Marian B. Wilkin

Regulation of notch endosomal sorting and signaling by Drosophila Nedd4 family proteins.

The Notch receptor mediates a short-range signal that regulates many cell fate decisions. The misregulation of Notch has been linked to cancer and to developmental disorders. Upon binding to its ligands, Delta (Dl) or Serrate (Ser), the Notch ectodomain is shed by the action of an ADAM protease. The Notch intracellular domain is subsequently released proteolytically from the membrane by Presenilin and translocates to the nucleus to activate the transcription factor, Suppressor of Hairless. We show in Drosophila that Notch signaling is limited by the activity of two Nedd4 family HECT domain proteins, Suppressor of deltex [Su(dx)] and DNedd4. We rule out models by which Su(dx) downregulates Notch through modulating Deltex or by limiting the adherens junction accumulation of Notch. Instead, we show that Su(dx) regulates the postendocytic sorting of Notch within the early endosome to an Hrs- and ubiquitin-enriched subdomain en route to the late endosome. We propose a model in which endocytic sorting of Notch mediates a decision between its activation and downregulation. Such intersections between trafficking routes may provide key points at which other signals can modulate Notch activity in both normal development and in the pathological misactivation of Notch.

Drosophila HOPS and AP-3 complex genes are required for a Deltex-regulated activation of notch in the endosomal trafficking pathway.

DSL ligands promote proteolysis of the Notch receptor, to release active Notch intracellular domain (N(ICD)). Conversely, the E3 ubiquitin ligase Deltex can activate ligand-independent Notch proteolysis and signaling. Here we show that Deltex effects require endocytic trafficking by HOPS and AP-3 complexes. Our data suggest that Deltex shunts Notch into an endocytic pathway with two possible endpoints. If Notch transits into the lysosome lumen, it is degraded. However, if HOPS and AP-3 deliver Notch to the limiting membrane of the lysosome, degradation of the Notch extracellular domain allows subsequent Presenilin-mediated release of N(ICD). This model accounts for positive and negative regulatory effects of Deltex in vivo. Indeed, we uncover HOPS/AP-3 contributions to Notch signaling during Drosophila midline formation and neurogenesis. We discuss ways in which these endocytic pathways may modulate ligand-dependent and -independent events, as a mechanism that can potentiate Notch signaling or dampen noise in the signaling network.

Drosophila Dumpy is a gigantic extracellular protein required to maintain tension at epidermal–cuticle attachment sites

BACKGROUND Growth and morphogenesis during development depend both on patterning genes, which assign positional information, and on genes that regulate mechanical forces. The dumpy gene of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is an example of the latter class, with mutant phenotypes affecting size and shape of the limbs, thoracic cuticle, trachea and mouthparts. RESULTS The genetically complex dumpy locus was found to span over 100 kb and encode a gigantic 2.5 MDa extracellular matrix protein. Dumpy represents an extreme form of modular protein evolution, containing 308 epidermal growth factor (EGF) modules, interspersed with a new module class, DPY, and terminating in a crosslinking zona pellucida domain and membrane anchor sequence. We determined the three-dimensional structure of the DPY module by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and found that it forms a disulphide-stabilised beta sheet motif, capable of linking end-to-end with EGF modules to form a fibre. Consistent with its cuticle phenotypes, dumpy is expressed at several sites of cuticle-epidermal cell attachment, including the trachea and the muscle tendon cells, which mediate anchorage of the muscles to the cuticle. CONCLUSIONS The dumpy gene encodes a gigantic extracellular molecule that we predict to be a membrane-anchored fibre of almost a micrometer in length. Insertion and crosslinking of this fibre within the cuticle may provide a strong anchor for the underlying tissue, allowing it to maintain mechanical tension at sites under stress. This would explain its contribution to tissue morphogenesis through its regulation of mechanical properties.

Multiple levels of Notch signal regulation (Review)

Notch is a vitally important signalling receptor controlling cell fate determination and pattern formation in numerous ways during development of both invertebrate and vertebrate species. An intriguing pathway for the Notch signal has emerged where, after ligand-dependent proteolysis, an intracellular fragment of the receptor itself translocates to the nucleus to regulate gene expression. The nuclear activity of the Notch intracellular domain is linked to complexes regulating chromatin organization through histone deacetylation and acetylation. To allow the Notch signal to be deployed in numerous contexts, many different mechanisms have evolved to regulate the level, duration and spatial distribution of Notch activity. Regulation occurs at multiple levels including patterns of ligand and receptor expression, Notch - ligand interactions, trafficking of the receptor and ligands, and covalent modifications including glycosylation, phosphorylation and ubiquitination. Several Notch regulatory proteins have conserved domains that link them to the ubiquitination pathway, and ubiquitination of the Notch intracellular domain has recently been linked to its degradation. Different proteolytically derived isoforms of Notch have also been identified that may be involved in alternative Notch-dependent signals or regulatory mechanisms, and differences between the four mammalian Notch homologues are beginning to be appreciated.

Down-regulation of Notch target gene expression by Suppressor of deltex.

