María Teresa Bascarán

Cardiovascular risk in patients with bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND To date, little is known about cardiovascular risk (CVR) in terms of coronary heart disease (CHD) and cardiovascular mortality risk (CMR) in patients with bipolar disorder. This study provides data on the overall risk of any fatal or non-fatal coronary heart disease (CHD) and on the cardiovascular mortality risk (CMR) within 10 years in these patients. METHODS Naturalistic, cross-sectional, multicenter study conducted in Spain. Patients were evaluated for cardiovascular risk using the Framinghan function (CHD) and the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) function (CMR). RESULTS The mean age was 46.6 years and 49% were male. Forty-six percent were in remission. Ten-year CHD risk was 7.6% (males 10.2% versus females 4.7%, p<0.001) and 10-year CMR was 1.8% (males 2.2% versus females 1.3%, p 0.161). Fifty-one percent smoked and 34% was obese. Metabolic syndrome was present in 22.4% of the sample (35.6% according to AHA and NHLBI criteria). Cardiovascular risk significantly increases with age, body mass index and presence of metabolic syndrome. LIMITATIONS The cross-sectional design of the study. CONCLUSIONS Cardiovascular risk is high in patients with bipolar disorder. It is associated with age, body mass index and metabolic syndrome. Psychiatrists should be aware of this issue and carefully monitor these patients for cardiovascular risk factors, including cigarette smoking, as part of the standard of care when treating them.

Psychometric evaluation of the negative syndrome of schizophrenia

In this paper, we reviewed the available instruments for assessing the negative syndrome of schizophrenia, describing their strengths and weaknesses. Current instruments were classified into two categories according to their content validity and assessment approach as first- or second-generation instruments. The BPRS, SANS, the SENS and the PANSS belong to the first generation, while the BNSS, the CAINS and the MAP-SR belong to the second generation. The NSA can be considered a transitional instrument between the two. First-generation instruments have more content validity problems than second-generation instruments do, as they do not accurately reflect the currently accepted negative syndrome (they do not include all negative symptoms and signs or they include symptoms from other dimensions). They also have more problems relative to the use of behavioural referents instead of internal experiences of deficits when assessing symptoms, which may lead to measuring functioning instead of negative symptoms. Further research needs to be done in this area in order to ensure the evaluation of primary negative symptoms and internal experiences involved in negative symptoms rather than external behaviours.

Long term outcomes of pharmacological treatments for opioid dependence: does methadone still lead the pack?

The aim of this review was to update and summarize the scientific knowledge on the long term outcomes of the different pharmacological treatment options for opioid dependence currently available and to provide a critical discussion on the different treatment options based on these results. We performed a literature search using the PubMed databases and the reference lists of the identified articles. Data from research show that the three pharmacological options reviewed are effective treatments for opioid dependence with positive long term outcomes. However, each one has its specific target population and setting. While methadone and buprenorphine are first line options, heroin‐assisted treatment is a second line option for those patients refractory to treatment with methadone with concomitant severe physical, mental, social and/or functional problems. Buprenorphine seems to be the best option for use in primary care offices. The field of opioid dependence treatment is poised to undergo a process of reinforcement and transformation. Further efforts from researchers, clinicians and authorities should be made to turn new pharmacological options into clinical reality and to overcome the structural and functional obstacles that maintenance programmes face in combatting opioid dependence.

Is the biological nature of depressive symptoms in borderline patients without concomitant Axis I pathology idiosyncratic? Sleep EEG comparison with recurrent brief, major depression and control subjects

The relationship between borderline personality disorder (BPD) and the affective disorders is controversial, and we have previously compared BPD and major depression (MD) with endocrinological measures and sleep electroencephalography (S-EEG). We have also compared BPD, MD and recurrent brief depression (RBD) using endocrine tests. We have proposed that depressive symptoms in BPD might have a biological substrate that is distinct from those in depressive illness without comorbid BPD. BPD has been proposed to overlap with RBD, which has been found to share perturbed biological substrates with MD, but we have not found the same biological pattern in BPD. When endocrinological data in BPD, MD and RBD were compared, we did not find evidence of biological linkage between BPD and RBD. To clarify the biological nature of depressive symptoms in BPD, we examined S-EEG characteristics in BPD, RBD, MD and controls. Among 20 BPD patients, 12 were also diagnosed as having clinical RBD. BPD patients showed differences in sleep continuity and especially in sleep architecture compared with RBD, MD and controls. BPD with or without clinical RBD did not show significant differences in any parameter. BPD with or without clinical RBD had less slow sleep activity not only than MD but also than non-borderline RBD patients. We propose that although BPD patients can have concomitant MD, they often exhibit a specific BPD-associated affective syndrome that is different from both MD and non-borderline RBD in the quality and duration of symptoms and the biological substrate.

