Marieke H. Mossink
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Marieke H. Mossink.
Oncogene | 2003
Marieke H. Mossink; Arend van Zon; Rik J. Scheper; Pieter Sonneveld; Erik A.C. Wiemer
Vaults are ribonucleoprotein particles found in the cytoplasm of eucaryotic cells. The 13 MDa particles are composed of multiple copies of three proteins: an Mr 100 000 major vault protein (MVP) and two minor vault proteins of Mr 193 000 (vault poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase) and Mr 240 000 (telomerase-associated protein 1), as well as small untranslated RNA molecules of approximately 100 bases. Although the existence of vaults was first reported in the mid-1980s no function has yet been attributed to this organelle. The notion that vaults might play a role in drug resistance was suggested by the molecular identification of the lung resistance-related (LRP) protein as the human MVP. MVP/LRP was found to be overexpressed in many chemoresistant cancer cell lines and primary tumor samples of different histogenetic origin. Several, but not all, clinico-pathological studies showed that MVP expression at diagnosis was an independent adverse prognostic factor for response to chemotherapy. The hollow barrel-shaped structure of the vault complex and its subcellular localization indicate a function in intracellular transport. It was therefore postulated that vaults contributed to drug resistance by transporting drugs away from their intracellular targets and/or the sequestration of drugs. Here, we review the current knowledge on the vault complex and critically discuss the evidence that links vaults to drug resistance.
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences | 2003
A.T.M. van der Zon; Marieke H. Mossink; Rik J. Scheper; Pieter Sonneveld; Erik A.C. Wiemer
Vaults are large ribonucleoprotein particles found in eukaryotic cells. They are composed of multiple copies of a Mr 100,000 major vault protein and two minor vault proteins of Mr 193,000 and 240,000, as well as small untranslated RNAs of 86–141 bases. The vault components are arranged into a highly characteristic hollow barrel-like structure of 35 × 65 nm in size. Vaults are predominantly localized in the cytoplasm where they may associate with cytoskeletal elements. A small fraction of vaults are found to be associated with the nucleus. As of yet, the precise cellular function of the vault complex is unknown. However, their distinct morphology and intracellular distribution suggest a role in intracellular transport processes. Here we review the current knowledge on the vault complex, its structure, components and possible functions.
Cancer Research | 2004
Arend van Zon; Marieke H. Mossink; Martijn Schoester; Rik J. Scheper; Pieter Sonneveld; Erik A.C. Wiemer
Vaults may contribute to multidrug resistance by transporting drugs away from their subcellular targets. To study the involvement of vaults in the extrusion of anthracyclines from the nucleus, we investigated the handling of daunorubicin by drug-sensitive and drug-resistant non-small lung cancer cells, including a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged major vault protein (MVP)-overexpressing transfectant (SW1573/MVP-GFP). Cells were exposed to 1 μm daunorubicin for 60 min, after which the cells were allowed to efflux the accumulated drug. No significant differences in daunorubicin efflux kinetics were observed between the sensitive SW1573 and SW1573/MVP-GFP transfectant, whereas the drug-resistant SW1573/2R120 cells clearly demonstrated an increased efflux rate. It was noted that the redistribution of daunorubicin from the nucleus into distinct vesicular structures in the cytoplasm was not accompanied by changes in the intracellular localization of vaults. Similar experiments were performed using mouse embryonic fibroblasts derived from wild-type and MVP knockout mice, which were previously shown to be devoid of vault particles. Both cell lines showed comparable drug efflux rates, and the intracellular distribution of daunorubicin in time was identical. Reintroduction of a human MVP tagged with GFP in the MVP−/− cells results in the formation of vault particles but did not give rise an altered daunorubicin handling compared with MVP−/− cells expressing GFP. Our results indicate that vaults are not directly involved in the sequestration of anthracyclines in vesicles nor in their efflux from the nucleus.
