Marijke C. Kars
Utrecht University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Marijke C. Kars.
Supportive Care in Cancer | 2011
Marijke C. Kars; Mieke H. F. Grypdonck; Maria C De Korte-Verhoef; Willem A. Kamps; Esther M.M. Meijer-van den Bergh; Marian Verkerk; Johannes J. M. van Delden
PurposeFor children with incurable cancer death usually is anticipated and preceded by a phase of palliative care. Despite recognition that parents have difficulty adapting to a palliative perspective there is little insight into this process. This study explored, from a parental perspective, the process parents go through when cure is no longer a possibility.Participants and methodsA multicenter study using qualitative research was undertaken during the EoL phase. One-time and repeated open interviews were conducted with 44 parents of 23 children with incurable cancer.ResultsFeelings of loss play a prominent role during the EoL phase. Dealing with loss is a process of stepwise relinquishing that becomes manifest in an internal struggle between preservation and letting go. Preservation means that parents try to maintain the child’s status quo. Letting go means parents give up their resistance to loss in service of their child’s well-being. Although the relative measure of each changes over time, parents have great difficulty making the transition because it implies a change in source of control. A timely completion of this transition positively influences the child’s well-being as well as the evaluation of enacted parenthood.ConclusionFor parents the essence of the palliative process is not to accept death but to deal with the loss of their child. Although the need to avoid loss and gain control by means of preservation is fully understandable, the study indicated that parents who made the transition to letting go had an increased receptiveness of their child’s real situation and needs.
Palliative Medicine | 2016
Marijke C. Kars; Ghislaine J.M.W. van Thiel; Rieke van der Graaf; Marleen Moors; Alexander de Graeff; Johannes J. M. van Delden
Background: When healthcare professionals or other involved parties prevent eligible patients from entering a trial as a research subject, they are gatekeeping. This phenomenon is a persistent problem in palliative care research and thought to be responsible for the failure of many studies. Aim: To identify potential gatekeepers and explore their reasons for gatekeeping in palliative care research. Design: A ‘Review of Reasons’ based on the systematic Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses approach and a thematic synthesis. Data source: PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and PsycINFO from 2000 to May 20 2015 were searched. Studies in children (aged <18 years) and patients with dementia were excluded. Results: Thirty papers on gatekeeping in palliative care research were included. Five groups of potential gatekeepers were identified: healthcare professionals, research ethics committees, management, relatives and researchers. The fear of burdening vulnerable patients was the most reported reason for gatekeeping. Other reasons included ‘difficulty with disclosure of health status’, ‘fear of burdening the patient’s relatives’, ‘doubts about the importance or quality of the study’, ‘reticent attitude towards research and (research) expertise’ and ‘logistics’. In hospice and homecare settings, the pursuit of comfort care may trigger a protective attitude. Gatekeeping is also rooted in a (perceived) lack of skills to recruit patients with advanced illness. Conclusion: Gatekeeping is motivated by the general assumption of vulnerability of patients, coupled with an emphasis on the duty to protect patients. Research is easily perceived as a threat to patient well-being, and the benefits appear to be overlooked. The patients’ perspective concerning study participation is needed to gain a full understanding and to address gatekeeping in palliative care research.
Nursing Ethics | 2011
Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé; Sofie Verhaeghe; Marijke C. Kars; Annemarie Coolbrandt; Marleen Stevens; Maaike Stubbe; Nathalie Deweirdt; Jeroen Vincke; Maria Grypdonck
The aim of this article is to demonstrate the usefulness of qualitative research for studying the ethics of care, bringing to light the lived experience of health care recipients, together with the importance of methods that allow reconstruction of the processes underlying this lived experience. Lived experiences of families being approached for organ donation, parents facing the imminent death of their child and patients being treated using stem cell transplantation are used to illustrate how ethical principles are differentiated, modified or contradicted by the narrative context of persons concerned. The integration of empirical data into ethics will help caregivers in their ethical decision making and may enrich care ethics as a narrative and interpretative field.
Pediatric Blood & Cancer | 2015
Sara A. S. Dekking; Rieke van der Graaf; Marijke C. Kars; Auke Beishuizen; Martine C. de Vries; Johannes J. M. van Delden
Traditionally, in ethical guidelines and in research ethics literature, care and research are clearly separated based on their different objectives. In contrast, in paediatric oncology, research and care are closely combined. Currently, it is unknown how relevant actors in paediatric oncology perceive this combination of research and care. We conducted a qualitative study into the experiences of those involved in Dutch paediatric oncology with the intertwinement of research and care and the dual role of paediatric oncologists as researchers and treating physicians.
