Marian J. Surma
Medical University of Łódź
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Marian J. Surma.
Nuclear Medicine Review | 2018
Marian J. Surma; Anna Płachcińska; Jacek Kuśmierek
BACKGROUND Measurements of GFR may be performed with a slope/intercept method (S/I), using only two blood samples taken in strictly defined time points. The aim of the study was to modify this method in order to extend time intervals suitable for blood sampling. Modification was based on a variation of a Russel et al. model parameter, selection of time intervals suitable for blood sampling and assessment of uncertainty of calculated results. MATERIAL AND METHODS Archived values of GFR measurements of 169 patients with different renal function, from 5.5 to 179 mL/min, calculated with a multiple blood sample method were used. Concentrations of a radiopharmaceutical in consecutive minutes, from 60th to 190th after injection, were calculated theoretically, using archived parameters of biexponential functions describing a decrease in 99mTc-DTPA concentration in blood plasma with time. These values, together with injected activities, were treated as measurements and used for S/I clearance calculations. Next, values of S/I clearance were compared with the multiple blood sample method in order to calculate suitable values of exponent present in a Russels model, for every combination of two blood sampling time points. A model was considered accurately fitted to measured values when SEE ≤ 3.6 mL/min. Assessments of uncertainty of obtained results were based on law of error superposition, taking into account mean square prediction error and also errors introduced by pipetting, time measurement and stochastic radioactive decay. RESULTS The accepted criteria resulted in extension of time intervals suitable for blood sampling to: between 60 and 90 minutes after injection for the first sample and between 150 and 180 minutes for the second sample. Uncertainty of results was assessed as between 4 mL/min for GFR = 5-10 mL/min and 8 mL/min for GFR = 180 mL/min. CONCLUSIONS Time intervals accepted for blood sampling fully satisfy nuclear medicine staff and ensure proper determination of GFR. Uncertainty of results is entirely acceptable and for high GFR values even comparable with uncertainty of multi-sample measurements.
Nuclear Medicine Review | 2017
Jacek Kuśmierek; Małgorzata Bieńkiewicz; Tomasz Konecki; Marian J. Surma; Marek Sosnowski; Anna Płachcińska
BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to examine whether parametric clearance images (PAR) enhance diagnostic potential of a dynamic renal scintigraphy with detection of local dysfunction of kidneys, on a model of kidneys after treatment with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), MATERIAL AND METHODS: Kidneys after ESWL were accepted as a proper model for the implementation of this objective because of the previously proven damaging effect of a shock wave on renal parenchyma and known region of ESWL application. Forty patients (23 males and 17 females) at the age of 37 to 70 years (mean value 54) with untreated earlier single, one-sided nephrolithiasis, currently treated with ESWL, underwent a study. A dynamic renal 99mTc-EC scintigraphy was performed three times: before ESWL, a week and a month after this therapeutic intervention. PAR images generated with use of an in-house developed software were compared with summation (SUM) of images obtained from radiopharmaceutical uptake phase and quantitative global function parameters (GFP) of each kidney, like split function, MTT - mean transit time and PTT - parenchymal transit time. RESULTS PAR and SUM images of all 40 kidneys before ESWL were normal. PAR images revealed local or diffused defects a week and a month after therapeutic intervention in statistically significantly larger numbers of kidneys than SUM images (19 vs. 6, p = 0.002 and 16 vs. 5, p = 0.003, respectively). A week after ESWL, when defects in PAR images were observed in about a half of all renal segments (29/57 - 51%) all GFP values were significantly worse than in kidneys without defects. A month after ESWL defects in PAR images could be observed in ab. 1/3 (17/48 - 35%) of segments and were less extensive, whereas GFP values did not differ significantly from values in kidneys without clearance function impairment in the PAR images. CONCLUSIONS PAR images enhance diagnostic potential of a dynamic renal scintigraphy with detection of local function defects. These images allow to detect more local renal function defects than SUM images.
Nuclear Medicine Review | 1998
Marian J. Surma
Nuclear Medicine Review | 2001
Marian J. Surma
Nuclear Medicine Review | 2003
Izabela Frieske; Marian J. Surma; Małgorzata Bieńkiewicz; Jolanta Białkowska-Warzecha; Julian Liniecki; Jan Kuydowicz; Jacek Kuśmierek
Nuclear Medicine Review | 2002
Marian J. Surma
Nuclear Medicine Review | 1999
Marian J. Surma; Jolanta Wiewiórka; Agnieszka Szadkowska; Julian Liniecki
Nuclear Medicine Review | 2008
Izabela Frieske; Ewa Pietrzak-Stelmasiak; Małgorzata Bieńkiewicz; Marian J. Surma; Jacek Kuśmierek
Nuclear Medicine Review | 2007
Izabela Frieske; Marian J. Surma; Agnieszka Rogozińska-Zawiślak; Agnieszka Szadkowska; Mariusz Gadzicki; Jerzy Bodalski; Jacek Kuśmierek
Nuclear Medicine Review | 2015
Paweł Cichocki; Marian J. Surma; Wojciech Woźnicki; Małgorzata Bieńkiewicz; Anna Płachcińska; Jacek Kuśmierek