Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Mario R. Korte is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Mario R. Korte.


Nature Reviews Nephrology | 2011

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: the state of affairs

Mario R. Korte; Denise E. Sampimon; Michiel G.H. Betjes; Raymond T. Krediet

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a severe complication of long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD) with a 50% mortality rate. EPS is characterized by progressive and excessive fibrotic thickening of the peritoneum, leading to encapsulation of the bowels and intestinal obstruction. At present, EPS cannot be detected with certainty during its early stages; however, a progressive loss of ultrafiltration capacity often precedes its development. Studies that attempted to elucidate the pathogenesis of EPS have shown that the duration of exposure to PD fluids is the most important risk factor for EPS, and that young age and possibly the effects of peritonitis are additional contributory factors. The pathophysiology of EPS is probably best described as a multiple-hit process with a central role for transforming growth factor β. A form of EPS that develops shortly after kidney transplantation has also been recognized as a distinct clinical entity, and may be a common form of EPS in countries with a high transplantation rate. Criteria have been developed to identify EPS by abdominal CT scan at the symptomatic stage, but further clinical research is needed to identify early EPS in asymptomatic patients, to clarify additional risk factors for EPS and to define optimal treatment strategies.


Peritoneal Dialysis International | 2011

RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH ENCAPSULATING PERITONEAL SCLEROSIS IN DUTCH EPS STUDY

Mario R. Korte; Denise E. Sampimon; Hester F. Lingsma; Marien W. Fieren; Caspar W. N. Looman; Robert Zietse; Willem Weimar; Michiel G.H. Betjes

♦ Objective: Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a serious complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD) with a multifactorial pathophysiology and possible increasing incidence. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the independent associations of PD duration, age, dialysis fluids, and kidney transplantation with EPS. ♦ Methods: A multicenter case–control study was performed in the Netherlands from 1 January 1996 until 1 July 2007. The population comprised 63 patients with EPS and 126 control patients. Control patients were selected from the national registry and were matched for date of PD start. Associations were analyzed using a log linear regression model. Primary outcome was appearance of EPS. ♦ Results: Compared with control patients, patients with EPS were younger at the start of PD (34.7 ± 15.4 years vs. 51.5 ± 14.7 years, p < 0.0001). The cumulative period on PD was longer in EPS patients than in control patients (78.7 ± 37.8 months vs. 32.8 ± 24 months, p < 0.0001), and the cumulative period on icodextrin was also longer in EPS patients (32.7 ± 23.3 months vs. 18.1 ± 15.7 months, p = 0.006). Compared with control patients, more EPS patients underwent kidney transplantation (47 vs. 59, p < 0.0001). With regard to the period after transplantation, the yearly probability of EPS increased in the year after transplantation to 7.5% from 1.75%. In multivariate regression analysis, cumulative PD duration, age at PD start, transplantation, time from last transplantation to EPS, calendar time, time on icodextrin, and ultrafiltration failure were independently associated with EPS. Transfer from PD to hemodialysis for reasons other than suspected EPS could not be identified as a risk factor for EPS. ♦ Conclusions: Duration of PD, age at PD start, kidney transplantation, time since last transplantation, ultrafiltration failure, and time on icodextrin were associated with a higher risk of EPS.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2011

Posttransplantation encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis contributes significantly to mortality after kidney transplantation

Mario R. Korte; S. M. Habib; H. Lingsma; W. Weimar; M. G. H. Betjes

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a severe complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and may present after kidney transplantation, a condition known as posttransplantation EPS. The prevalence and impact of posttransplantation EPS on survival after kidney transplantation is unknown. From January 1, 1996 until July 1, 2007, 1241 PD patients were transplanted. Thirty‐eight cases of posttransplantation EPS (3%) were identified from the Dutch multicenter EPS study. In EPS patients the mean pretransplant dialysis duration was longer than in the controls (71.4 ± 37.5 months vs. 34.7 ± 25.5, p < 0.0001). The majority of EPS cases were observed within the first 2 years after transplantation, but some cases appeared many years after transplantation.


Peritoneal Dialysis International | 2011

A COLLABORATIVE APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING EPS: THE EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE

Angela Summers; Alferso C. Abrahams; M. Dominik Alscher; Michiel G.H. Betjes; Elisabeth W. Boeschoten; Niko Braun; Paul Brenchley; Simon J. Davies; Louese Dunn; Lyda F. Engelsman; Marien W. Fieren; Guido Garosi; Eric Goffin; Lara Heuveling; Mario R. Korte; Bengt Lindholm; Peter Rutherford; Dirk G. Struijk; Marion Verduijn; Christian Verger; Ralf Westerhuis

Manchester Royal Infirmary,1 Manchester, UK; University Medical Center Utrecht,2 Utrecht, Netherlands; Robert-Bosch-Hospital,3 Stuttgart, Germany; Erasmus Medical Center,4 Rotterdam, Netherlands; Hans Mak Institute,5 Naarden, Netherlands; University Hospital of North Staffordshire,6 Stoke-on-Trent, UK; Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese,7 Siena, Italy; Universite catholique de Louvain,8 Brussels, Belgium; Albert Schweitzer Hospital,9 Dordrecht, Netherlands; Karolinska Institutet,10 Stockholm, Sweden; Baxter Healthcare SA,11 Zurich, Switzerland; University of Amsterdam,12 Amsterdam, Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center,13 Leiden, Netherlands; Rene Dubos Hospital,14 Pontoise, France; and University Medical Center Groningen,15 Groningen, Netherlands


Peritoneal Dialysis International | 2010

Use of Angiotensin II Inhibitors in Patients That Develop Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis

Denise E. Sampimon; Inna Kolesnyk; Mario R. Korte; Marien W.J.A. Fieren; Dirk G. Struijk; Raymond T. Krediet

2007; 50:967–88. 10. Singhal MK, Bhaskaran S, Vidgen E, Bargman JM, Vas SI, Oreopoulos DG. Rate of decline of residual renal function in patients on continuous peritoneal dialysis and factors affecting it. Perit Dial Int 2000; 20:429–38. 11. Baker RJ, Senior H, Clemenger M, Brown EA. Empirical aminoglycosides for peritonitis do not affect residual renal function. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 41:670–5. 12. Lui SL, Cheng SW, Ng F, Ng SY, Wan KM, Yip T, et al. Cefazolin plus netilmicin versus cefazolin plus ceftazidime for treating CAPD peritonitis: effect on residual renal function. Kidney Int 2005; 68:2375–80. 13. Demoulin N, Goffin E. Intraperitoneal urokinase and oral rifampicin for persisting asymptomatic dialysate infection following acute coagulase-negative staphylococcus peritonitis. Perit Dial Int 2009; 29:548–53. 14. Sepandj F, Ceri H, Gibb AP, Read RR, Olson M. Biofilm infections in peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis: comparison of standard MIC and MBEC in evaluation of antibiotic sensitivity of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Perit Dial Int 2003; 23:77–9. 15. Hermsen ED, Hovde LB, Hotchkiss JR, Rotschafer JC. Increased killing of staphylococci and streptococci by daptomycin compared with cefazolin and vancomycin in an in vitro peritoneal dialysate model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47:3764–7. doi:10.3747/pdi.2010.00010


PLOS ONE | 2014

Histological and clinical findings in patients with post-transplantation and classical encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: a European multicenter study

Joerg Latus; Sayed M. Habib; Daniel Kitterer; Mario R. Korte; Christoph Ulmer; Peter Fritz; Simon J. Davies; Mark Lambie; M. Dominik Alscher; Michiel G.H. Betjes; Stephan Segerer; Niko Braun

Background Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) commonly presents after peritoneal dialysis has been stopped, either post-transplantation (PT-EPS) or after switching to hemodialysis (classical EPS, cEPS). The aim of the present study was to investigate whether PT-EPS and cEPS differ in morphology and clinical course. Methods In this European multicenter study we included fifty-six EPS patients, retrospectively paired-matched for peritoneal dialysis (PD) duration. Twenty-eight patients developed EPS after renal transplantation, whereas the other twenty-eight patients were classical EPS patients. Demographic data, PD details, and course of disease were documented. Peritoneal biopsies of all patients were investigated using histological criteria. Results Eighteen patients from the Netherlands and thirty-eight patients from Germany were included. Time on PD was 78(64–95) in the PT-EPS and 72(50–89) months in the cEPS group (p>0.05). There were no significant differences between the morphological findings of cEPS and PT-EPS. Podoplanin positive cells were a prominent feature in both groups, but with a similar distribution of the podoplanin patterns. Time between cessation of PD to the clinical diagnosis of EPS was significantly shorter in the PT-EPS group as compared to cEPS (4(2–9) months versus 23(7–24) months, p<0.001). Peritonitis rate was significantly higher in cEPS. Conclusions In peritoneal biopsies PT-EPS and cEPS are not distinguishable by histomorphology and immunohistochemistry, which argues against different entities. The critical phase for PT-EPS is during the first year after transplantation and therefore earlier after PD cessation then in cEPS.


American Journal of Nephrology | 2013

Lower mortality and inflammation from post-transplantation encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis compared to the classical form.

Sayed M. Habib; Mario R. Korte; Michiel G.H. Betjes

Background: Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) may occur after kidney transplantation (post-transplantation EPS) or may be diagnosed during or after peritoneal dialysis treatment (classical EPS). The aim of the present study was to investigate to what extent both EPS entities differ in clinical presentation, radiological findings, outcome, and the systemic inflammatory response, as measured by plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) levels both prior to and after EPS diagnosis. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 15 post-transplantation EPS and 19 classical EPS patients who were diagnosed at seven hospitals in the Netherlands between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2011. Results: There were no inter-group differences in age, duration of peritoneal dialysis, clinical presentation, or radiology findings at diagnosis. Post-transplantation patients had experienced a lower number of peritonitis episodes per patient-year (0.2 (0.0-0.4) vs. 0.7 (0.3-1.2), p = 0.01) with a longer interval between the last peritonitis and EPS diagnosis (18.1 (4.6-34.3) vs. 4.4 (0.89-13.78) months, p = 0.01). Post-transplantation EPS patients showed a remarkably lower mortality rate (40.0 vs. 84.2%, p < 0.05). In both groups a pattern of elevated CRP values was observed, increasing within the year before EPS diagnosis. In the post-transplantation group the median CRP level at diagnosis was lower (56.0 vs. 144.50 mg/l, p < 0.05) than in the classical EPS group. Conclusion: Post-transplantation EPS has a similar clinical presentation as classical EPS but with a lower systemic inflammatory response and better outcome.


Peritoneal Dialysis International | 2013

Localized encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis constricting the terminal ileum-an unusual appearance requiring surgical intervention

Sayed M. Habib; Sander M. Hagen; Mario R. Korte; Robert Zietse; Frank J.M.F. Dor; Michiel G.H. Betjes

♦ Background: Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a rare complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). It is characterized by encapsulation of the bowel, causing symptoms of intestinal obstruction. Exclusive involvement of parts of the bowel may occur and may be more common than previously thought. Our main objective was to investigate and report on patients with localized EPS. ♦ Methods: Between July 2002 and December 2011, 9 of 17 EPS patients were referred to our department of surgery for a diagnostic laparotomy. Three of the 9 cases showed localized encapsulation of the small bowel and were selected for the purpose of this study. ♦ Results: All 3 patients presented with an acute inflammatory state and symptoms of bowel obstruction. In 2 patients, EPS became clinically overt after kidney transplantation; the third patient was diagnosed while on hemodialysis. All shared a history of PD ranging from 31 to 101 months. In none of the patients was radiologic examination conclusive, although 2 showed peritoneal thickening and ascites. Each patient underwent laparotomy, confirming EPS. In all cases, a thickened peritoneal membrane became apparent, predominantly covering the ileocecal region of the intestine. In addition, a constrictive membrane at the level of the terminal ileum was noted. In 2 cases, the patients underwent enterolysis and dissection of the constricting fibrotic peritoneal membrane (peritonectomy) without bowel resection. The 3rd patient was managed with parenteral nutrition and tamoxifen. The postoperative course in 1 patient was complicated by infected ascites that resolved with antibiotic treatment. Eventually, all patients were doing well, with adequate oral intake and without the need for repeat surgery. ♦ Conclusions: Localized EPS may be more common than previously thought. It has a predilection for the level of the terminal ileum. We believe that an elective diagnostic laparotomy should be considered early, because this procedure offers both diagnostic opportunities and therapeutic options. Localized EPS cases may benefit most from enterolysis and peritonectomy.


