Maria Q. Baggstrom

Third-generation chemotherapy agents in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Purpose: To estimate the efficacy of third-generation (3G) chemotherapy agents (paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and irinotecan) on response and survival in stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: A meta-analysis was performed using trials identified through MEDLINE. Results on tumor response and survival were collected from randomized trials comparing 3G monotherapy versus best supportive care (BSC), 3G monotherapy versus second-generation (2G) platinum-based regimens, and 3G platinum-based regimens versus 2G platinum-based regimens. Results: Of the 2480 citations screened, 20 randomized controlled trials fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 19 trials were used in the analyses. The data from two, three-arm trials were used in two different comparisons. Five trials (n = 1029 patients) compared 3G monotherapy with BSC. The summary risk difference (RD) for 1-year survival favored 3G agents by 7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2%, 12%). Four trials (n = 871 patients) compared treatment with 3G monotherapy versus 2G platinum-based regimens. The response RD was −6% (95% CI: −11%, 0%), and the 1-year survival rate RD was 3% (95% CI: −3%, 10%), suggesting that despite a slightly higher response rate for 2G platinum-based regimens relative to 3G monotherapy, there is equivalency in survival. Twelve trials (n = 3995) compared 3G versus 2G platinum-based regimens. The RD for response was 12% (95% CI: 10%, 15%). A RD for 1-year was not calculated, because of heterogeneity among the trials. A subset analysis of 3G versus 2G platinum-based doublets revealed a 1-year survival-rate RD of 6% (95% CI: 2%, 10%), favoring 3G platinum-based regimens without evidence of heterogeneity. Conclusions: 3G agents have been a significant advance in the treatment of NSCLC.

A Phase II Study of AT-101 (Gossypol) in Chemotherapy-Sensitive Recurrent Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background: AT-101 is an oral inhibitor of the antiapoptotic Bcl proteins (Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, Bcl-W, and Mcl-1) and an inducer of the pro-apoptotic proteins noxa and puma. We studied the efficacy of AT-101 in patients with recurrent chemosensitive extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Methods: Patients with recurrent “sensitive” SCLC (defined as no progression during and no disease recurrence <2 months after completion of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy) were eligible. AT-101 was administered 20 mg orally daily for 21 of 28 days each cycle for up to six cycles. The primary end point was the objective response rate. Results: At the time of planned interim evaluation, none of the 14 evaluable patients enrolled in the first stage had any response to therapy, and the study was closed permanently for further accrual. Three patients (21%) achieved stable disease after two cycles of therapy. Grade 3 toxicities included anorexia, fatigue, and nausea/vomiting. Conclusions: AT-101 is not active in patients with recurrent chemosensitive SCLC.

Clinical next-generation sequencing in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

A clinical assay was implemented to perform next‐generation sequencing (NGS) of genes commonly mutated in multiple cancer types. This report describes the feasibility and diagnostic yield of this assay in 381 consecutive patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Distinctive Characteristics of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in the Young: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Analysis

Background: The median age of patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at presentation is 71 years. We conducted an analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data to assess whether the presentation and outcomes of NSCLC in younger patients (age ≤40 years) are different from that in older patients (age >40 years). Methods: We obtained the demographic, clinical, and outcomes data for all patients diagnosed with NSCLC from 1988 to 2003 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry. Patients were grouped by age at diagnosis into younger than or equal to 40 years (younger cohort) or older than 40 years (older cohort). Results: During the period analyzed, we identified 2775 patients with NSCLC in the younger cohort and 236,313 patients in the older cohort. Compared with the older group, the younger group had greater proportion of African Americans (19.2% versus 10.9%; p < 0.0001), Asian or Pacific Islander (10.3% versus 5.9%; p < 0.0001), women (48.7% versus 41.9%; p < 0.0001), and patients with stage IV disease (57.4% versus 43.0%; p < 0.0001). Adenocarcinoma was more common in younger patients than in the older patients (57.5% versus 45.2%; p < 0.0001). Squamous cell carcinoma was less prevalent in the younger cohort than in older cohort (12.5% versus 26.4%; p < 0.0001). Five-year overall survival and cancer specific survival were significantly better for younger patients than for older patients across all stages. Conclusions: There is a greater representation of African Americans, Asians or Pacific Islanders, women, and adenocarcinoma histology in the younger cohort of patients with NSCLC compared with the older cohort. Despite presenting with stage IV disease more often, the overall and cancer-specific survivals are better in younger cohort than in the older cohort.

