Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Maria Papadakaki is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Maria Papadakaki.


Journal of Interpersonal Violence | 2009

Seeking for Risk Factors of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) in a Greek National Sample The Role of Self-Esteem

Maria Papadakaki; Georgia Tzamalouka; Sevasti Chatzifotiou; Joannes Chliaoutakis

The objective of this article is to gain a better understanding of the magnitude of intimate partner violence (IPV) in Greece and to explore factors associated with increased risk of IPV prevalence. A cross-sectional study was undertaken among 1,122 men and women, aged 18 to 65, who are residents of urban areas of Greece. The questionnaire used included 3 sections and 39 items that examined the sociodemographic characteristics of the participants, rate of IPV victimization and perpetration (physical, sexual, emotional), childhood experience of violence, and level of self-esteem. Statistical analysis showed self-esteem to be significantly associated with physical violence victimization and perpetration (odds ratio [OR] = .975, confidence interval [CI] = .955—.996; OR = .972, CI = .951—.993, respectively), whereas experience of abuse during childhood was shown to be a strong predictor in all six models of IPV victimization and perpetration (p < .001). Finally, gender, age and years of cohabitation were some sociodemographic and background characteristics found to increase the risk of specific forms of IPV. Conclusions drawn from the current study should be taken into account in attempts aiming at preventing or ameliorating the problem.


Culture, Health & Sexuality | 2015

Prevalence and correlates of young people's sexual aggression perpetration and victimisation in 10 European countries: a multi-level analysis

Barbara Krahé; Anja Berger; Ine Vanwesenbeeck; Gabriel Bianchi; Joannes Chliaoutakis; Andrés A. Fernández-Fuertes; Antonio Fuertes; Margarida Gaspar de Matos; Eleni Hadjigeorgiou; Birgitt Haller; Sabine Hellemans; Zbigniew Izdebski; Christiana Kouta; Dwayne Meijnckens; Liubove Murauskiene; Maria Papadakaki; Lúcia Ramiro; Marta Reis; Katrien Symons; Paulina Tomaszewska; Isabel Vicario-Molina; Andrzej Zygadło

Data are presented on young peoples sexual victimisation and perpetration from 10 European countries (Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Greece, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia and Spain) using a shared measurement tool (N = 3480 participants, aged between 18 and 27 years). Between 19.7 and 52.2% of female and between 10.1 and 55.8% of male respondents reported having experienced at least one incident of sexual victimisation since the age of consent. In two countries, victimisation rates were significantly higher for men than for women. Between 5.5 and 48.7% of male and 2.6 and 14.8% of female participants reported having engaged in a least one act of sexual aggression perpetration, with higher rates for men than for women in all countries. Victimisation rates correlated negatively with sexual assertiveness and positively with alcohol use in sexual encounters. Perpetration rates correlated positively with attitudes condoning physical dating violence and with alcohol use in men, and negatively with sexual assertiveness in women. At the country level, lower gender equality in economic power and in the work domain was related to higher male perpetration rates. Lower gender equality in political power and higher sexual assertiveness in women relative to men were linked to higher male victimisation rates.


Implementation Science | 2012

REsearch into implementation STrategies to support patients of different ORigins and language background in a variety of European primary care settings (RESTORE): study protocol

Anne MacFarlane; Catherine O’Donnell; Frances Mair; Mary O’Reilly-de Brún; Tomas de Brún; Wolfgang Spiegel; Maria van den Muijsenbergh; Evelyn van Weel-Baumgarten; Christos Lionis; Nicola Burns; Katja Gravenhorst; Christine Princz; Erik Teunissen; Francine van den Driessen Mareeuw; Aristoula Saridaki; Maria Papadakaki; Maria Vlahadi; Christopher Dowrick

