Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Marius Stan is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Marius Stan.


Philosophy of Science | 2014

Unity for Kant’s Natural Philosophy

Marius Stan

I uncover here a conflict in Kant’s natural philosophy. His matter theory and laws of mechanics are in tension. Kant’s laws are fit for particles but are too narrow to handle continuous bodies, which his doctrine of matter demands. To fix this defect, Kant ultimately must ground the Torque Law; that is, the impressed torque equals the change in angular momentum. But that grounding requires a premise—the symmetry of the stress tensor—that Kant denies himself. I argue that his problem would not arise if he had kept his early theory of matter as made of mass points, or “physical monads.”


Philosophy of Science | 2016

Huygens on Inertial Structure and Relativity

Marius Stan

I explain and assess here Huygens’s concept of relative motion. I show that it allows him to ground most of the Law of Inertia and also to explain rotation. Thereby his concept obviates the need for Newton’s absolute space. Thus, his account is a powerful foundation for mechanics, although not without some tension.


Archive | 2017

From General to Special Metaphysics of Nature

Michael Bennett McNulty; Marius Stan

In his Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, Kant presents the “pure part” of natural science – that is, the a priori principles holding of matter. This special metaphysics of matter is, Kant claims, grounded on the general metaphysics of nature described in the System of Principles of his first Critique. This chapter develops a comprehensive account of Kant’s framework for natural science that touches on interpretive issues that arise in the transition from general to special metaphysics and that outlines his dynamics and its limitations.


Archive | 2017

Newton's Concepts of Force among the Leibnizians

Marius Stan

I argue that the key dynamical concepts and laws of Newtons Principia never gained a solid foothold in Germany before Kant in the 1750s. I explain this absence as due to Leibniz. Thus I make a case for a robust Leibnizian legacy for Enlightenment science, and I solve what Jonathan Israel called “a meaningful historical problem on its own,” viz. the slow and hesitant reception of Newton in pre-Kantian Germany.


Studies in History and Philosophy of Science | 2013

Kant’s third law of mechanics: The long shadow of Leibniz

Marius Stan


Archive | 2003

Kant's Philosophy of Science

Eric Watkins; Marius Stan


The Leibniz Review | 2009

Kant's Early Theory of Motion: Metaphysical Dynamics and Relativity

Marius Stan


Metascience | 2014

Once more unto the breach: Kant and Newton

Marius Stan


Southern Journal of Philosophy | 2012

NEWTON AND WOLFF: THE LEIBNIZIAN REACTION TO THE PRINCIPIA, 1716–1763

Marius Stan


Noûs | 2017

Absolute Time: The Limit of Kant's Idealism

Marius Stan

Collaboration


Dive into the Marius Stan's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric Watkins

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge