Marina D. Kaymakcalan

Clinical risk factors for the development of hypertension in patients treated with inhibitors of the VEGF signaling pathway

VEGF signaling pathway inhibitor (anti‐VEGF) therapy is associated with hypertension, but little is known about predisposing clinical characteristics. This study describes the real‐world association between baseline clinical characteristics, blood pressure (BP) response, and survival in patients prescribed anti‐VEGF therapies.

QTc interval prolongation with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Background:Multi-targeted vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are known to cause cardiac toxicity, but the relative risk (RR) of QTc interval prolongation and serious arrhythmias associated with them are not reported.Methods:We conducted a trial-level meta-analysis of randomised phase II and III trials comparing arms with and without a US Food and Drug Administration-approved VEGFR TKI (sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, axitinib, vandetanib, cabozantinib, ponatinib and regorafenib). A total of 6548 patients from 18 trials were selected. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the summary incidence, RR and 95% CIs.Results:The RR for all-grade and high-grade QTc prolongation for the TKI vs no TKI arms was 8.66 (95% CI 4.92–15.2, P<0.001) and 2.69 (95% CI 1.33–5.44, P=0.006), respectively, with most of the events being asymptomatic QTc prolongation. Respectively, 4.4% and 0.83% of patients exposed to VEGFR TKI had all-grade and high-grade QTc prolongation. On subgroup analysis, only sunitinib and vandetanib were associated with a statistically significant risk of QTc prolongation, with higher doses of vandetanib associated with a greater risk. The rate of serious arrhythmias including torsades de pointes did not seem to be higher with high-grade QTc prolongation. The risk of QTc prolongation was independent of the duration of therapy.Conclusions:In the largest study to date, we show that VEGFR TKI can be associated with QTc prolongation. Although most cases were of low clinical significance, it is unclear whether the same applies to patients treated off clinical trials.

Angiotensin System Inhibitors and Survival Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Purpose: The renin-angiotensin system may play a role in carcinogenesis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of angiotensin system inhibitors (ASI) on outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated in the targeted therapy era. Experimental Design: We conducted a pooled analysis of mRCC patients treated on phase II and III clinical trials. Statistical analyses were performed using Cox regression adjusted for several risk factors and the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: A total of 4,736 patients were included, of whom 1,487 received ASIs and 783 received other antihypertensive agents. Overall, ASI users demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) compared with users of other antihypertensive agents (adjusted HR, 0.838, P = 0.0105, 26.68 vs. 18.07 months) and individuals receiving no antihypertensive therapy (adjusted HR, 0.810, P = 0.0026, 26.68 vs. 16.72 months). When stratified by therapy type, a benefit in OS was demonstrated in ASI users compared with nonusers in individuals receiving VEGF therapy (adjusted HR, 0.737, P < 0.0001, 31.12 vs. 21.94 months) but not temsirolimus or IFNα. An in vitro cell viability assay demonstrated that sunitinib in combination with an ASI significantly decreased RCC cell viability compared with control at physiologically relevant doses. This effect was not observed with either agent alone or with other non-ASI antihypertensives or temsirolimus. Conclusions: In the largest analysis to date, we demonstrate that ASI use improved survival in mRCC patients treated in the targeted therapy era. Further studies are warranted to investigate the mechanism underlying this interaction and verify our observations to inform clinical practice. Clin Cancer Res; 21(11); 2471–9. ©2015 AACR.

