Marie-Christine Falcou

Incidence and Prognostic Significance of Complete Axillary Downstaging After Primary Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients With T1 to T3 Tumors and Cytologically Proven Axillary Metastatic Lymph Nodes

PURPOSE To determine the incidence and prognostic significance of eradication of cytologically proven axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients treated with primary chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 1985 and December 1994, 152 breast cancer patients with invasive T1 to T3 tumors and axillary metastases cytologically proven by fine-needle sampling underwent primary chemotherapy followed by lumpectomy or mastectomy, level I and II axillary lymph node dissection, and irradiation. We studied pathologic complete responses (pCRs) of axillary nodes and breast tumors, as well as predictors of distant metastases. RESULTS Thirty-five patients (23%) had axillary pCRs, and 20 patients (13.2%) had pCRs of primary breast tumors. Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grade 3 tumors (P =.04) and a clinical response to chemotherapy > or = 50% (P =.003) were associated with negative axillary status at dissection. An initial tumor size < or = 3 cm (63 patients) was associated with pCR of the primary tumor (P =.02) but not with complete histologic clearance of axillary lymph nodes. The median length of follow-up was 75 months. In the univariate analysis, age greater than 40 years (P =.003), absence of residual nodal disease (P =.01), and pCR of the tumor (P =.05) were associated with better distant disease-free survival. Five-year distant disease-free survival rates were 73.5% +/- 14.9% among patients with no involved nodes at the time of surgery and 48.7% +/- 9.2% among patients with residual nodal disease. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, parameters associated with poor distant disease-free survival were age < or = 40 years (P =.002), persistence of nodal involvement (P =.03), and S-phase fraction greater than 4% (P =.02). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that axillary status is a better prognostic factor than response of the primary tumor to primary chemotherapy.

prospective Evaluation of Late Cosmetic Results following Breast Reconstruction: I. Implant Reconstruction

The long‐term cosmetic outcome of breast implant reconstruction is unknown. The morbidity and cosmetic outcome of 360 patients who underwent immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction with various types of implants have been analyzed prospectively over a 9‐year period. Of these patients, 334 who completed their reconstruction were suitable for evaluation of their cosmetic outcome. The early complication rate (< 2 months) was 9.2 percent, with an explantation rate of 1.7 percent. The late complication rate (> 2 months) was 23 percent, with a pathological capsular contracture rate of 11 percent at 2 years and 15 percent at 5 years and an implant removal rate of 7 percent. The revisional surgery rate was 30.2 percent. The cosmetic results were assessed prospectively using an objective five‐point global scale. Every patient was scored at each visit once surgery was completed. The overall cosmetic outcome deteriorated in a linear fashion, from an initial acceptable result of 86 percent 2 years after patients completed their reconstruction to only 54 percent at 5 years. This decline in cosmetic outcome was not associated with the type of implant used, the volume of the implant, the age of the patient, or the type of mastectomy incision employed. Radiotherapy was not a significant factor because only 28 patients were irradiated. Upon Cox model analysis, pathological capsular contracture was the only factor that contributed significantly to a poor cosmetic outcome in which p < 0.0001 (relative risk 6.3). Despite a high revisional surgery rate, deterioration still occurred, suggesting that other unaccounted for variables were responsible. On photographic retrospective review of the patients without capsular contracture who demonstrated deterioration in their cosmetic scores, it became clear that a possible reason for their poor results was late asymmetry produced by the failure of both breasts to undergo symmetrical ptosis with aging. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 107: 1702, 2001.)

Oncoplastic breast surgery for cancer: analysis of 540 consecutive cases [outcomes article].