Validation of the Spanish Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP) in outpatients with stable and unstable schizophrenia.

Abstract Introduction The main long-term therapeutic goals of schizophrenia should go beyond the symptoms and include the improvement of patients’ psychosocial functioning and quality of life. The aim of this study was to validate the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale in Spanish outpatients with schizophrenia. Materials and methods Naturalistic, 6-month follow-up, multicentre study. 244 patients and 76 controls were evaluated using the PSP, the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), and the Clinical Global Impression–Severity (CGI-S) and Change (CGI-C) scales. Results Internal reliability = 0.87. Test-retest reliability = 0.98. Construct validity = 1 component that explained 73.2% of the variance. Convergent validity: Pearson correlation coefficient between PSP and SOFAS= 0.95 (p Conclusion The Spanish PSP is a reliable, valid and sensitive instrument for measuring functioning in outpatients with schizophrenia. As a brief, clinician-rated instrument, the PSP scale seems to be appropriate for use in everyday clinical practice as a mean of identifying and monitoring changes in patients functioning.

A cross-cultural comparison between Spain and the USA: Temperament and character distribution by sex and age

The Unified Biosocial Theory of Personality developed by Cloninger has been applied in different cultures. Distribution by age and sex of the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) dimensions were assessed cross-culturally for samples in Spain and the USA. Three non-clinical samples were included: i) 404 participants from Asturias (Spain); ii) 240 participants from Burgos (Spain); and iii) 300 adults from St. Louis (USA). Each participant was assessed by means of the TCI. A significant negative correlation between NS and both HA (r=-0.329; P<0.01) and P (r=-0.217; P<0.01) was found in the study sample, as well as significant effects of age in NS, HA, RD, and C for women and in NS and HA for men, and also of sex in HA and RD. Personality dimensions for the two Spanish samples appear to be similar (differences in HA4 and RD) compared to those for the US sample (differences in NS, HA, RD and P). Findings support Cloningers theory about differences between men and women, but not regarding the intercorrelations between temperament dimensions.

Evolución de la prevalencia administrativa de los trastornos mentales durante 13 años en Asturias (norte de España)

INTRODUCTION The study of administrative prevalence from cumulative psychiatric case registers allows the mental health state of the studied region and the functioning of its Health Services to be estimated. METHODS Data were extracted from the Asturias Cumulative Psychiatric Case Register (RACPAS) between January 1st 1998 and December 3 th 2010. Characteristics of the population of the catchment area were studied, and their relationship with the administrative prevalence was analyzed. RESULTS The mean population in the studied period was 1,078,406 inhabitants. The Fritz index and the Youth and replacement indices of the active population decreased throughout the period. There was no significant increase in the prevalence of organic mental disorders, psychosis, mood disorders, and substance use in males, or behavioral disorders associated with somatic factors and physiological dysfunctions in females. There were significant gender differences in the prevalence of all disorders, except for personality disorders and organic mental disorders. Population ageing had a significant influence on the increase in the prevalence of most mental disorders in both males and females. CONCLUSIONS A slight general increase in the administrative prevalence of mental disorders is observed during the studied period, and it was influenced by population ageing.

A Review of Quality-of-Life Assessment Measures in Schizophrenia: Limitations and Future Developments

The assessment of quality of life (QoL) in patients with schizophrenia is an area of growing concern since it is considered an essential distal outcome for clinical trials and patient management (Auquier et al. 2003; Awad and Voruganti 2012) according to the patient-reported outcome (PRO) movement in medicine (see Fig. 5.1). Its evaluation is founded on the notion that every patient has a right to self-determination in health-care decisions and his/her subjective perspective should be considered in both diagnosis and care planning processes (Awad and Voruganti 2012; Badia et al. 1999; Bilker et al. 2003).