Marie Pennanen
Georgetown University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Marie Pennanen.
Disease Markers | 2001
Cloud P. Paweletz; Bruce J. Trock; Marie Pennanen; Theodore N. Tsangaris; Collette Magnant; Lance A. Liotta; Emanuel F. Petricoin
Nipple aspirate fluid (NAF) has been used for many years as a potential non-invasive method to identify markers for breast cancer risk or early detection. Because individual markers have not been optimal, we are exploring the use of surface enhanced laser desorption and ionization time of flight (SELDI-TOF) mass spectrometry to identify patterns of proteins that might define a proteomic signature for breast cancer. SELDI-TOF was used to analyze a study set of NAF samples that included 12 women with breast cancer and 15 healthy controls (the latter included three women with an abnormal mammogram but subsequent normal biopsy). In this preliminary report, we present data showing that SELDI analysis of NAF is rapid, reproducible, and capable of identifying protein signatures that appear to differentiate NAF samples from breast cancer patients and healthy controls, including those with an abnormal mammogram who were later proven to be biopsy normal.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | 2005
Marc D. Schwartz; Caryn Lerman; Barbara M. Brogan; Beth N. Peshkin; Claudine Isaacs; Tiffani A. DeMarco; Chanita Hughes Halbert; Marie Pennanen; Clinton Finch
Background: Among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who are at risk for carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, knowledge of mutation status can influence local breast cancer treatment decisions. Thus, genetic testing at the time of diagnosis is increasingly considered an option for such patients. In this study, we evaluated factors associated with the decision to undergo BRCA1/BRCA2 gene testing at the time of initial breast cancer diagnosis. Methods: Participants were newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who had not yet received definitive local breast cancer treatment and who had a family history consistent with hereditary breast cancer. Participants were offered genetic counseling and BRCA1/BRCA2 testing with results in 2 to 3 weeks. Results: Of 231 patients who referred to the study, 20 (9%) declined the baseline interview, 34 (15%) completed a baseline interview but declined genetic testing, and 177 (76%) underwent BRCA1/BRCA2 testing. Physician recommendation for BRCA1/BRCA2 testing and indecision about definitive local treatment were both associated with undergoing testing. Among patients who were tested, 38 (21%) proceeded with definitive local treatment before receiving test results. Delay in the availability of test results and low levels of anxiety were associated with the decision to proceed with definitive local treatment before receiving test results. Conclusions: These results suggest that if rapid testing is available and genetic referrals are made for appropriate patients, a high proportion are likely to opt for such testing. In particular, patients who have not yet reached a decision about definitive local treatment may benefit from a genetic referral.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2007
Kenneth P. Tercyak; Beth N. Peshkin; Barbara M. Brogan; Tiffani A. DeMarco; Marie Pennanen; Shawna C. Willey; Colette Magnant; Sarah Rogers; Claudine Isaacs; Marc D. Schwartz
PURPOSE Recent studies indicate that high-risk breast cancer patients (ie, women who carry mutations in BRCA1/2 genes) who opt for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) have a substantially reduced risk of developing contralateral breast cancer. However, the immediate and long-term impact of this decision on womens quality of life and psychosocial functioning is largely unknown. In this study, we compared the impact of BRCA1/2 genetic test result and CPM on these outcomes among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who opted for CPM at the time of their definitive surgical treatment versus patients who did not. PATIENTS AND METHODS Participants were 149 high-risk women who underwent genetic counseling and testing for alterations in the BRCA1/2 genes. We measured self-reported quality of life, cancer-specific distress, and genetic testing-specific distress using standardized instruments before receipt of genetic test results and again 1 and 12 months later. RESULTS Compared with patients who chose breast conservation or unilateral mastectomy, those who chose mastectomy of the affected breast and CPM of the unaffected breast did not report diminished quality of life or elevated distress. CONCLUSION With respect to quality of life and distress, patients who choose CPM fare as well as those who do not in the first year after surgery.
Psycho-oncology | 1999
Janet Audrain; Barbara K. Rimer; David Cella; Michael Stefanek; Judy Garber; Marie Pennanen; Kathy J. Helzlsouer; Victor G. Vogel; Ting Hsiang Lin; Caryn Lerman
The present investigation sought to determine (1) the impact of a single session stress management/coping intervention (problem‐solving training; PST) versus a general health counseling (GHC) control condition on breast self‐examination (BSE) adherence among relatives of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, and (2) whether women with heightened perceived risk of breast cancer and/or cancer specific distress at baseline were more likely to improve their BSE adherence following PST. The participants were 510 women age 20–75 who had at least one first‐degree relative with breast cancer. All of the participants completed a baseline telephone interview, an intervention (PST versus GHC), and a 3‐month follow‐up telephone interview. The results revealed a 36% overall improvement in BSE adherence, with no significant between‐group difference in improvement (χ2=0.03, p=0.87). The logistic regression analysis of improvement in BSE adherence revealed a statistically significant cancer‐specific distress by treatment interaction (p=0.04). Among women who received PST, those with high levels of cancer‐specific distress were two times more likely to improve in BSE adherence than women low in cancer‐specific distress. There was no effect of cancer‐specific distress in the control condition. These results suggest that women with a family history of breast cancer who have high levels of distress may be most likely to benefit from behavioral coping skills intervention to promote adherence to breast cancer screening. Copyright
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2004
Claudine Isaacs; Luciane R. Cavalli; Yoram Cohen; Marie Pennanen; Lalita K. Shankar; Matthew L. Freedman; Baljit Singh; Minetta C. Liu; Ann Gallagher; Janice D. Rone; Robert B. Dickson; David Sidransky; Bassem R. Haddad
We describe a method for the isolation of free DNA from ductal lavage (DL) and nipple aspirate fluid (NAF), and its evaluation for the presence of LOH at the BRCA1 and FHIT genes and for mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations at the D310 marker, to improve early detection of breast cancer. We evaluated 26 DL and six NAF samples from 14 women of known BRCA1 status, who have no clinical evidence of breast tumors: nine mutation carriers and five non-carriers. LOH studies at the BRCA1 locus were possible in 19/26 DL samples, and at the FHIT locus in 16/26 samples. In 4/9 mutation carriers we found LOH at the BRCA1 allele, and in two of these we also found LOH at the FHIT allele. In one of the mutation carriers with BRCA1 LOH, invasive breast cancer was subsequently detected, and the tumor showed the same LOH as the DL. In one of the true negatives, BRCA1 and FHIT LOH were detected. The mitochondrial studies were possible in all 26 DL samples and a somatic mutation was found in 3/9 carriers, two of whom also had LOH at the BRCA1 locus, and in none of the non-carriers. mtDNA mutation evaluation was possible in 4/6 NAF samples. The NAF and DL results were concordant. One NAF sample from a BRCA1 patient showed a mtDNA mutation. Our data demonstrates the feasibility of performing molecular studies using the free DNA present in the ductal fluid, while the intact cells can be used for cytologic studies.
Clinical Cancer Research | 2004
Vered Stearns; Andrew Coop; Baljit Singh; Ann Gallagher; Hideko Yamauchi; Ronald Lieberman; Marie Pennanen; Bruce J. Trock; Daniel F. Hayes; Matthew J. Ellis
Purpose: Efficient strategies to screen promising agents in early phase development are essential for rapid progress in breast cancer chemoprevention. We report our experience with the natural compound perillyl alcohol (POH) administered in a short-term surrogate end point biomarker (SEB) protocol, using the “window” between diagnostic and definitive surgery. Experimental Design: Eligible patients included those with a diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, lobular carcinoma in situ, or invasive carcinoma (<3 cm in size) that required further surgery. Thirty-seven of 267 women screened were enrolled in the study (14%). Five women received single-dose POH (1.5 g/m2) 2 days before surgery, 16 received escalating doses of POH (1.2 g/m2 to 4.8 g/m2/day) for 2 days before surgery, and 16 served as untreated controls. Exploratory SEB analysis [estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, proliferation, apoptosis, M6P/insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-2R, IGF1, IGF2 and transforming growth factor β] was conducted before and after POH. Results: Only a small portion of the population screened entered the study. Reasons for nonparticipation included protocol ineligibility, conflict of timing of surgery, miscellaneous logistical reasons, or patient’s choice. POH administration was well tolerated and did not interfere with surgical management. The power to observe changes in candidate SEB was diminished by a 44% incidence of cases in which the index lesion was not present in the definitive surgical specimen. Conclusions: Preoperative POH exposure was safe and suitable for a more definitive phase II SEB study. Further investigations must overcome logistical obstacles to accrual, and they must focus on approaches to maximize tissue collection and to incorporate genomic analysis of target lesions.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2004
Marc D. Schwartz; Caryn Lerman; Barbara M. Brogan; Beth N. Peshkin; Chanita Hughes Halbert; Tiffani A. DeMarco; William F. Lawrence; David Main; Clinton Finch; Colette Magnant; Marie Pennanen; Theodore N. Tsangaris; Shawna C. Willey; Claudine Isaacs
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | 2003
Scott L. Spear; Christopher V. Pelletiere; Andrew J. Wolfe; Theodore N. Tsangaris; Marie Pennanen
Clinical Cancer Research | 2003
Vered Stearns; Baljit Singh; Theodore N. Tsangaris; Jeanette Crawford; Antonella Novielli; Mathew J. Ellis; Claudine Isaacs; Marie Pennanen; Cecilia Tibery; Ahmad Farhad; Rebecca Slack; Daniel F. Hayes
Clinical Cancer Research | 2002
Matthew J. Ellis; Natalie Davis; Andrew Coop; Minetta C. Liu; Lisa M. Schumaker; Richard Y. Lee; Rujirutana Srikanchana; Chris G. Russell; Baljit Singh; William R. Miller; Vered Stearns; Marie Pennanen; Theodore N. Tsangaris; Ann Gallagher; Aiyi Liu; Alan Zwart; Daniel F. Hayes; Marc E. Lippman; Yue Wang; Robert Clarke