BackgroundThe implementation of guidelines and training initiatives to support communication in cross-cultural primary care consultations is ad hoc across a range of international settings with negative consequences particularly for migrants. This situation reflects a well-documented translational gap between evidence and practice and is part of the wider problem of implementing guidelines and the broader range of professional educational and quality interventions in routine practice. In this paper, we describe our use of a contemporary social theory, Normalization Process Theory and participatory research methodology—Participatory Learning and Action—to investigate and support implementation of such guidelines and training initiatives in routine practice.MethodsThis is a qualitative case study, using multiple primary care sites across Europe. Purposive and maximum variation sampling approaches will be used to identify and recruit stakeholders—migrant service users, general practitioners, primary care nurses, practice managers and administrative staff, interpreters, cultural mediators, service planners, and policy makers. We are conducting a mapping exercise to identify relevant guidelines and training initiatives. We will then initiate a PLA-brokered dialogue with stakeholders around Normalization Process Theory’s four constructs—coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring. Through this, we will enable stakeholders in each setting to select a single guideline or training initiative for implementation in their local setting. We will prospectively investigate and support the implementation journeys for the five selected interventions. Data will be generated using a Participatory Learning and Action approach to interviews and focus groups. Data analysis will follow the principles of thematic analysis, will occur in iterative cycles throughout the project and will involve participatory co-analysis with key stakeholders to enhance the authenticity and veracity of findings.DiscussionThis research employs a unique combination of Normalization Process Theory and Participatory Learning and Action, which will provide a novel approach to the analysis of implementation journeys. The findings will advance knowledge in the field of implementation science because we are using and testing theoretical and methodological approaches so that we can critically appraise their scope to mediate barriers and improve the implementation processes.


Health Policy | 2016

Reducing the health care burden for marginalised migrants: The potential role for primary care in Europe

Catherine O’Donnell; Nicola Burns; Frances Mair; Christopher Dowrick; Ciaran Clissmann; Maria van den Muijsenbergh; Evelyn van Weel-Baumgarten; Christos Lionis; Maria Papadakaki; Aristoula Saridaki; Tomas de Brún; Anne MacFarlane

There is a growing interest in the health of migrants worldwide. Migrants, particularly those in marginalised situations, face significant barriers and inequities in entitlement and access to high quality health care. This study aimed to explore the potential role of primary care in mitigating such barriers and identify ways in which health care policies and systems can influence the ability of primary care to meet the needs of vulnerable and marginalised migrants. The study compared routinely available country-level data on health system structure and financing, policy support for language and communication, and barriers and facilitators to health care access reported in the published literature. These were then mapped to a framework of primary care systems to identify where the key features mitigating or amplifying barriers to access lay. Reflecting on the data generated, we argue that culturally-sensitive primary care can play a key role in delivering accessible, high-quality care to migrants in vulnerable situations. Policymakers and practitioners need to appreciate that both individual patient capacity, and the way health care systems are configured and funded, can constrain access to care and have a negative impact on the quality of care that practitioners can provide to such populations. Strategies to address these issues, from the level of policy through to practice, are urgently needed.


Evaluation & the Health Professions | 2012

Defining Physicians' Readiness to Screen and Manage Intimate Partner Violence in Greek Primary Care Settings

Maria Papadakaki; Dimitra Prokopiadou; Eleni Petridou; Manolis Kogevinas; Christos Lionis

The current article aims to translate the PREMIS (Physician Readiness to Manage Intimate Partner Violence) survey into the Greek language and test its validity and reliability in a sample of primary care physicians. The validation study was conducted in 2010 and involved all the general practitioners serving two adjacent prefectures of Greece (n = 80). Maximum-likelihood factor analysis (MLF) was used to extract key survey factors. The instrument was further assessed for the following psychometric properties: (a) scale reliability, (b) item-specific reliability, (c) test–retest reliability, (d) scale construct validity, and (e) internal predictive validity. The MLF analysis of 23 opinion items revealed a seven-factor solution (preparation, constraint, workplace issues, screening, self-efficacy, alcohol/drugs, victim understanding), which was statistically sound (p = .293). Most of the newly derived scales displayed satisfactory internal consistency (α ≥ .60), high item-specific reliability, strong construct, and internal predictive validity (F = 2.82; p = .004), and high repeatability when retested with 20 individuals (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > .70). The tool was found appropriate to facilitate the identification of competence deficits and the evaluation of training initiatives.


Family Practice | 2015

Guidelines and training initiatives that support communication in cross-cultural primary-care settings : appraising their implementability using Normalization Process Theory

Tomas de Brún; Mary O’Reilly de-Brún; Evelyn van Weel-Baumgarten; Chris van Weel; Christopher Dowrick; Christos Lionis; Catherine O’Donnell; Nicola Burns; Frances Mair; Aristoula Saridaki; Maria Papadakaki; Christine Princz; Maria van den Muijsenbergh; Anne MacFarlane

