Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Mario Occhipinti is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Mario Occhipinti.


Oncotarget | 2017

The sexist behaviour of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy

Andrea Botticelli; Concetta Elisa Onesti; Ilaria Grazia Zizzari; Bruna Cerbelli; Paolo Sciattella; Mario Occhipinti; Michela Roberto; Francesca Romana Di Pietro; Adriana Bonifacino; Michele Ghidini; Patrizia Vici; Laura Pizzuti; Chiara Napoletano; Lidia Strigari; Federica Mazzuca; Marianna Nuti; Paolo Marchetti

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeting the molecules CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1, showed efficacy against several type of cancers and are currently used in clinical practice. An important biological variable that influences innate and adaptive immunity is the sex, acting through genetic, hormonal and environmental factors. The overall differences between sexes could be crucial to evaluate the response to ICIs. Materials and methods We performed a meta-analysis of Phase II-III Clinical Trials published up to June 2017 in which anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 were studied. We extracted the OS and PFS HR differentiated by sex from subgroups analysis of each trial. We analyzed the three classes of drugs separately. Results We selected 36 Phase II-III Clinical Trials, 9 of which reported results for OS and 6 for PFS. We analyzed 2 Clinical Trials for OS with anti-CTLA-4, including 1178 patients, observing a benefit for males vs females (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.77 vs HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.96, p 0.078). Not statistically significant results were observed with anti-PD-1 neither for OS (males vs females: HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.64-0.83 vs HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.94, p 0.285) neither for PFS (males vs females: HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.82 vs HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.66-1.09, p 0.158). We cannot perform a meta-analysis for anti-PD-L1 due to the lack of data. Conclusions Different mechanisms could be involved in sex differences with regard to immunotherapy. These differences could be relevant to identify immunological targets in order to draw studies exploring novel combinations of immunotherapy agents.


Anti-Cancer Drugs | 2017

A nomogram to predict 5-fluorouracil toxicity: when pharmacogenomics meets the patient

Marina Borro; Federica Mazzuca; Bruna Cerbelli; Paolo Marchetti; Maurizio Simmaco; Antonella Petremolo; Giovanna Gentile; Mario Occhipinti; Concetta Elisa Onesti; Luana Lionetto; Annalisa Milano; Lidia Strigari; Serena Macrini; Rosa Falcone; Michela Roberto; Andrea Botticelli; Elisabetta Anselmi; Francesca Romana Di Pietro

Fluoropyrimidines combined with other agents are commonly used for gastrointestinal cancer treatment. Considering that severe toxicities occur in 30% of patients, we aimed to structure a nomogram to predict toxicity, based on metabolic parameter and patients’ characteristics. We retrospectively enrolled patients affected by gastrointestinal tract cancers. Pretreatment 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) degradation rate and DPYD, TSER, MTHFR A1298T, and C677T gene polymorphisms were characterized. Data on toxicities were collected according to CTCAE v3.0. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to structure a nomogram. 642 patients were enrolled (384 men; 258 female; median age: 67 years, range: 27–87): 449 (69.9%) patients were affected by colorectal cancer; 118 (18.4%) by gastroesophageal cancer; 66 (10.3%) by pancreatic cancer; and nine (1.4%) by other cancers. Grade 3–4 toxicities were observed in 118 (18.4%) patients and were most frequently observed in patients with altered 5-FU degradation rate (43.5 and 26.7% of the patients in the poor metabolizer and in the ultrarapid metabolizer group respectively, vs. 17% in the normal metabolizer group) and in DPYD heterozygous mutated patients (83.3% of the patients). Age, DPYD status, the number of drugs administered, and 5-FU degradation rate value were associated to severe toxicities. On the basis of these findings, we structured a nomogram to assess a score to predict the risk of developing severe toxicity. Compared with the available pharmacogenetic tests, this approach can be applied to the whole population, predicting the risk for severe toxicity, with an easy, low-cost, and not invasive technique.


Anti-Cancer Drugs | 2017

5-Fluorouracil degradation rate could predict toxicity in stages II-III colorectal cancer patients undergoing adjuvant FOLFOX.

Concetta Elisa Onesti; Andrea Botticelli; Marco La Torre; Marina Borro; Giovanna Gentile; Adriana Romiti; Luana Lionetto; Antonella Petremolo; Mario Occhipinti; Michela Roberto; Rosa Falcone; Maurizio Simmaco; Paolo Marchetti; Federica Mazzuca

5-Fluorouracil is commonly used for gastrointestinal cancer treatment in an adjuvant setting; however, the toxicity can lead to a reduction, delay, or discontinuation of treatment. We retrospectively investigated the association between the 5-fluorouracil degradation rate (5-FUDR) and genetic polymorphisms of TSER, DPYD, and MHTFR with toxicity in colorectal cancer patients treated with adjuvant FOLFOX. Pretreatment 5-FUDR and MTHFR A1298T or C677T, TSER, and DPYD gene polymorphisms were characterized in stages II–III colorectal cancer patients. Patients were classified into three metabolic classes according to the 5-FUDR value. Association with toxicities was evaluated retrospectively using logistic regression analysis. Overall, 126 patients were selected (35 women, 91 men). Seven patients were poor metabolizers, 116 patients were normal metabolizers and three patients were ultra-rapid metabolizers. The median 5-FUDR was 1.53 ng/ml/106 cells/min (range: 0.42–2.57 ng/ml/106 cells/min). Severe, rate-limiting toxicities (grades 3–4) were encountered in 22.2% of patients. No associations between MTHFR or TSER polymorphisms and toxicity were detected, whereas 5-FUDR showed a statistically significant association with toxicity (P=0.0047). The DPYD heterozygous mutation was detected in only one patient, who showed grade 4 hematological toxicity and a lower 5-FUDR value. The 5-FUDR value seems not to be affected by MTHFR and TSER polymorphisms. Compared with the available pharmacogenomics tests, the pretreatment evaluation of 5-FUDR increases the proportion of identified colorectal patients at high risk for severe toxicity. Thus, it appears to be a suitable pretreatment toxicity biomarker in a subgroup of patients in whom dose-intensity maintenance is the key factor.


PLOS ONE | 2016

Degradation Rate of 5-Fluorouracil in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A New Predictive Outcome Biomarker?

Andrea Botticelli; Marina Borro; Concetta Elisa Onesti; Lidia Strigari; Giovanna Gentile; Bruna Cerbelli; Adriana Romiti; Mario Occhipinti; Claudia Sebastiani; Luana Lionetto; Luca Marchetti; Maurizio Simmaco; Paolo Marchetti; Federica Mazzuca

Background 5-FU based chemotherapy is the most common first line regimen used for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Identification of predictive markers of response to chemotherapy is a challenging approach for drug selection. The present study analyzes the predictive role of 5-FU degradation rate (5-FUDR) and genetic polymorphisms (MTHFR, TSER, DPYD) on survival. Materials and Methods Genetic polymorphisms of MTHFR, TSER and DPYD, and the 5-FUDR of homogenous patients with mCRC were retrospectively studied. Genetic markers and the 5-FUDR were correlated with clinical outcome. Results 133 patients affected by mCRC, treated with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy from 2009 to 2014, were evaluated. Patients were classified into three metabolic classes, according to normal distribution of 5-FUDR in more than 1000 patients, as previously published: poor-metabolizer (PM) with 5-FU-DR ≤ 0,85 ng/ml/106 cells/min (8 pts); normal metabolizer with 0,85 < 5-FU-DR < 2,2 ng/ml/106 cells/min (119 pts); ultra-rapid metabolizer (UM) with 5-FU-DR ≥ 2,2 ng/ml/106 cells/min (6 pts). PM and UM groups showed a longer PFS respect to normal metabolizer group (14.5 and 11 months respectively vs 8 months; p = 0.029). A higher G3-4 toxicity rate was observed in PM and UM, respect to normal metabolizer (50% in both PM and UM vs 18%; p = 0.019). No significant associations between genes polymorphisms and outcomes or toxicities were observed. Conclusion 5-FUDR seems to be significantly involved in predicting survival of patients who underwent 5-FU based CHT for mCRC. Although our findings require confirmation in large prospective studies, they reinforce the concept that individual genetic variation may allow personalized selection of chemotherapy to optimize clinical outcomes.


Drug Safety - Case Reports | 2018

Hyperprogressive Disease and Early Hypereosinophilia After Anti-PD-1 Treatment: A Case Report

Mario Occhipinti; Rosa Falcone; Concetta Elisa Onesti; Paolo Marchetti

Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) has been recently proposed as a new pattern of progression in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Until now, no biological marker has been found to predict this accelerated tumour growth. We describe the case of a 62-year-old women who experienced a marked increase in absolute eosinophil count (AEC) concurrently with a huge radiological progression after the first nivolumab dose in absence of other immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Further investigations are needed to establish the role of early hypereosinophilia as a marker of progression and to identify patients who might not benefit from ICI treatment.


Journal of Thoracic Disease | 2017

Crizotinib plus radiotherapy in brain oligoprogressive NSCLC ROS1 rearranged and PD-L1 strong

Mario Occhipinti; Rosa Falcone; Concetta Elisa Onesti; Andrea Botticelli; Federica Mazzuca; Paolo Marchetti; Salvatore Lauro

ROS1+ patients represent a unique molecular subset of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Early phase clinical trials have shown a high response rate to crizotinib in these patients. We describe a case of an 18 years old woman, never smoker, with NSCLC ROS1+ and miliary brain metastases treated with crizotinib and radiotherapy. From October 2014 to June 2015 the Patient was treated with crizotinib. The first intracranial time to progression (IT-TTP) occurred after 7 months; the patient underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and continued TKI treatment. The second IT-TTP appeared after 16 months. A continued response in the chest was observed for all the 23 months of crizotinib treatment. At the progression, we assessed programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression by immunohistochemistry, that resulted highly expressed. Our report indicates that the integration of crizotinib with local treatments should be considered in ROS1 NSCLC patients experiencing oligometastatic progression. Moreover, this case is an example of PD-L1 strong in oncogene addicted patients.


Anticancer Research | 2017

Pharmacogenetic Approach to Toxicity in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Taxanes

S. Angelini; Andrea Botticelli; Concetta Elisa Onesti; Raffaele Giusti; V. Sini; V. Durante; Lidia Strigari; Giovanna Gentile; Bruna Cerbelli; P. Pellegrini; V. Sgroi; Mario Occhipinti; F. R. Di Pietro; A. Rossi; Maurizio Simmaco; Federica Mazzuca; Paolo Marchetti


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017

Prognostic factors associated with survival and recurrence in resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: retrospective analysis of 497 patients operated at two Italian centers

Michele Ghidini; Andrea Botticelli; Bianca Maria Donida; Lidia Strigari; Concetta Elisa Onesti; Margherita Ratti; Claudio Pizzo; Federico Aldighieri; Laura Toppo; Valerio Ranieri; Mario Occhipinti; Chiara Senti; Giulia Tanzi; Federica Mazzuca; Paolo Marchetti; Mario Martinotti; Rodolfo Passalaqua; Gianluca Tomasello; Massimo Rovatti


Annals of Oncology | 2017

Early onset of endocrine alterations during PD-1 blockade in advanced NSCLC patients.

Concetta Elisa Onesti; Andrea Botticelli; Mario Occhipinti; Francesca Romana Di Pietro; Ilaria Grazia Zizzari; Chiara Napoletano; Marianna Nuti; Salvatore Lauro; Federica Mazzuca; Paolo Marchetti


Annals of Oncology | 2017

Treatment and outcome for small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA): a real life experience of two Italian centres

Mario Occhipinti; Andrea Botticelli; Concetta Elisa Onesti; Michele Ghidini; Riccardo Righini; Claudio Pizzo; Annalisa Milano; Gianluca Tomasello; Francesca Romana Di Pietro; Laura Toppo; Margherita Ratti; Rodolfo Passalacqua; Paolo Marchetti; Federica Mazzuca

Collaboration


Dive into the Mario Occhipinti's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paolo Marchetti

Sapienza University of Rome

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrea Botticelli

Sapienza University of Rome

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Federica Mazzuca

Sapienza University of Rome

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Maurizio Simmaco

Sapienza University of Rome

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rosa Falcone

Sapienza University of Rome

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Luana Lionetto

Sapienza University of Rome

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michela Roberto

Sapienza University of Rome

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Adriana Romiti

Sapienza University of Rome

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge