Maria Malanga

Poly(ADP-ribose) Reactivates Stalled DNA Topoisomerase I and Induces DNA Strand Break Resealing

Regulating the topological state of DNA is a vital function of the enzyme DNA topoisomerase I. However, when acting on damaged DNA, topoisomerase I may get trapped in a covalent complex with nicked DNA (stalled topoisomerase I), that, if unrepaired, may lead to genomic instability or cell death. Here we show that ADP-ribose polymers target specific domains of topoisomerase I and reprogram the enzyme to remove itself from cleaved DNA and close the resulting gap. Two members of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family, PARP-1 and 2, act as poly(ADP-ribose) carriers to stalled topoisomerase I sites and induce efficient repair of enzyme-associated DNA strand breaks. Thus, by counteracting topoisomerase I-induced DNA damage, PARP-1 and PARP-2 act as positive regulators of genomic stability in eukaryotic cells.

Poly ADP-ribosylation: A DNA break signal mechanism

Recent evidence obtained with transgenic knockout mice suggests that the enzyme poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP) does not play a direct role in DNA break processing [1, 2]. Nevertheless, inactivation of the catalytic or the DNA nick-binding functions of PARP affects cellular responses to genotoxins at the level of cell survival, sister chromatid exchanges and apoptosis [2, 3]. In the present report, we conceptualize the idea that PARP is part of a DNA break signal mechanism [4, 5]. In vitro screening studies revealed the existence of a protein family containing a polymer-binding motif of about 22 amino acids. This motif is present in p53 protein as well as in MARCKS, a protein involved in the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton. Biochemical analyses showed that these sequences are directly targeted by PARP-associated polymers in vitro, and this alters several molecular functions of p53- and MARCKS protein. PARP-deficient knockout mice from transgenic mice were found to exhibit several phenotypic features compatible with altered DNA damage signaling, such as downregulation and lack of responsiveness of p53 protein to genotoxins, and morphological changes compatible with MARCKS-related cytoskeletal dysfunction. The knockout phenotype could be rescued by stable expression of the PARP gene. — We propose that PARP-associated polymers may recruit signal proteins to sites of DNA breakage and reprogram their functions. (Mol Cell Biochem 193: 5–11,1999)

HISTONE SHUTTLING BY POLY ADP-RIBOSYLATION

The enzymes poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase and poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase may cooperate to drive a histone shuttle mechanism in chromatin. The mechanism is triggered by binding of the N-terminal zinc-finger domain of the polymerase to DNA strand breaks, which activates the catalytic activities residing in the C-terminal domain. The polymerase converts into a protein carrying multiple ADP-ribose polymers which displace histones from DNA by specifically targeting the histone tails responsible for DNA condensation. As a result, the domains surrounding DNA strand breaks become accessible to other proteins. Poly(ADP0ribose) glycohydrolase attacks ADP-ribose polymers in a specific order and thereby releases histones for reassociation with DNA. Increasing evidence from different model systems suggests that histone shuttling participates in DNA repairin vivo as a catalyst for nucleosomal unfolding.

Rapid regulation of telomere length is mediated by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1

Shelterin/telosome is a multi-protein complex at mammalian telomeres, anchored to the double-stranded region by the telomeric-repeat binding factors-1 and -2. In vitro modification of these proteins by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation through poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases-5 (tankyrases) and -1/-2, respectively, impairs binding. Thereafter, at least telomeric-repeat binding factor-1 is degraded by the proteasome. We show that pharmacological inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity in cells from two different species leads to rapid decrease in median telomere length and stabilization at a lower setting. Specific knockdown of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 by RNA interference had the same effect. The length of the single-stranded telomeric overhang as well as telomerase activity were not affected. Release of inhibition led to a fast re-gain in telomere length to control levels in cells expressing active telomerase. We conclude that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 activity and probably its interplay with telomeric-repeat binding factor-2 is an important determinant in telomere regulation. Our findings reinforce the link between poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation and aging/longevity and also impact on the use of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in tumor therapy.

Poly(ADP-ribose) binds to the splicing factor ASF/SF2 and regulates its phosphorylation by DNA topoisomerase I.

Human DNA topoisomerase I plays a dual role in transcription, by controlling DNA supercoiling and by acting as a specific kinase for the SR-protein family of splicing factors. The two activities are mutually exclusive, but the identity of the molecular switch is unknown. Here we identify poly(ADP-ribose) as a physiological regulator of the two topoisomerase I functions. We found that, in the presence of both DNA and the alternative splicing factor/splicing factor 2 (ASF/SF2, a prototypical SR-protein), poly(ADP-ribose) affected topoisomerase I substrate selection and gradually shifted enzyme activity from protein phosphorylation to DNA cleavage. A likely mechanistic explanation was offered by the discovery that poly(ADP-ribose) forms a high affinity complex with ASF/SF2 thereby leaving topoisomerase I available for directing its action onto DNA. We identified two functionally important domains, RRM1 and RS, as specific poly(ADP-ribose) binding targets. Two independent lines of evidence emphasize the potential biological relevance of our findings: (i) in HeLa nuclear extracts, ASF/SF2, but not histone, phosphorylation was inhibited by poly(ADP-ribose); (ii) an in silico study based on gene expression profiling data revealed an increased incidence of alternative splicing within a subset of inflammatory response genes that are dysregulated in cells lacking a functional poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1. We propose that poly(ADP-ribose) targeting of topoisomerase I and ASF/SF2 functions may participate in the regulation of gene expression.

