Marina Tadolini

Tuberculosis elimination: theory and practice in Europe

Although Europe identified the pathway to tuberculosis (TB) elimination in 1990, no information on programmes for country preparedness is available. A questionnaire investigating TB elimination activities was submitted to 38 national TB programme representatives of low TB incidence (<20 cases per 100 000 population) European countries/territories of the World Health Organization European region. Out of 31 providing a complete answer, 17 (54.8%) reported to have a dedicated national TB programme, 20 (64.5%) a national plan including TB elimination (13 (41.9%) including targets), 22 (71%) guidelines, 14 (45.2%) a specific budget for TB activities, and 23 (74.2%) TB reference centres. All countries reported having case-based electronic TB surveillance, 19 (61.3%) perform regular supervision, 12 (38.7%) have a monitoring and evaluation plan and five (16.1%) perform modelling. In three countries (9.7%), TB health services are free for insured individuals only. In 22 countries/territories (71%) not all TB drugs were available, while in 12 (38.7%) drug stock-outs have been described. Although high-risk group screening for latent TB infection is performed by the majority of countries, only 6 (19.4%) provided figures on preventive treatment completion rates. Not all elements identified as essential for country preparedness to achieve TB elimination are available in the countries surveyed. As TB elimination interventions are sub-optimally applied, more training, awareness and political commitment are necessary http://ow.ly/ru6PV

ERS/WHO Tuberculosis Consilium assistance with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis management in a child: case study of compassionate delamanid use

To the Editor: The European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe implemented a consultation body, the ERS/WHO Tuberculosis (TB) Consilium, in late April 2013 [1–4]. This is a novel, high-priority initiative, as part of the 2012–2013 Presidential plan, to face the growing problem of drug-resistant TB in Europe and globally to support clinicians in managing difficult-to-treat TB cases. Clinicians are increasingly challenged by difficult-to-treat cases of multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB ( i.e. TB caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains resistant to isoniazid and rifampicin) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR)-TB ( i.e. TB caused by MDR-TB strains that are also resistant to at least one fluoroquinolone and one injectable second-line anti-TB drug) [5–8]. MDR/XDR-TB is seriously hampering TB control and elimination in Europe [9–11], as patients require long and expensive regimens with significant adverse effects, while cure rates remain low [7, 8, 12–14]. Clinicians can upload a case description and queries via the ERS/WHO TB Consilium website (www.tbconsilium.org), the process of which takes up to 20 minutes. The case is then assigned to global experts who provide feedback to the clinician’s questions in a limited timeframe, free of charge. At the time of writing, the TB Consilium has provided expert opinion on 51 cases (and two outbreaks from 11 countries), with an average response time of 36 h. The most frequently posed questions are related to the design and duration of the most appropriate regimens for difficult-to-treat patients [4]. In the absence of a sufficient number of medicines to which a strain is sensitive in vivo , life-saving treatment may rely on the use of new medicines (bedaquiline or delamanid) either under conditional or through compassionate use [15– …

First case of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis treated with both delamanid and bedaquiline

The European Respiratory Journal has recently discussed delamanid and bedaquiline and their use in difficult-to-treat cases affected by multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) or extensively drug-resistant (XDR-TB) [1–4]. The use of delamanid or bedaquiline is particularly important when four active drugs cannot be identified and included in a regimen, as per World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines [1–6]. Recently a debate has been initiated around the report of a severe, almost untreatable, XDR-TB case who could not access both new drugs simultaneously [7–10] due to concerns about possible additive toxicity (cardiotoxicity), as well as the lack of evidence and specific guidance on their combined use [10–13]. Report of the first case, concerns and challenges of treatment of severe XDR-TB with both delamanid and bedaquiline http://ow.ly/WzeB3004Cmo

Effectiveness and safety of meropenem/ clavulanate-containing regimens in the treatment of MDR- and XDR-TB

No large study has ever evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of meropenem/clavulanate to treat multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR- and XDR-TB). The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the therapeutic contribution, effectiveness, safety and tolerability profile of meropenem/clavulanate added to a background regimen when treating MDR- and XDR-TB cases. Patients treated with a meropenem/clavulanate-containing regimen (n=96) showed a greater drug resistance profile than those exposed to a meropenem/clavulanate-sparing regimen (n=168): in the former group XDR-TB was more frequent (49% versus 6.0%, p<0.0001) and the median (interquartile range (IQR)) number of antibiotic resistances was higher (8 (6–9) versus 5 (4–6)). Patients were treated with a meropenem/clavulanate-containing regimen for a median (IQR) of 85 (49–156) days. No statistically significant differences were observed in the overall MDR-TB cohort and in the subgroups with and without the XDR-TB patients; in particular, sputum smear and culture conversion rates were similar in XDR-TB patients exposed to meropenem/clavulanate-containing regimens (88.0% versus 100.0%, p=1.00 and 88.0% versus 100.0%, p=1.00, respectively). Only six cases reported adverse events attributable to meropenem/clavulanate (four of them then restarting treatment). The nondifferent outcomes and bacteriological conversion rate observed in cases who were more severe than controls might imply that meropenem/clavulanate could be active in treating MDR- and XDR-TB cases. Meropenem/clavulanate is effective and safe to treat MDR- and XDR-TB in comparison with controls http://ow.ly/XG75j

Compassionate use of new drugs in children and adolescents with multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: early experiences and challenges

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that 480 000 new multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB) cases occurred globally in 2014, with 190 000 deaths. Limited data are available on the burden of MDR-TB in children. A recent systematic review estimated that 32 000 children acquire MDR-TB annually; of these, very few are correctly diagnosed and provided with appropriate treatment [1]. First experience and challenges of compassionate use of new anti-TB drugs to treat MDR- and XDR-TB in children http://ow.ly/SWXF300a0UX

Faster for less: the new "shorter" regimen for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

Multidrug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis (TB) are growing clinical and public health concerns, with an estimated worldwide incidence and mortality of 480 000 and 190 000 cases, respectively (2014) [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) End TB Strategy reiterates the MDR-/XDR-TB threat and the solutions to control the epidemic [2]. Unfortunately, large proportions of patients with resistant TB do not have access to adequate diagnostics and treatment yet, while treatment success rates remain suboptimal (as demonstrated in the largest retrospective cohort of MDR-TB patients, i.e., TB caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates resistant to at least isoniazid and rifampicin) and decrease further with resistance patterns beyond XDR-TB [3]. Evaluation of drug resistances is needed to identify candidates for the shorter regimen in MDR-TB hot spots http://ow.ly/wZV33022VXt

Comparison of effectiveness and safety of imipenem/clavulanate- versus meropenem/clavulanate-containing regimens in the treatment of MDR- and XDR-TB

No large study to date has ever evaluated the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of imipenem/clavulanate versus meropenem/clavulanate to treat multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR- and XDR-TB). The aim of this observational study was to compare the therapeutic contribution of imipenem/clavulanate versus meropenem/clavulanate added to background regimens to treat MDR- and XDR-TB cases. 84 patients treated with imipenem/clavulanate-containing regimens showed a similar median number of antibiotic resistances (8 versus 8) but more fluoroquinolone resistance (79.0% versus 48.9%, p<0.0001) and higher XDR-TB prevalence (67.9% versus 49.0%, p=0.01) in comparison with 96 patients exposed to meropenem/clavulanate-containing regimens. Patients were treated with imipenem/clavulanate- and meropenem/clavulanate-containing regimens for a median (interquartile range) of 187 (60–428) versus 85 (49–156) days, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed on sputum smear and culture conversion rates (79.7% versus 94.8%, p=0.02 and 71.9% versus 94.8%, p<0.0001, respectively) and on success rates (59.7% versus 77.5%, p=0.03). Adverse events to imipenem/clavulanate and meropenem/clavulanate were reported in 5.4% and 6.5% of cases only. Our study suggests that meropenem/clavulanate is more effective than imipenem/clavulanate in treating MDR/XDR-TB patients. Meropenem/clavulanate is safe and more effective than imipenem/clavulanate in treating MDR and XDR-TB patients http://ow.ly/Z4S2o

First independent evaluation of QuantiFERON-TB Plus performance

Tuberculosis elimination requires an effective strategy to diagnose and treat people infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis who would otherwise be at high risk of developing and transmitting active disease [1, 2]. The diagnostic tools for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) are the tuberculin skin test (TST) and the T-cell interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs). Two IGRAs are commercially available, QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and T-SPOT.TB (Oxford Immunotec, Abingdon, UK). Compared to the TST, IGRAs offer operational advantages and higher specificity in the bacille Calmette–Guérin (BCG)-vaccinated population [3], and they are at least as sensitive for LTBI [4]. However, IGRAs have limitations: reduced sensitivity in children and immunocompromised subjects, including HIV-infected individuals [3, 4]; failure to discriminate between active tuberculosis and LTBI; and poor correlation with the risk of progression to active disease [3]. QuantiFERON-TB Plus improves sensitivity for active TB and maintains high specificity among unvaccinated controls http://ow.ly/XjYPK

First evaluation of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus performance in contact screening

Identifying latently infected individuals is crucial for the elimination of tuberculosis (TB). We evaluated for the first time the performance of a new type of interferon-γ release assay, QuantiFERON-TB Plus (QFT-Plus), which includes an additional antigen tube (TB2), stimulating both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells in contacts of TB patients. Contacts were screened for latent TB infection by tuberculin skin test, QFT-Plus and QuantiFERON-TB Gold in Tube (QFT-GIT). In 119 TB contacts, the overall agreement between QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT was high, with a Cohens κ of 0.8. Discordant results were found in 12 subjects with negative QFT-GIT and positive QFT-Plus results. In analyses of markers of TB exposure and test results, the average time spent with the index case was the strongest risk factor for positivity in each of these tests. The difference in interferon-γ production between the two antigen tubes (TB2−TB1) was used as an estimate of CD8+ stimulation provided by the TB2. TB2−TB1 values >0.6 IU·mL−1 were significantly associated with proximity to the index case and European origin. QFT-Plus has a stronger association with surrogate measures of TB exposure than QFT-GIT in adults screened for latent TB infection. Interferon-γ response in the new antigen tube used an indirect estimate of specific CD8+ response correlates with increased Mycobacterium tuberculosis exposure, suggesting a possible role in identifying individuals with recent infection. QuantiFERON-TB Plus improved the diagnostic accuracy for latent TB infection in the setting of contact screening http://ow.ly/2Az0300SDg3

ERS/WHO Tuberculosis Consilium: reporting of the initial 10 cases

To the Editor: As part of the 2012–2013 European Respiratory Society (ERS) Presidential plan, the ERS/World Health Organization (WHO) Tuberculosis (TB) Consilium was implemented as a novel high priority initiative to face the growing global multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB pandemic, which is also very much a European problem [1–3]. This priority is largely due to the alarming rates of MDR-TB ( i.e . active TB cases infected by Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains that are resistant to isoniazid and rifampicin) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB ( i.e . TB caused by strains that are resistant to at least one fluoroquinolone and one injectable second-line anti-TB drug, in addition to isoniazid and rifampicin) [4–7]. MDR/XDR-TB are considered serious threats for TB control and elimination in Europe as their clinical outcomes are largely suboptimal, as the regimens are very toxic and expensive and taken for much longer [6–9]. The largest available meta-analysis, assessing 9153 MDR-TB cases, has shown treatment success as low as 54% (with 15% dying, 8% failing/relapsing and 23% defaulting). In cases whose disease is caused by M. tuberculosis strains with resistance patterns beyond XDR-TB the outcomes are much lower: treatment success ranges from 19% to 40%, failure/relapse from 15% to 54% and death from 15% to 35% [6, 7]. Due to the clinical complexity (frequent occurrence of adverse events, lack of clinical experience, limited availability of adequate diagnostics and second-line anti-TB drugs in some countries), the real risk for acquiring …