Maria Vidal

Increased expression of angiogenic factors in human colonic angiodysplasia

OBJECTIVE:Angiodysplasia of the colon is a distinct vascular abnormality characterized by focal accumulation of ectatic vessels in the mucosa and submucosa. To investigate whether angiogenesis contributes to the pathogenesis of human colonic angiodysplasia, we examined the expression of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and its endothelial cell receptors flt-1 and KDR.METHODS:Immunohistochemistry was performed in sections of specimens obtained from 18 patients with colonic angiodysplasia and from eight patients with colon cancer and its adjacent, histologically normal margins of resection. We used affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal antibodies and a streptoavidin–biotin peroxidase method.RESULTS:We detected strong immunoreactivity for vascular endothelial growth factor, homogeneously distributed in the endothelial lining of blood vessels of all sizes in 16 (89%) specimens of colonic angiodysplasia and in seven (88%) patients with colon cancer. In contrast, very limited immunoreactivity was found in normal colon. Vascular staining for flt-1 was observed in eight (44%) and one (12.5%) of the colonic angiodysplasia or colon cancer specimens, respectively, but not in normal colon. Vascular immunoreactivity for basic fibroblast growth factor was observed in seven (39%) specimens from patients with colonic angiodysplasia, whereas either very limited or no immunostaining was found in sections from specimens of patients with colon cancer and its normal margins.CONCLUSIONS:In human colonic angiodysplasia, increased expression of angiogenic factors is likely to play a pathogenic role.

Overexpression of c‐erbB‐2 in epithelial ovarian cancer. Prognostic value and relationship with response to chemotherapy

Background. Overexpression of the c‐erbB‐2 protein has been reported in tumors from approximately 25% of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. However, its clinical significance has not been well established.

Molecular features and survival outcomes of the intrinsic subtypes within HER2-positive breast cancer.

Background The clinical impact of the biological heterogeneity within HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer is not fully understood. Here, we evaluated the molecular features and survival outcomes of the intrinsic subtypes within HER2+ breast cancer. Methods We interrogated The Cancer Genome Atlas (n = 495) and Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) datasets (n = 1730) of primary breast cancers for molecular data derived from DNA, RNA and protein, and determined intrinsic subtype. Clinical HER2 status was defined according to American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines or DNA copy-number aberration by single nucleotide polymorphism arrays. Cox models tested the prognostic significance of each variable in patients not treated with trastuzumab (n = 1711). Results Compared with clinically HER2 (cHER2)-negative breast cancer, cHER2+ breast cancer had a higher frequency of the HER2-enriched (HER2E) subtype (47.0% vs 7.1%) and a lower frequency of Luminal A (10.7% vs 39.0%) and Basal-like (14.1% vs 23.4%) subtypes. The likelihood of cHER2-positivity in HER2E, Luminal B, Basal-like and Luminal A subtypes was 64.6%, 20.0%, 14.4% and 7.3%, respectively. Within each subtype, only 0.3% to 3.9% of genes were found differentially expressed between cHER2+ and cHER2-negative tumors. Within cHER2+ tumors, HER2 gene and protein expression was statistically significantly higher in the HER2E and Basal-like subtypes than either luminal subtype. Neither cHER2 status nor the new 10-subtype copy number-based classification system (IntClust) added independent prognostic value to intrinsic subtype. Conclusions When the intrinsic subtypes are taken into account, cHER2-positivity does not translate into large changes in the expression of downstream signaling pathways, nor does it affect patient survival in the absence of HER2 targeting.

Genomic Analyses across Six Cancer Types Identify Basal-like Breast Cancer as a Unique Molecular Entity

To improve our understanding of the biological relationships among different types of cancer, we have characterized variation in gene expression patterns in a set of 1,707 samples representing 6 human cancer types (breast, ovarian, brain, colorectal, lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell lung cancer). In the unified dataset, breast tumors of the Basal-like subtype were found to represent a unique molecular entity as any other cancer type, including the rest of breast tumors, while showing striking similarities with squamous cell lung cancers. Moreover, gene signatures tracking various cancer- and stromal-related biological processes such as proliferation, hypoxia and immune activation were found expressed similarly in different proportions of tumors across the various cancer types. These data suggest that clinical trials focusing on tumors with common profiles and/or biomarker expression rather than their tissue of origin are warranted with a special focus on Basal-like breast cancer and squamous cell lung carcinoma.