Cancer Nursing | 2016
Nathalie Belpame; Marijke C. Kars; Dimitri Beeckman; Elsie Decoene; Marijke Quaghebeur; Ann Van Hecke; Sofie Verhaeghe
Background: Adolescents and young adults with cancer face distinct psychosocial challenges because of the multiple developmental tasks associated with their age. Research on psychosocial care, directed to the unique needs and demands of this population, is limited. Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the psychosocial experiences of adolescents and young adults with cancer to further the understanding of the meanings they attribute to their experiences. Intervention/Methods: This study used a qualitative design in which individual semistructured interviews were conducted with 23 participants aged 15 to 25 years. Results: Physical consequences of the disease and its treatment, loss of independence, and being alone were significant challenges. Major coping strategies of the participants were to avoid the possible threats to life and maintain a positive attitude and normal life. Participants were “directors” who took control in order to manage their illness, maintain a sense of control, and master their lives to the fullest extent possible. Conclusions: The concept of the “AYA (adolescent and young adult) director” provides insight for healthcare professionals to understand how adolescents and young adults experience cancer. Implications for Practice: Throughout the cancer experience, participants wanted to be treated as individuals with specific needs and preferences. They preferred circumstances they are accustomed to; some found it difficult to accept restrictions imposed by the hospital. Adolescents and young adults with cancer want to be involved in the way healthcare professionals communicate with them and the information they are provided.
European Journal of Pediatrics | 2017
Lisa M. Verberne; Marijke C. Kars; Antoinette Y. N. Schouten-van Meeteren; Diederik K. Bosman; Derk A. Colenbrander; Martha A. Grootenhuis; Johannes J. M. van Delden
AbstractIn paediatric palliative care (PPC), parents are confronted with increasing caregiving demands. More children are cared for at home, and the need for PPC of children is lengthened due to technical and medical improvements. Therefore, a clear understanding of the content of parental caregiving in PPC becomes increasingly important. The objective is to gain insight into parental caregiving based on the lived experience of parents with a child with a life-limiting disease. An interpretative qualitative study using thematic analysis was performed. Single or repeated interviews were undertaken with 42 parents of 24 children with a malignant or non-malignant disease, receiving PPC. Based on their ambition to be a ‘good parent’, parents caring for a child with a life-limiting disease strived for three aims: controlled symptoms and controlled disease, a life worth living for their ill child and family balance. These aims resulted in four tasks that parents performed: providing basic and complex care, organising good quality care and treatment, making sound decisions while managing risks and organising a good family life. Conclusion: Parents need early explanation from professionals about balancing between their aims and the related tasks to get a grip on their situation and to prevent becoming overburdened.What is Known:• In paediatric palliative care, parents are confronted with increasing caregiving demands.• Parenting is often approached from the perspective of stress.What is New:• Parents strive for three aims: controlled symptoms and controlled disease, a life worth living for their child and family balance.• Parents perform four tasks: providing basic and complex care, organising good quality care, making decisions while managing risks and organising a good family life.• Professionals need insight into the parents’ aims and tasks from the parental perspective to strengthen parents’ resilience.
Pediatric Drugs | 2016
Sara A. S. Dekking; Rieke van der Graaf; Antoinette Y. N. Schouten-van Meeteren; Marijke C. Kars; Johannes J. M. van Delden
BackgroundIn pediatric oncology, many oncologists invite their own patients to participate in research. Inclusion within a dependent relationship is considered to potentially compromise voluntariness of consent. Currently, it is unknown to what extent those involved in pediatric oncology experience the dependent relationship as a threat to voluntary informed consent, and what they see as safeguards to protect voluntary informed consent within a dependent relationship.AimWe performed a qualitative study among key actors in pediatric oncology to explore their experiences with the dependent relationship and voluntary informed consent.MethodsWe conducted three focus groups and 25 semi-structured, in-depth interviews with pediatric oncologists, research coordinators, Research Ethics Committee members, parents of children with cancer, and adolescents with cancer.ResultsProfessionals regarded the dependent relationship both as a potential threat to and as a positive influence on voluntary decision making. Parents and adolescents did not feel as though dependency upon the oncologist influenced their decisions. They valued the involvement of their own physician in the informed consent process. The professionals suggested three strategies to protect voluntariness: emphasizing voluntariness; empowering families; involvement of an independent person.ConclusionsAlthough the dependent relationship between pediatric oncologists, patients and parents may be problematic for voluntary informed consent, this is not necessarily the case. Moreover, the involvement of treating physicians may even have a positive impact on the informed consent process. Although we studied pediatric oncology, our results may also apply to many other fields of pediatric medicine where research and care are combined, for example, pediatric rheumatology, neurology and nephrology. Clinical trials in these fields are inevitably often designed, initiated and conducted by medical specialists closely involved in patient care.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management | 2018
