Maria Regina Chalita

Shifting trends in in vitro antibiotic susceptibilities for common ocular isolates during a period of 15 years.

PURPOSE To assess the in vitro susceptibility of the most common ocular bacterial isolates to several antibiotics and verify changing trends in the antibiotic susceptibility in a 15-year period. DESIGN Experimental study. METHODS All cultures positive for Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS), Streptococcus sp, and Pseudomonas sp in conjunctival (n = 4,585) and corneal (n = 3,779) samples from patients seen at the Federal University of São Paulo from 1985 to 2000 were evaluated. Cultures were performed in liquid and solid media, and susceptibility tests were done to amikacin, gentamicin, neomycin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, cephalothin, and chloramphenicol. RESULTS Amikacin and neomycin showed an improvement of their sensitivity during the study period (88%-95% and 50%-85%, respectively) for corneal and conjunctival samples. Gentamicin and tobramycin revealed a decrease of sensitivity in time, from 95% to less than 80% in corneal and conjunctival samples. Ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, and ofloxacin had good sensitivity to all evaluated bacteria, better in conjunctiva (95%) than in cornea (90%). Sensitivity of S. aureus to cephalothin decreased during the study but was still 98% for CNS. Chloramphenicol had good sensitivity to S. aureus (85% in corneal and 92%in conjunctival samples), CNS (87% and 88.5%), and Streptococcus sp (95% and 96%). CONCLUSIONS Gentamicin, tobramycin, and cephalothin decreased their in vitro susceptibility to all tested pathogens. The fluoroquinolones remained a good choice in the treatment of ocular infections, with high suscep-tibility to all pathogens tested. Chloramphenicol also revealed an increase in its susceptibility to all bacteria evaluated.

Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, reading speed, and wavefront analysis: pseudophakic eye with multifocal IOL (ReSTOR) versus fellow phakic eye in non-presbyopic patients.

PURPOSE To compare the visual performance in the pseudophakic eye and the phakic eye in four patients who underwent unilateral intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. METHODS Four patients presenting with unilateral cataract underwent ReSTOR (Alcon Laboratories, Ft Worth, Tex) IOL implantation in their nondominant eye, targeting emmetropia. RESULTS Uncorrected near visual acuity was >20/32 in all operated eyes and best spectacle-corrected distance visual acuity was 20/16 for two eyes, 20/25 for one eye, and 20/32 for one eye. Reading speed was similar between the eyes, but not for critical print size. Contrast sensitivity was lower in the pseudophakic eyes. Wavefront analysis showed no considerable difference in total high order aberrations, coma, and spherical aberration between eyes for all patients. CONCLUSIONS In young patients with unilateral cataract surgery, unilateral multifocal IOL implantation provides satisfactory visual acuity and may be considered an alternative treatment option in this patient population.

Postoperative wavefront analysis and contrast sensitivity of a multifocal apodized diffractive IOL (ReSTOR) and three monofocal IOLs.

PURPOSE To compare visual acuity, total and high order wavefront aberrations (coma, spherical aberration, and other terms of high order aberration), and contrast sensitivity in 105 eyes implanted with 4 different types of intraocular lenses (IOLs) (1 multifocal apodized diffractive IOL and 3 monofocal IOLs). METHODS A prospective study comparing four types of IOLs (Alcon ReSTOR [50 eyes], Alcon Acrysof MA30AC [20 eyes], Alcon Acrysof SA60AT [20 eyes], and Mediphacos Acqua IOL [15 eyes]) was carried out. All eyes were targeted for emmetropia. Complete ophthalmological examination, including uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson chart), and wavefront analysis, was performed 2 months postoperatively. RESULTS All eyes in all groups had BSCVA > or = 20/32 postoperatively. Mean total aberration root-mean-square (RMS) values were: 0.72 +/- 0.25 microm (ReSTOR), 0.94 +/- 0.26 microm (MA30), 0.84 +/- 0.23 microm (SA60), and 2.04 +/- 0.77 microm (Acqua). Mean higher order aberration values were: 0.35 +/- 0.15 microm (ReSTOR), 0.41+/- 0.12 microm (MA30), 0.43 +/- 0.13 microm (SA60), and 0.85 +/- 0.50 microm (Acqua). The Acqua IOL showed statistically significant more total and higher order aberrations when compared with the other IOLs (P < .05). The ReSTOR IOL showed statistically significant less induction of spherical aberration when compared to the monofocal IOLs (P < .05). Mean contrast sensitivity values were: 1.64 +/- 0.08 (ReSTOR), 1.72 +/- 0.08 (MA30), 1.70 +/- 0.07 (SA60), and 1.65 +/- 0.11 (Acqua). CONCLUSIONS Different types of IOLs resulted in measurably different postoperative higher order aberration patterns. The multifocal apodized diffractive IOL (ReSTOR) induced significantly less spherical aberration compared to the monofocal IOLs. Contrast sensitivity revealed better values with MA30 and SA60 IOLs when compared to ReSTOR. The integration of wavefront technology in evaluating pseudophakic patients represents a step towards better understanding and analyzing postoperative visual quality.