HER2-enriched subtype as a predictor of pathological complete response following trastuzumab and lapatinib without chemotherapy in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer (PAMELA): an open-label, single-group, multicentre, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND HER2-positive breast cancer consists of four intrinsic molecular subtypes-luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and basal-like-and a normal-like subtype, with the HER2-enriched subtype having the highest activation of the EGFR-HER2 pathway. We aimed to test the hypothesis that patients with the HER2-enriched subtype benefit the most from dual HER2 blockade. METHODS PAMELA is an open-label, single-group, phase 2 trial done in 19 hospitals in Spain. We recruited female patients aged at least 18 years with previously untreated, centrally confirmed HER2-positive, stage I-IIIA invasive breast cancer regardless of hormone receptor status. Patients were given lapatinib (1000 mg per day orally) and trastuzumab (loading dose of 8 mg/kg, followed by 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks intravenously) for 18 weeks; hormone receptor-positive patients were additionally given letrozole (2·5 mg per day orally; if menopausal) or tamoxifen (20 mg per day orally; if premenopausal). Surgery was done 1-3 weeks after the last dose of study treatment. Intrinsic molecular subtypes of tumour biopsy samples taken at baseline (day 0) and day 14 were determined with the PAM50 predictor. The primary outcome was the ability of the HER2-enriched subtype to predict pathological complete response at the time of surgery. The primary outcome was assessed in the evaluable population (ie, all patients who had initial tumour biopsy samples available and who underwent definitive surgery) and safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one part of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01973660, and is completed. FINDINGS Between Oct 28, 2013, and Nov 26, 2015, we recruited 151 patients, of whom 14 (9%) discontinued treatment and 137 (91%) completed treatment as planned. At baseline, most patients had the HER2-enriched subtype (101 [67%]), followed by luminal A (22 [15%]), luminal B (16 [11%]), basal-like (nine [6%]), and normal-like (three [2%]) subtypes. At the time of surgery, 46 (30%, 95% CI 23-39) of 151 patients had pathological complete response in the breast. 41 (41%, 31-51) of 101 patients with the HER2-enriched subtype and five (10%, 4-23) of 50 patients with non-HER2-enriched subtypes achieved pathological complete response at the time of surgery (odds ratio 6·2, 95% CI 2·3-16·8; p=0·0004). INTERPRETATION The HER2-enriched subtype can identify patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who are likely to benefit from dual HER2 blockade therapies. FUNDING GlaxoSmithKline, Susan Komen Foundation, CERCA Programme-Generalitat de Catalunya, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria Foundation, Pas a Pas, and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation.

Prospective study of the impact of the Prosigna assay on adjuvant clinical decision-making in unselected patients with estrogen receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor negative, node negative early-stage breast cancer

Abstract Purpose: Improved understanding of risk of recurrence (ROR) is needed to reduce cases of recurrence and more effectively treat breast cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to examine how a gene-expression profile (GEP), identified by Prosigna, influences physician adjuvant treatment selection for early breast cancer (EBC) and the effects of this influence on optimizing adjuvant treatment recommendations in clinical practice. Methods: A prospective, observational, multicenter study was carried out in 15 hospitals across Spain. Participating medical oncologists completed pre-assessment, post-assessment, and follow-up questionnaires recording their treatment recommendations and confidence in these recommendations, before and after knowing the patient’s ROR. Patients completed questionnaires on decision-making, anxiety, and health status. Results: Between June 2013 and January 2014, 217 patients enrolled and a final 200 were included in the study. Patients were postmenopausal, estrogen receptor positive, human epidermal growth hormone factor negative, and node negative with either stage 1 or stage 2 tumors. After receiving the GEP results, treatment recommendations were changed for 40 patients (20%). The confidence of medical oncologists in their treatment recommendations increased in 41.6% and decreased in 6.5% of total cases. Patients reported lower anxiety after physicians made treatment recommendations based on the GEP results (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Though this study does not include evaluation of the impact of GEP on long-term outcomes, it was found that GEP results influenced the treatment decisions of medical oncologists and their confidence in adjuvant therapy selection. Patients’ anxiety about the selected adjuvant therapy decreased with use of the GEP.

Intrinsic subtypes and gene expression profiles in primary and metastatic breast cancer

Biological changes that occur during metastatic progression of breast cancer are still incompletely characterized. In this study, we compared intrinsic molecular subtypes and gene expression in 123 paired primary and metastatic tissues from breast cancer patients. Intrinsic subtype was identified using a PAM50 classifier and χ2 tests determined the differences in variable distribution. The rate of subtype conversion was 0% in basal-like tumors, 23.1% in HER2-enriched (HER2-E) tumors, 30.0% in luminal B tumors, and 55.3% in luminal A tumors. In 40.2% of cases, luminal A tumors converted to luminal B tumors, whereas in 14.3% of cases luminal A and B tumors converted to HER2-E tumors. We identified 47 genes that were expressed differentially in metastatic versus primary disease. Metastatic tumors were enriched for proliferation-related and migration-related genes and diminished for luminal-related genes. Expression of proliferation-related genes were better at predicting overall survival in metastatic disease (OSmet) when analyzed in metastatic tissue rather than primary tissue. In contrast, a basal-like gene expression signature was better at predicting OSmet in primary disease compared with metastatic tissue. We observed correlations between time to tumor relapse and the magnitude of changes of proliferation, luminal B, or HER2-E signatures in metastatic versus primary disease. Although the intrinsic subtype was largely maintained during metastatic progression, luminal/HER2-negative tumors acquired a luminal B or HER2-E profile during metastatic progression, likely reflecting tumor evolution or acquisition of estrogen independence. Overall, our analysis revealed the value of stratifying gene expression by both cancer subtype and tissue type, providing clinicians more refined tools to evaluate prognosis and treatment. Cancer Res; 77(9); 2213-21. ©2017 AACR.

