Marianne Sinn

Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Gemcitabine and Long-term Outcomes Among Patients With Resected Pancreatic Cancer: The CONKO-001 Randomized Trial

IMPORTANCE The prognosis for patients with pancreatic cancer is poor, even after resection with curative intent. Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy is standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer, but its effect on survival in the adjuvant setting has not been demonstrated. OBJECTIVE To analyze whether previously reported improvement in disease-free survival with adjuvant gemcitabine therapy translates into improved overall survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS CONKO-001 (Charité Onkologie 001), a multicenter, open-label, phase 3 randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic cancer after complete tumor resection. Patients with macroscopically completely removed pancreatic cancer entered the study between July 1998 and December 2004 in 88 hospitals in Germany and Austria. Follow-up ended in September 2012. INTERVENTIONS After stratification for tumor stage, nodal status, and resection status, patients were randomly assigned to either adjuvant gemcitabine treatment (1g/m2 d 1, 8, 15, q 4 weeks) for 6 months or to observation alone. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included treatment safety and overall survival, with overall survival defined as the time from date of randomization to death. Patients lost to follow-up were censored on the date of their last follow-up. RESULTS A total of 368 patients were randomized, and 354 were eligible for intention-to-treat-analysis. By September 2012, 308 patients (87.0% [95% CI, 83.1%-90.1%]) had relapsed and 316 patients (89.3% [95% CI, 85.6%-92.1%]) had died. The median follow-up time was 136 months. The median disease-free survival was 13.4 (95% CI, 11.6-15.3) months in the treatment group compared with 6.7 (95% CI, 6.0-7.5) months in the observation group (hazard ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.44-0.69]; P < .001). Patients randomized to adjuvant gemcitabine treatment had prolonged overall survival compared with those randomized to observation alone (hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.61-0.95]; P = .01), with 5-year overall survival of 20.7% (95% CI, 14.7%-26.6%) vs 10.4% (95% CI, 5.9%-15.0%), respectively, and 10-year overall survival of 12.2% (95% CI, 7.3%-17.2%) vs 7.7% (95% CI, 3.6%-11.8%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with macroscopic complete removal of pancreatic cancer, the use of adjuvant gemcitabine for 6 months compared with observation alone resulted in increased overall survival as well as disease-free survival. These findings provide strong support for the use of gemcitabine in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN34802808.

Second-Line Oxaliplatin, Folinic Acid, and Fluorouracil Versus Folinic Acid and Fluorouracil Alone for Gemcitabine-Refractory Pancreatic Cancer: Outcomes From the CONKO-003 Trial

PURPOSE To assess the efficacy of a second-line regimen of oxaliplatin and folinic acid-modulated fluorouracil in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who have experienced progression while receiving gemcitabine monotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS A randomized, open-label, phase III study was conducted in 16 institutions throughout Germany. Recruitment ran from January 2004 until May 2007, and the last follow-up concluded in December 2012. Overall, 168 patients age 18 years or older who experienced disease progression during first-line gemcitabine therapy were randomly assigned to folinic acid and fluorouracil (FF) or oxaliplatin and FF (OFF). Patients were stratified according to the presence of metastases, duration of first-line therapy, and Karnofsky performance status. RESULTS Median follow-up was 54.1 months, and 160 patients were eligible for the primary analysis. The median overall survival in the OFF group (5.9 months; 95% CI, 4.1 to 7.4) versus the FF group (3.3 months; 95% CI, 2.7 to 4.0) was significantly improved (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.91; log-rank P = .010). Time to progression with OFF (2.9 months; 95% CI, 2.4 to 3.2) versus FF (2.0 months; 95% CI, 1.6 to 2.3) was significantly extended also (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.94; log-rank P = .019). Rates of adverse events were similar between treatment arms, with the exception of grades 1 to 2 neurotoxicity, which were reported in 29 patients (38.2%) and six patients (7.1%) in the OFF and FF groups, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSION Second-line OFF significantly extended the duration of overall survival when compared with FF alone in patients with advanced gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer.

Efficacy of Prophylactic Low–Molecular Weight Heparin for Ambulatory Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Outcomes From the CONKO-004 Trial

PURPOSE Advanced pancreatic cancer (APC), in addition to its high mortality, accounts for the highest rates of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). Enoxaparin, a low-molecular weight heparin, is effective in prevention and treatment of VTEs. Some small studies have indicated that this benefit might extend to patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with histologically proven APC were randomly assigned to ambulant first-line chemotherapy and prophylactic use of enoxaparin or chemotherapy alone to investigate the probable reduction in symptomatic VTEs and the impact on survival. RESULTS A total of 312 patients were recruited as one of the protocol end points was reached. Within the first 3 months, the numbers of symptomatic VTEs were as follows: 15 of 152 patients in the observation group and two of 160 patients in the enoxaparin group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.52; χ(2) P = .001). The numbers of major bleeding events were as follows: five of 152 patients in the observation arm and seven of 160 patients in the enoxaparin arm (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.35 to 3.72; χ(2) P = 1.0). Overall cumulative incidence rates of symptomatic VTEs were 15.1% (observation) and 6.4% (enoxaparin; HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.83; P = .01). Progression-free (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.32; P = .64) and overall survival (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.38; P = .44) did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the high efficacy and feasibility of primary pharmacologic prevention of symptomatic VTEs in outpatients with APC. Treatment efficacy was not affected by simultaneous treatment with enoxaparin in this trial setting.

