Marie Claude Morice

Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Whether the two drug-eluting stents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration-a sirolimus-eluting stent and a paclitaxel-eluting stent-are associated with increased risks of death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis compared with bare-metal stents is uncertain. Our aim was to compare the safety and effectiveness of these stents. METHODS We searched relevant sources from inception to March, 2007, and contacted investigators and manufacturers to identify randomised controlled trials in patients with coronary artery disease that compared drug-eluting with bare-metal stents, or that compared sirolimus-eluting stents head-to-head with paclitaxel-eluting stents. Safety outcomes included mortality, myocardial infarction, and definite stent thrombosis; the effectiveness outcome was target lesion revascularisation. We included 38 trials (18,023 patients) with a follow-up of up to 4 years. Trialists and manufacturers provided additional data on clinical outcomes for 29 trials. We did a network meta-analysis with a mixed-treatment comparison method to combine direct within-trial comparisons between stents with indirect evidence from other trials while maintaining randomisation. FINDINGS Mortality was similar in the three groups: hazard ratios (HR) were 1.00 (95% credibility interval 0.82-1.25) for sirolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents, 1.03 (0.84-1.22) for paclitaxel-eluting versus bare-metal stents, and 0.96 (0.83-1.24) for sirolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents. Sirolimus-eluting stents were associated with the lowest risk of myocardial infarction (HR 0.81, 95% credibility interval 0.66-0.97, p=0.030 vs bare-metal stents; 0.83, 0.71-1.00, p=0.045 vs paclitaxel-eluting stents). There were no significant differences in the risk of definite stent thrombosis (0 days to 4 years). However, the risk of late definite stent thrombosis (>30 days) was increased with paclitaxel-eluting stents (HR 2.11, 95% credibility interval 1.19-4.23, p=0.017 vs bare-metal stents; 1.85, 1.02-3.85, p=0.041 vs sirolimus-eluting stents). The reduction in target lesion revascularisation seen with drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents was more pronounced with sirolimus-eluting stents than with paclitaxel-eluting stents (0.70, 0.56-0.84; p=0.0021). INTERPRETATION The risks of mortality associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents are similar. Sirolimus-eluting stents seem to be clinically better than bare-metal and paclitaxel-eluting stents.

ESC Guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: the Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

Table 1. Classes of recommendation Table 2. Levels of evidence Table 3. Estimated fetal and maternal effective doses for various diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures Table 4. Predictors of maternal cardiovascular events and risk score from the CARPREG study Table 5. Predictors of maternal cardiovascular events identified in congential heart diseases in the ZAHARA and Khairy study Table 6. Modified WHO classification of maternal cardiovascular risk: principles Table 7. Modified WHO classification of maternal cardiovascular risk: application Table 8. Maternal predictors of neonatal events in women with heart disease Table 9. General recommendations Table 10. Recommendations for the management of congenital heart disease Table 11. Recommendations for the management of aortic disease Table 12. Recommendations for the management of valvular heart disease Table 13. Recommendations for the management of coronary artery disease Table 14. Recommendations for the management of cardiomyopathies and heart failure Table 15. Recommendations for the management of arrhythmias Table 16. Recommendations for the management of hypertension Table 17. Check list for risk factors for venous thrombo-embolism Table 18. Prevalence of congenital thrombophilia and the associated risk of venous thrombo-embolism during pregnancy Table 19. Risk groups according to risk factors: definition and preventive measures Table 20. Recommendations for the prevention and management of venous thrombo-embolism in pregnancy and puerperium Table 21. Recommendations for drug use ABPM : ambulatory blood pressure monitoring ACC : American College of Cardiology ACE : angiotensin-converting enzyme ACS : acute coronary syndrome AF : atrial fibrillation AHA : American Heart Association aPTT : activated partial thromboplastin time ARB : angiotensin receptor blocker AS : aortic stenosis ASD : atrial septal defect AV : atrioventricular AVSD : atrioventricular septal defect BMI : body mass index BNP : B-type natriuretic peptide BP : blood pressure CDC : Centers for Disease Control CHADS : congestive heart failure, hypertension, age (>75 years), diabetes, stroke CI : confidence interval CO : cardiac output CoA : coarction of the aorta CT : computed tomography CVD : cardiovascular disease DBP : diastolic blood pressure DCM : dilated cardiomyopathy DVT : deep venous thrombosis ECG : electrocardiogram EF : ejection fraction ESC : European Society of Cardiology ESH : European Society of Hypertension ESICM : European Society of Intensive Care Medicine FDA : Food and Drug Administration HCM : hypertrophic cardiomyopathy ICD : implantable cardioverter-defibrillator INR : international normalized ratio i.v. : intravenous LMWH : low molecular weight heparin LV : left ventricular LVEF : left ventricular ejection fraction LVOTO : left ventricular outflow tract obstruction MRI : magnetic resonance imaging MS : mitral stenosis NT-proBNP : N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide NYHA : New York Heart Association OAC : oral anticoagulant PAH : pulmonary arterial hypertension PAP : pulmonary artery pressure PCI : percutaneous coronary intervention PPCM : peripartum cardiomyopathy PS : pulmonary valve stenosis RV : right ventricular SBP : systolic blood pressure SVT : supraventricular tachycardia TGA : complete transposition of the great arteries TR : tricuspid regurgitation UFH : unfractionated heparin VSD : ventricular septal defect VT : ventricular tachycardia VTE : venous thrombo-embolism WHO : World Health Organization Guidelines summarize and evaluate all available evidence, at the time of the writing process, on a particular issue with the aim of assisting physicians in selecting the best management strategies for an individual patient, with a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome, as well as the risk–benefit ratio of particular diagnostic or therapeutic means. Guidelines are no substitutes but are complements for textbooks and cover the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Core Curriculum topics. Guidelines and recommendations should help the …

Randomized study to evaluate sirolimus-eluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions.

Background—A sirolimus-eluting stent (Cypher, Cordis Corp) has been reported to markedly decrease restenosis in selected lesions; higher-risk lesions, including coronary bifurcations, have not been studied. Methods and Results—This prospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions. Patients were randomly assigned to either stenting of both branches (group A) or stenting of the main branch with provisional stenting of the side branch (SB) (group B). Eighty-five patients (86 lesions) were enrolled. There was 1 case of unsuccessful delivery of any device at the bifurcation site. Given the high crossover, more lesions were treated with 2 stents (n=63) than with stent/balloon (n=22). Clinical follow-up at 6 months was completed in all patients and angiographic follow-up in 53 patients in group A (85.5%) and 21 in group B (95.4%). One patient died suddenly 4.5 months after the procedure. There were 3 cases of stent thrombosis (3.5%). The total restenosis rate at 6 months was 25.7%, and it was not significantly different between the double-stenting (28.0%) and the provisional SB-stenting (18.7%) groups. Fourteen of the restenosis cases occurred at the ostium of the SB and were focal. Target lesion revascularization was performed in 7 cases; target vessel failure occurred in 15 cases (17.6%). Conclusions—These results are an improvement compared with historical controls using bare metal stents. Restenosis at the SB remains a problem. At this time, no statement can be made regarding the most appropriate technique to use when treating bifurcations with the Cypher stent.

Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial

AIMS Long-term randomized comparisons of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in left main coronary (LM) disease and/or three-vessel disease (3VD) patients have been limited. This analysis compares 3-year outcomes in LM and/or 3VD patients treated with CABG or PCI with TAXUS Express stents. METHODS AND RESULTS SYNTAX is an 85-centre randomized clinical trial (n= 1800). Prospectively screened, consecutive LM and/or 3VD patients were randomized if amenable to equivalent revascularization using either technique; if not, they were entered into a registry. Patients in the randomized cohort will continue to be followed for 5 years. At 3 years, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCE: death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularization; CABG 20.2% vs. PCI 28.0%, P< 0.001], repeat revascularization (10.7 vs. 19.7%, P< 0.001), and MI (3.6 vs. 7.1%, P= 0.002) were elevated in the PCI arm. Rates of the composite safety endpoint (death/stroke/MI 12.0 vs. 14.1%, P= 0.21) and stroke alone (3.4 vs. 2.0%, P= 0.07) were not significantly different between treatment groups. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event rates were not significantly different between arms in the LM subgroup (22.3 vs. 26.8%, P= 0.20) but were higher with PCI in the 3VD subgroup (18.8 vs. 28.8%, P< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS At 3 years, MACCE was significantly higher in PCI- compared with CABG-treated patients. In patients with less complex disease (low SYNTAX scores for 3VD or low/intermediate terciles for LM patients), PCI is an acceptable revascularization, although longer follow-up is needed to evaluate these two revascularization strategies.

