Marian Devonec

Bladder cancer diagnosis by flow cytometry. Correlation between cell samples from biopsy and bladder irrigation fluid

Results of flow cytometry (FCM) examinations of bladder irrigation specimens were compared with those of FCM examinations of cell suspensions from bladder biopsies of 44 urologic patients. The fluorescent dye, acridine orange (AO), was used to stain DNA and RNA differentially and abnormal urothelial cells were identified by their relative content of nucleic acids. Granulocytes and squamous cells could be distinguished from transitional cells in this procedure, and did not interfere with the analyses. Of 28 patients with papillary carcinoma, carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma, 27 were identified through FCM examination of irrigation cytology specimens; the one false‐negative result was from a low‐grade papillary carcinoma. Of 7 patients with papilloma, FCM examinations of irrigation specimens were positive in 4 and negative in 3. Results of FCM studies of biopsy specimens were in good but not complete agreement with those of irrigation specimens. In several cases, irrigation FCM disclosed tumor stemlines that were not identified in biopsy specimens. Discrepancies of this kind seemed most likely due to differences in sampling. Irrigation FCM seems to be a sensitive method for assessing multiple‐site bladder tumors, and may be a useful technique for monitoring the course of conservatively managed bladder tumors.

Urinary Prostate Cancer 3 Test: Toward the Age of Reason?

The prostate cancer 3 (PCA3) gene was discovered in 1999, on the basis of differential expression between cancer and noncancerous prostate tissue. Including the first study published in 2003, 11 clinical studies have evaluated its utility for the diagnosis of prostate cancer by measuring the number of PCA3 RNA copies in urine enriched with prostate cells. Although the sensitivity of the PCA3 test was less than that of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), its specificity appeared to be much better, particularly in patients with a previous negative biopsy. Recent studies also have suggested that this test could be used to predict cancer prognosis.

Bilan initial, suivi et traitement des troubles mictionnels en rapport avec hyperplasie bénigne de prostate : recommandations du CTMH de l’AFU

AIM To elaborate guidelines for the diagnosis, the follow-up, and the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHOD A systematic review of the literature was conducted to select more relevant publications. The level of evidence was evaluated. Graded recommendations were written by a working group, and then reviewed by a reviewer group according to the formalized consensus technique. RESULTS Terminology of the International Continence Society was used. Initial assessment has several aims: making sure that lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are related to BPH, assessing bother related to LUTS and checking for a possible complicated bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Initial assessment should include: medical history, LUTS assessment using a symptomatic score, physical examination including digital rectal examination, urinalysis, flow rate recording, and residual urine volume. Frequency volume chart is recommended when storage symptoms are predominant. Serum PSA should be done when the diagnosis of prostate cancer can modify the management. When a surgical treatment is discussed, serum PSA, serum creatinine and ultrasonography of the urinary tract are recommended. BPH patients should be informed of the benign and possibly progressive patterns of the disease. When LUTS cause no bother, annual follow-up should be planned. Medical treatment includes some phytotherapy agents, alpha-blockers and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors. The last two can be associated. The association of antimuscarinics and alpha-blockers can be offered to patients with residual storage symptoms when already under alpha-blockers therapy, after checking for the absence of severe BOO (residual volume more than 200mL or max urinary flow less than 10mL/s). Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors could be used in patients complaining for both LUTS and erectile dysfunction. In case of complication, or when medical treatment is inefficient or not tolerated, then a surgical treatment should be discussed. Treatment decision should be done according to type of LUTS and related bother, prostate anatomy, level of obstruction and its consequences on urinary tract, patient co-morbidities, experience of practitioner, and choice of patient. Surgical treatments with the higher level of evidence of efficacy include monopolar or bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate, open prostatectomy, transurethral incision of the prostate, photoselective vaporization of the prostate, and Holmium laser enuclation of the prostate. CONCLUSION Here are the first guidelines of the French Urological Association for the initial assessment, the follow-up and the treatment of urinary disorders related to BPH.

RecommandationBilan initial, suivi et traitement des troubles mictionnels en rapport avec hyperplasie bénigne de prostate : recommandations du CTMH de l’AFUInitial assessment, follow-up and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia: Guidelines of the LUTS committee of the French Urological Association

AIM To elaborate guidelines for the diagnosis, the follow-up, and the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHOD A systematic review of the literature was conducted to select more relevant publications. The level of evidence was evaluated. Graded recommendations were written by a working group, and then reviewed by a reviewer group according to the formalized consensus technique. RESULTS Terminology of the International Continence Society was used. Initial assessment has several aims: making sure that lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are related to BPH, assessing bother related to LUTS and checking for a possible complicated bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Initial assessment should include: medical history, LUTS assessment using a symptomatic score, physical examination including digital rectal examination, urinalysis, flow rate recording, and residual urine volume. Frequency volume chart is recommended when storage symptoms are predominant. Serum PSA should be done when the diagnosis of prostate cancer can modify the management. When a surgical treatment is discussed, serum PSA, serum creatinine and ultrasonography of the urinary tract are recommended. BPH patients should be informed of the benign and possibly progressive patterns of the disease. When LUTS cause no bother, annual follow-up should be planned. Medical treatment includes some phytotherapy agents, alpha-blockers and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors. The last two can be associated. The association of antimuscarinics and alpha-blockers can be offered to patients with residual storage symptoms when already under alpha-blockers therapy, after checking for the absence of severe BOO (residual volume more than 200mL or max urinary flow less than 10mL/s). Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors could be used in patients complaining for both LUTS and erectile dysfunction. In case of complication, or when medical treatment is inefficient or not tolerated, then a surgical treatment should be discussed. Treatment decision should be done according to type of LUTS and related bother, prostate anatomy, level of obstruction and its consequences on urinary tract, patient co-morbidities, experience of practitioner, and choice of patient. Surgical treatments with the higher level of evidence of efficacy include monopolar or bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate, open prostatectomy, transurethral incision of the prostate, photoselective vaporization of the prostate, and Holmium laser enuclation of the prostate. CONCLUSION Here are the first guidelines of the French Urological Association for the initial assessment, the follow-up and the treatment of urinary disorders related to BPH.

Laser treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients on oral anticoagulant therapy : a review

We assessed the therapeutic efficacy and safety of laser prostatectomy (LP) for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in patients on oral anticoagulation. We systematically reviewed previous reports, using the Pubmed database and bibliographies of retrieved articles and reviews. The oral anticoagulation included coumarin derivatives and platelet‐aggregation inhibitors (PAI). Previous studies do not allow the establishment of definitive conclusions for managing patients on oral anticoagulation and who require BPH surgery. No randomized studies are available. Nevertheless, compared to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), LP seems to decrease the risk of haemorrhage in patients taking PAI or coumarin derivatives. Therefore, LP is a useful alternative to TURP for managing patients on oral anticoagulation, and could be proposed as the first intention for those patients. Continuing PAI during the procedure is feasible. A replacement of coumarin derivatives by low molecular weight heparin is preferable. No conclusion can be reached on the preferred type of laser technique to treat these patients, but data on laser enucleation is much less abundant and conclusive than that on laser vaporization.

Urinary PCA3 Score Predicts Prostate Cancer Multifocality

PURPOSE The urinary PCA3 gene test has proved helpful for deciding whether to (re)biopsy to diagnose prostate cancer. We searched for pathological features that influence the shedding of PCA3 producing prostate cancer cells in urine after digital rectal examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS Included in our study were 102 patients with an informative PCA3 score on the Progensa® PCA3 assay who underwent radical prostatectomy. Correlations were evaluated between PCA3 score and histopathological factors on prostatectomy, including tumor site in the prostate and the number of cancer foci. RESULTS PCA3 score significantly correlated with total tumor volume in prostatectomy specimens (p <0.001) but not with prostatectomy Gleason score or pathological stage. PCA3 score positively correlated with apical and basal invasion, and with bilaterality and multifocality. On multivariate analysis multifocality was an independent factor influencing PCA3 score (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS Site in the prostate gland and the number of cancer foci may explain the observed PCA3 score variation in patients operated on for prostate cancer. The PCA3 test could be helpful in preoperatively selecting patients with unifocal and unilateral cancer who could benefit from active surveillance or focal therapy.

Comparative Evaluation of Urinary PCA3 and TMPRSS2: ERG Scores and Serum PHI in Predicting Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness

It has been suggested that urinary PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG fusion tests and serum PHI correlate to cancer aggressiveness-related pathological criteria at prostatectomy. To evaluate and compare their ability in predicting prostate cancer aggressiveness, PHI and urinary PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG (T2) scores were assessed in 154 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for biopsy-proven prostate cancer. Univariate and multivariate analyses using logistic regression and decision curve analyses were performed. All three markers were predictors of a tumor volume ≥0.5 mL. Only PHI predicted Gleason score ≥7. T2 score and PHI were both independent predictors of extracapsular extension (≥pT3), while multifocality was only predicted by PCA3 score. Moreover, when compared to a base model (age, digital rectal examination, serum PSA, and Gleason sum at biopsy), the addition of both PCA3 score and PHI to the base model induced a significant increase (+12%) when predicting tumor volume >0.5 mL. PHI and urinary PCA3 and T2 scores can be considered as complementary predictors of cancer aggressiveness at prostatectomy.

PCA3 and PCA3-Based Nomograms Improve Diagnostic Accuracy in Patients Undergoing First Prostate Biopsy

While now recognized as an aid to predict repeat prostate biopsy outcome, the urinary PCA3 (prostate cancer gene 3) test has also been recently advocated to predict initial biopsy results. The objective is to evaluate the performance of the PCA3 test in predicting results of initial prostate biopsies and to determine whether its incorporation into specific nomograms reinforces its diagnostic value. A prospective study included 601 consecutive patients addressed for initial prostate biopsy. The PCA3 test was performed before ≥12-core initial prostate biopsy, along with standard risk factor assessment. Diagnostic performance of the PCA3 test was evaluated. The three available nomograms (Hansen’s and Chun’s nomograms, as well as the updated Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator; PCPT) were applied to the cohort, and their predictive accuracies were assessed in terms of biopsy outcome: the presence of any prostate cancer (PCa) and high-grade prostate cancer (HGPCa). The PCA3 score provided significant predictive accuracy. While the PCPT risk calculator appeared less accurate; both Chun’s and Hansen’s nomograms provided good calibration and high net benefit on decision curve analyses. When applying nomogram-derived PCa probability thresholds ≤30%, ≤6% of HGPCa would have been missed, while avoiding up to 48% of unnecessary biopsies. The urinary PCA3 test and PCA3-incorporating nomograms can be considered as reliable tools to aid in the initial biopsy decision.

Bilan initial et suivi de l’hyperplasie bénigne de prostate : revue de littérature du CTMH de l’AFU

PURPOSE To perform an update on the initial evaluation and follow-up of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHOD A systematic review of recent literature was performed. Level of evidence of publications was evaluated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Objectives of the initial evaluation are to assess the link between low urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and BPH, to evaluate the bother associated to LUTS, assess a complicated bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), diagnose an adenocarcinoma of the prostate if it modifies the therapeutic strategy, and establish an evolutive profile of the disease. Clinical assessment with digital rectal examination, evaluation of symptoms by a dedicated questionnaire and urine analysis are the first steps of BPH evaluation. Bladder diary is useful to objective storage symptoms. Uroflowmetry and post-void residual volume assessment are useful if BOO is suspected. Measure of serum creatinine and ultrasound exam of the urinary tract are second line explorations. Urine cytology, neurological evaluation, urethrocystoscopy, urodynamics with pressure-flow studies are useful if the link between LUTS and BPH is unclear. PSA dosage is used for prostate cancer screening or as a prognostic marker of BPH evolution.

Transurethral plasma vaporization of the prostate: 3-month functional outcome and complications

Study Type – Therapy (multi‐centre cohort)