Marilee C Allen

The effects of physical therapy on cerebral palsy. A controlled trial in infants with spastic diplegia

Legislatively mandated programs for early intervention on behalf of handicapped infants often stipulate the inclusion of physical therapy as a major component of treatment for cerebral palsy. To evaluate the effects of physical therapy, we randomly assigned 48 infants (12 to 19 months of age) with mild to severe spastic diplegia to receive either 12 months of physical therapy (Group A) or 6 months of physical therapy preceded by 6 months of infant stimulation (Group B). The infant-stimulation program included motor, sensory, language, and cognitive activities of increasing complexity. Masked outcome assessment was performed after both 6 and 12 months of therapy to evaluate motor quotient, motor ability, and mental quotient. After six months, the infants in Group A had a lower mean motor quotient than those in Group B (49.1 vs. 58.1, P = 0.02) and were less likely to walk (12 vs. 35 percent, P = 0.07). These differences persisted after 12 months of therapy (47.9 vs. 63.3, P less than 0.01, and 36 vs. 73 percent, P = 0.01, respectively). We noted no significant differences between the groups in the incidence of contractures or the need for bracing or orthopedic surgery. Group A also had a lower mean mental quotient than Group B after six months of therapy (65.6 vs. 75.5, P = 0.05). The routine use of physical therapy in infants with spastic diplegia offered no short-term advantage over infant stimulation. Because of the limited scope of the trial, our conclusions favoring infant stimulation are preliminary. The results suggest that further study of the effects of both physical therapy and infant stimulation is indicated.

The Association Between Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization and Subsequent Pediatric Care Utilization in the United States

Objective. To explore the association between adequacy of prenatal care utilization and subsequent pediatric care utilization. Design. A longitudinal follow-up of a nationally representative sample of infants born in 1988. Participants. Nine thousand four hundred forty women who had a live birth in 1988, and whose child was alive at the time of interview, and 8285 women from the original sample who were reinterviewed in 1991. Main Outcome Measure. There were four outcome measures: number of well-child visits; adequate immunization for diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis; adequate immunization for polio; and continuity of a regular source of care, as measured by the number of sites for pediatric care. Results. Children whose mothers had less than adequate prenatal care utilization had significantly fewer well-child visits, and were significantly less likely to have adequate immunizations, even after income, health insurance coverage, content of prenatal care, wantedness of child, sites of prenatal and pediatric care, and maternal and pregnancy risk characteristics were taken into account. Less than adequate prenatal care utilization was not associated with having more than one pediatric care site. Conclusions. Prenatal care utilization can be used to identify and target interventions to women who are at risk for not obtaining well-child care or complete immunizations for their children.

Gross motor milestones in preterm infants: Correction for degree of prematurity

The age of gross motor milestone attainment and how it is affected by degree of prematurity at delivery were studied in 100 high-risk, preterm (less than 32 weeks) infants with normal motor outcome. We calculated the mean age of attainment for each milestone on the basis of chronologic age from the date of delivery and term age equivalent, correcting for degree of preterm delivery. Half of these preterm infants were male; 70% were black. The infants were compared with a population of normal infants born at term. In this very preterm population, there were no consistent sex differences, but black infants generally attained motor milestones before white infants. For each motor milestone, regardless of gender or race, the mean term age equivalents of attainment for very preterm infants closely approximated the mean ages of milestone attainment for term infants, whereas the mean chronologic ages were delayed 2 or 3 months. We conclude that very preterm infants can be expected to demonstrate sequential gross motor development at a rate expected for degree of prematurity. Chronologic age is not a valid measurement scale to use in determining motor delay in very preterm infants.

CAT/CLAMS A Tool for the Pediatric Evaluation of Infants and Young Children With Developmental Delay

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends regular developmental screening as a part of routine child health supervision. However, the pediatrician has a limited number of tools available to further evaluate a child who is found to be suspect or abnormal on a developmental screening test. The Clinical Adaptive Test/Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale (CAT/CLAMS) was therefore developed to provide pediatricians with a technique to assess infants and toddlers with suspected developmental delay. The CAT/CLAMS demonstrated strong psychometric properties. Concurrent validity with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) was demonstrated in 43 children ages 12 to 19 months who were tested on three occasions with both instruments (correlation coefficient ranging between 0.63 and 0.87; P<.001). Predictive validity 6 and 12 months later was also demonstrated in this population with correlation coefficients ranging between 0.73 and .077, significant at the P=.001 level. Utilizing the CAT/CLAMS as part of the pediatricians evaluation of children with developmental concerns would allow the pediatrician to compare language and nonlanguage problem-solving abilities and, therefore, aid in diagnosis and appropriate referral.

Trends and racial differences in birth weight and related survival.

Objective: In the past two decades, infant mortality rates in the United States declined in African-American and White populations. Despite this, racial disparities in infant mortality rates have increased and rates of low birth weight deliveries have shown little change. In this study, we examine temporal changes in birth weight distributions, birth weight specific neonatal mortality, and the birth weight threshold for an adverse risk of survival within both racial groups in order to explore the mechanisms for the disparities in infant mortality rates. Method: Single live births born to South Carolina resident mothers between 1975 and 1994 and considered White or African-American based on the mothers report of maternal race on the birth certificate were selected for investigation. We define the birth weight threshold for adverse survival odds as the birth weight at which 50% or more of infants in the population died within the first month of life. Results: Despite significant increases in very low birth weight percentages, neonatal mortality rates markedly declined. Birth weight specific neonatal mortality decreased for both races, although greater reductions accrued to White low birth weight infants. By the end of the study period, the birth weight at which over 50% of newborns died within the first month of life was 696 g for Whites and 673 g for African-Americans. Discussion: The ongoing decline in neonatal mortality is mainly due to reductions in birth weight specific neonatal mortality, probably related to high-risk obstetric and neonatal care. Technological developments in these areas may have differentially benefited Whites, resulting in an increasing racial disparity in mortality rates. Moreover, the relatively greater and increasing mortality risk from postmaturity and macrosomia in infants of African-America mothers may further exacerbate the racial gap in infant mortality.