Chemotherapy With or Without Maintenance Sunitinib for Untreated Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study—CALGB 30504 (Alliance)

PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of maintenance sunitinib after chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS The Cancer and Leukemia Group B 30504 trial was a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II study that enrolled patients before chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) or carboplatin area under the curve of 5 on day 1 plus etoposide 100 mg/m(2) per day on days 1 to 3 every 21 days for four to six cycles). Patients without progression were randomly assigned 1:1 to placebo or sunitinib 37.5 mg per day until progression. Cross-over after progression was allowed. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) from random assignment for maintenance placebo versus sunitinib using a one-sided log-rank test with α = .15; 80 randomly assigned patients provided 89% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.67. RESULTS One hundred forty-four patients were enrolled; 138 patients received chemotherapy. Ninety-five patients were randomly assigned; 10 patients did not receive maintenance therapy (five on each arm). Eighty-five patients received maintenance therapy (placebo, n = 41; sunitinib, n = 44). Grade 3 adverse events with more than 5% incidence were fatigue (19%), decreased neutrophils (14%), decreased leukocytes (7%), and decreased platelets (7%) for sunitinib and fatigue (10%) for placebo; grade 4 adverse events were GI hemorrhage (n = 1) and pancreatitis, hypocalcemia, and elevated lipase (n = 1; all in same patient) for sunitinib and thrombocytopenia (n = 1) and hypernatremia (n = 1) for placebo. Median PFS on maintenance was 2.1 months for placebo and 3.7 months for sunitinib (HR, 1.62; 70% CI, 1.27 to 2.08; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.60; one-sided P = .02). Median overall survival from random assignment was 6.9 months for placebo and 9.0 months for sunitinib (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.79 to 2.10; one-sided P = .16). Three sunitinib and no placebo patients achieved complete response during maintenance. Ten (77%) of 13 patients evaluable after cross-over had stable disease on sunitinib (6 to 27 weeks). CONCLUSION Maintenance sunitinib was safe and improved PFS in extensive-stage SCLC.

Postoperative Radiotherapy for Pathologic N2 Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Review of the National Cancer Data Base

PURPOSE To investigate the impact of modern postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on overall survival (OS) for patients with N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated nationally with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with pathologic N2 NSCLC who underwent complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy from 2006 to 2010 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base and stratified by use of PORT (≥ 45 Gy). A total of 4,483 patients were identified (PORT, n = 1,850; no PORT, n = 2,633). The impact of patient and treatment variables on OS was explored using Cox regression. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 22 months. On univariable analysis, improved OS correlated with younger age, treatment at an academic facility, female sex, urban population, higher income, lower Charlson comorbidity score, smaller tumor size, multiagent chemotherapy, resection with at least a lobectomy, and PORT. On multivariable analysis, improved OS remained independently predicted by younger age, female sex, urban population, lower Charlson score, smaller tumor size, multiagent chemotherapy, resection with at least a lobectomy, and PORT (hazard ratio, 0.886; 95% CI, 0.798 to 0.988). Use of PORT was associated with an increase in median and 5-year OS compared with no PORT (median OS, 45.2 v 40.7 months, respectively; 5-year OS, 39.3% [95% CI, 35.4% to 43.5%] v 34.8% [95% CI, 31.6% to 38.3%], respectively; P = .014). CONCLUSION For patients with N2 NSCLC after complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy, modern PORT seems to confer an additional OS advantage beyond that achieved with adjuvant chemotherapy alone.

The Effect of FDG-PET on the Stage Distribution of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose: To study the impact of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) on stage distribution and survival for patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We searched the Barnes-Jewish Hospital/Washington University School of Medicine database for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) diagnosed between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2004. Since the use of FDG-PET increased in our institution in the year 2000, patients were subdivided into those diagnosed before or after January 1, 2000. We compared the stage distribution of NSCLC before and after the year 2000. We also compared the survival for patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2004 staged with or without FDG-PET. Results: We identified 6118 patients diagnosed with NSCLC, with 3765 (61%) diagnosed before the year 2000 and 2362 (39%) thereafter. The use of FDG-PET was significantly increased after the year 2000 (37% versus 7%, p < 0.001) and there was a significant increase in the proportion of stage IV patients (30–37%, p < 0.001) with an associated decrease in stages I and III. Median overall survival was increased in all patients with stage IV disease diagnosed after the year 2000 (5.8 months versus 4.5 months). Patients with stage III or IV disease staged with FDG-PET scan also had improved survival compared with those undergoing conventional staging Conclusion: The increased use of FDG-PET was associated with a stage migration in patients with NSCLC, which may partially account for improvements in survival as compared with historical controls.

