Marilyn J. Young
Florida State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Marilyn J. Young.
Argumentation and Advocacy | 1990
Marilyn J. Young
Since the conspiratist Weltanschauung uses logical or rhetorical fallacies to conceal the issues and exploit the ambiguities of uncertain situations, this essay advocates the application of traditional tests of evidence and argument to conspiratist discourse. Using the conspiracy interpretation of the Soviet shootdown of Korean Air Lines 007 as an exemplar, the authors demonstrate that conspiratist arguments, by their very nature, demand that the critic develop an evaluative system to explicate the dynamics of such arguments.
Quarterly Journal of Speech | 2001
Jim A. Kuypers; Marilyn J. Young; Michael K. Launer
The response of the Soviet Union to the American destruction of Iran Air 655 in 1988 represents a break in the mutual cycle of superpower condemnation that occurred throughout the Cold War and most of the Reagan presidency. This essay concerns the Soviet response: first, we examine the manner in which Soviet print media disputed U.S. media comparisons with the 1983 downing of Korean airlines flight 007; second, we analyze Soviet news editorials as a composite narrative. Essentially, scattered editorial accounts are collected, compiled, and read as a single Soviet narrative of the event. Read as a composite narrative, the Soviet response represents an important break in the cycle of superpower bickering common throughout post‐Truman presidencies.
Southern Journal of Communication | 1994
Jim A. Kuypers; Marilyn J. Young; Michael K. Launer
When the U.S.S. Vincennes shot down Iran Air 655 (Airbus) on 3 July 1988, the Reagan administration initially reacted in a reserved and perfunctory manner; however, within two weeks the discourse had assumed a more vituperative demeanor. These disparate rhetorical styles suggest the premise that the administration redefined the context from which it communicated to the world. This study analyzes administrative rhetoric of the United States government during the Airbus crisis, examining all written verbatim records produced by the administration within a thirty day period following the shootdown. By studying the interplay of text and context, as this relates to the concept of rhetorical situation, we demonstrate that the administration contextually reconstructed the entire incident, that George Bushs speech before the United Nations on 14 July 1988 was the culmination of this change, and that discourse following Bushs speech evinced rhetorical qualities characteristic of administrative discourse during t...
Quarterly Journal of Speech | 1988
Marilyn J. Young; Michael K. Launer
In September 1983, Soviet planes shot down Korean Air Lines Flight 007, provoking an exercise in crisis rhetoric by President Reagan and members of his administration. A case study of the incident illuminates the interactive nature of context, public knowledge, and rhetorical situation. Errors in argumentation strategy undermined the American position, raising doubts about U.S. complicity in the tragedy and enabling the Soviet Union to present a plausible explanation for its action.
Argumentation | 1997
David Cratis Williams; John Ishiyama; Marilyn J. Young; Michael K. Launer
The authors argue that in the 1993 Duma elections it was the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, led by Gennady Zyuganov, that incorporated rhetorical values and audience adaptation into its campaign strategy. Finding its discursive ground limited by history, the CPRF gradually shifted its rhetorical posture and argumentative strategies, redefining itself in the process. This evolution allowed the CPRF to employ the ideographs of ’democracy‘, ‘will of the people‘, ’citizen‘, and other key terms of Western-style democracy, while retaining, albeit in transformed meaning, traditional communist ideographs such as ’justice‘ and ’spirituality‘. In addition, the CPRF was able to borrow selectively from the history of the USSR between 1917 and 1989, thereby imbuing their political appeals with historical force and cultural memory.
The Southern Communication Journal | 2008
Marilyn J. Young
Malcolm Sillars’ 1976 essay, ‘‘Persistent Problems in Rhetorical Criticism,’’ addressed eight problems=questions that recur in discussions of rhetorical studies. Looking back at this essay we find, not surprisingly, that some of these questions obtain today while others have become less pressing. It is true that these are questions that rhetorical critics have discussed among themselves; but it is also true that these are questions that are often put to us by those outside our discipline. They are questions of what we study and how.
Advances in the History of Rhetoric | 2015
David Cratis Williams; Marilyn J. Young
Just as the popular imagination became inflamed by the events of 1989, and the “fall of the wall” was commonly taken as a sign of the inevitability of a new, open, free, and democratic Eastern Europe, so too was the disintegration of the Soviet Union in December of 1991 taken as a sign of the inevitability of a new, open, free, and democratic Russia. Although the events in Berlin were significant in spurring changes onward, with different rhetorical choices by Soviet and Russian leaders along the way history could have been written quite differently. The central concern of this article is to show how these rhetorical choices shaped the future of post-Communist transition in the Russian Federation. We proceed chronologically, examining key moments in the rhetoricity of the Russian transition from Communism toward its current form of governance.
Journal of Communication | 1991
Marilyn J. Young; Michael K. Launer
Argumentation and Advocacy | 1997
John Ishiyama; Michael K. Launer; Irina E. Likhachova; David Cratis Williams; Marilyn J. Young
Archive | 1988
Marilyn J. Young; Michael K. Launer