Background: Synchronous plastic and oncological surgery is undertaken to improve the security of excision margins and yield high-quality aesthetic outcomes when conventional breast-conserving therapy either anticipates poor results or is not possible. Methods: A total of 540 consecutive patients underwent primary oncoplastic breast surgery for cancer with high tumor-to-breast volume ratios and locations precluding a good aesthetic result with simple tumor excision. A variety of techniques were employed at the Institut Curie between 1986 and 2007, and aesthetic outcomes were assessed on a five-point scale from 1 (excellent) to 5 (poor). Results: The median age was 52 years (range, 28 to 90 years), and median follow-up was 49 months (6 to 262 months). Median tumor size was 29.1 mm (range, 4 to 100 mm), with most patients (72.3 percent) having a brassiere cup size of B or C. Close or involved margins occurred in 18.9 percent, with mastectomy being necessary in 9.4 percent. A satisfactory aesthetic outcome (ratings of 1 to 3) at 5 years was obtained in 90.3 percent. Five-year overall and distant disease-free survival rates were 92.9 and 87.9 percent, respectively, with local recurrence in 6.8 percent. Conclusions: With local recurrence and survival rates similar to those for breast-conserving therapy, this series confirms the safety of oncoplastic breast surgery for tumors both high in volume and difficult in location. Highly satisfactory cosmetic outcomes extend the indications for conservative surgery, further reduce the mastectomy rate, and limit adverse aesthetic sequelae.

Primary Chemotherapy for Operable Breast Cancer: Incidence and Prognostic Significance of Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery

PURPOSE To determine the incidence and the prognostic value of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in patients treated with primary chemotherapy and breast-conserving surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 1985 and December 1994, 257 patients with invasive T1 to T3 breast carcinoma were treated with primary chemotherapy, lumpectomy, and radiation therapy. The median follow-up time was 93 months. To evaluate the role of IBTR in metastase-free survival, a Cox regression multivariate analysis was performed using IBTR as a time-dependent covariate. RESULTS The IBTR rates were 16% (+/- 2.4%) at 5 years and 21.5% (+/- 3.2%) at 10 years. Multivariate analysis showed that the probability of local control was decreased by the following independent factors: age < or = 40 years, excision margin < or = 2 mm, S-phase fraction more than 4%, and clinical tumor size more than 2 cm at the time of surgery. In patients with excision margins of more than 2 mm, the IBTR rates were 12.7% at 5 years and 17% at 10 years. Nodal status, age < or = 40 years, and negative estrogen receptor status were predictors of distant disease in the Cox multivariate model with fixed covariates. The contribution of IBTR was highly significant (relative risk = 5.34) when added to the model, whereas age < or = 40 years was no longer significant. After IBTR, 31.4% (+/- 7.0%) of patients developed metastases at 2 years and 59.7% (+/- 8.1%) at 5 years. Skin involvement, size at initial surgery, and estrogen receptor status were predictors of metastases after IBTR. CONCLUSION IBTR is a strong predictor for distant metastases. There are implications for conservative surgery after downstaging of the tumor and therapy at the time of IBTR.

Prediction of tumour involvement in remaining axillary lymph nodes when the sentinel node in a woman with breast cancer contains metastases

In a significant proportion of women with breast cancer, the sentinel node is the only involved node in the axilla. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with histologically positive non‐sentinel lymph nodes.

Résections hépatiques pour métastases de cancer du sein : résultats et facteurs pronostiques (65 cas)

Study aim: To report results of liver resections for breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM) and to evaluate the rate of survival and the prognostic factors. Patients and method: Between 1988 and 1999, 69 patients were operated on for BCLM and 65 who had liver resection were analyzed. The selection criteria for surgery were: normal performance status and liver function test; radiological objective response to chemotherapy (and/or hormonotherapy); in cases of non-isolated BCLM, complete response of associated metastatic site (usually bone) and no brain metastases. The mean age of the 65 patients was 47 (30–70) years. BCLM was diagnosed an average of 60 (0–205) months after the initial cancer. The BCLM was more frequently solitary (n = 44). The mean diameter was 3.8 (0–12) cm. The mean number of cycles of chemotherapy before surgery was 7.5 (3–24). Liver resections included major hepatectomy (n = 31) : right n = 19, extended left n = 4, left n = 8, minor hepatectomy (n = 25) and limited resection (n = 9). Results: There was no postoperative mortality. The 18% morbidity rate included a majority of pleural effusions with two reoperations. The median follow-up was 41 months (6–100 months). The survival rate after surgery was 90% at 1 year, 71% at 3 and 46% at 4 years. Thirteen patients are alive at 4 years. The 36-month survival rate differed according to the time to onset of BCLM: 55% before versus 86% after 48 months (p = 0.01). The other studied factors were not statistically associated with survival. The recurrence rate in the remaining liver at 36 months differed according to the lymph node status of the initial breast cancer: 40% for N0-N1 versus 81% for N1b-N2 (p = 0.01) and according to the type of liver resection: 45% for minor liver resection versus 73% for major (p = 0.02). Conclusion: Adjuvant liver surgery should be included in multicenter treatment protocols for medically-controlled breast cancer liver metastasis.

Histological margin assessment for breast ductal carcinoma in situ: precision and implications.

Local recurrence after lumpectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a major concern and is related to residual disease in the breast. We studied the predictive value of lumpectomy margins for residual DCIS and compared our results and pathological processing techniques with those published in the literature. Margin status was determined for 89 patients with screen-detected DCIS who had lumpectomy and re-excision, for the presence and extent of residual disease. Margin width was defined as the narrowest distance between tumor and any inked margin or, where margins were positive, classified into focal involvement (<1 mm of the inked surface involved), minimal (≥1<15 mm) and extensive (≥15 mm). The amount of residual tumor was quantified according to the number of ducts involved with tumor: small (fewer than 10 ducts) or large (10 or more ducts) residuum. The initial margin status was a significant predictor for the presence of residual tumor in re-excision specimens (P=0.006). There was residual tumor in 44 and 45% of close non-involved (>1 and ≤1 mm width) margins, 67% of focally, 71% of moderately and 94% of extensively positive margins. The pathologic tumor size was also a predictor for the presence of residual tumor with 27, 68 and 74% of lesions measuring ≤10, 11–25, >25 mm,respectively, showing residual disease. The presence of residual tumor was not significantly related to age, mammographic appearance, nuclear grade or intraductal necrosis. The initial margin status was found to predict for the amount of residual tumor. With careful margin assessment, margin status after lumpectomy for DCIS can be used to predict for the presence and amount of residual tumor in the breast and is a guide to further management decisions. A standard for margin status reporting and pathological processing of screen-detected DCIS in situ lesions will help in the interpretation of data from different institutions.

Can we decrease the skin reaction in breast cancer patients using hyaluronic acid during radiation therapy? Results of phase III randomised trial☆

PURPOSE Radio-induced early skin reactions still remain a clinical challenge. Preliminary results with Hyaluronic acid, one of the most recent topical products used in this indication are proving interesting. To evaluate the efficacy of Hyaluronic acid compared to placebo. MATERIAL AND METHODS Breast cancer patients with grade 1-2 radio-induced dermatitis during postoperative radiotherapy were eligible. They were randomised to receive either hyaluronic acid (A) or a simple emollient (B). The primary endpoint was the clinical evaluation of the erythema (success versus failure). Secondary endpoints were the evaluation of skin colorimetry, pain, and quality of life. RESULTS Two-hundred patients were enrolled (A=99, B=101). Ninety-five patients per treatment arm could be evaluated. Failures occurred in 23 patients (24%) in the hyaluronic acid arm, and 32 (34%) in the emollient arm (p=0.15). Seventy-three patients (36.5%) prematurely stopped the treatment without any ensuing difference between the two arms. Body mass index and the size of the epithelitis were both independently associated with the failure of the local treatment. The relative reduction of colorimetric levels was 20% in the hyaluronic acid group, and 13% in the emollient group (p=0.46). Concerning the quality of life assessment, there was a trend towards a lower level of pain in patients receiving hyaluronic acid (p=0.053). CONCLUSIONS The present study showed no significant difference between hyaluronic acid and simple emollient in the treatment of acute radio-induced dermatitis. There was however a trend towards an improvement in both pain level and skin colorimetry.