Risk of infections in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and non-RCC patients treated with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors

Background:Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are used in a variety of malignancies. Infections have been reported with these drugs. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis to further characterise the risk of infections in cancer patients treated with these agents.Methods:Pubmed and oncology conferences’ proceedings were searched for studies from January 1966 to June 2012. Studies were limited to phase II and III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of everolimus or temsirolimus reporting on cancer patients with adequate safety profiles. Summary incidences, relative risks (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.Results:A total of 3180 patients were included. The incidence of all-grade and high-grade infections due to mTOR inhibitors was 33.1% (95% CI, 24.5–43.0%) and 5.6% (95% CI, 3.8–8.3%), respectively. Compared with controls, the RR of all-grade and high-grade infections due to mTOR inhibitors was 2.00 (95% CI, 1.76–2.28, P<0.001) and 2.60 (95% CI, 1.54–4.41, P<0.001), respectively. Subgroup analysis found no difference in incidences or risks between everolimus and temsirolimus or between different tumour types (renal cell carcinoma (RCC) vs non-RCC). Infections included respiratory tract (61.7%), genitourinary (29.4%), skin/soft tissue (4.2%), and others (4.9%).Conclusion:Treatment with mTOR inhibitors is associated with a significant increase in risk of infections. Close monitoring for any signs of infections is warranted.

Incidence and risk of treatment-related mortality in cancer patients treated with the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors

BACKGROUND Inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is an established treatment for multiple malignancies. We carried out an up-to-date meta-analysis to determine the risk of fatal adverse events (FAEs) in cancer patients treated with mTOR inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS PubMed, conferences and clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for articles reported from January 1966 to June 2012. Eligible studies were limited to approved mTOR inhibitors (everolimus and temsirolimus) and reported on patients with cancer, randomized design and adequate safety profiles. Data extraction was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. RESULTS In all, 3193 patients from eight randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) were included, 2236 from everolimus trials and 957 from temsirolimus trials. The relative risk (RR) of FAEs related to mTOR inhibitors use was 2.20 (95% CI, 1.25-3.90; P = 0.006) compared with control patients. On subgroup analysis, no difference in the rate of FAEs was found between everolimus and temsirolimus or between tumor types [renal cell carcinoma (RCC) versus non-RCC]. No evidence of publication bias was observed. CONCLUSION The use of mTOR inhibitors is associated with a small but higher risk of FAEs compared to control patients. In the appropriate clinical scenario, the use of these drugs remains justified in their approved indications.

Programmed death ligand-1 expression in adrenocortical carcinoma: an exploratory biomarker study

BackgroundAdrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare tumor in which prognostic factors are still not well established. Programmed Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in ACC and its association with clinico-pathological features and survival outcomes are unknown.MethodsFormalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens were obtained from 28 patients with ACC. PD-L1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in both tumor cell membrane and tumor infiltrating mononuclear cells (TIMC). PD-L1 positivity on tumor cells was defined as ≥5% tumor cell membrane staining. TIMC were evaluated by IHC using a CD45 monoclonal antibody. For PD-L1 expression in TIMC, a combined score based on the extent of infiltrates and percentage of positive cells was developed. Any score greater that zero was considered PD-L1 positive. Baseline clinico-pathological characteristics and follow up data were retrospectively collected. Comparisons between PD-L1 expression and clinico-pathological features were evaluated using unpaired t-test and Fisher’s exact test. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to assess association between PD-L1 expression and 5-year overall survival (OS).ResultsAmong 28 patients with surgically treated ACC, 3 (10.7%) were considered PD-L1 positive on tumor cell membrane. On the other hand, PD-L1 expression in TIMC was performed in 27 specimens and PD-L1 positive staining was observed in 19 (70.4%) patients. PD-L1 positivity in either tumor cell membrane or TIMC was not significantly associated with higher stage at diagnosis, higher tumor grade, excessive hormone secretion, or OS.ConclusionsPD-L1 expression can exist in ACC in both tumor cell membrane and TIMC with no relationship to clinico-pathologic parameters or survival.

Risk factors and model for predicting toxicity-related treatment discontinuation in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor–targeted therapy: Results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)–targeted therapies are standard treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC); however, toxicities can lead to drug discontinuation, which can affect patient outcomes. This study was aimed at identifying risk factors for toxicity and constructing the first model to predict toxicity‐related treatment discontinuation (TrTD) in mRCC patients treated with VEGF‐targeted therapies.

