Mario Preti

Squamous vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia

Introduction Vulvar cancer is a rare disease and no systematic screening is available. Therefore, detection of vulvar cancer precursors relies on the presence of vulvar symptoms or the accuracy and the knowledge of the healthcare provider inspecting the vulva. In the recent past, vulvar cancer precursor lesions have been grouped under the term vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN). VIN is diagnosed by multiple different healthcare providers, including dermatologists, gynecologists, general practitioners, and colposcopists, as well as those providing care in sexually transmitted disease clinics. Such heterogeneity of medical branches involved in VIN management probably reflects the difficulties in exchanging clinical experiences and the lack of a uniform approach to the disease. However, the interdisciplinary work has allowed a deeper understanding of the biology, pathology, and clinical features of vulvar cancer precursors so that, even managed by a variety of healthcare providers from different specialties, today patients affected by VIN are offered comparable therapies. In this chapter, the relevant aspects of diagnosis and treatment are summarized.

Pluripotent factor lin-28 and its homologue lin-28b in epithelial ovarian cancer and their associations with disease outcomes and expression of let-7a and IGF-II

Lin-28 and lin-28B are RNA-binding proteins which can block microRNA let-7 maturation and affect the differentiation and proliferation of embryonic stem cells. Lin-28 may also regulate the expression of insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II). As one of the pluripotent factors involved in making induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS), lin-28 is considered a potential therapeutic target for cancer treatment. To further understand the role of lin-28 in cancer, we analysed the expression of lin-28 and its homologue lin-28B in tumour samples, and evaluated their associations with let-7a maturation, IGF-II expression, disease features and outcomes in 211 patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer. The analysis showed that both lin-28 and lin-28B were positively correlated with primary and pre-let-7a-3; lin-28B, not lin-28, was inversely correlated with mature let-7a. A positive correlation was also observed between lin-28B and IGF-II expression, while no association was found between lin-28B and IGF-I or IGFBP-3. The study further demonstrated that lin-28B expression was associated with the risk of disease progression and death; patients with high lin-28B had shorter progression-free and overall survival than those with low lin-28B. These results seem to support the findings of recent in vitro experiments, showing that lin-28 blocks the process of let-7a maturation. Our study also suggests that lin-28B may promote ovarian cancer progression and serve as an unfavourable prognostic marker for the disease. The correlation between lin-28B and IGF-II indicates that the growth factor may mediate the effect of lin-28B on tumour growth.

Inter‐observer variation in histopathological diagnosis and grading of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: results of an European collaborative study

Objective To evaluate the inter‐observer variability of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis and grading system.

Recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva

The identification of prognostic factors in the recurrence of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma is crucial for less invasive treatments.

The 2015 International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD) Terminology of Vulvar Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions

OBJECTIVES: The impact of terminology for vulvar intraepithelial lesions has been significant over the years, because it has affected diagnosis, treatment, and research. The introduction of the Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology (LAST) in 2012 raised 2 concerns in relation to vulvar lesions: firstly, the absence of reference to “differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia” (differentiated VIN) could lead to its being overlooked by health care providers, despite its malignant potential. Secondly, including the term “low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion” (LSIL) in LAST recreated the potential for overdiagnosis and overtreatment for benign, self-limiting lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD) assigned the terminology committee the task of developing a terminology to take these issues into consideration. The committee reviewed the development of terminology for vulvar SILs with the previous 2 concerns in mind and reviewed several new terminology options. RESULTS: The final version accepted by the ISSVD contains the following: 1) Low-grade SIL of the vulva or vulvar LSIL, encompassing flat condyloma or human papillomavirus effect. 2) High-grade SIL or vulvar HSIL (which was termed “vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia usual type” in the 2004 ISSVD terminology). 3) Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia, differentiated type. CONCLUSION: The advantage of the new terminology is that it includes all types of vulvar SILs, it provides a solution to the concerns in relation to the application of LAST to vulvar lesion, and it is in accordance with the World Health Organization classification as well as the LAST, creating unity among clinicians and pathologists.

Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia

Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) is a high-grade intraepithelial squamous lesion and precursor of invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The 2004 International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD) classification distinguished two types of VIN: usual type (human papillomavirus (HPV)-related) and differentiated type (not HPV-related). The incidence of usual-type VIN is higher in younger women, while differentiated-type VIN is more common in older patients with chronic dermatologic conditions. Differentiated-type VIN has a greater invasive potential and shorter time between diagnosis and SCC than usual-type VIN. The diagnosis of VIN is carried out by identifying a lesion by visual inspection and confirming by performing a biopsy. Screening tests are not available. Patients with usual-type VIN are at a higher risk of developing another HPV-related malignancy of the anogenital tract; therefore, examination from the cervix to the perianal area is mandatory. The therapeutic approach to VIN balances the invasive potential with the need to be as conservative as possible. Current prophylactic HPV vaccines offer protection against usual-type VIN and related invasive carcinoma.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting outcome of patients with vulvar cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To construct and validate a nomogram to predict relapse-free survival of patients treated for vulvar cancer. METHODS: Data from 244 patients treated for vulvar cancer at a single institution (Creteil, France) were used as a training set to develop and calibrate a nomogram for predicting relapse-free survival and local relapse-free survival. We used bootstrap resampling for the internal validation and we tested the nomogram on an independent validation set of patients (Torino, Italy) for the external validation. RESULTS: The nomograms were based on a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Covariates for the relapse-free survival model included age, T stage, number of metastatic nodes, bilateral lymph node involvement, omission of the lymphadenectomy, margin status, lymphovascular space invasion, and depth of invasion. The concordance indices were 0.85 and 0.83 in the training set before and after bootstrapping, respectively, and 0.83 in the validation set. The predictions of our nomogram discriminated better than did the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage (0.83 compared with 0.78, P = .01). The calibration of our nomogram was good. In the validation set, 2-year and 5-year relapse-free survival were well predicted with less than 5% difference between the predicted and observed survivals for each quartile. A nomogram for predicting local relapse was also developed. CONCLUSION: We have developed nomograms for predicting distant and local relapse of vulvar cancer at 2 and 5 years and validated them both internally and externally. These nomograms will be freely available on the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease Web site. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III

The 2015 International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD) Terminology of Vulvar Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions.

Objectives The impact of terminology for vulvar intraepithelial lesions has been significant over the years, because it has affected diagnosis, treatment, and research. The introduction of the Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology (LAST) in 2012 raised 2 concerns in relation to vulvar lesions: firstly, the absence of reference to “differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia” (differentiated VIN) could lead to its being overlooked by health care providers, despite its malignant potential. Secondly, including the term “low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion” (LSIL) in LAST recreated the potential for overdiagnosis and overtreatment for benign, self-limiting lesions. Materials and Methods The International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD) assigned the terminology committee the task of developing a terminology to take these issues into consideration. The committee reviewed the development of terminology for vulvar SILs with the previous 2 concerns in mind and reviewed several new terminology options. Results The final version accepted by the ISSVD contains the following: •Low-grade SIL of the vulva or vulvar LSIL, encompassing flat condyloma or human papillomavirus effect. •High-grade SIL or vulvar HSIL (which was termed “vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia usual type” in the 2004 ISSVD terminology). •Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia, differentiated type. Conclusions The advantage of the new terminology is that it includes all types of vulvar SILs, it provides a solution to the concerns in relation to the application of LAST to vulvar lesion, and it is in accordance with the World Health Organization classification as well as the LAST, creating unity among clinicians and pathologists.

Vulvar paget disease: one century after first reported.

Objectives. To provide a critical assessment of the published literature on vulvar Paget disease and to allow individualized approaches to affected patients. Materials and Methods. A computerized search for studies published in the literature up to June 2002 was carried out using Ovid© and Medline databases. We excluded single case reports, letters to editors, and abstracts. Results. Historical and epidemiological aspects of vulvar Paget disease are summarized. Clinical and histopathological data support a recent proposal to classify vulvar Paget disease into two categories, primary and secondary, with significant clinical and prognostic implications. The treatment for primary vulvar Paget disease is wide and deep surgical excision. Inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy is added in the management of invasive neoplasms. In the presence of secondary Paget disease, therapy must be directed toward treatment of associated carcinoma. Conclusions. The subclassification of vulvar Paget disease is essential for correct clinical management and treatment. Immunohistochemistry may assist in this important distinction.

E6/E7 mRNA testing for human papilloma virus-induced high-grade cervical intraepithelial disease (CIN2/CIN3): a promising perspective

Since the introduction of biomolecular testing for the identification of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA (hrHPV-DNA) in cervical cancer preventive strategies, many interesting aspects have emerged in this field; firstly, HPV-DNA testing has been demonstrated to have better sensitivity than conventional cytology in several settings: screening, triage of ASC-US and in follow-up after treatment. Despite this, some limitations of these new technologies have also been underlined: the major issue is the low specificity of the tests, which cannot discriminate between regressive and progressive infections. Thus, recent research has moved the attention towards novel markers of progression that could more precisely detect cases at real risk of cancer development. In view of the fact that progression to cancer is dependable of the E6/E7 proteins integration and transforming action, the overexpression of E6/E7 transcripts has been seen as a valuable marker of this risk. This review aims to summarise the literature data on this topic and to provide a clear view of the emerging perspectives.