrial flutter has shown circular (reentrant) activation of the right atrium around anatomic structures and areas of functional block. The direction of rotation is counterclockwise (in a frontal view), and in the low right atrium the myocardium between the inferior vena cava (IVC) and the tricuspid valve (TV) is critical to close the activation circle. The circuit can be interrupted by radiofrequency ablation of the myocardium between the TV and the IVC, and, in some cases, by ablation between the coronary sinus and TV. Flutter interruption does not mean complete isthmus ablation, as it may remain inducible, requiring further ablation. Despite attaining noninducibility, flutter may recur, and new procedures may be needed for complete ablation. Atrial fibrillation occurs in up to 30% of the cases during follow‐up but is generally well controlled with antiarrhythmic drugs that were ineffective in treating flutter before ablation. Some noncommon atrial flutters show circular right atrial activation in a reversed (clockwise) direction, with the same critical areas in the low right atrium, and in these isthmus ablation is effective. Other noncommon flutters have different substrates in the right or left atrium, and mapping has to define specific critical isthmuses as ablation targets in each case. Left atrial flutter circuits remain inaccessible to ablation.

Bundle-Branch Reentry and the Postpacing Interval After Entrainment by Right Ventricular Apex Stimulation: A New Approach to Elucidate the Mechanism of Wide-QRS-Complex Tachycardia With Atrioventricular Dissociation

Background —Diagnosis of bundle-branch reentry ventricular tachycardia (BBR-VT) by the standard approach is challenging, and this may lead to nonrecognition of this tachycardia mechanism. Because the postpacing interval (PPI) after entrainment has been correlated with the distance from the pacing site to the reentrant circuit, BBR-VT entrainment by pacing from the right ventricular apex (RVA) should result in a PPI similar to the tachycardia cycle length (TCL). This factor may differentiate BBR-VT from other mechanisms of wide-QRS-complex tachycardia with AV dissociation, such as myocardial reentrant VT (MR-VT) or AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), in which the circuit is usually located away from the RVA. Methods and Results —Transient entrainment by RVA pacing was attempted in 18 consecutive BBR-VTs and finally achieved in 13. Results were compared with those found in 59 consecutive MR-VTs and 50 consecutive AVNRTs. The mean PPI−TCL difference was significantly (P <0.0001) shorter in the BBR-VT group (9±11 ms) than in the MR-VT (109±48 ms) and the AVNRT (150±29 ms) groups. No BBR-VT showed a PPI−TCL >30 ms (range −12 to 24 ms). Except for 2 MR-VTs, no MR-VT (range 21 to 211 ms) or AVNRT (range 100 to 215 ms) showed a PPI−TCL <30 ms. Conclusions —A PPI−TCL >30 ms, after entrainment by RVA stimulation, makes BBR-VT unlikely. Conversely, a PPI−TCL <30 ms is suggestive of BBR-VT but should lead to further investigation by use of conventional criteria.

Catheter Ablation of Atrial Flutter Circuits

Atrial flutter (AF) mapping has shown circular activation in the right atrium (RA), wilh a “counterclockwise” rotation in a frontal view. The myocardial isthmus between the inferior vena cava and the tricuspid valve (IVC‐T) closes the activation circuit in its caudal end. The reproducibility of this activafion pattern, and the fact that some “rare” AF with a “clockwise” rotation of activation use the same circuit, suggests that reentry is greatly facilitated by the anatomical arrangement of the caudal end of the RA. This suggested that ablation of the IVC‐T isthmus may interrupt AF and prevent its recurrence. We have applied radiofrequency (RF) current to the IVC‐T isthmus in nine patients, producing sudden interruption of activation at this point in five (all those treated with large surface electrode catheters). in three others, RF produced acceleration or disorganization, leading to interruption. Preliminary follow‐up data suggest a favorable effect on AF recurrence, either by preventing it, or by making antiarrhythmic drugs effective.

Atrial Flutter Mapping and Ablation II. Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Flutter Circuits

The definition of the anatomical substrate of reentry in at rial flutter has allowed the recognition of narrow, critical areas of the circuit, where radiofrequencv ablation can interrupt reentry. In common flutter the isthmus between the inferior vena cava and the tricuspid valve appears the best target, but ablation between the coronary sinus and tricuspid valve can also be effective in some cases. In atypical flutter using the same circuit as common flutter in a “clockwise” direction, ablation of the same isthmus is effective. Flutter interruption is the main objective, but it does not mean complete isthmus ablation. If flutter remains inducible, new applications are delivered in the isthmus, until it is made noninducible. Complications are rare. Despite attaining noninducibility, flutter may recur, and new procedures may he needed to prevent recurrence. Atrial fibrillation can occur in up to 30% of the cases during follow‐up, but it is generally well controlled with antiarrhythmic drugs, that were ineffective to treat flutter before ablation. In reentry circuits based on surgical atrial scars, ablation of an isthmus between the scar and the inferior vena cava can also be effective. Left atrial circuits are not known well enough to guide successful ablation.

The Upper Link of Human Common Atrial Flutter Circuit Definition by Multiple Endocardial Recordings during Entrainment

Common atrial flutter is due to a macroreentry circuit in the right atrium, but the cranial path of the circuit has not been defined. The objectives of this article are to determine the cranial turning point of flutter activation in relation to a hypothetic obstacle, the superior vena cava opening, by examining the changes in activation sequence produced by entrainment from different points. In 13 cases of common atrial flutter with typical counter‐clockwise right atrial circuits confirmed by endocardial mapping the atrium was paced from the high posterior and mid‐septal walls. Entrainment was confirmed by simultaneous recordings of 6–7 right atrial electrograms. Changes in sequence of electrograms from high septum and high anterolateral walls was sought. Electrogram sequence and morphology did not change with entrainment at the posterior wall with respect to the basal flutter or mid‐septal wall entrainment. Pacing “below” the superior vena cava did not advance the anterior wall electrogram in relation to the septal electrogram. These findings suppport the concept that common Putter activation turned around (cranial and anterior to) the superior vena cava opening, and not around the free end of a line of block below the superior vena cava in the posterior wall. Common atrial flutter activation rotates cranial (and anterior) to the superior vena cava opening, through the “right atrial roof” The line of functional block should span from inferior to superior vena cava openings.

Mechanisms of Induction of Typical and Reversed Atrial Flutter

Mechanisms of Flutter Induction. Introduction: Typical flutter is due to reentry around caval veins and terminal crest. In patients with typical flutter, reversed (clockwise) reentry can be induced. We studied mechanisms of typical and reversed flutter induction.