Correlation of Aberrations With Visual Symptoms Using Wavefront Analysis in Eyes After Laser in situ Keratomileusis

PURPOSE To evaluate the information assessed with the Alcon LADARWave wavefront measurement device and correlate it with visual symptoms in eyes previously treated with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and to analyze the influence of scotopic pupil size on visual symptoms. METHODS One hundred and five eyes of 58 patients who underwent LASIK were evaluated. Wavefront measurements were assessed using the Alcon LADARWave device. Visual symptoms were correlated to higher order aberrations in three different pupil sizes (5 mm, 7 mm, and scotopic pupil size). Generalized estimating equations were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS In eyes after LASIK, visual symptoms analysis showed positive correlation of double vision with total coma and with horizontal coma for the 5-mm and 7-mm pupil sizes, negative correlation between starburst and total coma for the 7-mm pupil size, positive correlation of double vision with horizontal coma, and glare and starburst with spherical aberration and with total aberrations. Scotopic pupil size had a positive association with starburst and negative association with double vision. CONCLUSION The LADARWave wavefront measurement device is a valuable diagnostic tool in measuring ocular aberrations in eyes after LASIK. A strong correlation between visual symptoms and ocular aberrations, such as monocular diplopia with coma, and starburst and glare with spherical aberration, suggest this device is valuable in diagnosing symptomatic LASIK-induced aberrations. Horizontal coma was correlated with double vision, while vertical coma was not, demonstrating a greater sensitivity with horizontally oriented multifocality.

Wavefront-guided Surface Ablation With Prophylactic Use of Mitomycin C After a Buttonhole Laser in situ Keratomileusis Flap

PURPOSE To describe the surgical outcome of a patient who had a previous buttonhole after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and 3 months later, had wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with topical mitomycin C 0.02%. METHODS A 38-year-old man underwent bilateral LASIK for correction of myopic astigmatism. A buttonhole in his right eye LASIK flap occurred, but the surgeon decided to proceed with ablation due to the small size of the buttonhole. After LASIK, the patient complained of monocular diplopia in his right eye with 20/30 best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. Wavefront analysis showed a large amount of higher order aberrations, especially coma. Slit-lamp examination revealed a moderate buttonhole scar. Three months after LASIK, the patient underwent wavefront-guided PRK with application of topical mitomycin C 0.02% on the stromal bed, for a duration of 2 minutes. RESULTS One month after wavefront-guided PRK, his uncorrected visual acuity was 20/25 in the right eye, with no symptoms. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity in the right eye was 20/15 with +0.25 -0.50 x 110 degrees. No haze or scar was seen on slit-lamp examination. Wavefront analysis showed a decrease in higher order aberrations, especially coma and spherical aberration. CONCLUSIONS Wavefront-guided PRK with prophylactic topical mitomycin C was effective in treating a patient with visual symptoms and loss of BSCVA after a LASIK flap buttonhole. No delayed epithelial healing, side effects or complications were noted due to mitomycin C.

Alcon CustomCornea wavefront-guided retreatments after laser in situ keratomileusis.

PURPOSE To evaluate the outcome of wavefront-guided ablations for the correction of residual myopia and astigmatism after standard laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS Twenty nine eyes of 26 patients who underwent wavefront-guided LASIK retreatment with Alcon CustomCornea (Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, Tex) were evaluated. Complete ophthalmologic examination, corneal topography, and wavefront measurements were performed. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, and wavefront analysis were evaluated preoperatively, 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. Wavefront measurements were assessed using the LADARWave device. Statistical analysis was performed using the McNemar test and percentages of success. RESULTS One week postoperatively, UCVA was > or =20/40 in 100% of eyes (> or =20/20 in 31%) and BSCVA was > or =20/40 in 100% (> or =20/20 in 73%). Wavefront analysis showed a decrease in total aberrations, high order aberrations, defocus, coma, spherical aberration, and other terms of higher order aberrations at 1-week follow-up. Three months postoperatively, UCVA was > or =20/40 in 100% of eyes (> or =20/20 in 38%) and BSCVA was > or =20/40 in 100% (> or =20/20 in 81%). Six months postoperatively, UCVA was > or =20/40 in 100% of eyes (> or =20/20 in 60%) and BSCVA was > or =20/40 in 100% (> or =20/20 in 90%). Wavefront analysis showed decrease in total aberration, high order aberration, defocus, coma, and spherical aberration. CONCLUSION Wavefront-guided LASIK retreatment in post-LASIK eyes represents a good option for laser vision correction. All eyes showed reduction in pre-existing total aberrations. Some high order aberration components decreased in this initial series. Further follow-up is necessary to assess the initial predictability of wavefront-guided LASIK upgrade.