BACKGROUND Guidelines and training initiatives (G/TIs) available to support communication in cross-cultural primary health care consultations are not routinely used. We need to understand more about levers and barriers to their implementation and identify G/TIs likely to be successfully implemented in practice. OBJECTIVE To report a mapping process used to identify G/TIs and to prospectively appraise their implementability, using Normalization Process Theory (NPT). METHODS RESTORE is a 4-year EU FP-7 project. We used purposeful and network sampling to identify experts in statutory and non-statutory agencies across Austria, England, Greece, Ireland, Scotland and the Netherlands who recommended G/TI data from the grey literature. In addition, a peer review of literature was conducted in each country. Resulting data were collated using a standardized Protocol Mapping Document. G/TIs were identified for inclusion by (i) initial elimination of incomplete G/TI material; (ii) application of filtering criteria; and (iii) application of NPT. RESULTS 20 G/TIs met selection criteria: 8 guidelines and 12 training initiatives. Most G/TIs were identified in the Netherlands (n = 7), followed by Ireland (n = 6) and England (n = 5). Fewer were identified in Scotland (n = 2), and none in Greece or Austria. The majority (n = 13) were generated without the inclusion of migrant service users. All 20 were prospectively appraised for potential implementability by applying NPT. CONCLUSIONS NPT is useful as a means of prospectively testing G/TIs for implementability. Results indicate a need to initiate meaningful engagement of migrants in the development of G/TIs. A European-based professional standard for development and assessment of cross-cultural communication resources is advised.


BMC Family Practice | 2014

Irrational prescribing of over-the-counter (OTC) medicines in general practice: testing the feasibility of an educational intervention among physicians in five European countries

Christos Lionis; Elena Petelos; Sue Shea; Georgia Bagiartaki; Ioanna Tsiligianni; Apostolos Kamekis; Vasiliki Tsiantou; Maria Papadakaki; Athina Tatsioni; Joanna Moschandreas; Aristoula Saridaki; Antonios Bertsias; Tomas Faresjö; Åshild Olsen Faresjö; Luc Martinez; Dominic Agius; Yesim Uncu; George Samoutis; Jiri Vlcek; Abobakr Abasaeed; Bodossakis Merkouris

BackgroundIrrational prescribing of over-the-counter (OTC) medicines in general practice is common in Southern Europe. Recent findings from a research project funded by the European Commission (FP7), the “OTC SOCIOMED”, conducted in seven European countries, indicate that physicians in countries in the Mediterranean Europe region prescribe medicines to a higher degree in comparison to physicians in other participating European countries. In light of these findings, a feasibility study has been designed to explore the acceptance of a pilot educational intervention targeting physicians in general practice in various settings in the Mediterranean Europe region.MethodsThis feasibility study utilized an educational intervention was designed using the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). It took place in geographically-defined primary care areas in Cyprus, France, Greece, Malta, and Turkey. General Practitioners (GPs) were recruited in each country and randomly assigned into two study groups in each of the participating countries. The intervention included a one-day intensive training programme, a poster presentation, and regular visits of trained professionals to the workplaces of participants. Reminder messages and email messages were, also, sent to participants over a 4-week period. A pre- and post-test evaluation study design with quantitative and qualitative data was employed. The primary outcome of this feasibility pilot intervention was to reduce GPs’ intention to provide medicines following the educational intervention, and its secondary outcomes included a reduction of prescribed medicines following the intervention, as well as an assessment of its practicality and acceptance by the participating GPs.ResultsMedian intention scores in the intervention groups were reduced, following the educational intervention, in comparison to the control group. Descriptive analysis of related questions indicated a high overall acceptance and perceived practicality of the intervention programme by GPs, with median scores above 5 on a 7-point Likert scale.ConclusionsEvidence from this intervention will estimate the parameters required to design a larger study aimed at assessing the effectiveness of such educational interventions. In addition, it could also help inform health policy makers and decision makers regarding the management of behavioural changes in the prescribing patterns of physicians in Mediterranean Europe, particularly in Southern European countries.


BMC Family Practice | 2011

Measuring the burden of herpes zoster and post herpetic neuralgia within primary care in rural Crete, Greece

Christos Lionis; Constantine I. Vardavas; Emmanouil K. Symvoulakis; Maria Papadakaki; Foteini Anastasiou; Maria Antonopoulou; Charalampos M Apostolakis; Stelios A Dimitrakopoulos; George I Fountakis; Ilias A Grammatikopoulos; John D Komninos; Dimitris Kounalakis; Eva S Ladoukaki; Kornilia Makri; Chrysa S Petraki; Nikos G Ploumis; Dimitra Prokopiadou; Ioanna Stefanaki; Nikos Tsakountakis; Ioanna Tsiligianni; Emmanouil N Tzortzis; Aggeliki Vasilaki; Theodoros K Vasilopoulos; George Vrentzos