SPARC expression in resected pancreatic cancer patients treated with gemcitabine: results from the CONKO-001 study

BACKGROUND Previous investigations in pancreatic cancer suggested a prognostic role for secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) expression in the peritumoral stroma but not for cytoplasmic SPARC expression. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of SPARC expression in pancreatic cancer patients treated with gemcitabine compared with untreated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS CONKO-001 was a prospective randomized phase III study investigating the role of adjuvant gemcitabine when compared with observation. Tissue samples of 160 patients were available for SPARC immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays to evaluate its impact on patient outcome. RESULTS Strong stromal SPARC expression was associated with worse disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the overall study population (DFS: P = 0.005, OS: P = 0.033). Its negative prognostic impact was restricted to patients treated with gemcitabine (DFS: P = 0.007, OS: P = 0.006). High cytoplasmic SPARC expression also was associated with worse patient outcome (DFS: P = 0.041, OS: P = 0.011). Again the effect was restricted to patients treated with gemcitabine (DFS: P = 0.002, OS: P = 0.003). In multivariable analysis, SPARC expression was independently predictive of patient outcome. CONCLUSIONS Our data confirm the prognostic significance of SPARC expression after curatively intended resection. The negative prognostic impact was restricted to patients who received adjuvant treatment with gemcitabine, suggesting SPARC as a predictive marker for response to gemcitabine.

Does long‐term survival in patients with pancreatic cancer really exist?—Results from the CONKO‐001 study

Long‐term survival (LTS) in patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer is still uncommon, little data is available to identify long‐term survivors. The CONKO‐001 study, which established gemcitabine after resection as adjuvant therapy, may provide data to answer this question.

α-Smooth muscle actin expression and desmoplastic stromal reaction in pancreatic cancer: results from the CONKO-001 study

Background:Previous investigations in pancreatic cancer suggest a prognostic role for α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) expression and stromal density in the peritumoural stroma. The aim of this study was to further validate the impact of α-SMA expression and stromal density in resectable pancreatic cancer patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine compared with untreated patients.Methods:CONKO-001 was a prospective randomised phase III study investigating the role of adjuvant gemcitabine as compared with observation. Tissue samples of 162 patients were available for immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays to evaluate the impact of α-SMA expression and stromal density impact on patient outcome.Results:High α-SMA expression in tumour stroma was associated with worse patient outcome (DFS: P=0.05, OS: P=0.047). A dense stroma reaction was associated with improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the overall study population (DFS: P=0.001, OS: P=0.001). This positive prognostic impact was restricted to patients with no adjuvant treatment (DFS: P<0.001, OS: P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, α-SMA and stromal density expression were independently predictive factors for survival.Conclusions:Our data confirm the negative prognostic impact of high α-SMA expression in pancreatic cancer patients after curatively intended resection. In contrast to former investigations, we found a positive prognostic impact for a dense stroma. This significant influence was restricted to patients who received no adjuvant therapy.

Human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 expression analysed by the clone SP 120 rabbit antibody is not predictive in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with adjuvant gemcitabine - Results from the CONKO-001 trial

BACKGROUND High expression of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) is considered to predict survival in patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine for pancreatic cancer. A standard evaluation system for immunohistochemical analysis (antibody, scoring system) has not yet been established. METHODS CONKO-001, a prospective randomised phase III study investigated the role of adjuvant gemcitabine (gem) as compared to observation (obs). Tumour samples of 156 patients were analysed by immunohistochemistry with the rabbit monoclonal antibody SP120 (Ventana Medical Systems) for expression of hENT1. Kaplan-Meier analyses for median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed in dependence of hENT1 expression measured analogously to Farrell et al. 2009 and Poplin et al. 2013. RESULTS For the 88 gem and 68 obs patients, median DFS/OS was 12.9/22.7 months and 6.2/19.1 months. High hENT1 expression was not associated with improved median DFS (Farrell: no hENT1 22.2 months, low hENT1 13.7 months, high hENT1 12.1 months, p=0.248; Poplin: low hENT1 13.2 months versus high hENT1 11.5 months, p=0.5) or median OS (Farrell: no hENT1 21.7 months, low hENT1 24.7 months, high hENT1 19.5, p=0.571; Poplin: low hENT1 24.4 months versus high hENT1 19.7 months, p=0.92;) in the gem group or in the obs group (median DFS Farrell: no hENT1 5.1 months, low hENT1 6.2 months, high hENT1 7.5 months, p=0.375; Poplin: low hENT1 6.2 months versus high hENT1 5.9 months, p=0.83; median OS Farrell: no hENT1 20.2months, low hENT1 17.7 months, high HENT1 19.1 months, p=0.738; Poplin: low hENT1 17.7 months versus high hENT1 20.4 months, p=0.65) measured by the Farrell or Poplin Score. CONCLUSIONS We cannot confirm a predictive role of hENT1 measured by the clone SP120 rabbit antibody in our study population. Reproducible standard procedures are urgently needed prior to the implementation or exclusion of hENT1 as a predictive biomarker in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN34802808.

