Maria-Novella Piersantelli

Thalidomide-dexamethasone versus Interferon-alpha-dexamethasone as maintenance treatment after ThaDD induction for multiple myeloma: a prospective, multicentre, randomised study

Maintenance therapy was explored in multiple myeloma (MM) patients after conventional thalidomide, dexamethasone and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (ThaDD). Patients with newly or relapsed MM obtaining at least minor response after 6 ThaDD courses, were randomised to receive α‐interferon (IFN) 3 MU 3 times a week or thalidomide 100 mg daily until relapse. Both groups also received pulsed dexamethasone 20 mg 4 d a month. Fifty‐one patients were randomized in the IFN‐dexamethasone (ID) arm and 52 in the thalidomide‐dexamethasone (TD) arm. The characteristics of two groups were similar. A significantly better 2‐years progression‐free survival (PFS; 63% vs. 32%; P = 0·024) and overall survival (84% vs. 68%; P = 0·030) was observed in the thalidomide arm. In high‐risk patients and in those achieving less than very good partial response after induction, TD fared better in term of PFS. Main side effects were peripheral neuropathy and constipation in TD group, fatigue, anorexia and haematological toxicity in ID arm. There was a 21% probability of discontinuation at 3 years in the thalidomide arm and 44% in the IFN arm (P = 0·014). Low‐dose thalidomide plus pulsed low‐dose dexamethasone after conventional thalidomide combination‐based therapy was also feasible in the long term, enabling significantly better residual disease control if compared with a standard maintenance therapy.

Thalidomide–dexamethasone plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin vs. thalidomide–dexamethasone: a case-matched study in advanced multiple myeloma

Objectives:  Nearly all patients with multiple myeloma (MM) relapse or become refractory to front‐line therapy. Several salvage therapies have been explored, but the optimal combination regimen has not been defined. We performed a case‐matched study comparing patients with relapsed/refractory MM receiving thalidomide–dexamethasone alone or the combination thalidomide–dexamethasone–liposomal pegylated doxorubicin.

Serum C-Reactive Protein at Diagnosis and Response to Therapy Is the Most Powerful Factor Predicting Outcome of Multiple Myeloma Treated with Thalidomide/Anthracycline—Based Therapy

BACKGROUND Few studies have focused on factors affecting outcome in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) treated with thalidomide-based therapy. We investigated factors affecting response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with MM treated with the thalidomide, dexamethasone, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (ThaDD) regimen with the aim to select patients benefiting more from this therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixty-six patients with MM were treated first line with the ThaDD regimen. We analyzed demographics and disease-related characteristics to search for factors affecting response (> or = very good partial remission [VGPR] vs. < VGPR], PFS, and OS. RESULTS Overall, 45 patients (68%) showed response > or = VGPR; median TTP and OS were 23.5 months and 35.5 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis selected only serum C-reactive protein (sCRP) as a predictive factor for response (P < .0001). By multivariate analysis, normal sCRP level (P = .001) and response to treatment > or = VGPR (P = .007) were found to be associated with longer PFS. The factors that remained significantly associated with a longer OS when assessed by multivariate analysis were normal sCRP level (P = .005) and response to therapy > or = VGPR (P = .019). CONCLUSION Serum C-reactive protein before therapy and response after therapy are the only factors useful in identifying patients benefiting from anthracycline/thalidomide-based therapy.