Marian Raley
University of Newcastle
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Marian Raley.
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition | 2018
H.J. van der Fels-Klerx; E.D. van Asselt; Marian Raley; Morten Poulsen; Helle Korsgaard; Lea Bredsdorff; Maarten Nauta; M. D'Agostino; David Coles; Hans J.P. Marvin; Lynn J. Frewer
ABSTRACT This study aimed to critically review methods for ranking risks related to food safety and dietary hazards on the basis of their anticipated human health impacts. A literature review was performed to identify and characterize methods for risk ranking from the fields of food, environmental science and socio-economic sciences. The review used a predefined search protocol, and covered the bibliographic databases Scopus, CAB Abstracts, Web of Sciences, and PubMed over the period 1993–2013. All references deemed relevant, on the basis of predefined evaluation criteria, were included in the review, and the risk ranking method characterized. The methods were then clustered—based on their characteristics—into eleven method categories. These categories included: risk assessment, comparative risk assessment, risk ratio method, scoring method, cost of illness, health adjusted life years (HALY), multi-criteria decision analysis, risk matrix, flow charts/decision trees, stated preference techniques and expert synthesis. Method categories were described by their characteristics, weaknesses and strengths, data resources, and fields of applications. It was concluded there is no single best method for risk ranking. The method to be used should be selected on the basis of risk manager/assessor requirements, data availability, and the characteristics of the method. Recommendations for future use and application are provided.
PLOS ONE | 2018
Helen Kendall; Paul Naughton; Sharron Kuznesof; Marian Raley; Moira Dean; Beth Clark; Hanna Stolz; Robert Home; Mei-Yen Chan; Q. Zhong; P. Brereton; Lynn J. Frewer
Background/Aims Persistent incidents of food fraud in China have resulted in low levels of consumer trust in the authenticity and safety of food that is domestically produced. We examined the relationship between the concerns of Chinese consumers regarding food fraud, and the role that demonstrating authenticity may play in relieving those concerns. Methods A two-stage mixed method design research design was adopted. First, qualitative research (focus groups n = 7) was conducted in three Chinese cities, Beijing, Guangzhou and Chengdu to explore concerns held by Chinese consumers in relation to food fraud. A subsequent quantitative survey (n = 850) tested hypotheses derived from the qualitative research and theoretical literature regarding the relationship between attitudinal measures (including risk perceptions, social trust, and perceptions of benefit associated with demonstrating authenticity), and behavioral intention to purchase “authentic” European products using structural equation modelling. Results Chinese consumers perceive food fraud to be a hazard that represents a food safety risk. Food hazard concern was identified to be geographically influenced. Consumers in Chengdu (tier 2 city) possessed higher levels of hazard concern compared to consumers in Beijing and Guangzhou (tier 1). Structural trust (i.e. trust in actors and the governance of the food supply chain) was not a significant predictor of attitude and intention to purchase authenticated food products. Consumers were shown to have developed ‘risk-relieving’ strategies to compensate for the lack of trust in Chinese food and the dissonance experienced as a consequence of food fraud. Indexical and iconic authenticity cues provided by food manufacturers and regulators were important elements of product evaluations, although geographical differences in their perceived importance were observed. Conclusions Targeted communication of authenticity assurance measures, including; regulations; enforcement; product testing; and actions taken by industry may improve Chinese consumer trust in the domestic food supply chain and reduce consumer concerns regarding the food safety risks associated with food fraud. To support product differentiation and retain prestige, European food manufactures operating within the Chinese market should recognise regional disparities in consumer risk perceptions regarding food fraud and the importance of personal risk mitigation strategies adopted by Chinese consumers to support the identification of authentic products.
Environment and Planning C-government and Policy | 2004
Jeremy Phillipson; Matthew Gorton; Marian Raley; Andrew Moxey
Journal of Rural Studies | 2004
Jeremy Phillipson; Katy Bennett; Philip Lowe; Marian Raley
Archive | 2000
Marian Raley; Andrew Moxey
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability | 2013
Guy Garrod; Marian Raley; Olivier Aznar; Omar Bacqueiro Espinosa; Olivier Barreteau; Myriam Gomez; Franziska Schaft; Nadine Turpin
International Journal of Food Studies | 2016
Marian Raley; Maddalena Ragona; S.J. Sijtsema; A.R.H. Fischer; Lynn J. Frewer
EFSA Supporting Publications | 2015
H.J. van der Fels-Klerx; E.D. van Asselt; Marian Raley; Morten Poulsen; Helle Bisgaard Korsgaard; Lea Bredsdorff; Maarten Nauta; V. Flari; M. D'Agostino; David Coles; Lynn J. Frewer
Regional and Business Studies | 2011
Diana Kopeva; Mariya Peneva; Omar Baquiero; Ramona Franić; Guy Garrod; Baptiste Hautdidier; Nedka Ivanova; Miroslav Jelinek; Marta Konecna; Ramon Laplana; Burghard C. Meyer; Mario Njavro; Marian Raley; Amanda Sahrbacher; Nadine Turpin
Archive | 2013
Nicola Thompson; Guy Garrod; Marian Raley