In Drosophila, Suppressor of deltex (Su(dx)) mutations display a wing vein gap phenotype resembling that of Notch gain of function alleles. The Su(dx) protein may therefore act as a negative regulator of Notch but its activity on actual Notch signalling levels has not been demonstrated. Here we show that Su(dx) does regulate the level of Notch signalling in vivo, upstream of Notch target genes and in different developmental contexts, including a previously unknown role in leg joint formation. Overexpression of Su(dx) was capable of blocking both the endogenous activity of Notch and the ectopic Notch signalling induced by the overexpression of Deltex, an intracellular Notch binding protein. In addition, using the conditional phenotype of the Su(dx)(sp) allele, we show that loss of Su(dx) activity is rapidly followed by an up-regulation of E(spl)mbeta expression, the immediate target of Notch signal activation during wing vein development. While Su(dx) adult wing vein phenotypes are quite mild, only affecting the distal tips of the veins, we show that the initial consequence of loss of Su(dx) activity is more severe than previously thought. Using a time-course experiment we show that the phenotype is buffered by feedback regulation illustrating how signalling networks can make development robust to perturbation.

Endocytic regulation of Notch activation and down-regulation (Review)

Notch receptor signalling plays a central role in development and its misfunction has been linked to a number of diseases. In the cannonical Notch signalling pathway, ligand binding to Notch activates a series of proteolytic cleavages that release the Notch intracellular domain for trafficking to the nucleus, where it activates the transcription factor, Suppressor of Hairless (Su(H)). A number of recent papers have demonstrated the importance of endocytic trafficking of Notch and its ligands for both the activation and the down-regulation of the Notch receptor. These reports highlight uncertainty regarding the whereabouts in the cell where Notch activation occurs, and the form of the ligand that can induce signalling. In this review we speculate that, decision points between alternative trafficking pathways represent important regulatory nodes that may allow Notch signalling levels to be modulated by other developmental signals, providing context-dependency to Notch activation. We also review data that suggest that key proteolytic events, associated with Notch activation, may occur within the endocytic pathway or require prior endocytosis and recycling of Notch and its ligands to the cell surface. Sorting within the endocytic pathway, regulated by several different ubiquitin ligase proteins, may be involved in ensuring whether ligand and receptor are competent to signal. Furthermore, the utilisation of an alternative mechanism of Notch signalling, independent of Su(H), may depend on driving endocytic Notch into a specific compartment, in response to the activity of the ring finger domain protein, Deltex.

Roles of Drosophila Deltex in Notch receptor endocytic trafficking and activation

Cell signaling mediated by the Notch receptor (N) regulates many cell‐fate decisions and is partly controlled by the endocytic trafficking of N. Drosophila deltex (dx) encodes an evolutionarily conserved regulator of N signaling, an E3‐ubiquitin ligase, which ubiquitinates N’s intracellular domain. Although Dx was shown to function in N endocytosis in studies of dx over‐expression, the roles of endogenous Dx have remained hidden. Here, we investigated N endocytosis in a dx‐null Drosophila mutant and found that endogenous Dx is required for at least two steps of N trafficking: the incorporation of N into endocytic vesicles from the plasma membrane and the transport of N from early endosomes to lysosomes. In the absence of Dx functions, N was stabilized in unknown endocytic compartments, where it was probably insulated from transport to lysosomes. We also found that canonical N signaling and Dx‐mediated N signaling are activated in two different endocytic compartments, before N is incorporated into multivesicular body (MVB) interluminal vesicles and after N is transported from MVBs, respectively. The endocytic compartment in which Dx‐mediated N signaling is activated appears to coincide with the activity of endogenous Dx in N trafficking. These findings extend our understanding of how N’s trafficking and activation are correlated.

Compensatory Flux Changes within an Endocytic Trafficking Network Maintain Thermal Robustness of Notch Signaling

Summary Developmental signaling is remarkably robust to environmental variation, including temperature. For example, in ectothermic animals such as Drosophila, Notch signaling is maintained within functional limits across a wide temperature range. We combine experimental and computational approaches to show that temperature compensation of Notch signaling is achieved by an unexpected variety of endocytic-dependent routes to Notch activation which, when superimposed on ligand-induced activation, act as a robustness module. Thermal compensation arises through an altered balance of fluxes within competing trafficking routes, coupled with temperature-dependent ubiquitination of Notch. This flexible ensemble of trafficking routes supports Notch signaling at low temperature but can be switched to restrain Notch signaling at high temperature and thus compensates for the inherent temperature sensitivity of ligand-induced activation. The outcome is to extend the physiological range over which normal development can occur. Similar mechanisms may provide thermal robustness for other developmental signals.

Su(dx) E3 ubiquitin ligase–dependent and –independent functions of Polychaetoid, the Drosophila ZO-1 homologue

Polychaetoid coordinates receptor trafficking and signaling with adherens junction organization.

Concerted Evolution Within the Drosophila dumpy Gene

We have determined by reverse Southern analysis and direct sequence comparisons that most of the dumpy gene has evolved in the dipteran and other insect orders by purifying selection acting on amino acid replacements. One region, however, is evolving rapidly due to unequal crossing over and/or gene conversion. This region, called “PIGSFEAST,” or PF, encodes in D. melanogaster 30–47 repeats of 102 amino acids rich in serines, threonines, and prolines. We show that the processes of concerted evolution have been operating on all species of Drosophila examined to date, but that an adjacent region has expanded in Anopheles gambiae, Aedes aegypti, and Tribolium castaneum, while the PF repeats are reduced in size and number. In addition, processes of concerted evolution have radically altered the codon usage patterns in D. melanogaster, D. pseudoobscura, and D. virilis compared with the rest of the dumpy gene. We show also that the dumpy gene is expressed on the inner surface of the micropyle of the mature oocyte and propose that, as in the abalone system, concerted evolution may be involved in adaptive changes affecting Dumpys possible role in sperm–egg recognition.