Peritoneal Dialysis International | 2017

Significant Decreasing Incidence of Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis in the Dutch Population of Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Michiel G.H. Betjes; Sayed M. Habib; Els W. Boeschoten; Aline C. Hemke; Dick G. Struijk; Ralph Westerhuis; Alferso C. Abrahams; Mario R. Korte

The Dutch Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis (EPS) Registry was started in 2009. Cases were identified by contacting all Dutch nephrologists twice yearly. The predefined criteria for EPS allowed for inclusion of patients with diagnosed and suspected EPS. Cases registered between January 2009 and January 2015 were analyzed with follow-up until September 2015. Fifty-three EPS cases were identified, of which 28.3% were post-transplantation EPS cases. Fourteen patients were initially categorized as suspected EPS, of whom 13 developed EPS. A remarkable 6-fold decrease in the yearly incidence of EPS was observed, from 0.85% in 2009 to 0.14% in 2014. This decrease could not be explained by a decrease in the number of PD patients or average duration of PD treatment in this period. Two-year survival of EPS patients was 52%. The use of tamoxifen and surgical interventions increased significantly over the years. Tamoxifen-treated cases showed a trend to better patient survival and post-transplantation EPS had a significantly favorable outcome. In conclusion, the incidence of EPS has declined significantly in the Netherlands from 2009 to 2014.


PLOS ONE | 2015

CD4-positive T cells and M2 macrophages dominate the peritoneal infiltrate of patients with encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis

Sayed M. Habib; Alferso C. Abrahams; Mario R. Korte; Robert Zietse; Lisette de Vogel; Walther H. Boer; Amélie Dendooven; Marian C. Clahsen-van Groningen; Michiel G.H. Betjes

Background Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a severe complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Previously, it has been shown that infiltrating CD4-positive T cells and M2 macrophages are associated with several fibrotic conditions. Therefore, the characteristics of the peritoneal cell infiltrate in EPS may be of interest to understand EPS pathogenesis. In this study, we aim to elucidate the composition of the peritoneal cell infiltrate in EPS patients and relate the findings to clinical outcome. Study Design, Setting, and Participants We studied peritoneal membrane biopsies of 23 EPS patients and compared them to biopsies of 15 PD patients without EPS. The cellular infiltrate was characterized by immunohistochemistry to detect T cells(CD3-positive), CD4-positive (CD4+) and CD8-positive T cell subsets, B cells(CD20-positive), granulocytes(CD15-positive), macrophages(CD68-positive), M1(CD80-positive), and M2(CD163-positive) macrophages. Tissues were analysed using digital image analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to investigate the survival in the different staining groups. Results The cellular infiltrate in EPS biopsies was dominated by mononuclear cells. For both CD3 and CD68, the median percentage of area stained was higher in biopsies of EPS as opposed to non-EPS patients (p<0.001). EPS biopsies showed a higher percentage of area stained for CD4 (1.29%(0.61-3.20)) compared to CD8 (0.71%(0.46-1.01), p = 0.04), while in the non-EPS group these cells were almost equally represented (respectively 0.28%(0.05-0.83) versus 0.22%(0.17-0.43), p = 0.97). The percentage of area stained for both CD80 and CD163 was higher in EPS than in non-EPS biopsies (p<0.001), with CD163+ cells being the most abundant phenotype. Virtually no CD20-positive and CD15-positive cells were present in biopsies of a subgroup of EPS patients. No relation was found between the composition of the mononuclear cell infiltrate and clinical outcome. Conclusions A characteristic mononuclear cell infiltrate consisting of CD4+ and CD163+ cells dominates the peritoneum of EPS patients. These findings suggest a role for both CD4+ T cells and M2 macrophages in the pathogenesis of EPS.

Collaboration


Dive into the Mario R. Korte's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michiel G.H. Betjes

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sayed M. Habib

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert Zietse

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marien W. Fieren

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge