Marie McPherson

Early Diagnoses and Psychotherapeutic Medication Treatment Experiences of a Cohort of Children Under 6 Years Old Who Received Antipsychotic Treatment in Florida's Medicaid Program

OBJECTIVE To describe the diagnostic characteristics and psychotherapeutic medication experiences of a cohort of children who received antipsychotic treatment before their sixth birthday. METHODS Children enrolled in Floridas Medicaid program were identified as having initiated an index episode of antipsychotic treatment before their sixth birthday. The characteristics of these children were compared to nonrecipients who were less than 6 years old on January 1, 2004. An index episode is described as the filling of at least two consecutive antipsychotic prescriptions with a gap no greater than 15 days between the last day supplied of the first prescription and the fill date of the second prescription. We describe the diagnoses and psychotherapeutic medication experiences of these children during the 365 days before the start of their index episodes (preindex periods) and during the 365 days immediately after the start of their index episodes (index periods). RESULTS Five hundred twenty-eight recipients were identified. Recipients were more likely than nonrecipients to be male, to be older, and to have a supplemental security income enrollment status. Recipients were exposed to psychotherapeutic medications at very early ages. Four hundred thirty-nine (83%) had already been treated with some psychotherapeutic medication during their preindex periods. Of these children, 303 (69%) filled at least one prescription for an antipsychotic medication. Index antipsychotic episodes were often lengthy. Mean ± standard deviation and median episode lengths were 266.9 ± 286.8 and 174 days, respectively. During the index periods half of the children were found to have attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and 18% had disruptive behavior disorders. Treatment during these periods included other classes of psychotherapeutic medications for 73% of children. Nearly 30% (29.6%) received two or more classes of medications in addition to antipsychotics. CONCLUSIONS We found a large group of very young children who were persistently treated with antipsychotic medications. This early and extensive exposure is a cause for concern.

Exposure to antipsychotic medications over a 4-year period among children who initiated antipsychotic treatment before their sixth birthday†

This study aims the following: (i) to describe the exposure to antipsychotic medications over a 4‐year period experienced by a cohort of children who initiated antipsychotic treatment before their sixth birthday; and (ii) to identify variables associated with the risk of antipsychotic exposure.

The risks and benefits of switching patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder from two to one antipsychotic medication: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND Despite little evidence to support its use and practice guidelines discouraging the practice, antipsychotic polypharmacy is widely prevalent in schizophrenia. This randomized controlled trial studied the effects of switching patients stable on two antipsychotic medications to one antipsychotic medication. METHOD 104 adult outpatients with schizophrenia from 7 community mental health centers clinically stable on concurrent treatment with 2 antipsychotics were randomly assigned to stay on polypharmacy or to switch to antipsychotic monotherapy. Participants were followed for 1-year with assessments of symptoms and side effects occurring every 60days (7 total assessments). We examined differences in time trajectories in symptoms (PANSS, CGI) and side effects (EPS, metabolic, other) as a function of group assignment (switch vs. stay) and time, using intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS Participants who switched to antipsychotic monotherapy experienced greater increases in symptoms than stay patients. These differences emerged in the second 6months of the trial. All-cause discontinuation rates over the 1-year trial were higher in the switch-to-monotherapy group than in the stay-on-polypharmacy group (42% vs. 13%; p<0.01). There were no differences in change over time in any of the side effect measures, except that stay patients experienced a greater decrease in Simpson Angus total scores than switch patients. CONCLUSION Clinicians should be cautious in switching patients with chronic schizophrenia who are stable on 2 antipsychotics to one antipsychotic. Given the challenges in discontinuing antipsychotic polypharmacy, adequate trials of evidence-based treatments such as clozapine and long-acting injectable antipsychotics should be undertaken in inadequately responsive schizophrenia patients before moving to antipsychotic polypharmacy.

Impact of the Florida Medicaid Prior-Authorization Program on Use of Antipsychotics by Children Under Age Six

OBJECTIVE This study assessed the impact of a prior-authorization process on the use of antipsychotic medications by children under six years old in Floridas fee-for-service Medicaid program. METHODS Child psychiatrists reviewed requests for antipsychotic treatment (N=1,424) using forms and criteria created by a panel of Florida-based experts. Data on the characteristics of the children and clinicians involved were organized into 11 consecutive quarters beginning in July 2008. Multivariate generalized estimating equations were used to examine the association between each study variable and changes in the odds of submission of a new request over time. RESULTS Prior-authorization requests declined from 124 in the first quarter to 81 in the last quarter. Compared with applications from child psychiatrists, the odds of applications being submitted by adult psychiatrists, neurologists, and pediatricians increased over time. CONCLUSIONS Although applications declined, the diminished role of child psychiatry specialists raises questions about the impact of the program on the quality of care provided.

Is the Risk of Antipsychotic Polypharmacy Discontinuation Dependent on the Agents Used

This study assesses the risks and benefits of switching from two to one antipsychotic among participants on two non-clozapine oral antipsychotics, and among those on combinations involving either clozapine or an injectable antipsychotic. Ninety adult participants with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were assigned to stay on polypharmacy or to switch to monotherapy. Half of these participants were receiving combinations of non-clozapine oral antipsychotics and half were receiving combinations involving either clozapine or an injectable antipsychotic. Participants were assessed every 60 days for one year. We examined differences in symptom and side effect trajectories as a function of group assignment and time for both medication groups. Participants who switched from two to one non-clozapine oral antipsychotic experienced significant increases in symptoms relative to stay participants. They also saw significant side effect benefits. Switch participants on combinations involving clozapine or an injectable antipsychotic did not differ over time from stay participants on either symptom or side effect measures. It appears that patients on these combinations can be safely switched to monotherapy. While there may be symptom related risks associated with switching patients on combinations of non-clozapine oral antipsychotics, there are significant health related benefits. Clozapine or injectable antipsychotic monotherapy are recommended options.