Laser epithelial keratomileusis: Outcome of initial cases performed by an experienced surgeon

PURPOSE To evaluate refractive outcome and objective clinical data, and determine efficacy, predictability, and safety of laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for myopic treatments. METHODS We performed a retrospective non-comparative single-surgeon case series on the first 20 LASEK procedures (Alcon LADARVision 4000 laser). Mean patient age was 41.2 years (range 21 to 60 yr): 13 men and 7 women. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -6.47+/-2.78 D. Corneal haze, uncorrected and spectacle-corrected visual acuity and manifest refraction were evaluated. RESULTS Of 20 eyes studied, 3 were corrected for monovision. In the non-monovision group, 20/40 or better visual acuity was achieved in 94% (16 eyes) at 1 month, 100% (13 eyes) at 3 months, and 91% (10 eyes) at 6 months after LASEK; 20/20 or better was achieved in 12% (2 eyes) at 1 month, 46% (6 eyes) at 3 months, and 45% (5 eyes) at 6 months. Corneal haze at 1 month was grade 0.5 in 35% (7 eyes), 1 in 20% (4 eyes) and 2 in 10% (2 eyes). At 3 months, 62% (12 eyes) had grade 0.5 and 31% (6 eyes) had grade 1. At 6 months, 58% (12 eyes) had grade 0.5, 25% (5 eyes) had grade 1, and 8% (2 eyes) had grade 2. CONCLUSIONS LASEK is a challenging procedure. Creating the epithelial flap is not simple and may have contributed to the high haze incidence in our study.

Corneal Haze Following PRK With Mitomycin C as a Retreatment Versus Prophylactic Use in the Contralateral Eye

PURPOSE To report photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) treated with mitomycin C (MMC) for previous corneal haze in one eye and PRK with MMC to prevent corneal haze formation in the fellow eye. METHODS A 40-year-old woman underwent PRK with MMC to treat previous corneal haze (secondary to previous PRK without MMC) for residual refractive error of +0.50 +0.25 x 165 in the left eye and PRK with MMC to prevent corneal haze in the right eye. RESULTS Postoperative slit-lamp examination revealed no haze in the right eye, but continued mild haze in the left eye. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with PRK and MMC for previous corneal haze is not as effective as primary PRK with MMC in preventing postoperative corneal haze formation.

Resposta cicatricial corneana em diferentes modalidades de cirurgia refrativa

The corneal wound healing response following refractive procedures represents a subject of high relevance, due to its direct influence on the postoperative results. Technical modifications of current refractive procedures, like the automated flap creation with the femtosecond laser, LASEK, PRK with mitomycin C and Epi-LASIK have been proposed as alternatives to traditional LASIK and PRK. Several theoretical advantages have encouraged the diffusion of these new techniques; however, a better understanding of the corneal wound healing response following these procedures is required. The present text proposes a review of the corneal wound healing characteristics following different modalities of refractive surgical procedures.

Rejeição corneana pós transplante de córnea: análise de dados do Banco de Olhos do Hospital São Paulo - Escola Paulista de Medicina

Purpose: Among all grafts, corneal transplantation is the most commonly performed. Graft outcome is usually good, but some cases failure due to rejection can be observed.There are some well-known risk factors for corneal graft rejection. The purpose of this study is to analyze cases of corneal graft rejection in our Service focusing on peculiar risk factors. Methods: We analyzed 113 cases of penetrating keratoplas-ties performed in 1998. Cases of corneal graft rejection were evaluated in relation to preoperative diagnosis, existence of synechia, corneal vascularization, increased intraocular pressure, previous graft rejection, donor age, time of enu-cleation and preservation of the donor cornea and the surgeons surgical experience. Results: We were able to identify 20 (17.69%) cases of graft rejection. Among these 9 had synechia, 4 corneal neovas-cularization, 8 increased intraocular pressure and 7 pre-vious graft rejection. Conclusions: Our results are in agreement with those of the literature. It seems that the surgeons experience plays a role in corneal graft rejection. It is important to call attention to the fact that reference services handle difficult and more complicated cases which may be at a higher risk to rejection.