The CAT/CLAMS Assessment for Early Intervention Services

The Clinical Adaptive Test/Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale (CAT/CLAMS) is a relatively new test of language, problem-solving abilities, and visual-motor skills for children ages 0 to 36 months of age. This instrument was compared to the Bayley Mental Developmental Index (MDI), the generally accepted standard of infant developmental tests. This study evaluates 328 normal children tested in infancy and then at 18 and 30 months of age. Specificity was excellent (95% to 100%) at both 18- and 30-month levels when compared to the Bayley MDI. Sensitivity, however, was 21 % at the 18-month level and 67% at the 30-month level. Predictive validity (.65) and within-test validity (.69) are good. The CAT/CLAMS compares favorably with the Bayley MDI assessment of children between 18 and 30 months of age and can be used for clinical assessment of toddlers referred for development assessment prior to admission to early intervention programs.

The high-risk infant

A large number of infants are born each year with biologic or environmental risk factors that put them at increased risk for developmental disability, although most do not go on to have major disabilities. Some risk factors, for example, intraparenchymal hemorrhage, periventricular cysts, encephalomalacia, and abnormal neurodevelopmental examination, carry a much higher risk of developmental disability than others. There is much overlap among risk factors, and infants with multiple risk factors generally have a greater risk of disability than infants with just a single risk factor. All high-risk infants should receive careful pediatric follow-up that includes developmental screening, but efficient use of so far quite limited resources argues for selection of the highest risk infants for comprehensive developmental follow-up or early intervention programs. A system of tracking and monitoring high-risk infants during infancy and childhood would allow for early identification of developmental delay and appropriate referral for community resources.

USING GROSS MOTOR MILESTONES TO IDENTIFY VERY PRETERM INFANTS AT RISK FOR CEREBRAL PALSY

The authors evaluated the efficacy of 10 gross motor milestones to screen for cerebral palsy in 173 high‐risk, very preterm infants (≤32 weeks gestation) followed for 18 to 24 months. Correcting for preterm birth and using population norms led to a better improvement in specificity and positive predictive values; race‐specific norms did not contribute significantly. Incorporating a history of milestone attainment into the routine during sequential office visits will help health‐care providers to monitor the development of high‐risk infants.

Association of prematurity and neonatal infection with neurologic morbidity in very low birth weight infants

OBJECTIVE To identify risk factors predictive of neurologic morbidity in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. METHODS This is a case–control study of all infants weighing 1500 g or less admitted to a single tertiary neonatal intensive care unit between April 1999 and December 2001. The case group were those neonates with neurologic morbidity including intraventricular hemorrhage, seizures, hydrocephalus, and periventricular leukomalacia. The control group were those without neurologic morbidity. Wilcoxon rank-sum, Fisher exact test, χ2, and univariate and stepwise multiple logistic regression were performed, with P < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS Of 213 VLBW infants, 77 had neurologic morbidity: 61 had intraventricular hemorrhage, eight had seizures, 13 had hydrocephalus, and nine had periventricular leukomalacia. Several infants had more than one morbidity. Gestational age (odds ratio [OR] 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94, 0.96; P < .005), birth weight (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.49, 0.79; P < .005), and neonatal infection (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.17, 1.58; P < .005) were highly associated with neurologic morbidity. There was no difference in mean umbilical arterial cord pH (7.25 ± 0.15, 7.28 ± 0.09, P = .45) or base excess (−3.8 ± 4.8 mEq/L, −2.3 ± 3.0, P = .10). Only three of 52 infants (5.8%) in the case group had an umbilical arterial pH of less than 7. CONCLUSION Prematurity and neonatal infection were the dominant factors associated with neurologic morbidity in VLBW infants. Intrapartum acidosis occurred in less than 6% of those with neurologic morbidity.

ASSESSMENT OF EARLY AUDITORY AND VISUAL ABILITIES OF EXTREMELY PREMATURE INFANTS

The early auditory and visual abilities of 47 extremely premature infants (31 born ≤28 weeks gestation) were assessed with a bell, a light and an optokinetic nystagmus drum. All the infants alerted to the bell and blinked to the light from 25 weeks postconceptional age (PCA) and beyond. A few infants at first had only a change in heart rate or respiratory rate in response to the bell, or required a high‐intensity light to elicit a blink. The majority appeared to habituate to the bell and light during their first examination at one week of age. None of the infants blinked in response to a threatening gesture. Optokinetic nystagmus could be elicited as early as 30 weeks PCA, could be elicited in the majority by 36 weeks PCA, and universally by term (40 weeks PCA). The responses of 15 fullterm newborn infants were not significantly different from those of the preterm infants at term. Alerting to a bell, blinking to light and habituation to both are simple bedside maneuvers for assessing extremely premature infants <30 weeks PCA. Optokinetic nystagmus may be useful in assessing the visual abilities of premature infants closer to term.