Mariska Y. M. Peeters

Prediction of propofol clearance in children from an allometric model developed in rats, children and adults versus a 0.75 fixed-exponent allometric model

AbstractBackground and Objective: For propofol clearance, allometric scaling has been applied successfully for extrapolations between species (rats and humans) and within the human bodyweight range (children and adults). In this analysis, the human bodyweight range is explored to determine for which range an allometric model with a fixed or estimated exponent can be used to predict propofol clearance, without correction for maturation. Methods: The predictive value of the allometric equation, clearance (CL) is equal to 0.071 × bodyweight in kg0.78, which was developed from rats, children and adults, and the predictive value of a fixed exponent allometric model derived from the basal metabolic rate, CL is equal to CL standardized to a 70 kg adult × (bodyweight in kg standardized to a 70 kg adult)0.75, were evaluated across five independent patient groups including (i) 25 (pre)term neonates with a postmenstrual age of 27–43 weeks; (ii) 22 postoperative infants aged 4–18 months; (iii) 12 toddlers aged 1–3 years; (iv) 14 adolescents aged 10–20 years; and (v) 26 critically ill adults sedated long term. The median percentage error of the predictions was calculated using the equation %error = (CLallometric − CLi)/CLi × 100, where CLallometric is the predicted propofol clearance from the allometric equations for each individual and CLi is the individual-predicted (post hoc) propofol clearance value derived from published population pharmacokinetic models. Results: In neonates, the allometric model developed from rats, children and adults, and the fixed-exponent allometric model, systematically overpredicted individual propofol clearance, with median percentage errors of 288% and 216%, respectively, whereas in infants, both models systematically underpredicted individual propofol clearance, with median percentage errors of −43% and −55%, respectively. In toddlers, adolescents and adults, both models performed reasonably well, with median percentage errors of −12% and–32%, respectively, in toddlers, 16% and −14%, respectively, in adolescents, and 12% and −18%, respectively, in adults. Conclusion: Both allometric models based on bodyweight alone may be of use to predict propofol clearance in individuals older than 2 years. Approaches that also incorporate maturation are required to predict clearance under the age of 2 years.

Propofol Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics for Depth of Sedation in Nonventilated Infants after Major Craniofacial Surgery

Background: To support safe and effective use of propofol in nonventilated children after major surgery, a model for propofol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics is described. Methods: After craniofacial surgery, 22 of the 44 evaluated infants (aged 3–17 months) in the pediatric intensive care unit received propofol (2–4 mg · kg−1 · h−1) during a median of 12.5 h, based on the COMFORT-Behavior score. COMFORT-Behavior scores and Bispectral Index values were recorded simultaneously. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling was performed using NONMEM V (GloboMax LLC, Hanover, MD). Results: In the two-compartment model, body weight (median, 8.9 kg) was a significant covariate. Typical values were Cl = 0.70 · (BW/8.9)0.61 l/min, Vc = 18.8 l, Q = 0.35 l/min, and Vss = 146 l. In infants who received no sedative, depth of sedation was a function of baseline, postanesthesia effect (Emax model), and circadian night rhythm. In agitated infants, depth of sedation was best described by baseline, postanesthesia effect, and propofol effect (Emax model). The propofol concentration at half maximum effect was 1.76 mg/l (coefficient of variation = 47%) for the COMFORT-Behavior scale and 3.71 mg/l (coefficient of variation = 145%) for the Bispectral Index. Conclusions: Propofol clearance is two times higher in nonventilated healthy children than reported in the literature for ventilated children and adults. Based on the model, the authors advise a propofol dose of 30 mg/h in a 10-kg infant to achieve values of 12–14 on the COMFORT-Behavior scale and 70–75 on the Bispectral Index during the night. Wide pharmacodynamic variability emphasizes the importance of dose titration.

Disease severity is a major determinant for the pharmacodynamics of propofol in critically ill patients

As oversedation is still common and significant variability between and within critically ill patients makes empiric dosing difficult, the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol upon long‐term use are characterized, particularly focused on the varying disease state as determinant of the effect. Twenty‐six critically ill patients were evaluated during 0.7–9.5 days (median 1.9 days) using the Ramsay scale and the bispectral index as pharmacodynamic end points. NONMEM V was applied for population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling. Propofol pharmacokinetics was described by a two‐compartment model, in which cardiac patients had a 38% lower clearance. Severity of illness, expressed as a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, particularly influenced the pharmacodynamics and to a minor degree the pharmacokinetics. Deeper levels of sedation were found with an increasing SOFA score. With severe illness, critically ill patients will need downward titration of propofol. In patients with cardiac failure, the propofol dosages should be reduced by 38%.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Propofol in Morbidly Obese Patients

AbstractBackground and Objectives: In view of the increasing prevalence of morbidly obese patients, the influence of excessive total bodyweight (TBW) on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol was characterized in this study using bispectral index (BIS) values as a pharmacodynamic endpoint. Methods: A population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model was developed with the nonlinear mixed-effects modelling software NONMEM VI, on the basis of 491 blood samples from 20 morbidly obese patients (TBW range 98–167 kg) and 725 blood samples from 44 lean patients (TBW range 55–98 kg) from previously published studies. In addition, 2246 BIS values from the 20 morbidly obese patients were available for pharmacodynamic analysis. Results: In a three-compartment pharmacokinetic model, TBW proved to be the most predictive covariate for clearance from the central compartment (CL) in the 20 morbidly obese patients (CL 2.33L/min × [TBW/70]^[0.72]). Similar results were obtained when the morbidly obese patients and the 44 lean patients were analysed together (CL 2.22 L/min × [TBW/70]^[0.67]). No covariates were identified for other pharmacokinetic parameters. The depth of anaesthesia in the morbidly obese patients was adequately described by a two-compartment biophase-distribution model with a sigmoid maximum possible effect (Emax) pharmacodynamic model (concentration at half-maximum effect [EC50] 2.12 mg/L) without covariates. Conclusion: We developed a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model of propofol in morbidly obese patients, in which TBW proved to be the major determinant of clearance, using an allometric function with an exponent of 0.72. For the other pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, no covariates could be identified.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of midazolam and metabolites in nonventilated infants after craniofacial surgery.

Background:Because information on the optimal dose of midazolam for sedation of nonventilated infants after major surgery is scant, a population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model is developed for this specific group. Methods:Twenty-four of the 53 evaluated infants (aged 3–24 months) admitted to the Pediatric Surgery Intensive Care Unit, who required sedation judged necessary on the basis of the COMFORT-Behavior score and were randomly assigned to receive midazolam, were included in the analysis. Bispectral Index values were recorded concordantly. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling was performed using NONMEM V (GloboMax LLC, Hanover, MD). Results:For midazolam, total clearance was 0.157 l/min, central volume was 3.8 l, peripheral volume was 30.2 l, and intercompartmental clearance was 0.30 l/min. Assuming 60% conversion of midazolam to 1-OH-midazolam, the volume of distribution for 1-OH-midazolam and 1-OH-midazolamglucuronide was 6.7 and 1.7 l, and clearance was 0.21 and 0.047 l/min, respectively. Depth of sedation using COMFORT-Behavior could adequately be described by a baseline, postanesthesia effect (Emax model) and midazolam effect (Emax model).The midazolam concentration at half maximum effect was 0.58 &mgr;m with a high interindividual variability of 89%. Using the Bispectral Index, in 57% of the infants the effect of midazolam could not be characterized. Conclusion:In nonventilated infants after major surgery, midazolam clearance is two to five times higher than in ventilated children. From the model presented, the recommended initial dosage is a loading dose of 1 mg followed by a continuous infusion of 0.5 mg/h during the night for a COMFORT-Behavior of 12–14 in infants aged 1 yr. Large interindividual variability warrants individual titration of midazolam in these children.

Critical illness is a major determinant of midazolam clearance in children aged 1 month to 17 years

Background: In children, a large variability in pharmacokinetics of midazolam, a cytochrome P450 3A4/5 (CYP3A4/5) enzyme substrate, has been described, which cannot be explained by age-related changes alone. In this study, these age-related changes are studied in relation to other covariates to explain the variability in the pharmacokinetics of midazolam in children. Methods: Population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using a joint dataset of 3 studies conducted previously: study 1: pediatric intensive care patients requiring sedation in the intensive care unit; study 2: pediatric oncology patients undergoing an invasive procedure; study 3: otherwise healthy infants admitted for postoperative monitoring after elective major craniofacial surgery. Midazolam, 1-hydroxymidazolam, and 1-hydroxymidazolam glucuronide concentrations were considered to determine the pharmacokinetics of midazolam and metabolites using NONMEM 6.2. SimCYP pediatric simulator was used for simulation. Results: Fifty-four children aged between 1 month and 17 years who received intravenous midazolam (bolus and/or continuous infusion) for sedation were included in this study. A reduction of 93% for CYP3A4/5 (midazolam to 1-hydroxymidazolam) and 86% for uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (1-hydroxymidazolam to 1-hydroxymidazolam glucuronide) mediated clearance was found in pediatric intensive care patients compared with the other 2 patient groups. We did not find a significant influence of age or bodyweight on CYP3A4/5-mediated total clearance. For uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase–mediated clearance, bodyweight explained 41.5% of the variability. Conclusions: From infancy to adolescence, critical illness seems to be a major determinant of midazolam clearance, which may result from reduced CYP3A4/5 activity due to inflammation. This may have important implications for dosing of midazolam and other CYP3A drug substrates in critically ill children.

The allometric exponent for scaling clearance varies with age: a study on seven propofol datasets ranging from preterm neonates to adults

AIM For scaling clearance between adults and children, allometric scaling with a fixed exponent of 0.75 is often applied. In this analysis, we performed a systematic study on the allometric exponent for scaling propofol clearance between two subpopulations selected from neonates, infants, toddlers, children, adolescents and adults. METHODS Seven propofol studies were included in the analysis (neonates, infants, toddlers, children, adolescents, adults1 and adults2). In a systematic manner, two out of the six study populations were selected resulting in 15 combined datasets. In addition, the data of the seven studies were regrouped into five age groups (FDA Guidance 1998), from which four combined datasets were prepared consisting of one paediatric age group and the adult group. In each of these 19 combined datasets, the allometric scaling exponent for clearance was estimated using population pharmacokinetic modelling (nonmem 7.2). RESULTS The allometric exponent for propofol clearance varied between 1.11 and 2.01 in cases where the neonate dataset was included. When two paediatric datasets were analyzed, the exponent varied between 0.2 and 2.01, while it varied between 0.56 and 0.81 when the adult population and a paediatric dataset except for neonates were selected. Scaling from adults to adolescents, children, infants and neonates resulted in exponents of 0.74, 0.70, 0.60 and 1.11 respectively. CONCLUSIONS For scaling clearance, ¾ allometric scaling may be of value for scaling between adults and adolescents or children, while it can neither be used for neonates nor for two paediatric populations. For scaling to neonates an exponent between 1 and 2 was identified.

Pilot study on the influence of liver blood flow and cardiac output on the clearance of propofol in critically ill patients

ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of cardiac output and liver blood flow on propofol concentrations in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit.MethodsFive medical/surgical critically ill patients were enrolled in this preliminary study. Liver blood flow was measured using sorbitol. The cardiac output was measured by bolus thermodilution. NONMEM ver. V was applied for propofol pharmacokinetic analysis.ResultsThe clearance of propofol was positively influenced by the liver blood flow (P < 0.005), whereas no significant correlation between cardiac output and propofol clearance was found. A correlation between liver blood flow and cardiac output or cardiac index could not be assumed in this patient group.ConclusionsLiver blood flow is a more predictive indicator than cardiac output for propofol clearance in critically ill patients when the techniques of hepatic sorbitol clearance and bolus thermodilution, respectively, are used. Further study is needed to determine the role played by liver blood flow and cardiac output on the pharmacokinetics of highly extracted drugs in order to reduce the observed high interindividual variabilities in response in critically ill patients.

Pharmacokinetics of paracetamol and its metabolites in women at delivery and post‐partum

AIM A recent report on intravenous (i.v.) paracetamol pharmacokinetics (PK) showed a higher total clearance in women at delivery compared with non-pregnant women. To describe the paracetamol metabolic and elimination routes involved in this increase in clearance, we performed a population PK analysis in women at delivery and post-partum in which the different pathways were considered. METHODS Population PK parameters using non-linear mixed effect modelling were estimated in a two-period PK study in women to whom i.v. paracetamol (2 g loading dose followed by 1 g every 6 h up to 24 h) was administered immediately following Caesarean delivery and in a subgroup of the same women to whom single 2 g i.v.loading dose was administered 10-15 weeks post-partum. RESULTS Population PK analysis was performed based on 255 plasma and 71 urine samples collected in 39 women at delivery and in eight of these 39 women 12 weeks post-partum. Total clearance was higher in women at delivery compared with 12th post-partum week (21.1 vs. 11.7 l h⁻¹) due to higher clearances to paracetamol glucuronide (11.6 vs. 4.76 l h⁻¹), to oxidative metabolites (4.95 vs. 2.77 l h⁻¹) and of unchanged paracetamol (1.15 vs. 0.75 l h⁻¹). In contrast, there was no difference in clearance to paracetamol sulphate. CONCLUSION The increased total paracetamol clearance at delivery is caused by a disproportional increase in glucuronidation clearance and a proportional increase in clearance of unchanged paracetamol and in oxidation clearance, of which the latter may potentially limit further dose increase in this patient group.

Morphine Glucuronidation and Elimination in Intensive Care Patients: A Comparison with Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND:Although morphine is used frequently to treat pain in the intensive care unit, its pharmacokinetics has not been adequately quantified in critically ill patients. We evaluated the glucuronidation and elimination clearance of morphine in intensive care patients compared with healthy volunteers based on the morphine and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) concentrations. METHODS:A population pharmacokinetic model with covariate analysis was developed with the nonlinear mixed-effects modeling software (NONMEM 7.3). The analysis included 3012 morphine and M3G concentrations from 135 intensive care patients (117 cardiothoracic surgery patients and 18 critically ill patients), who received continuous morphine infusions adapted to individual pain levels, and 622 morphine and M3G concentrations from a previously published study of 20 healthy volunteers, who received an IV bolus of morphine followed by a 1-hour infusion. RESULTS:For morphine, a 3-compartment model best described the data, whereas for M3G, a 1-compartment model fits best. In intensive care patients with a normal creatinine concentration, a decrease of 76% was estimated in M3G clearance compared with healthy subjects, conditional on the M3G volume of distribution being the same in intensive care patients and healthy volunteers. Furthermore, serum creatinine concentration was identified as a covariate for both elimination clearance of M3G in intensive care patients and unchanged morphine clearance in all patients and healthy volunteers. CONCLUSIONS:Under the assumptions in the model, M3G elimination was significantly decreased in intensive care patients when compared with healthy volunteers, which resulted in substantially increased M3G concentrations. Increased M3G levels were even more pronounced in patients with increased serum creatinine levels. Model-based simulations show that, because of the reduction in morphine clearance in intensive care patients with renal failure, a 33% reduction in the maintenance dose would result in morphine serum concentrations equal to those in healthy volunteers and intensive care patients with normal renal function, although M3G concentrations remain increased. Future pharmacodynamic investigations are needed to identify target concentrations in this population, after which final dosing recommendations can be made.