Marie-Elise Labrecque

A Review of Assessment Tools of Illness Representations: Are These Adapted for a Work Disability Prevention Context?

Introduction: Musculoskeletal disorders are among the main causes of short- and long-term disability. Aim: Identify the methods for assessing multidimensional components of illness representations. Methods: An electronic literature search (French, English) from 1980 to the present was conducted in medical, paramedical and social science databases using predetermined key words. After screening titles and abstracts based on a specific set of criteria, sixty-four articles were reviewed. Results: Qualitative approaches for assessing illness representation were found mainly in the fields of anthropology and sociology and were based on the explanatory models of illness. The interviews reviewed were: the Short Explanatory Model Interview, the Explanatory Model of Illness Catalogue and the McGill Illness Narrative Interview. Quantitative approaches were found in the health psychology field and used the following self-administered questionnaires: the Survey of Pain Attitudes, the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory, the Pain Beliefs Questionnaire, the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, the Implicit Model of Illness Questionnaire, the Illness Perception Questionnaire, including its derivatives, and the Illness Cognition Questionnaire. Conclusion: This review shows the actual use and existence of multiple interviews and questionnaires in assessing multidimensional illness representations. All have been used and/or tested in a medical context but none have been tested in a work disability context. Further research will be needed to determine their suitability for use in a work disability context.

Factors Associated With Presenteeism and Psychological Distress Using a Theory-Driven Approach.

Objective: To test a model of presenteeism on the basis of established and emerging theories separated into organizational and individual factors that could be mediated by psychological distress. Methods: This was a Web survey of 2371 employees (response rate of 48%) of a provincial government agency. We assessed theories with validated measures for organizational and individual factors. Results: Psychological distress was negatively associated to presenteeism, when controlling for sex, short-term work absence in the last year, and social desirability. Both individual and organizational factors were related to psychological distress. The most important factors included the presence of stress events in the preceding 6 months, extrinsic efforts (interruptions, work requirements), self-esteem as a worker, and internal amotivation. Conclusions: By identifying modifiable factors, our results suggest that the implementation of a work organization structure that promotes stimulation and accomplishment would reduce psychological distress and further presenteeism.

Operationalizing a Shared Decision Making Model for Work Rehabilitation Programs: A Consensus Process

Purpose The objective of this study was to design and operationalize shared decision making (SDM) rehabilitation model for worker rehabilitation programs. SDM has previously been shown to improve decision outcomes in patient-health care professional relationships. To date, SDM has not yet been adapted to work rehabilitation, although it could be a valuable approach to better understand and agree on return-to-work decisions. Methods We designed a preliminary model for return-to-work decisions for workers suffering from pain due to musculoskeletal injuries. We submitted the preliminary model and a questionnaire to expert health care professionals. Using the Technique for Research of Information by Animation of a Group of Experts method, a group consensus process was used to discuss and refine the experts’ responses to operationalize a model adapted for rehabilitation. Results Eleven occupational therapists (three were clinical coordinators) and four psychologists participated in three group consensus sessions. The final version of the model included one general longitudinal objective (the maintenance of a working alliance and assuring mutual comprehension among all stakeholders), and 11 specific objectives: establishing a working alliance, seven in the deliberation phase of the SDM process, and three in the implementation of the decision. Participants also reached consensus on between 1 and 8 indicators per objective. Conclusion We developed and operationalized an SDM rehabilitation model intended for a return-to-work implementation plan. The next step will be to document its feasibility among the main stakeholders (employer, union, insurer and worker) taking part in decisions about return to work.

Factors associated with generalized anxiety in workers undergoing work rehabilitation for persistent musculoskeletal pain

Abstract Purpose: To document in workers having a work disability due to a musculoskeletal disorder (MSD), the presence and variation over time of their intolerance of uncertainty and its maintenance factors as defined in Dugas et al.’s generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) model, i.e. worries, negative problem orientation, beliefs about the usefulness of worrying, cognitive avoidance and their consequences on depressive symptoms. Methods: An observational, prospective repeated-measures design was retained. Thirty-nine workers with an MSD having caused a work absence of over three months and who were beginning a work rehabilitation program were recruited and evaluated at four moments (beginning of rehabilitation program, first hours of work exposure, 50% of regular working hours and end of rehabilitation program). Validated self-report questionnaires measuring intolerance of uncertainty and its maintenance factors were administered. Finally, the Worry and Anxiety Questionnaire measured the presence and intensity of GAD symptoms as defined in the DSM-IV-TR. Results: Fifty percent of the workers initially exhibited GAD symptoms. Concerning the variation over time, improvements were noted in all GAD-related factors during the program, particularly with the first hours of work exposure. At the end of rehabilitation, only 21% of the participants still met GAD diagnostic criteria. Conclusion: Workers with an MSD causing a work disability averaging one year in length and enrolled in a work rehabilitation program exhibited a high level of anxiety at the beginning of the work rehabilitation program. Workers perceived a usefulness in worrying and presented some intolerance of uncertainty and some cognitive avoidance strategies. According to Dugas et al.’s GAD model, the intensity of the symptoms associated with GAD development and maintenance factors was, however, not typical of a GAD. Implication for Rehabilitation A reconceptualization of the problem in terms of reducing the work disability rather than reducing pain may constitute a promising avenue to reduce anxiety symptoms. Future studies should look at the specific impact of work exposure, not only on pain symptoms but also on worries. The high level of anxiety and the reported worries by workers stresses the importance of studying the hypothesis of a workplace phobia in order to improve clinical practice guidelines.

Acceptability and Feasibility of a Shared Decision-Making Model in Work Rehabilitation: A Mixed-Methods Study of Stakeholders’ Perspectives

Purpose To establish the acceptability and feasibility of implementing a shared decision-making (SDM) model in work rehabilitation. Methods We used a sequential mixed-methods design with diverse stakeholder groups (representatives of private and public employers, insurers, and unions, as well as workers having participated in a work rehabilitation program). First, a survey using a self-administered questionnaire enabled stakeholders to rate their level of agreement with the model’s acceptability and feasibility and propose modifications, if necessary. Second, eight focus groups representing key stakeholders (n = 34) and four one-on-one interviews with workers were conducted, based on the questionnaire results. For each stakeholder group, we computed the percentage of agreement with the model’s acceptability and feasibility and performed thematic analyses of the transcripts. Results Less than 50% of each stakeholder group initially agreed with the overall acceptability and feasibility of the model. Stakeholders proposed 37 modifications to the objectives, 17 to the activities, and 39 to improve the model’s feasibility. Based on in-depth analysis of the transcripts, indicators were added to one objective, an interview guide was added as proposed by insurers to ensure compliance of the SDM process with insurance contract requirements, and one objective was reformulated. Conclusion Despite initially low agreement with the model’s acceptability on the survey, subsequent discussions led to three minor changes and contributed to the model’s ultimate acceptability and feasibility. Later steps will involve assessing the extent of implementation of the model in real rehabilitation settings to see if other modifications are necessary before assessing its impact.