Intravascular Ultrasound Findings in the Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind RAVEL (RAndomized study with the sirolimus-eluting VElocity balloon-expandable stent in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery Lesions) Trial

Background—The goal of this intravascular ultrasound investigation was to provide a more detailed morphological analysis of the local biological effects of the implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent compared with an uncoated stent. Methods and Results—In the RAVEL trial, 238 patients with single de novo lesions were randomized to receive either an 18-mm sirolimus-eluting stent (Bx VELOCITY stent, Cordis) or an uncoated stent (Bx VELOCITY stent). In a subset of 95 patients (sirolimus-eluting stent=48, uncoated stent=47), motorized intravascular ultrasound pullback (0.5 mm/s) was performed at a 6-month follow-up. Stent volumes, total vessel volumes, and plaque-behind-stent volumes were comparable. However, the difference in neointimal hyperplasia (2±5 versus 37±28 mm3) and percent of volume obstruction (1±3% versus 29±20%) at 6 months between the 2 groups was highly significant (P <0.001), emphasizing the nearly complete abolition of the proliferative process inside the drug-eluting stent. Analysis of the proximal and distal edge volumes showed no significant difference between the 2 groups in external elastic membrane or lumen and plaque volume at the proximal and distal edges. There was also no evidence of intrastent thrombosis or persisting dissection at the stent edges. Although there was a higher incidence of incomplete stent apposition in the sirolimus group compared with the uncoated stent group (P <0.05), it was not associated with any adverse clinical events at 1 year. Conclusions—Sirolimus-eluting stents are effective in preventing neointimal hyperplasia without creating edge effect and without affecting the plaque burden behind the struts.

Assessment of the SYNTAX score in the Syntax study

AIMS The SYNTAX score has been designed to better anticipate the risks of percutaneous or surgical revascularisation, taking into account the functional impact of the coronary circulation with all its anatomic components including the presence of bifurcations, total occlusions, thrombus, calcification, and small vessels. The purpose of this paper is to describe the baseline assessment of the SYNTAX score in the Syntax randomised trial, the corelab reproducibility, the potential difference in score assessment between the investigator and the corelab, and to ascertain the impact on one-year outcome after either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) in patients with complex coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS To assess the reliability of Syntax scoring, 100 diagnostic angiograms from the Syntax trial were randomly selected and assessed independently by two observers. Intra-observer variability was assessed by analysing 91 sets of angiograms after an interval of at least eight weeks by one of the observers. Clinical outcomes in the randomised cohort of the Syntax trial up to one year are presented with stratification by tertile group of the SYNTAX score. The weighted kappa value for the inter-observer reproducibility on the global score was 0.45, while the intra-observer weighted kappa value was 0.59. The SYNTAX score as calculated by investigators consistently underscored the corelab score by 3.4 points. When the Syntax randomised cohort was stratified by tertiles of the SYNTAX score, there were similar or non-significantly different MACCE rates in those with low or intermediate scores; however in the top tertile the MACCE rate was greater in those receiving PCI compared to CABG. CONCLUSIONS The SYNTAX score is a visual coronary score with an acceptable corelab reproducibility that has an impact on the one-year outcome of those having PCI, whereas it has no effect on the one-year outcome following surgical revascularisation. The SYNTAX score tool is likely to be useful in a wide range of patients with complex coronary disease.

Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II

BACKGROUND The anatomical SYNTAX score is advocated in European and US guidelines as an instrument to help clinicians decide the optimum revascularisation method in patients with complex coronary artery disease. The absence of an individualised approach and of clinical variables to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are limitations of the SYNTAX score. SYNTAX score II aimed to overcome these limitations. METHODS SYNTAX score II was developed by applying a Cox proportional hazards model to results of the randomised all comers SYNTAX trial (n=1800). Baseline features with strong associations to 4-year mortality in either the CABG or the PCI settings (interactions), or in both (predictive accuracy), were added to the anatomical SYNTAX score. Comparisons of 4-year mortality predictions between CABG and PCI were made for each patient. Discriminatory performance was quantified by concordance statistics and internally validated with bootstrap resampling. External validation was done in the multinational all comers DELTA registry (n=2891), a heterogeneous population that included patients with three-vessel disease (26%) or complex coronary artery disease (anatomical SYNTAX score ≥33, 30%) who underwent CABG or PCI. The SYNTAX trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00114972. FINDINGS SYNTAX score II contained eight predictors: anatomical SYNTAX score, age, creatinine clearance, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), presence of unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease, peripheral vascular disease, female sex, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). SYNTAX score II significantly predicted a difference in 4-year mortality between patients undergoing CABG and those undergoing PCI (p(interaction) 0·0037). To achieve similar 4-year mortality after CABG or PCI, younger patients, women, and patients with reduced LVEF required lower anatomical SYNTAX scores, whereas older patients, patients with ULMCA disease, and those with COPD, required higher anatomical SYNTAX scores. Presence of diabetes was not important for decision making between CABG and PCI (p(interaction) 0·67). SYNTAX score II discriminated well in all patients who underwent CABG or PCI, with concordance indices for internal (SYNTAX trial) validation of 0·725 and for external (DELTA registry) validation of 0·716, which were substantially higher than for the anatomical SYNTAX score alone (concordance indices of 0·567 and 0·612, respectively). A nomogram was constructed that allowed for an accurate individualised prediction of 4-year mortality in patients proposing to undergo CABG or PCI. INTERPRETATION Long-term (4-year) mortality in patients with complex coronary artery disease can be well predicted by a combination of anatomical and clinical factors in SYNTAX score II. SYNTAX score II can better guide decision making between CABG and PCI than the original anatomical SYNTAX score. FUNDING Boston Scientific Corporation.

Intracoronary Stent Implantation Without Ultrasound Guidance and With Replacement of Conventional Anticoagulation by Antiplatelet Therapy 30-Day Clinical Outcome of the French Multicenter Registry

BACKGROUND Stenting reduces both acute complications of coronary angioplasty and restenosis rates but increases subacute thrombosis rates and hemorrhagic complications when used with coumadin anticoagulation. METHODS AND RESULTS To simplify postcoronary stenting treatment and to reduce these drawbacks, we evaluated the 1-month outcome of a prospective registry of 2900 patients in whom successful coronary artery stenting was performed without coumadin anticoagulation. Patients received 100 mg/d aspirin and 250 mg/d ticlopidine for 1 month. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) treatment was progressively reduced in four consecutive stages, from 1-month treatment to none. Event-free outcome at 1 month was achieved in 2816 patients (97.1%). Major stent-related cardiac events were subacute closure in 51 patients (1.8%), including death in 12 (0.5%), acute myocardial infarction in 17 (0.6%), and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in 9 (0.3%). Stent thrombosis was more frequent with balloon size of < 3.0 mm (< or = 2.5 mm, 10%; 3.0 mm, 2.3%; > or = 3.5 mm, 1.0%; P < .001), bail-out situations (6.67% versus 1.38%, P < .001), and patients with unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction (2.2% versus 1.12%, P = .02). Bleeding complications that required transfusion, surgical repair, or both occurred in 55 patients (1.9%). Bleeding complications were related to female gender (4.0% versus 1.51%, P < .001), duration of LMWH treatment (3.83% in phase II/III versus 0.69% in phase IV/V, P < .001), sheath size (6F, 0.52%; 7F, 1.04%; > or = 8F, 4.23%; P < .001), bail-out situations (4.76% versus 1.67%, P < .01), and saphenous graft stenting (4.38% versus 1.75%, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that poststenting treatment by ticlopidine/aspirin is an effective alternative to coumadin anticoagulation, achieving low rates of subacute closure and bleeding complications. LMWH treatment does not improve subacute reocclusion rates but increases bleeding complications. Furthermore, as bleeding complications were independently related to sheath size, we suggest that stenting with 6F guiding catheters may prevent local complications. Furthermore, the ticlopidine/aspirin combination allows a low-cost stenting strategy without ultrasound assessment of stent deployment and permits short inhospital stay.

Prospective, Multicenter Study of the Safety and Feasibility of Primary Stenting in Acute Myocardial Infarction: In-Hospital and 30-Day Results of the PAMI Stent Pilot Trial

Abstract Objectives. The goals of this study were to examine the safety and feasibility of a routine (primary) stent strategy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Background. Limitations of reperfusion by primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in AMI include in-hospital recurrent ischemia or reinfarction in 10% to 15% of patients, restenosis in 37% to 49% and late infarct-related artery reocclusion in 9% to 14%. By lowering the residual stenosis and sealing dissection planes created by PTCA, primary stenting may further improve short- and long-term outcomes after mechanical reperfusion. Methods. Three hundred twelve consecutive patients treated with primary PTCA for AMI at nine international centers were prospectively enrolled. After PTCA, stenting was attempted in all eligible lesions (vessel size 3.0 to 4.0 mm; lesion length ≤2 stents; and the absence of giant thrombus burden after PTCA, major side branch jeopardy or excessive proximal tortuosity or calcification). Patients with stents were treated with aspirin, ticlopidine and a 60-h tapering heparin regimen. Results. Stenting was attempted in 240 (77%) of 312 patients, successfully in 236 (98%), with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow restored in 230 patients (96%). Patients with stents had low rates of in-hospital death (0.8%), reinfarction (1.7%), recurrent ischemia (3.8%) and predischarge target vessel revascularization for ischemia (1.3%). At 30-day follow-up, no additional deaths or reinfarctions occurred among patients with stents, and target vessel revascularization was required in only one additional patient (0.4%). Conclusions. Primary stenting is safe and feasible in the majority of patients with AMI and results in excellent short-term outcomes.

Drug eluting and bare metal stents in people with and without diabetes: collaborative network meta-analysis

Objective To compare the effectiveness and safety of three types of stents (sirolimus eluting, paclitaxel eluting, and bare metal) in people with and without diabetes mellitus. Design Collaborative network meta-analysis. Data sources Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), relevant websites, reference lists, conference abstracts, reviews, book chapters, and proceedings of advisory panels for the US Food and Drug Administration. Manufacturers and trialists provided additional data. Review methods Network meta-analysis with a mixed treatment comparison method to combine direct within trial comparisons between stents with indirect evidence from other trials while maintaining randomisation. Overall mortality was the primary safety end point, target lesion revascularisation the effectiveness end point. Results 35 trials in 3852 people with diabetes and 10 947 people without diabetes contributed to the analyses. Inconsistency of the network was substantial for overall mortality in people with diabetes and seemed to be related to the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (P value for interaction 0.02). Restricting the analysis to trials with a duration of dual antiplatelet therapy of six months or more, inconsistency was reduced considerably and hazard ratios for overall mortality were near one for all comparisons in people with diabetes: sirolimus eluting stents compared with bare metal stents 0.88 (95% credibility interval 0.55 to 1.30), paclitaxel eluting stents compared with bare metal stents 0.91 (0.60 to 1.38), and sirolimus eluting stents compared with paclitaxel eluting stents 0.95 (0.63 to 1.43). In people without diabetes, hazard ratios were unaffected by the restriction. Both drug eluting stents were associated with a decrease in revascularisation rates compared with bare metal stents in people both with and without diabetes. Conclusion In trials that specified a duration of dual antiplatelet therapy of six months or more after stent implantation, drug eluting stents seemed safe and effective in people both with and without diabetes.