Journal of Cell Science | 2003
Arend van Zon; Marieke H. Mossink; Martijn Schoester; Adriaan B. Houtsmuller; George L. Scheffer; Rik J. Scheper; Pieter Sonneveld; Erik A.C. Wiemer
Vaults are barrel-shaped cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein particles that are composed of a major vault protein (MVP), two minor vault proteins [telomerase-associated protein 1 (TEP1), vault poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (VPARP)] and small untranslated RNA molecules. Not all expressed TEP1 and VPARP in cells is bound to vaults. TEP1 is known to associate with the telomerase complex, whereas VPARP is also present in the nuclear matrix and in cytoplasmic clusters (VPARP-rods). We examined the subcellular localization and the dynamics of the vault complex in a non-small cell lung cancer cell line expressing MVP tagged with green fluorescent protein. Using quantitative fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) it was shown that vaults move temperature independently by diffusion. However, incubation at room temperature (21°C) resulted in the formation of distinct tube-like structures in the cytoplasm. Raising the temperature could reverse this process. When the vault-tubes were formed, there were fewer or no VPARP-rods present in the cytoplasm, suggesting an incorporation of the VPARP into the vault-tubes. MVP molecules have to interact with each other via their coiled-coil domain in order to form vault-tubes. Furthermore, the stability of microtubules influenced the efficiency of vault-tube formation at 21°C. The dynamics and structure of the tubes were examined using confocal microscopy. Our data indicate a direct and dynamic relationship between vaults and VPARP, providing further clues to unravel the function of vaults.
Immunology | 2003
Marieke H. Mossink; Jan Cees de Groot; Arend van Zon; Erna Fränzel-Luiten; Martijn Schoester; George L. Scheffer; Pieter Sonneveld; Rik J. Scheper; Erik A.C. Wiemer
Dendritic cells (DCs) act as mobile sentinels of the immune system. By stimulating T lymphocytes, DCs are pivotal for the initiation of both T‐ and B‐cell‐mediated immune responses. Recently, ribonucleoprotein particles (vaults) were found to be involved in the development and/or function of human DCs. To further investigate the role of vaults in DCs, we examined the effects of disruption of the major vault protein (MVP/LRP) on the development and antigen‐presenting capacity of DCs, using our MVP/LRP knockout mouse model. Mononuclear bone marrow cells were isolated from wild‐type and knockout mice and stimulated to differentiate to DCs. Like human DCs, the wild‐type murine DC cultures strongly expressed MVP/LRP. Nevertheless, the MVP/LRP‐deficient DCs developed normally and showed similar expression levels of several DC surface markers. No differences were observed in in vitro studies on the antigen uptake and presenting capacities of the wild‐type and MVP/LRP knockout DCs. Moreover, immunization of the MVP/LRP‐deficient mice with several T‐cell antigens led to responses similar to those observed in the wild‐type mice, indicating that the in vivo DC migration and antigen‐presentation capacities are intact. Moreover, no differences were observed in the induction of the T cell‐dependent humoral responses and orally induced peripheral T‐cell tolerance. In conclusion, vaults are not required for primary DC functions. Their abundance in DCs may, however, still reflect basic roles in myeloid cell proliferation and DC development.
Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2004
Sivanagarani Kolli; Christina Ivins Zito; Marieke H. Mossink; Erik A.C. Wiemer; Anton M. Bennett
Cancer Research | 2002
Marieke H. Mossink; Arend van Zon; Erna Fränzel-Luiten; Martijn Schoester; Valerie A. Kickhoefer; George L. Scheffer; Rik J. Scheper; Pieter Sonneveld; Erik A.C. Wiemer
Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2001
Arend van Zon; Marieke H. Mossink; Martijn Schoester; George L. Scheffer; Rik J. Scheper; Pieter Sonneveld; Erik A.C. Wiemer
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications | 2002
Arend van Zon; Marieke H. Mossink; Martijn Schoester; George L. Scheffer; Rik J. Scheper; T. Pieter Sonneveld; Erik A.C. Wiemer
Experimental Cell Research | 2005
Arend van Zon; Marieke H. Mossink; Adriaan B. Houtsmuller; Martijn Schoester; George L. Scheffer; Rik J. Scheper; Pieter Sonneveld; Erik A.C. Wiemer