Adrenocortical carcinoma: The management of metastatic disease

Adrenocortical cancer is a rare malignancy. While surgery is the cornerstone of the management of localized disease, metastatic disease is hard to treat. Cytotoxic chemotherapy and mitotane have been utilized with a variable degree of benefit and few long-term responses. A growing understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of this malignancy as well as multidisciplinary and multi-institutional collaborative efforts will result in better defined targets and subsequently, effective novel therapies.

Statins and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND A growing body of evidence has demonstrated the anti-neoplastic activity of statins. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of statin use on survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated in the modern therapy era. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a pooled analysis of mRCC patients treated on phase II and III clinical trials. Statistical analyses were performed using Cox regression and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS We identified 4736 patients treated with sunitinib (n=1059), sorafenib (n=772), axitinib (n=896), temsirolimus (n=457), temsirolimus+interferon (IFN)-α (n=208), bevacizumab+temsirolimus (n=393), bevacizumab+IFN-α (n=391) or IFN-α (n=560), of whom 511 were statin users. Overall, statin users demonstrated an improved overall survival (OS) compared to non-users (25.6 versus 18.9 months, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.801, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.659-0.972, p=0.025). When stratified by therapy type, a benefit in OS was demonstrated in statin users compared to non-users in individuals receiving therapy targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (28.4 versus 22.2 months, aHR 0.749, 95% CI 0.584-0.961, p=0.023) or mammalian target of rapamycin (18.6 versus 14.0 months, aHR 0.657, 95% CI 0.445-0.972, p=0.035) but not in those receiving IFN-α (15.6 versus 14.8 months, aHR 1.292, 95% CI 0.703-2.275, p=0.410). Adverse events were similar between users and non-users. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate that statin use may be associated with improved survival in patients with mRCC treated in the targeted therapy era. Statins could represent an adjunct therapy for patients with mRCC; however, this is hypothesis generating and requires prospective evaluation.

Discontinuing VEGF-targeted Therapy for Progression Versus Toxicity Affects Outcomes of Second-line Therapies in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Micro‐Abstract Whether clinical outcomes differ in patients who receive second‐line (2L) targeted therapy on the basis of reason for discontinuation of first‐line (1L) therapy is unknown. We included 1124 patients from 15 International mRCC Database Consortium centers. Compared with patients who stopped 1L vascular endothelial growth factor‐targeted therapies because of progression of disease, patients who stopped because of toxicity had better outcomes in 2L treatment: greater clinical benefit (68% vs. 56%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.58) and longer overall survival (17.4 vs. 11.2 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69 (95% confidence interval, 0.56‐0.84; P = .0002). Background: A significant subgroup of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients discontinue vascular endothelial growth factor‐targeted therapies (VEGF‐TT) because of toxicity. Whether clinical outcomes differ in patients who receive second‐line (2L) targeted therapy on the basis of reason for discontinuation of first‐line (1L) therapy is unknown. Patients and Methods: Patients from 15 International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) centers who started 2L targeted therapy were included and the reason for discontinuation of 1L therapy retrospectively collected. Treatment outcomes of 2L, including response, time to treatment failure, and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Results: In total, 1124 patients were identified: 866 patients (77%) discontinued 1L VEGF‐TT because of disease progression, and 208 patients (19%) because of toxicity. The reason for discontinuation of 1L therapy did not differ according to IMDC risk group. Compared with patients who stopped 1L VEGF‐TT because of disease progression, patients who stopped because of toxicity had greater clinical benefit (nonprogressive disease as best response) in 2L treatment (68% vs. 56%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07‐2.35; P = .023) and longer OS (17.4 vs. 11.2 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56‐0.84; P = .0002) adjusted for type of therapy, time to initiation of 2L treatment, IMDC risk group, and number of metastases at initiation of 2L treatment. Conclusion: mRCC patients who discontinue 1L VEGF‐TT because of toxicity have better outcomes with 2L therapy than patients who stop therapy because of disease progression. These findings should be taken into consideration when designing clinical trials for 2L therapies in mRCC.