Blood group determinates incidence for pancreatic cancer in Germany

Background: Genetic risk factors for sporadic pancreatic cancer are largely unknown but actually under high exposure. Findings of correlations between the AB0 blood group system (Chromosome 9q34,1—q34,2) and the risk of pancreatic cancer (PC) in patients from Asia, America and south Europe have already been published. So far it is unclear, whether this correlation between blood group an PC incidence can be found in German patients as well. Methods: One hundred and sixty-six patients who underwent a resection of PC were evaluated in a period between 2000 and 2010. Blood group reference distribution for the German population is given as: 0: 41%; A: 43%; B: 11%; AB: 5%; Rhesus positive: 85%; Rhesus negative: 15%. Analyses were done using the non-parametric Chi2-test (p-value two sided; SPSS 19.0). Results: Median age was 62 (34–82) years. Gender: female 73/44%; male: 93/56%. Observed blood group proportions: 0: 43 (25.9%)/A: 94 (56.6%)/B: 16 (9.6%)/AB: 13 (7.8%)/Rhesus positive: 131 (78.9%)/negative: 35 (21.1%). We detected a significant difference to the German reference distribution of the AB0 system (Chi2 19.34, df 3, p < 0.001). Rhesus factor has no impact on AB0-distribution (Chi2 4.13, df 3, p = 0.25), but differs significantly from reference distribution—probably due to initial AB0-variation (Chi2 4.82, df 1, p = 0.028). The odds ratio for blood group A is 2.01 and for blood group 0 is 0.5. Conclusions: The incidence of PC in the German cohort is highly associated with the AB0-system as well. More patients with blood group A suffer from PC (p < 0.001) whereas blood group 0 was less frequent in patients with PC (p < 0.001). Thus, our findings support the results from other non-German surveys. The causal trigger points of this carcinogenesis correlation are still not known.

KRAS mutations in codon 12 or 13 are associated with worse prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Objective Mutations in the KRAS and P53 genes belong to the most frequently observed genetic alterations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to examine the frequency and prognostic impact of KRAS mutations. In addition, we attempted to define molecular subgroups with distinct biologic behavior by combination of KRAS sequencing data with p53 protein expression data. Methods KRAS mutational analyses were performed in a study group of 153 patients by Sanger sequencing. Immunohistochemistry for p53 was performed on tissue microarrays. Results KRAS mutations in codon 12 or 13 were found in 68% of cases. Nuclear staining for p53 was detectable in 110 (68%) of 162 evaluable cases. We found no correlation between KRAS mutational status and p53 expression. KRAS mutational status but not p53 immunohistochemistry was an independent prognostic factor in the study group (P = 0.02). In a stratified analysis according to KRAS mutational status, p53 expression failed to define prognostic groups beyond the impact of KRAS mutational status. Conclusions Our results support the crucial role of KRAS mutational status in pancreatic cancer biology. KRAS mutational status may serve as a prognostic marker. However, its predictive role for targeted therapies remains to be evaluated.

Primary pharmacological prevention of thromboembolic events in ambulatory patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with chemotherapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The indication for medical venous thrombosis prophylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients is still under discussion. To provide more data on this topic we conducted an analysis in ambulatory patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, reflecting a patient cohort at high risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (sVTE). PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from 312 consecutively recruited patients of the CONKO-004 trial were analysed according to predefined parameters and additionally with respect to established scores. To focus on patients with highest risk of sVTE unvaried and multivariate analyses were conducted. RESULTS The global analyses had educed a number needed to treat (NNT) by medical thrombosis prophylaxis of 12 patients to prevent one sVTE. The modified score model did not provide further clinical benefit. However, the regression model can identify single parameters with a trend to higher risk of sVTE or higher risk of severe bleeding. Most of the parameters do not have enough power to be significant, but they can support clinical decisions. CONCLUSION These data suggest that medical thrombosis prophylaxis should be performed in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer at least for the initial 3 months of first line chemotherapy.