The roles of poly(ADP-ribose)-metabolizing enzymes in alkylation-induced cell death

Abstract.Poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) has been identified as a DNA damage-inducible cell death signal upstream of apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF). PAR causes the translocation of AIF from mitochondria to the nucleus and triggers cell death. In living cells, PAR molecules are subject to dynamic changes pending on internal and external stress factors. Using RNA interference (RNAi), we determined the roles of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases-1 and -2 (PARP-1, PARP-2) and poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG), the key enzymes configuring PAR molecules, in cell death induced by an alkylating agent. We found that PARP-1, but not PARP-2 and PARG, contributed to alkylation-induced cell death. Likewise, AIF translocation was only affected by PARP-1. PARP-1 seems to play a major role configuring PAR as a death signal involving AIF translocation regardless of the death pathway involved.

Poly(ADP-ribose) binding properties of histone H1 variants

Using a poly(ADP-ribose) binding assay on protein blots we examined the ability of rat testis histone H1 variants to establish non-covalent interactions with the polymer. All the H1 variants bound ADP-ribose polymers; the binding was salt resistant and highly specific, occurring even in the presence of a large excess of competitor DNA. A comparison among the H1 variants showed that H1t has the highest affinity for poly(ADP-ribose). Long and branched poly(ADP-ribose) molecules were found to be preferentially involved in the interaction with the histone variants. The results further corroborate the concept that non-covalent interactions of poly(ADP-ribose) with target proteins may constitute an important mechanism to modulate chromatin structure.

Interactions of poly(ADP-ribose) with nuclear proteins

The molecular mechanisms whereby poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation primes chromatin proteins for an active role in DNA excision repair are not understood. The prevalent view is that the covalent linkage of ADP-ribose polymers is essential for the modification of target protein function. By contrast, we have focused on the possibility that ADP-ribose polymers interact non-covalently with nuclear proteins and thereby modulate their function. The results show that ADP-ribose polymers engage in highly specific and strong non-covalent interactions with a small number of nuclear proteins, predominantly histones, and among these only with specific polypeptide domains. The binding affinities were largely determined by two factors, ie the polymer sizes and the presence of branches. This provides an explanation for the target specificity of the histone shuttle mechanism that was previously reported by our laboratory. Interestingly, the polymer molecules being most effective in protein targeting in vitro, are strictly regulated in mammalian cells during DNA repair in vivo.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase signaling of topoisomerase 1-dependent DNA damage in carcinoma cells

A molecular approach to enhance the antitumour activity of topoisomerase 1 (TOP1) inhibitors relies on the use of chemical inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerases (PARP). Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is involved in the regulation of many cellular processes such as DNA repair, cell cycle progression and cell death. Recent findings showed that poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated PARP-1 and PARP-2 counteract camptothecin action facilitating resealing of DNA strand breaks. Moreover, repair of DNA strand breaks induced by poisoned TOP1 is slower in the presence of PARP inhibitors, leading to increased toxicity. In the present study we compared the effects of the camptothecin derivative topotecan (TPT), and the PARP inhibitor PJ34, in breast (MCF7) and cervix (HeLa) carcinoma cells either PARP-1 proficient or silenced, both BRCA1/2(+/+) and p53(+/+). HeLa and MCF7 cell lines gave similar results: (i) TPT-dependent cell growth inhibition and cell cycle perturbation were incremented by the presence of PJ34 and a 2 fold increase in toxicity was observed in PARP-1 stably silenced HeLa cells; (ii) higher levels of DNA strand breaks were found in cells subjected to TPT+PJ34 combined treatment; (iii) PARP-1 and -2 modification was evident in TPT-treated cells and was reduced by TPT+PJ34 combined treatment; (iv) concomitantly, a reduction of soluble/active TOP1 was observed. Furthermore, TPT-dependent induction of p53, p21 and apoptosis were found 24-72h after treatment and were increased by PJ34 both in PARP-1 proficient and silenced cells. The characterization of such signaling network can be relevant to a strategy aimed at overcoming acquired chemoresistance to TOP1 inhibitors.

Noncovalent Protein Interaction with Poly(ADP-Ribose)

Compared to most common posttranslational modifications of proteins, a peculiarity of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is the molecular heterogeneity and complexity of the reaction product, poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR). In fact, protein-bound PAR consists of variously sized (2-200 ADP-ribose residues) linear or branched molecules, negatively charged at physiological pH. It is now clear that PAR not only affects the function of the polypeptide to which it is covalently bound, but it can also influence the activity of other proteins by engaging specific noncovalent interactions. In the last 10 years, the family of PAR-binding proteins has been rapidly growing and functional studies have expanded the regulatory potential of noncovalent -protein targeting by PAR far beyond initial assumptions.In this chapter, methods are described for: (1) PAR synthesis and analysis; (2) detecting PAR-binding proteins in protein mixtures; (3) defining affinity and specificity of PAR binding to individual proteins or protein fragments; and (4) identifying PAR molecules selectively involved in the interaction.