Maribel Parra

UV Irradiation Induces the Murine Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Gene via the c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase Signaling Pathway: Requirement of an AP1 Enhancer Element

ABSTRACT UV irradiation leads to severe damage, such as cutaneous inflammation, immunosuppression, and cancer, but it also results in a gene induction protective response termed the UV response. The signal triggering the UV response was thought to originate from DNA damage; recent findings, however, have shown that it is initiated at or near the cell membrane and transmitted via cytoplasmic kinase cascades to induce gene transcription. Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) was the first protein shown to be UV inducible in xeroderma pigmentosum DNA repair-deficient human cells. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms responsible for the induction were not elucidated. We have found that the endogenous murine uPA gene product is transcriptionally upregulated by UV in NIH 3T3 fibroblast and F9 teratocarcinoma cells. This induction required an activator protein 1 (AP1) enhancer element located at −2.4 kb, since deletion of this site abrogated the induction. We analyzed the contribution of the three different types of UV-inducible mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases (ERK, JNK/SAPK, and p38) to the activation of the murine uPA promoter by UV. MEKK1, a specific JNK activator, induced transcription from the uPA promoter in the absence of UV treatment, whereas coexpression of catalytically inactive MEKK1(K432M) and of cytoplasmic JNK inhibitor JIP-1 inhibited UV-induced uPA transcriptional activity. In contrast, neither dominant negative MKK6 (or SB203580) nor PD98059, which specifically inhibit p38 and ERK MAP kinase pathways, respectively, could abrogate the UV-induced effect. Moreover, our results indicated that wild-type N-terminal c-Jun, but not mutated c-Jun (Ala-63/73), was able to mediate UV-induced uPA transcriptional activity. Taken together, we show for the first time that kinases of the JNK family can activate the uPA promoter. This activation links external UV stimulation and AP1-dependent uPA transcription, providing a transcription-coupled signal transduction pathway for the induction of the murine uPA gene by UV.

The plasminogen activation system in skeletal muscle regeneration: antagonistic roles of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor (PAI-1).

The plasminogen activation (PA) system is an extensively used mechanism for the generation of proteolytic activity in the extracellular matrix, where it contributes to tissue remodeling in a wide range of physiopathological processes. Despite the limited information available at present on plasminogen activators, their inhibitors and cognate receptors in skeletal muscle, increasing evidence is accumulating on their important roles in the homeostasis of muscle fibers and their surrounding extracellular matrix. The development of mice deficient for the individual components of the PA system has provided an incisive approach to test the proposed muscle functions in vivo. Skeletal muscle regeneration induced by injury has been analyzed in urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA)-, tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA)-, plasminogen (Plg)- and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1)-deficient mice and has demonstrated profound effects of these molecules on the fibrotic state and the inflammatory response, which contribute to muscle repair. In particular, the opposite roles of uPA and its inhibitor PAI-1 in this process are highlighted. Delineating the mechanisms by which the different plasminogen activation system components regulate tissue repair will be of potential therapeutic value for severe muscle disorders.

Epigenetic Regulation of B Lymphocyte Differentiation, Transdifferentiation, and Reprogramming

B cell development is a multistep process that is tightly regulated at the transcriptional level. In recent years, investigators have shed light on the transcription factor networks involved in all the differentiation steps comprising B lymphopoiesis. The interplay between transcription factors and the epigenetic machinery involved in establishing the correct genomic landscape characteristic of each cellular state is beginning to be dissected. The participation of “epigenetic regulator-transcription factor” complexes is also crucial for directing cells during reprogramming into pluripotency or lineage conversion. In this context, greater knowledge of epigenetic regulation during B cell development, transdifferentiation, and reprogramming will enable us to understand better how epigenetics can control cell lineage commitment and identity. Herein, we review the current knowledge about the epigenetic events that contribute to B cell development and reprogramming.

The alkylating carcinogen N -methyl- N ’-nitro-N -nitrosoguanidine activates the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 gene through sequential phosphorylation of p53 by ATM and ATR kinases

The alkylating agent MNNG is an environmental carcinogen that causes DNA lesions leading to cell death. We previously demonstrated that MNNG induced the transcriptional activity of the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) gene in a p53-dependent manner. However, the mechanism(s) linking external MNNG stimulation and PAI-1 gene induction remained to be elucidated. Here, we show that ATM and ATR kinases, but not DNA-PK, which participate in DNA damage-activated checkpoints, regulate the phosphorylation of p53 at serine 15 in response to MNNG cell treatment. Using ATM-deficient cells, ATM was shown to be required for early phosphorylation of serine 15 in response to MNNG, whereas catalytically inactive ATR selectively interfered with late phase serine 15 phosphorylation. In contrast, DNA-PK-deficient cells showed no change in the MNNG-induced serine 15 phosphorylation pattern. In agreement with this, sequential activation of ATM and ATR kinases was also required for adequate induction of the endogenous PAI-1 gene by MNNG. Finally, we showed that cells derived from PAI-1-deficient mice were more resistant to MNNG-induced cell death than normal cells, suggesting that p53-dependent PAI-1 expression partially mediated this effect. Since PAI-1 is involved in the control of tumor invasiveness, our finding that MNNG induces PAI-1 gene expression via ATM/ATR-mediated phosphorylation of p53 sheds new insight on the role of these DNA damage-induced cell cycle checkpoint kinases.

New transcription regulatory mechanisms of latent HIV LTR

Despite the effectiveness of antiretroviral medication, the HIV virus persists in resting memory T cells of infected patients in a latent state, providing the main impediment to eradication of the virus. We are interested in identifying the molecular mechanism responsible for the establishment and maintenance of HIV latency and its re-activation. We recently used a cell system reflecting HIV latency in my lab to determine the high resolution nucleosomal landscape of the latent HIV LTR and examine its dynamic changes upon re-activation (Rafati et al., Nov 2011 PLoS Biology). We combined mathematical predictions of nucleosome positioning with a combinatorial biochemical approach based on formaldehyde crosslinking of latent and activated HIV infected cells (using FAIRE, ChIP and high resolution MNase nucleosomal mapping) to define LTR nucleosome positioning and regulation during active and latent HIV infections. We found that BAF, an ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling complex generates a chromatin structure at the LTR that is energetically unfavorable to its intrinsic histone-DNA sequence preferences. Specifically, we find that BAF positions a repressive nucleosome immediately downstream of the HIV transcription start site, abrogating transcription, and in this way contributes to the establishment and maintenance of HIV latency. Our data describe a novel molecular mechanism for the establishment and maintenance of HIV latency, and we identify the catalytic subunit of BAF, the enzyme BRG1, as a putative molecular target to deplete the latent reservoir in infected patients. We will also present preliminary data addressing the role of a novel signalling pathway in de-repression of latent HIV, and the effect of small molecules and ligands, which activate this pathway to study reactivation of latent HIV. We anticipate these experiments will further our understanding of HIV transcription regulation and identify both novel cofactors for targeting and molecules with potential to purge HIV latency.