Maria Teresa Bourlon

Local control rates of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to the bone using stereotactic body radiation therapy: Is RCC truly radioresistant?

PURPOSE We report the radiographic and clinical response rate of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) compared with conventional fractionated external beam radiation therapy (CF-EBRT) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) bone lesions treated at our institution. METHODS AND MATERIALS Forty-six consecutive patients were included in the study, with 95 total lesions treated (50 SBRT, 45 CF-EBRT). We included patients who had histologic confirmation of primary RCC and radiographic evidence of metastatic bone lesions. The most common SBRT regimen used was 27 Gy in 3 fractions. RESULTS Median follow-up was 10 months (range, 1-64 months). Median time to symptom control between SBRT and CF-EBRT were 2 (range, 0-6 weeks) and 4 weeks (range, 0-7 weeks), respectively. Symptom control rates with SBRT and CF-EBRT were significantly different (P = .020) with control rates at 10, 12, and 24 months of 74.9% versus 44.1%, 74.9% versus 39.9%, and 74.9% versus 35.7%, respectively. The median time to radiographic failure and unadjusted pain progression was 7 months in both groups. When controlling for gross tumor volume, dose per fraction, smoking, and the use of systemic therapy, biologically effective dose ≥80 Gy was significant for clinical response (hazard ratio [HR], 0.204; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.043-0.963; P = .046) and radiographic (HR, 0.075; 95% CI, 0.013-0.430; P = .004). When controlling for gross tumor volume and total dose, biologically effective dose ≥80 Gy was again predictive of clinical local control (HR, 0.140; 95% CI, 0.025-0.787; P = .026). Toxicity rates were low and equivalent in both groups, with no grade 4 or 5 toxicity reported. CONCLUSIONS SBRT is both safe and effective for treating RCC bone metastases, with rapid improvement in symptoms after treatment and more durable clinical and radiographic response rate. Future prospective trials are needed to further define efficacy and toxicity of treatment, especially in the setting of targeted agents.

The Epidemiological, Mechanistic and Potential Clinical Role of Androgen Receptor (AR) in Urothelial Carcinoma.

The androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-inducible transcription factor that regulates target gene expression. Androgen signaling has been considered a putative explanation for gender differences in urothelial carcinoma (UC) incidence. In the absence of established risk factors, men still experience a threefold risk of UC as compared to women. Multiple investigations to modulate the AR have been performed with in vitro and in vivo models of UC. Down-regulation of the AR has been shown to inhibit UC growth through increased apoptosis, decreased cell proliferation, and decreased cell migration. AR activation up-regulates EGFR and HER2/neu expression contributing to UC progression. UC is more easily induced in male than female models and the incidence of chemically-induced UC is decreased by castration and the addition of estrogens; it is increased by testosterone. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been postulated to be androgen-driven in UC and affects chemotherapy sensitivity. UC has not achieved the same therapeutic advances that have been seen in other tumor types in recent years. Androgen-driven events may account for some of the treatment resistance seen in this tumor type. Novel agents which disrupt androgen synthesis and/or AR signaling are in development and some (abiraterone, enzalutamide) are approved for advanced prostate cancer. Biomarker AR-driven clinical trials of highly effective anti-androgen therapy (HEAT) agents in UC present a promising picture.

Impact of additional cytogenetic abnormalities on clinical outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia: First report in a Latin American population.

e19023Background: Additional cytogenetic abnormalities (ACAs) that arise within Philadelphia-positive cells in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), have been reported in 10%, 30%, and 90% ...

Clinical significance of sunitinib-associated macrocytosis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Increases in the mean corpuscular volume (MCV) have been observed in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) on tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment; however, its association with progression‐free‐survival (PFS) is unknown. We aimed to characterize TKI‐associated macrocytosis in mRCC and its relationship with PFS. Retrospective review of data on macrocytosis and thyroid dysfunction on mRCC patients treated with sunitinib and/or sorafenib. These results are evaluated in the context of our previous report on the association of hypothyroidism in this setting. We assessed PFS as clinically defined by the treating physician. Seventy‐four patients, 29 of whom received both drugs, were included. A treatment period was defined as time from initiation to discontinuation of either sunitinib or sorafenib; 103 treatment periods [sorafenib (47), sunitinib (56)] were analyzed. Macrocytosis was found in 55 and 8% of sunitinib‐ and sorafenib‐treated patients, respectively, P < 0.001. The median time to developing macrocytosis was 3 months (m, range 1–7). Median PFS in sunitinib‐treated patients was 11 m (95% CI: 6–19). Median PFS was higher among those with macrocytosis compared to normocytosis (21 m [95% CI: 11–25] vs. 4 m [95% CI: 3–8] P = 0.0001). Macrocytosis and hypothyroidism were two significant predictors of PFS. The greatest difference in PFS among all patients was observed in patients with both macrocytosis and hypothyroidism (25 m), compared to the normocytic and euthyroid patients (5 m) (P < 0.0001). Sunitinib‐related macrocytosis was associated with prolonged PFS, and concurrent development of hypothyroidism and macrocytosis further prolonged PFS. Increased MCV may have a role as a predictive biomarker for sunitinib. Prospective studies accounting for other known prognostic factors are needed to confirm this finding.