Sumytra Menon; Marijke C. Kars; Chetna Malhotra; Alastair V. Campbell; Johannes J. M. van Delden
CONTEXT Advance care planning (ACP) has been shown to improve end-of-life care, but it was developed in the U.S., and most research has been conducted in western communities. OBJECTIVES We aimed to study the attitudes and perceptions of patients with life-limiting illnesses, informal caregivers, doctors, nurses, and medical social workers regarding ACP in a multicultural family centric community. METHODS We conducted an explorative qualitative study, using focus groups and individual in-depth interviews. We used purposive sampling techniques to recruit 61 adults (15 doctors, 13 nurses, 5 medical social workers, 15 patients, and 13 caregivers) from multiple health care settings across the country. RESULTS The participants are genuinely anxious about the implementation of ACP. They had positive and negative expectations of ACP. Many were confused about the legal framework for health care decision-making and expected ACP to be of limited value because family members, rather than the patient, were usually the key decision makers. CONCLUSION A nuanced approach to ACP that considers the family network is required in multicultural family centric communities. Policies should be reconciled to create a more consistent message that respects patients, the family, and is legally coherent. Further research could focus on adaptations of ACP to promote its acceptance in such communities.
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care | 2016
Anne C. van der Gugten; Rob J. de Leeuw; Theo Verheij; Cornelis K. van der Ent; Marijke C. Kars
Abstract Objective: Internet plays a huge role in providing information about health care problems. However, it is unknown how parents use and perceive the internet as a source of information and how this influences health care utilisation when it comes to common complaints in infants. The objective was to evaluate the perception parents have on the role of internet in providing health care information on common symptoms in infants and its effects on health care utilisation. Design: A qualitative design was chosen. Setting and subjects: Parents were recruited from a population-based birth-cohort and selected purposefully. Main outcome measures: Semi-structured interviews were used to receive information of parentsʼ ideas. Thematic coding and constant comparison were used for interview transcript analysis. Results: Ten parents were interviewed. Parents felt anxious and responsible when their child displayed common symptoms, and appeared to be in need of information. They tried to obtain information from relatives, but more so from the internet, because of its accessibility. Nevertheless, information found on the internet had several limitations, evoked new doubts and insecurity and although parents compared information from multiple sources, only the physician was able to take away the insecurity. The internet did not interfere in the decision to consult the physician. Conclusions: Parents need information about their childrenʼs symptoms and the internet is a major resource. However, only physicians could take away their symptom-related doubts and insecurities and internet information did not play a role in parental decision making. Information gathered online may complement the information from physicians, rather than replace it. Key Points Internet plays an increasing role in providing health care information but it is unknown how this influences health care utilisation. Our study suggests that: Parents need information about their children’s symptoms and the internet is a major resource. However, only physicians could take away their symptom-related doubts and insecurities. Internet information did not play a role in parental decision making.
Palliative Medicine | 2017
Lisa M. Verberne; Antoinette Yn Schouten-van Meeteren; Diederik K. Bosman; Derk A. Colenbrander; Charissa T. Jagt; Martha A. Grootenhuis; Johannes J. M. van Delden; Marijke C. Kars
Background: Parents of children with a life-limiting disease have to rely on themselves at home while adequate paediatric palliative care is lacking. In several countries, paediatric palliative care teams are introduced to ensure continuity and quality of care and to support the child and the family. Yet, little is known about how parents experience such multidisciplinary teams. Aim: To obtain insight into the support provided by a new paediatric palliative care team from the parents’ perspective. Design: An interpretative qualitative interview study using thematic analysis was performed. Setting/participants: A total of 47 single or repeated interviews were undertaken with 42 parents of 24 children supported by a multidisciplinary paediatric palliative care team located at a university children’s hospital. The children suffered from malignant or non-malignant diseases. Results: In advance, parents had limited expectations of the paediatric palliative care team. Some had difficulty accepting the need for palliative care for their child. Once parents experienced what the team achieved for their child and family, they valued the team’s involvement. Valuable elements were as follows: (1) process-related aspects such as continuity, coordination of care, and providing one reliable point of contact; (2) practical support; and (3) the team members’ sensitive and reliable attitude. As a point of improvement, parents suggested more concrete clarification upfront of the content of the team’s support. Conclusion: Parents feel supported by the paediatric palliative care team. The three elements valued by parents probably form the structure that underlies quality of paediatric palliative care. New teams should cover these three valuable elements.