BackgroundResearch has indicated that general practitioners (GPs) have good clinical judgment in regards to diagnosing and managing herpes zoster (HZ) within clinical practice in a country with limited resources for primary care and general practice. The objective of the current study was to assess the burden of HZ and post herpetic neuralgia (PHN) within rural general practices in Crete, Greece.MethodsThe current study took place within a rural setting in Crete, Greece during the period of November 2007 to November 2009 within the catchment area in which the Cretan Rural Practice-based Research Network is operating. In total 19 GPs from 14 health care units in rural Crete were invited to participate, covering a total turnover patient population of approximately 25, 000 subjects. For the purpose of this study an electronic record database was constructed and used as the main tool for monitoring HZ and PHN incidence. Stress related data was also collected with the use of the Short Anxiety Screening Test (SAST).ResultsThe crude incidence rate of HZ was 1.4/1000 patients/year throughout the entire network of health centers and satellite practices, while among satellite practices alone it was calculated at 1.3/1000 patients/year. Additionally, the standardised incidence density within satellite practices was calculated at 1.6/1000 patients/year. In regards to the stress associated with HZ and PHN, the latter were found to have lower levels of anxiety, as assessed through the SAST score (17.4 ± 3.9 vs. 21.1 ± 5.7; p = 0.029).ConclusionsThe implementation of an electronic surveillance system was feasible so as to measure the burden of HZ and PHN within the rural general practice setting in Crete.


BMC Medical Education | 2013

Measuring the effectiveness of an intensive IPV training program offered to Greek general practitioners and residents of general practice

Maria Papadakaki; Eleni Petridou; Manolis Kogevinas; Christos Lionis

BackgroundThe need for effective training of primary care physicians in the prevention, detection and handling of intimate partner violence (IPV) has been widely acknowledged, given its frequency in daily practice. The current intervention study aimed to measure changes in the actual IPV knowledge, perceived knowledge, perceived preparedness and detection ability of practicing general practitioners (GPs) and general practice residents, following an intensive IPV training program.MethodsA pre/post-test design with a control group was employed to compare changes in baseline measures of IPV at the post intervention stage and at 12 months. A total of 40 participants provided full data; 25 GPs (11 in the intervention and 14 in the control) and 15 residents (intervention only). Three scales of the PREMIS survey were used to draw information on the study outcomes.ResultsThe training program met high acceptance by both groups of participants and high practicality in clinical practice. The GPs in the intervention group performed better than the GPs in the control group on “Perceived preparedness” and “Perceived knowledge” in both the post-intervention (p = .012, r = .50 and p = .001, r = .68) and the 12-month follow-up (p = .024, r = .45 and p = .007, r = .54) as well as better than the residents in “Perceived preparedness” at post-intervention level (p = .037, r = .41). Residents on the other hand, performed better than the GPs in the intervention group on “Actual knowledge” at the 12-month follow-up (p = .012, r = .49). No significant improvements or between group differences were found in terms of the self-reported detection of IPV cases.ConclusionFurther studies are needed to decide whether residency training could serve as an early intervention stage for IPV training.


European Journal of General Practice | 2017

Exploring barriers to primary care for migrants in Greece in times of austerity: perspectives of service providers

Maria Papadakaki; Christos Lionis; Aristoula Saridaki; Christopher Dowrick; Tomas de Brún; Mary O’Reilly-de Brún; Catherine O’Donnell; Nicola Burns; Evelyn van Weel-Baumgarten; Maria van den Muijsenbergh; Wolfgang Spiegel; Anne MacFarlane

Abstract Background: Migration in Europe is increasing at an unprecedented rate. There is an urgent need to develop ‘migrant-sensitive healthcare systems’. However, there are many barriers to healthcare for migrants. Despite Greece’s recent, significant experiences of inward migration during a period of economic austerity, little is known about Greek primary care service providers’ experiences of delivering care to migrants. Objectives: To identify service providers’ views on the barriers to migrant healthcare. Methods: Qualitative study involving six participatory learning and action (PLA) focus group sessions with nine service providers. Data generation was informed by normalization process theory (NPT). Thematic analysis was applied to identify barriers to efficient migrant healthcare. Results: Three main provider and system-related barriers emerged: (a) emphasis on major challenges in healthcare provision, (b) low perceived control and effectiveness to support migrant healthcare, and (c) attention to impoverished local population. Conclusion: The study identified major provider and system-related barriers in the provision of primary healthcare to migrants. It is important for the healthcare system in Greece to provide appropriate supports for communication in cross-cultural consultations for its diversifying population.

Collaboration


Dive into the Maria Papadakaki's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Areti Lagiou

Technological Educational Institute of Athens

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Evanthia Sakellari

Technological Educational Institute of Athens

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joannes Chliaoutakis

Technological Educational Institute of Crete

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge