Maria Teresa Herdeiro

Determinants of under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review.

A voluntary reporting system of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is fundamental to drug safety surveillance but under-reporting is its major limitation. This bibliographic review sought to assess the influence of personal and professional characteristics on ADR reporting and to identify knowledge and attitudes associated with ADR reporting.A systematic review was conducted using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. We included papers that were published in English, French and Spanish, and covered a study population made up of health professionals. In each case, the following data were extracted: study population; workplace; study type; sample size; type of questionnaire; type of scale for measuring knowledge; response rate; personal and professional factors; and knowledge and attitudes (based on Inman’s ‘seven deadly sins’) associated with reporting.Based on a search of computerized databases, we identified a total of 657 papers in MEDLINE and 973 in EMBASE. In all, the review covered 45 papers that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Medical specialty was the professional characteristic most closely associated with under-reporting in 76% of studies involving physicians. Other factors associated with under-reporting were ignorance (only severe ADRs need to be reported) in 95%; diffidence (fear of appearing ridiculous for reporting merely suspected ADRs) in 72%; lethargy (an amalgam of procrastination, lack of interest or time to find a report card, and other excuses) in 77%; indifference (the one case that an individual doctor might see could not contribute to medical knowledge) and insecurity (it is nearly impossible to determine whether or not a drug is responsible for a particular adverse reaction) in 67%; and complacency (only safe drugs are allowed on the market) in 47% of studies.While personal and professional factors display a weak influence, the knowledge and attitudes of health professionals appear to be strongly related with reporting in a high proportion of studies. This result may have important implications in terms of public health, if knowledge and attitudes are viewed as potentially modifiable factors.

Physicians' attitudes and adverse drug reaction reporting : a case-control study in Portugal.

AbstractObjectives: Voluntary adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting is fundamental to medical drug safety surveillance; however, substantial under-reporting exists and is the main limitation of the system. This study sought to identify the knowledge-and attitude-related factors associated with ADR reporting by physicians in Northern Portugal. Methods: Case-control study covering a population of National Health Service medical practitioners. The 88 cases comprised physicians who had reported at least one ADR to the drug surveillance unit from the year 2000 to the date of enrolment in the study. The 771 controls were randomly selected from among the remaining physicians. All interviews were conducted using a self-administered questionnaire. Knowledge and attitudes regarding spontaneous ADR reporting were based on Inman’s ‘seven deadly sins’. Agreement with the questions included in the questionnaire was measured using a horizontal, continuous visual analogue scale, which was unnumbered. Recorded answers were read in a range from zero (total disagreement) to ten (total agreement). We used logistic regression to determine the ADR reporting adjusted odds ratio (ORadj) for a change in exposure corresponding to the interquartile range for each attitude. Results: A total of 397 questionnaires were received from 731 eligible practitioners (54.3%). Physicians who worked in primary versus hospital care (ORadj 7.74 [95% CI 1.85, 32.30]) and in general medicine (ORadj 1.05 [95% CI 0.30, 3.69]) versus medical specialities were more likely to report ADRs. In contrast, physicians working in the medical-surgical/surgical fields were significantly less likely to report ADRs compared with medical specialists (ORadj 0.10 [95% CI 0.02, 0.46]). Attitudes to ADRs were strongly associated with reporting probability. Hence, an interquartile decrease in any of the following attitudes increased the probability of reporting by: (i) 87% (p < 0.05) for complacency (the belief that really serious ADRs are well documented by the time a drug is marketed); (ii) 109% (p < 0.01) for insecurity (the belief that it is nearly impossible to determine whether a drug is responsible for a particular adverse reaction); (iii) 143% (p < 0.001) for diffidence (the belief that one would only report an ADR if one were sure that it was related to the use of a particular drug); (iv) 220% (p < 0.001) for indifference (the belief that the one case an individual doctor might see could not contribute to medical knowledge); and (v) 71% (p < 0.05) for ignorance (the belief that it is only necessary to report serious or unexpected ADRs). Conclusion: This study shows that there are attitudes strongly associated with under-reporting. The implementation of purpose-designed educational interventions based on the attitudes identified in this study may serve to improve reporting substantially.

Influence of Pharmacists' attitudes on adverse drug reaction reporting : A case-control study in portugal

AbstractIntroduction: Pharmacists can play a fundamental role in adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting, although the factors that affect underreporting among these professionals are unknown. The objectives of this study were to identify (i) professional or demographic characteristics; and (ii) attitudes associated with pharmacists’ ADR reporting in northern Portugal. Methods: We conducted a case-control study on a population of pharmacists employed in hospital and community pharmacies across Portugal’s Northern Regional Health Authority catchment area in 2003. Cases (n = 34) comprised pharmacists who had reported at least one ADR to the northern region’s drug surveillance unit, and controls (n = 280) were randomly sampled from pharmacists who had never reported an ADR. All were interviewed using a mail questionnaire. Most attitudes were based on Inman’s ‘seven deadly sins’ and were measured using a continuous visual analogue scale. Answers were recorded in a range from 0 (total disagreement) to 10 (total agreement). Logistic regression was used to determine the ADR reporting adjusted odds ratio (OR) for a change in exposure corresponding to the interquartile range for each attitude. Results: The response rate was 86.8%. Reporting probability proved higher among hospital versus community pharmacists (adjusted OR 20.0; 95 CI 3.3, 125.0; p < 0.001). Attitudes to ADRs were strongly associated with reporting probability. Hence, an interquartile decrease in any of the following attitudes increased the probability of reporting by (i) 223% (95% CI 51, 595; p < 0.05) for “Really serious ADRs are well documented by the time a drug is marketed”; (ii) 240% (95% CI 89, 508; p = 0.002) for “I would only report an ADR if I were sure that it was related to the use of a particular drug”; (iii) 316% (95% CI 44, 1104; p = 0.010) for It is only necessary to report serious or unexpected ADRs; and (iv) 171% (95% CI 13, 549; p = 0.020) for “I do not have time to think about the involvement of the drug or other causes in ADRs”. Conclusions: ADR under-reporting is strongly associated with certain attitudes, possibly indicating that under-reporting could be minimised through educational interventions targeted at changing such attitudes. Pharmacists’ ADR education must be improved and educational programmes should be focused on altering attitudes identified by the study as being associated with under-reporting. Our data also indicate that community pharmacists must be a priority target for this intervention.

Improving the Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions : A Cluster-Randomized Trial Among Pharmacists in Portugal

AbstractBackground: Adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting systems are the basic component for comprehensive postmarketing surveillance of the risk of drug-induced adverse effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of educational outreach visits aimed at improving ADR reporting by pharmacists. Methods: The study population comprised all pharmacists working in a catchment area covered by Portugal’s Northern Regional Health Authority. Using unequal randomization, four spatial-clusters were assigned to the intervention group (n = 342) and eleven to the control group (n = 1091). The intervention took the form of 1-hour long educational outreach visits tailored to training needs detected in a previous study, with a 13- to 16-month follow-up period (March–June 2004 through June 2005). This study is registered as an international standard randomized controlled trial, number ISRCTN45 894687. Results: At baseline, ADR reporting rates (per 1000 pharmacist-years) did not differ significantly between the intervention and control groups (32.28 vs 29.16). The adjusted increase in ADR reporting attributable to the intervention was 275.63 per 1000 pharmacist-years (95% CI 162.15, 389.12; relative risk RR] = 5.87, 95% CI 1.98, 17.39). The intervention succeeded in multiplying the reporting rate of: serious ADRs, 10-fold (RR = 9.79; 95% CI 2.24, 42.66); unexpected ADRs, 4-fold (RR = 4.41; 95% CI 1.11, 17.53); high-causality ADRs, 9-fold (RR = 8.67; 95% CI 2.12, 35.42); and new drug-related ADRs, 9-fold (RR = 9.33; 95% CI 2.53, 34.40). While the greatest effect was registered during the first 4 months post-intervention, differences remained statistically significant for 8 months. Conclusions: Educational outreach visits improve ADR reporting by pharmacists in terms of quantity and relevance.

Strategies to Improve Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting: A Critical and Systematic Review

BackgroundUnderreporting is the major limitation of a voluntary adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting system. Many studies have assessed the effectiveness of different interventions designed to reduce underreporting.ObjectiveWe aimed to conduct a critical review of papers that assessed the effectiveness of different strategies to increase ADR reporting, regardless of the health professionals or patients included.Data SourcesScientific papers were selected after a search of the MEDLINE-PubMed and EMBASE scientific databases up to 7 December 2010.Study SelectionWe included papers in English, French or Spanish that analysed an intervention aimed at increasing the number of reported ADRs, and quantify the results of the intervention in terms of number of reports.Data ExtractionThe abstracts retrieved in both computerized searches were reviewed independently by two of the authors. Initially selected papers were thoroughly read to evaluate if they met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data in finally selected papers were independently extracted by both authors and set in pre-designed tables. A third author took the final decision in case of disagreement. For each study, we analysed study design, type of intervention, assessment period, and results of the intervention.ResultsOf the 4,221 papers located that fulfilled the search criteria, 43 met the selection criteria. With the exception of one study, the interventions assessed were deemed to be effective. The vast majority of papers displayed methodological and formal limitations that lowered the grade of evidence. Multiple interventions seem to have had more impact than did single interventions. There were very few cases in which interventions were designed on the basis of inappropriate attitudes and mistaken beliefs about ADRs.ConclusionsIn general, there is a need for studies of better methodological quality in this topic, so that more evidence of the effectiveness of the respective strategies can be collected for the purpose of improving ADR reporting by health professionals. It is probable that multiple interventions cause greater increases in the ADR reporting rates than single.

Educational interventions to improve prescription and dispensing of antibiotics: a systematic review

BackgroundExcessive and inappropriate antibiotic use contributes to growing antibiotic resistance, an important public-health problem. Strategies must be developed to improve antibiotic-prescribing. Our purpose is to review of educational programs aimed at improving antibiotic-prescribing by physicians and/or antibiotic-dispensing by pharmacists, in both primary-care and hospital settings.MethodsWe conducted a critical systematic search and review of the relevant literature on educational programs aimed at improving antibiotic prescribing and dispensing practice in primary-care and hospital settings, published in January 2001 through December 2011.ResultsWe identified 78 studies for analysis, 47 in primary-care and 31 in hospital settings. The studies differed widely in design but mostly reported positive results. Outcomes measured in the reviewed studies were adherence to guidelines, total of antibiotics prescribed, or both, attitudes and behavior related to antibiotic prescribing and quality of pharmacy practice related to antibiotics. Twenty-nine studies (62%) in primary care and twenty-four (78%) in hospital setting reported positive results for all measured outcomes; fourteen studies (30%) in primary care and six (20%) in hospital setting reported positive results for some outcomes and results that were not statistically influenced by the intervention for others; only four studies in primary care and one study in hospital setting failed to report significant post-intervention improvements for all outcomes. Improvement in adherence to guidelines and decrease of total of antibiotics prescribed, after educational interventions, were observed, respectively, in 46% and 41% of all the reviewed studies. Changes in behaviour related to antibiotic-prescribing and improvement in quality of pharmacy practice was observed, respectively, in four studies and one study respectively.ConclusionThe results show that antibiotic use could be improved by educational interventions, being mostly used multifaceted interventions.

Hepatotoxicity related to agomelatine and other new antidepressants: a case/noncase approach with information from the Portuguese, French, Spanish, and Italian pharmacovigilance systems.

Abstract Antidepressants have been associated with a low incidence of idiosyncratic hepatic injury. Some of them, nefazodone or amineptine, were observed to induce severe hepatic injury and withdrawn from the market. Recently, some cases of this severe condition have been reported in association with agomelatine use. Therefore, the objective of this study is to learn the risk of hepatic damage with agomelatine as compared with other new antidepressants. We took data from the Spanish, French, Italian, and Portuguese pharmacovigilance system databases. A case/noncase approach to assess the strength of the association between whichever antidepressant and hepatotoxicity was performed; cases were defined as reports of hepatotoxicity; noncases were reports of all reactions other than hepatotoxicity. Exposure was the recording of a new antidepressant in a report, whether or not it was suspected of causing the reaction. During the period surveyed, 3300 cases of hepatotoxicity were collected for the antidepressants assessed. They represent 10.3% of all cases collected for these drugs; the corresponding figure for all drugs was 6.0%. Meanwhile, 63 cases of hepatotoxicity associated with agomelatine were collected since its introduction until the end of the period studied; they account for a percentage of 14.6. Agomelatine was statistically associated with hepatotoxicity in Spain [reporting odds ratio (ROR), 4.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4–9.7)], France (ROR, 2.4 [95% CI, 1.5–3.7]), and Italy (ROR, 5.1 [95% CI, 1.7–14.0]). Current results support the idea of agomelatine to be related to a higher hepatotoxicity risk. Physicians should consider early discontinuation if the condition is suspected; health authorities should promptly explore the best regulatory actions to be taken.

Strategies to increase the sensitivity of pharmacovigilance in Portugal

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the results of an intervention to improve the number and relevance of reports of adverse drug reactions. METHODS A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted with pharmacists working in Northern Portugal, in 2007. After randomization, 364 individuals were placed into the intervention group (261 in telephone interviews and 103 in workshops), while the control group was comprised of 1,103 pharmacists. The following were approached in the educational intervention: the problem of adverse drug reaction, the impact on public health and spontaneous reporting. With regard to relevance, adverse reactions were classified into severe and unexpected. Statistical analysis was performed, based on the intention-to-treat principle; generalized linear mixed models were applied, using the penalized quasi-likelihood method. The pharmacists studied were followed during a period of 20 months. RESULTS The intervention increased the rate of spontaneous reporting of adverse reactions three times (RR = 3.22; 95% CI 1.33;7.80), when compared to the control group. The relevance of reporting rose, with an increase in severe adverse reactions by approximately four times (RR = 3.87; 95% CI 1.29;11.61) and in unexpected adverse reactions by five times (RR = 5.02; 95% CI 1.33;18.93), compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS During a period of up to four months, educational interventions significantly increased the number and relevance of spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions by pharmacists in Northern Portugal.OBJETIVO: Evaluar los resultados de intervencion para mejoria de la cantidad y relevancia de las notificaciones de reacciones adversas a medicamentos. METODOS: Fue implementado un estudio controlado aleatorio, por agrupaciones de farmaceuticos que ejercen actividad profesional en la region norte de Portugal, en 2007. Posterior a la aleatoriedad, 364 individuos fueron distribuidos en el grupo de intervencion (261 en la intervencion telefonica y 103 en los workshops); el grupo control fue constituido por 1.103 farmaceuticos. En la intervencion educativa fueron abordados la problematica de las reacciones adversas a medicamentos, el impacto en la salud publica y la notificacion espontanea. Con relacion a la relevancia, las reacciones adversas fueron clasificadas en graves e inesperadas. El analisis estadistico fue efectuado con base en el principio intention-to-treat; se aplicaron modelos lineares generalizados mixtos, utilizando el metodo penalized quasi-likelihood. Los farmaceuticos estudiados fueron seguidos durante un periodo de 20 meses. RESULTADOS: La intervencion aumento tres veces la tasa de notificacion espontanea de las reacciones adversas (RR=3,22; IC95%:1,33;7,80) con relacion al grupo control. Hubo un incremento en la relevancia de las notificaciones con aumento de las reacciones adversas graves en cerca de cuatro veces (RR=3,87; IC95%:1,29;11,61) e inesperadas en cinco veces (RR=5,02; IC 95%: 1,33;18,93), con relacion al grupo control. CONCLUSIONES: Las intervenciones educativas aumentan significativamente, en hasta cuatro meses, la cantidad y la relevancia de las notificaciones espontaneas de reacciones adversas a medicamentos por parte de los farmaceuticos de la region Norte de Portugal.

Workshop- and Telephone-Based Interventions to Improve Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting

AbstractBackground: Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is the method most widely used by pharmacovigilance systems, with the principal limitation being the physician’s underreporting. Objective: This study sought to evaluate the results of workshop and telephone-interview interventions designed to improve the quantity and relevance of ADR reporting by physicians. Methods: A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted on 6579 physicians in northern Portugal in 2008. Following randomization, we allocated 1034 physicians to a telephone-interview intervention, 438 to a workshop intervention and the remaining 5107 to the control group. At the workshop, a real clinical case was presented and participants were then asked to report on it by completing the relevant form. In the telephone intervention, participants were asked (i) whether they had ever had any suspicion of ADRs; (ii) whether they had experienced any difficulties in reporting; (iii) whether they remembered the different methods that could be used for reporting purposes; and (iv) whether they attached importance to the individual physician’s role in reporting. We followed up physicians to assess ADR reporting rates to the Northern Pharmacovigilance Centre. In terms of relevance, adverse reactions were classified as serious or unexpected. Statistical analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis, and generalized linear mixed models were applied using the penalized quasi-likelihood method. The physicians studied were followed up over a period of 20 months. Results: Two hundred physicians underwent the educational intervention. Comparison with the control group showed that the workshop intervention increased the spontaneous ADR reporting rate by an average of 4-fold (relative risk [RR] 3.97; 95% CI 3.86, 4.08; p < 0.001) across the 20 months post-intervention. Telephone interviews, in contrast, proved less efficient since they led to no significant difference (p = 0.052) vis-à-vis the control group in ADR reporting (RR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00, 1.04). The effects of the interventions on the reporting rate of serious and high-causality ADRs indicated that the RRs associated with workshops were 6.84 (95% CI 6.69, 6.98; p<0.001) for serious ADRs and 3.58 (95% CI 3.51, 3.66; p<0.001) for high-causality ADRs. Conclusions: Whereas telephone interventions only increased spontaneous reporting in the first 4 months of follow-up, workshops significantly increased both the quantity and relevance of spontaneous ADR reporting for more than 1 year.

Estratégias para aumentar a sensibilidade da farmacovigilância em Portugal

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the results of an intervention to improve the number and relevance of reports of adverse drug reactions. METHODS A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted with pharmacists working in Northern Portugal, in 2007. After randomization, 364 individuals were placed into the intervention group (261 in telephone interviews and 103 in workshops), while the control group was comprised of 1,103 pharmacists. The following were approached in the educational intervention: the problem of adverse drug reaction, the impact on public health and spontaneous reporting. With regard to relevance, adverse reactions were classified into severe and unexpected. Statistical analysis was performed, based on the intention-to-treat principle; generalized linear mixed models were applied, using the penalized quasi-likelihood method. The pharmacists studied were followed during a period of 20 months. RESULTS The intervention increased the rate of spontaneous reporting of adverse reactions three times (RR = 3.22; 95% CI 1.33;7.80), when compared to the control group. The relevance of reporting rose, with an increase in severe adverse reactions by approximately four times (RR = 3.87; 95% CI 1.29;11.61) and in unexpected adverse reactions by five times (RR = 5.02; 95% CI 1.33;18.93), compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS During a period of up to four months, educational interventions significantly increased the number and relevance of spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions by pharmacists in Northern Portugal.OBJETIVO: Evaluar los resultados de intervencion para mejoria de la cantidad y relevancia de las notificaciones de reacciones adversas a medicamentos. METODOS: Fue implementado un estudio controlado aleatorio, por agrupaciones de farmaceuticos que ejercen actividad profesional en la region norte de Portugal, en 2007. Posterior a la aleatoriedad, 364 individuos fueron distribuidos en el grupo de intervencion (261 en la intervencion telefonica y 103 en los workshops); el grupo control fue constituido por 1.103 farmaceuticos. En la intervencion educativa fueron abordados la problematica de las reacciones adversas a medicamentos, el impacto en la salud publica y la notificacion espontanea. Con relacion a la relevancia, las reacciones adversas fueron clasificadas en graves e inesperadas. El analisis estadistico fue efectuado con base en el principio intention-to-treat; se aplicaron modelos lineares generalizados mixtos, utilizando el metodo penalized quasi-likelihood. Los farmaceuticos estudiados fueron seguidos durante un periodo de 20 meses. RESULTADOS: La intervencion aumento tres veces la tasa de notificacion espontanea de las reacciones adversas (RR=3,22; IC95%:1,33;7,80) con relacion al grupo control. Hubo un incremento en la relevancia de las notificaciones con aumento de las reacciones adversas graves en cerca de cuatro veces (RR=3,87; IC95%:1,29;11,61) e inesperadas en cinco veces (RR=5,02; IC 95%: 1,33;18,93), con relacion al grupo control. CONCLUSIONES: Las intervenciones educativas aumentan significativamente, en hasta cuatro meses, la cantidad y la relevancia de las notificaciones espontaneas de reacciones adversas a medicamentos por parte de los farmaceuticos de la region Norte de Portugal.