Marica Arvigo

The clinical-molecular interface of somatostatin, dopamine and their receptors in pituitary pathophysiology

The role of somatostatin and dopamine receptors as molecular targets for the treatment of patients with pituitary adenomas is well established. Indeed, dopamine and somatostatin receptor agonists are considered milestones for the medical therapy of these tumours. However, in recent years, the knowledge of the expression of subtypes of somatostatin and dopamine receptors in pituitary adenomas, as well as of the coexpression of both types of receptors in tumour cells, has increased considerably. Moreover, recent insights suggest a functional interface of dopamine and somatostatin receptors, when coexpressed in the same cells. This interaction has been suggested to occur via dimerisation of these G-protein-coupled receptors. In addition, there was renewed interest around the concept of cell specificity in response to ligand-induced receptor activation. New experimental drugs, including novel somatostatin analogues, binding to multiple somatostatin receptor subtypes, as well as hybrid somatostatin-dopamine compounds have been generated, and recently a completely novel class of molecules has been developed. These advances have opened new perspectives for the medical treatment of patients with pituitary tumours poorly responsive to the present clinically available drugs, and perhaps also for the treatment of other categories of neuroendocrine tumours. The aim of the present review is to summarise the novel insights in somatostatin and dopamine receptor pathophysiology, and to bring these new insights into perspective for the future strategies in the medical treatment of patients with pituitary adenomas.

Assessment of disease activity in acromegaly by means of a single blood sample: comparison of the 120th minute postglucose value with spontaneous GH secretion and with the IGF system

objective  It has been suggested that the threshold of 1 µg/l of GH nadir after glucose load for definition of controlled acromegalic disease proposed in the 2000 consensus statement should be lowered to 0·30. We evaluated these two cut‐off values in comparison with IGF‐I, ALS and IGFBP‐3 in a group of acromegalic patients. With the aim of simplifying the follow‐up protocol in these patients we also tested if one single sample taken after glucose load could replace the nadir value.

Somatostatin and dopamine receptor interaction in prostate and lung cancer cell lines

Somatostatin analogues inhibit in vitro cell proliferation via specific membrane receptors (SSTRs). Recent studies on transfected cell lines have shown a ligand-induced formation of receptor dimers. The aim of this study is 1) to evaluate the role of specific ligands in modulating receptor interactions in the androgen-dependent prostate cancer cell line, LNCaP, and in the non-small cell lung cancer line, Calu-6, by co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblot; and 2) to correlate the antiproliferative effect of these compounds with their ability in modulating receptor interactions. In LNCaP, we have demonstrated the constitutive presence of sstr₁/sstr₂, sstr₂/sstr₅, sstr₅/dopamine (DA) type 2 receptor (D₂R), and sstr₂/D₂R dimers. BIM-23704 (sstr₁- and sstr₂-preferential compound) increased the co-immunoprecipitation of sstr₁/sstr₂ and significantly inhibited proliferation (-30.98%). BIM-23244 (sstr₂-sstr₅ selective agonist) significantly increased the co-immunoprecipitation of sstr₂/sstr₅, and induced a -41.36% inhibition of proliferation. BIM-23A760, a new somatostatin/DA chimeric agonist with a high affinity for sstr₂ and D₂R and a moderate affinity for sstr₅, significantly increased the sstr₅/D₂R and sstr₂/D₂R complexes and was the most powerful in inhibiting proliferation (-42.30%). The chimeric compound was also the most efficient in modulating receptor interaction in Calu-6, increasing the co-immunoprecipitation of D₂R/sstr₅ and inhibiting cell proliferation (-30.54%). However, behind BIM-23A760, BIM-53097 (D₂R-preferential compound) also significantly inhibited Calu-6 proliferation (-17.71%), suggesting a key role for D₂R in receptor cross talk and in controlling cell growth. Indeed, activation of monomeric receptors did not affect receptor co-immunoprecipitation, whereas cell proliferation was significantly inhibited when the receptors were synergistically activated. In conclusion, our data show a dynamic ligand-induced somatostatin and DA receptor interaction, which may be crucial for the antiproliferative effects of the new analogues.

Regulation of prostate cancer cell proliferation by somatostatin receptor activation

