Marion Porcherie

Contribution des acteurs régionaux à la réduction des inégalités sociales de santé : le cas de la France

Depuis le rapport de la Commission sur les Déterminants Sociaux de la Santé, plusieurs pays ont commencé à intégrer à leurs plans de santé la question des déterminants et de leur impact sur les inégalités de santé. En France, la création des Agences Régionales de Santé en 2009 est considérée comme une opportunité pour agir sur les inégalités sociales de santé (ISS) avec les instances régionales, départementales et locales qui détiennent les leviers appropriés. A la suite d’une analyse thématique des projets régionaux de santé, visant à identifier l’intégration des ISS ainsi que les approches retenues pour les aborder, quatre régions ont été étudiées plus finement. Des entretiens collectifs et individuels (N = 45 interviewés) ont été menés auprès d’acteurs de terrain et institutionnels, afin de mieux comprendre et identifier les types de programmes et processus pour réduire les ISS. Nos analyses font ressortir une prise en compte généralisée des ISS dans les documents de planification et de programmation des instances régionales, des stratégies régionales qui restent centrées sur les populations vulnérables avec une faible considération du gradient social, l’existence d’instances de concertations intersectorielles dans les quatre régions qui constituent un potentiel de gouvernance important à mieux exploiter, l’existence de modalités de suivi et d’évaluation des ISS qui restent à consolider, et une forte mobilisation de plusieurs secteurs dans les processus régionaux de consultation des publics et des acteurs, mais des résultats variables, souvent reliés au niveau de ressources investies et des approches privilégiées. L’analyse de ces expériences françaises démontre un intérêt croissant pour l’action sur les déterminants sociaux de la santé et les ISS ; mais leur opérationnalisation, toujours en cours, appelle à des analyses plus fines qui permettront de mieux éclairer les politiques publiques.

The GREENH-City interventional research protocol on health in all policies

BackgroundThis paper presents the research protocol of the GoveRnance for Equity, EnviroNment and Health in the City (GREENH-City) project funded by the National Institute for Cancer (Subvention N°2017–003-INCA). In France, health inequities have tended to increase since the late 1980s. Numerous studies show the influence of social, economic, geographic and political determinants on health inequities across the life course. Exposure to environmental factors is uneven across the population and may impact on health and health inequities. In cities, green spaces contribute to creating healthy settings which may help tackle health inequities. Health in All Policies (HiAP) represents one of the key strategies for addressing social and environmental determinants of health inequities. The objective of this research is to identify the most promising interventions to operationalize the HiAP approaches at the city level to tackle health inequities through urban green spaces. It is a participatory interventional research to analyze public policy in real life setting (WHO Healthy Cities).Method/designIt is a mixed method systemic study with a quantitative approach for the 80 cities and a comparative qualitative multiple case-studies of 6 cities. The research combines 3 different lens: 1/a political analysis of how municipalities apply HiAP to reduce social inequities of health through green space policies and interventions 2/a geographical and topological characterization of green spaces and 3/ on-site observations of the use of green spaces by the inhabitants.ResultsCity profiles will be identified regarding their HiAP approaches and the extent to which these cities address social inequities in health as part of their green space policy action. The analysis of the transferability of the results will inform policy recommendations in the rest of the Health City Network and widely for the French municipalities.Discussion/conclusionThe study will help identify factors enabling the implementation of the HiAP approach at a municipal level, promoting the development of green spaces policies in urban areas in order to tackle the social inequities in health.

À quelle échelle appliquer l’approche universelle proportionnée pour lutter contre les inégalités sociales de santé ? Pour une approche contextualisée des actions de prévention et de promotion de la santé

INTRODUCTION Reduction of social inequalities in health has been one of the main political pillars of Regional Health Agencies in France since their creation in 2009. This paper presents a contextual analysis of the effects on social inequalities in health of a hospital-based health promotion and disease prevention programme in terms of overall health policy and scope. METHODS Qualitative analysis was used to describe the impact on social inequalities in health according to the classification proposed by Diderichsen et al. Careys framework was used to apply proportionate universalism in order to analyse its action on these inequalities, adopting a contextualised and holistic approach with regard to regional and national public policy. The results showed that the intervention focused on targeted actions, but may have broader applications. The intervention strategy shifts between closing the inequality gap and levelling up the social gradient. However, analysis of this type of intervention using the proportionate universalism framework may lead to a revised view of the effects of the intervention on social inequalities in health. RESULTS Implementing health-equity focused interventions remains a challenge for each institution, including Regional Health Agencies. However, research on hospital-based preventive interventions highlights contrasting results in terms of social gradient, depending on whether the intervention is considered in isolation or in its broader context. DISCUSSION This article advocates a contextualised approach to analysing local interventions and their effects on social inequalities in health.

Urban green spaces and cancer: a protocol for a scoping review

Introduction Green space in the built environment is an important topic on the health agenda today. Studies have shown that access to green spaces is associated with better mental and physical health, yet green spaces can also be detrimental to health if they are not managed appropriately. Despite the increasing interest in urban green spaces, little research has so far been conducted into the links between green spaces and cancer. Objective The purpose of this scoping review is therefore to map the literature available on the types of relationship between urban green spaces and cancer. Method and analysis We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015 guideline to report the protocol. To conduct this scoping review, we will use a structured search strategy based on controlled vocabulary and relevant key terms related to green space, urban space and cancer. We will search MEDLINE (PubMed), GreenFILE (EBSCOhost), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (EBSCOhost) and ScienceDirect as electronic database as well as hand-search publications for grey literature. This review will therefore provide evidence on this current topic, one which could have practical implications for policy-makers involved in choices which are more conducive to healthy living. Ethics and dissemination No primary data will be collected since all data that will be presented in this review are based on published articles and publicly available documents, and therefore ethics committee approval is not a requirement. The findings of this review will be presented at workshops and conferences, and will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

Evaluation of a knowledge transfer scheme to improve policy making and practices in health promotion and disease prevention setting in French regions: a realist study protocol

BackgroundEvidence-based decision-making and practice are pivotal in public health. However, barriers do persist and they relate to evidence properties, organisations and contexts. To address these major knowledge transfer (KT) issues, we need to rethink how knowledge is produced and used, to enhance our understanding of decision-making processes, logics and mechanisms and to examine the ability of public health services to integrate research findings into their decisions and operations. This article presents a realist evaluation protocol to assess a KT scheme in prevention policy and practice at local level in France.Methods/designThis study is a comparative multiple case study, using a realist approach, to assess a KT scheme in regional health agencies (ARS) and regional non-profit organisations for health education and promotion (IREPS), by analysing the configurations contexts/mechanisms/outcomes of it. The KT scheme assessed is designed for the use of six reviews of systematic reviews concerning the following themes: nutrition, alcohol, tobacco smoking, physical activity, emotional and sexual life and psychosocial skills. It combines the following activities: supporting the access to and the adaptation of scientific and usable evidences; strengthening professionals’ skills to analyse, adopt and use the evidences in the course of their practices and their decision-making process; facilitating the use of evidence in the organisations and processes. RAMESE II reporting standards for realist evaluations was used.DiscussionThe aims of this study are to experiment and characterise the factors related to the scheme’s ability to enable public health stakeholders to address the challenges of KT and to integrate scientific knowledge into policy and practice. We will use the realist approach in order to document the parameters of successful KT strategies in the specific contexts of preventive health services in France, while seeking to determine the transferability of such strategies.

Correction to: The GREENH-City interventional research protocol on health in all policies

After publication of the article [1], it has been brought to our attention that in the original publication the third author’s name was spelt incorrectly. The correct spelling is “Emmanuelle Faure”. This was previously spelt as “Emmannuelle Faure”. The original article has been revised to reflect this.