Barriers to enrollment in non-small cell lung cancer therapeutic clinical trials.

Introduction: Despite recent advances in treatment, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Therefore, there is a strong need for developing clinical trials in lung cancer therapeutics. Only a small fraction of patients with lung cancer are enrolled in clinical trials. It is critical to understand the barriers to participation in lung cancer clinical trials. Methods: We reviewed the outpatient charts of consecutive patients with non-small cell lung cancer who presented for initial evaluation or consultation for further therapeutic management to the thoracic medical oncology group at the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2006. Available and appropriate clinical trials specific to the histologic subtype and stage were presented to the patients routinely, and reasons for nonenrollment were documented. We collected information on age, gender, ethnicity, histology, stage, performance status (PS), and insurance status. Results: During the study period, 263 patients with non-small cell lung cancer were identified for the study. After initial screening, 183 patients had clinical trials available, which were appropriate for their diagnosis and stage of disease. One hundred one patients (55.2%) were ineligible for enrollment in a clinical trial. The most common reasons for ineligibility were poor PS (18%), need for emergent radiation (12%), lack of adequate staging information (6%), and comorbid conditions (4.9%). Despite being eligible for participation, 57 patients (31.1%) did not enroll in a clinical trial. Patient refusal accounted for 8.7%. The problems with transportation and distance from the medical center were reasons given for nonparticipation by 7.1%. Eleven patients (6%) did not participate in a clinical trial because of insurance issues. Ultimately, 25 patients (13.7%) were enrolled in a clinical trial. Conclusions: Poor PS, the need for emergent radiation, and patient refusal were the most common reasons for not participating in a clinical trial.

A Phase I Study of Bexarotene and Rosiglitazone in Patients with Refractory Cancers

Background: Preclinical studies have shown that binding of PPAR-γ (polysome-proliferator activated receptor gamma) and retinoid-X receptor (RXR) to their ligands can slow growth and promote differentiation of malignant cells. Rosiglitazone, a PPAR-γ ligand, is approved for treatment of insulin-resistant diabetes, and bexarotene, a RXR ligand, is approved for treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. After binding to its ligand, the PPAR-γ receptor heterodimerizes with the RXR resulting in synergistic effects in preclinical models. We conducted a phase I study of bexarotene and rosiglitazone to define the MTD of rosiglitazone in this combination regimen. Methods: Patients with resistant solid tumors received bexarotene 300 mg/m2/day. The starting dose of rosiglitazone was 4 mg/day and was escalated in five cohorts by 2-mg increments up to 12 mg/day. Both drugs were continued until disease progression or toxicity was observed. Patients received atorvastatin 10 mg/day to control bexarotene-related hypertriglyceridemia. Results: Twenty-three patients were enrolled, with a median of 4 prior regimens (range 0–8). The study was closed after completing the 12 mg/day cohort without encountering dose-limiting toxicity. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were hypertriglyceridemia (17%), dyspnea (9%), nausea (9%), and dehydration (9%). No objective responses were observed. Conclusions: The combination of bexarotene (300 mg/m2/day) and rosiglitazone (12 mg/day) is safe and feasible but did not result in objective responses in heavily pretreated patients with solid tumors. This combination is suitable for evaluation in other conditions such as hematologic malignancies and inflammatory diseases.

Neoadjuvant docetaxel/estramustine prior to radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy in high risk localized prostate cancer: A phase II trial

BACKGROUND Patients with locally advanced or organ confined, high risk, prostate cancer are at significant risk of having disease recurrence despite definitive local therapy. We evaluated the 2-year progression-free survival of subjects treated with chemotherapy administered prior to definitive therapy with surgery or radiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients (n = 24) with locally advanced and high risk localized prostate cancer were treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel 36 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for 3 weeks and estramustine 140 mg orally 3 times daily for 3 consecutive days every 28 days prior to definitive treatment with prostatectomy or radiation. RESULTS All evaluable patients, except 1, completed the proposed cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with minimal dose reductions or delays. Of the 22 evaluable patients, 12 underwent radical prostatectomy and 10 underwent external beam radiation therapy. Twenty-one of 22 patients achieved a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction > 25%. There were no pathologic complete responses. With a median follow-up of 24 months, the 2-year progression-free survival was 45%. CONCLUSIONS Our findings support the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with men with high risk, locally advanced prostate adenocarcinoma, although the relative contributions of androgen deprivation therapy and docetaxel cannot be determined. The effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in preventing prostate cancer relapses should be studied in a randomized trial.