Although some evidence supports the antitumoral effects of somatostatin (SRIF) and related agonists, the available data in prostate cancer (PCa) model systems and clinical studies are few, conflicting and not conclusive. This study investigated the effects of lanreotide and new mono- and bi-specific SRIF agonists on proliferation, ligand-driven SRIF receptor (sst) dimerization and secretory pattern of the IGF system in LNCaP cells, a model of androgen-dependent PCa. LNCaP expressed all sst(s), but sst(4). Among them, sst(1) and sst(3) were inversely regulated by serum concentration. sst(1)/sst(2) and sst(2)/sst(5) dimers were constitutively present and further stabilized by treatment with BIM-23704 (sst(1)/sst(2)) and BIM-23244 (sst(2)/sst(5)), respectively. Dose-response studies showed that lanreotide and BIM-23244 were significantly more potent in inhibiting LNCaP cell proliferation than BIM-23120 (sst(2)) and BIM-23206 (sst(5)) alone or in combination. Treatment with BIM-23926 [corrected] (sst(1)) markedly reduced cell proliferation, whereas exposure to BIM-23704 resulted in a lower cell growth inhibition. The antiproliferative effects of BIM-23244, lanreotide and BIM-23704 were unchanged, reduced and abolished by the sst(2) antagonist BIM-23627, respectively. All SRIF analogs caused a significant induction in p27(KipI) and p21 and down-regulation of protein expression of cyclin E, as well as reduced IGF-I and IGF-II secretion. In particular, the administration of exogenous IGF-I, at variance to IGF-II, counteracted the inhibitory effect on cell proliferation of these compounds. Moreover, SRIF agonists reduced endogenous IGFBP-3 proteolysis. These results show that, in LNCaP cells, activation of sst(1) and sst(2)/sst(5) results in relevant antiproliferative/antisecretive actions.

Effects of uremia and inflammation on growth hormone resistance in patients with chronic kidney diseases.

Resistance to the anabolic action of growth hormone may contribute to the loss of strength and muscle mass in adult patients with chronic kidney disease. We tested this hypothesis by infusing growth hormone in patients to levels necessary to saturate hormone receptors. This led to a significant decrease of plasma potassium and amino acid levels in control and hyperkalemic patients with chronic kidney disease. These effects were completely or partially blunted in patients with elevated C-reactive protein levels. In forearm perfusion studies, growth hormone caused a further decrease in the negative potassium and protein balance of hemodialysis patients without inflammation but no effect was seen in patients with inflammation. Only IL-6 levels and age were found to be independent correlates in these growth hormone-induced variations in plasma potassium and blood amino acids. This shows that although a resistance to pharmacologic doses of growth hormone is not a general feature of patients with chronic kidney disease, there is a subgroup characterized by blunted growth hormone action. Our results support the hypothesis that uremia with inflammation, but not uremia per se, inhibits downstream growth hormone signaling contributing to muscle atrophy.

Somatostatin, Somatostatin Analogs and Somatostatin Receptor Dynamics in the Biology of Cancer Progression

The pharmacological effects (i.e., inhibition of endocrine secretion and cell proliferation) mediated by the hormone somatostatin (SRIF) are derived from its universal high-affinity binding to five different G proteincoupled receptors (GPCRs), named sst1-5. However, SRIF has a half-life of less than 3 min, whereas the available mono- and bi-specific SRIF preferential analogs show prolonged half-life and increased potency. These compounds may control tumor development, cell proliferation and metastatization by direct actions, including cell division arrest in G0/G1 phase (i.e., induction of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27(kip1) or p21(Cip1)), induction of apoptosis (i.e., induction of p53 and Bax) and suppression of cell invasion. Along with these direct actions on the biology of cancer progression, in vivo SRIF analogs may also regulate tumor growth through indirect actions, by suppressing the secretion of growth-promoting hormones and growth factors and angiogenesis. Interestingly, when ssts are co-expressed, they may interact forming homo- or heterodimers, also with other GPCRs such as type 2 dopamine receptor and the μ-opioid receptor 1, altering their original pharmacological and functional properties. Dimers can be not only constitutive, but perhaps also ligandpromoted: hence, compounds with high affinity for different ssts isoforms may be used to achieve effects elicited by specific dimers. Future developments in the knowledge of ssts dynamics upon SRIF and SRIF analogs binding in neoplastic tissues may allow the full elucidation of the pathophysiological role of this system and the exploitation of the therapeutic potential of its modulation.

Role of Dopamine Receptors in Normal and Tumoral Pituitary Corticotropic Cells and Adrenal Cells

The recent depiction of dopamine receptors (DRs) in tumors that cause Cushing’s syndrome (CS) has renewed the debate about the dopamine control on pituitary-adrenal axis, and opened interesting new perspectives for medical treatment of CS. The new insights arise from the recent accurate characterization of DR subtypes expression within tumors causing CS, the discovery of new mechanisms, such as the dimerization between DRs and other G-protein coupled receptors (CPCRs), including somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), and the recent availability of new agents targeting these receptor subtypes. Corticotropic adenomas express DR subtype 2 (D2R), together with different SSTR subtypes (ssts), in particular sst5. In vitro, activation of D2R inhibits ACTH release in the majority of cultures of corticotropic cells, whereas, in vivo, dopaminergic agents display an inhibitory effect on cortisol levels in a subset of patients with CS. In animal models the receptor profile can be deeply modulated in specific environmental conditions, that may resemble the different clinical phases of CS. The new insights about DRs and receptor-targeting drugs may offer different approaches for medical treatment of CS: combination therapies with different types of compounds, treatment with novel molecules (hybrid compounds) with a wider spectrum of activity, or even pretreatment manipulation of receptor profile. Finally, recent studies showed that D2R is also significantly expressed in ectopic ACTH-secreting tumors and in both normal and tumoral adrenal tissues. Dopamine-agonists may decrease cortisol levels in a number of these patients, strengthening the current (re)emerging interest in DRs as possible targets for medical treatment of CS.

Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in thoracic diseases

Somatostatin (SS) receptor scintigraphy is useful for the diagnosis of lesions with high density of SS receptors, and above all neuroendocrine tumors. For several years, only indium-labeled octreotide has been applied to visualise in vivo tissues with SS receptor overexpression. Radiolabeled octreotide became the gold standard for the detection of neuroendocrine tumors. More recently, however, several new SS analogues with varying affinity for SS receptor subtypes have been developed, and different radionuclides as radiolabels have been introduced. Moreover, significant improvements have been made by the introduction of hybrid machines, such as single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT that enable to perform whole-body imaging quickly and with high anatomical resolution in several body areas, including the chest. The development of more specific radiopharmaceuticals, together with the modern technique of imaging, may provide excellent quality images with high contrast, allowing to depict very small lesions and making them easy to interpret. Indeed, in the management of SS receptor-positive lesions, the contribution of nuclear medicine is essential in several clinical settings, such as initial diagnosis, disease staging, follow-up, treatment planning, and treatment monitoring. In addition, the tracer uptake might be used as a prognostic parameter and as a predictor of treatment response. In the chest, apart in (neuro)endocrine tumors, SS receptors have been demonstrated in granulomatous diseases, like sarcoidosis and other immune-mediated disorders, such as anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis. In this paper we review and discuss the role of SS receptor scintigraphy in diagnosis, staging or follow-up of thoracic SS receptor-positive lesions.

Effects of α-interferon on insulin-like growth factor-I, insulin-like growth factor-II and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 secretion by a human lung cancer cell line in vitro

The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of α-interferon (α-IFN) on cell growth and on the different IGF system components in a human non-small cell lung cancer line (Calu-6) in vitro. Our results confirm the release of IGF-I and IGF-II by these cells. The amount of IGF-II in conditioned media (10.25±3.95 nM/106 cells, mean±SE) was more than 10-fold higher than that of IGF-I. α-IFN treatment reduced IGF-II levels in the media, with a maximal effect between 1 and 10 U/ml (Δ% of control: −31 and −55%, respectively, p<0.05). IGF-I was significantly reduced at 0.5 U/ml (p<0.01). No difference, however, was observed in IGF mRNA expression between untreated and α-IFN treated cells. An increase in IGF-I and IGF-II intracellular levels in α-IFN treated cultures was observed, suggesting that α-IFN can regulate the transfer of these peptides into the cells. Furthermore, IGF type-I and particularly type-II receptor expression was increased after α-IFN treatment. IGFBP-3 was detected only in trace amounts in the conditioned media; however, it showed an increase after α-IFN treatment (+110% at 1 U/ml). IGFBP-3 mRNA expression showed a slight increase after treatment with 1 and 10 U/ml. α-IFN (1-10 U/ml) reduced the stimulatory effect of IGF-I on cell replication (p<0.01), inhibited (p<0.01) cell replication in untreated and in fetal calf serum (FCS)-stimulated cells, and increased apoptosis in Calu-6 cells. Our data suggest that α-IFN may exert its effects at the cellular level in part through modification of the local IGF system.

Characterization and sub-cellular localization of SS1R, SS2R, and SS5R in human late-stage prostate cancer cells: Effect of mono- and bi-specific somatostatin analogs on cell growth

Somatostatin (SST) and SST receptors (SS1R, SS2R, SS3R, SS4R and SS5R) appear to play a significant role in the progression of human prostate cancer (PCa), which is associated with heterogeneity of SSRs expression and specific cell localization as we already demonstrated in the LNCaP cell line, an in vitro model of human androgen-dependent PCa. In this study, PC-3 and DU-145 human castration-resistant PCa cells were found to express all SSRs, while LNCaP expressed all but SS4R. A 48-h treatment with BIM-23244 (SS2R/SS5R) or BIM-23926 (SS1R) SST analogs was more effective in inhibiting cell proliferation, compared to BIM-23120 (SS2R), BIM-23206 (SS5R) and BIM-23704 (SS1R/SS2R). BIM-23926 (SS1R) treatment increased the amount of p21 and decreased phosphorylated (p) ERK1/2. BIM-23244 (SS2R/SS5R) led to p21 increment only in PC-3 cells, and to pERK1/2 reduction in both cell lines. SS1R/SS2R and SS2R/SS5R receptor dimers were natively present on cell membrane and their amount was increased by BIM-23704 (SS1R/SS2R) or BIM-23244 (SS2R/SS5R) treatment, respectively. SS1R, SS2R and SS5R were differently distributed among nuclear, lysosomal and microsomal compartment, according to their different recycling dynamics. These results show that, in PC-3, DU-145 and LNCaP cells, activation of SS1R and SS2R/SS5R leads to relevant antiproliferative effects.