Gene expression-based classifications of fibroadenomas and phyllodes tumours of the breast

Fibroepithelial tumors (FTs) of the breast are a heterogeneous group of lesions ranging from fibroadenomas (FAD) to phyllodes tumors (PT) (benign, borderline, malignant). Further understanding of their molecular features and classification might be of clinical value. In this study, we analysed the expression of 105 breast cancer‐related genes, including the 50 genes of the PAM50 intrinsic subtype predictor and 12 genes of the Claudin‐low subtype predictor, in a panel of 75 FTs (34 FADs, 5 juvenile FADs, 20 benign PTs, 5 borderline PTs and 11 malignant PTs) with clinical follow‐up. In addition, we compared the expression profiles of FTs with those of 14 normal breast tissues and 49 primary invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCs). Our results revealed that the levels of expression of all breast cancer‐related genes can discriminate the various groups of FTs, together with normal breast tissues and IDCs (False Discovery Rate < 5%). Among FTs, the levels expression of proliferation‐related genes (e.g. CCNB1 and MKI67) and mesenchymal/epithelial‐related (e.g. CLDN3 and EPCAM) genes were found to be most discriminative. As expected, FADs showed the highest and lowest expression of epithelial‐ and proliferation‐related genes, respectively, whereas malignant PTs showed the opposite expression pattern. Interestingly, the overall profile of benign PTs was found more similar to FADs and normal breast tissues than the rest of tumours, including juvenile FADs. Within the dataset of IDCs and normal breast tissues, the vast majority of FADs, juvenile FADs, benign PTs and borderline PTs were identified as Normal‐like by intrinsic breast cancer subtyping, whereas 7 (63.6%) and 3 (27.3%) malignant PTs were identified as Claudin‐low and Basal‐like, respectively. Finally, we observed that the previously described PAM50 risk of relapse prognostic score better predicted outcome in FTs than the morphological classification, even within PTs‐only. Our results suggest that classification of FTs using gene expression‐based data is feasible and might provide clinically useful biological and prognostic information.

Europe combating cancer: The European Union's commitment to cancer research in the 6th Framework Programme

As one of the major health issues in Europe, cancer was a research priority in the 6th Framework Programme (2002–2006). About €485 million were devoted to this theme, which allowed funding of 108 multidisciplinary transnational projects. A significant part of them was large‐scale initiatives addressing complex issues through a broad combination of competences. All major types of cancer were covered, as well as the three dimensions such as prevention, diagnostic and treatment, with a particular emphasis on translational research aiming at bringing basic knowledge on medical practice. This approach will be continued in the 7th Framework Programme (2007–2013), together with a strengthened effort to improve the coordination of European cancer research, which is fragmented and in which EU action represents only a small part. EU cancer research will also be addressed within the reinforced efforts in the areas of pharmaceutical and technological developments as well as common aetiological mechanisms of diseases that the 7th Framework Programme will undertake.

Leu-M1 immunoreactivity and phaeochromocytoma.

The aim was to evaluate Leu-M1 immunoreactivity as a prognostic factor in phaeochromocytoma. Anti-Leu-M1 monoclonal antibodies were used to determine the Leu-M1 immunoreactivity in 17 histologically confirmed phaeochromocytomas from 15 patients, using an avidin-biotin technique. Ten patients had a sporadic phaeochromocytoma, and five had multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A (MEN 2A). Malignancy was diagnosed in three patients by the presence of metastases. Leu-M1 immunoreactivity was shown in 12 (70.5%) phaeochromocytomas. Three patterns of arrangement were observed: isolated (scattered positive cells) (n = 3); focal (aggregates of positive cells) (n = 5), and diffuse patterns (dispersed positive cells) (n = 4). Two cases of malignant phaeochromocytoma were positive (one focal and one isolated pattern). All cases of MEN 2A showed immunoreactivity, although no characteristic pattern was prevalent. A diffuse pattern was observed in all phaeochromocytomas longer than 7 cm. In conclusion, Leu-M1 expression is frequent in phaeochromocytoma. However, Leu-M1 immunoreactivity seems to be useless in predicting malignant behaviour and to be influenced mainly by tumour size.