Immediate breast reconstruction by prosthesis: A safe technique for extensive intraductal and microinvasive carcinomas

AbstractBackground: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) by prosthesis is frequently proposed after mastectomy. However, due to the morbidity of this operation, especially the early implant removal rate, its indications remain controversial. Methods: We have performed 141 IBR by prosthesis (saline or gel-filled implant, tissue expander) in a homogeneous population of patients with extensive intraductal or microinvasive carcinoma, diagnosed after an initial local excision. This prospective study was designed to assess the feasibility and morbidity of IBR for an “ideal” population, allowing wide cutaneous preservation, without preoperative or postoperative treatment. Results: The early prosthesis removal rate (<2 months) was 0.7%, with only 2.1% of early surgical revisions and 3% of lymphoceles. Cutaneous complications (5%) were significantly correlated with the type of incision. Cosmetic results at 1 year were good or very good in 66% of cases, similar to the percentage observed after delayed reconstruction by prosthesis. Conclusions: In this selected population, IBR by prosthesis did not induce any additional morbidity compared with mastectomy without reconstruction. IBR by prosthesis can be systematically proposed in cases of extensive intraductal or microinvasive carcinoma.

Anal canal cancer treatment: practical limitations of routine prescription of concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy

This study is an analysis of the criteria considered when prescribing concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, as a routine treatment for patients with anal canal cancer, and related complications. Between 1990 and 1996, 67 patients were treated at Institut Curie for invasive, nonmetastatic cancer of the anal canal. Median age was 65 years (range, 35–90 years). TNM stage distribution was as follows: seven T1, 17 T2, 27 T3, 16 T4, and 22 N+ patients. A total of 29 patients (i.e., five T1/T2, and 24 T3/T4) received concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Radiotherapy volumes and dose and prescribed dose for chemotherapy were not statistically different from one group of patients to another. Only 55% of T3/T4 patients underwent standard chemoradiation treatment for anal canal cancer. Age was the one of main factor in determining if the patient would undergo concomitant chemotherapy or not. For the T3/T4 patients, concomitant chemotherapy was prescribed to 69% of patients <55 years, 90% of patients between 56 and 64 years, 45% of patients between 65 and 75 years, and 20% of patients over 75 years (P<0.02). Overall survival at 4 years was 66%. The 4 years overall survival rate of T3/T4 patients, who underwent concomitant chemotherapy, was 72%, and that of T3/T4 patient who did not, was 34% (P<0.04). The patients who did not undergo chemotherapy were significantly older. The difference in cause-specific survival rates (72 vs 48%) was not significant. Relapse-free interval without local recurrence at 4 years was 70%. Relapse-free interval of T3/T4 patients was 78% with chemotherapy and 60% without chemotherapy (p=NS). Rates of treatment discontinuation and early toxicity were not statistically different. Late complications occurred in 33 patients, eight of whom had grade 2/3 tumours. At 2 years, complications occurred in 39% of patients who had undergone concomitant chemotherapy, and in 20% of patients who had not (p<0.02). Differences in grade 2/3 complications were not significant. In conclusion, although radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy is considered the current ‘gold-standard’ treatment for anal canal cancer, in our daily experience, only 55% of our T3/T4 patients have undergone this treatment. The remainder did not undergo chemotherapy mainly because they were deemed too old. In this series, no increase in local control and cause-specific survival was observed in patients who received concomitant chemotherapy; this may be due to the small number of patients included in the series. The increased rate of late complications observed in patients who received the combined treatment, however, provides evidence that this treatment should be restricted to younger patients without comorbidity and therefore justifies our position. Perhaps reduction of doses of chemotherapy must be discussed for older patients.