Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Marius Staring is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Marius Staring.


IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging | 2010

elastix : A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration

Stefan Klein; Marius Staring; Keelin Murphy; Max A. Viergever; Josien P. W. Pluim

Medical image registration is an important task in medical image processing. It refers to the process of aligning data sets, possibly from different modalities (e.g., magnetic resonance and computed tomography), different time points (e.g., follow-up scans), and/or different subjects (in case of population studies). A large number of methods for image registration are described in the literature. Unfortunately, there is not one method that works for all applications. We have therefore developed elastix, a publicly available computer program for intensity-based medical image registration. The software consists of a collection of algorithms that are commonly used to solve medical image registration problems. The modular design of elastix allows the user to quickly configure, test, and compare different registration methods for a specific application. The command-line interface enables automated processing of large numbers of data sets, by means of scripting. The usage of elastix for comparing different registration methods is illustrated with three example experiments, in which individual components of the registration method are varied.


IEEE Transactions on Image Processing | 2007

Evaluation of Optimization Methods for Nonrigid Medical Image Registration Using Mutual Information and B-Splines

Stefan Klein; Marius Staring; Josien P. W. Pluim

A popular technique for nonrigid registration of medical images is based on the maximization of their mutual information, in combination with a deformation field parameterized by cubic B-splines. The coordinate mapping that relates the two images is found using an iterative optimization procedure. This work compares the performance of eight optimization methods: gradient descent (with two different step size selection algorithms), quasi-Newton, nonlinear conjugate gradient, Kiefer-Wolfowitz, simultaneous perturbation, Robbins-Monro, and evolution strategy. Special attention is paid to computation time reduction by using fewer voxels to calculate the cost function and its derivatives. The optimization methods are tested on manually deformed CT images of the heart, on follow-up CT chest scans, and on MR scans of the prostate acquired using a BFFE, Tl, and T2 protocol. Registration accuracy is assessed by computing the overlap of segmented edges. Precision and convergence properties are studied by comparing deformation fields. The results show that the Robbins-Monro method is the best choice in most applications. With this approach, the computation time per iteration can be lowered approximately 500 times without affecting the rate of convergence by using a small subset of the image, randomly selected in every iteration, to compute the derivative of the mutual information. From the other methods the quasi-Newton and the nonlinear conjugate gradient method achieve a slightly higher precision, at the price of larger computation times.


IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging | 2009

Multi-Atlas-Based Segmentation With Local Decision Fusion—Application to Cardiac and Aortic Segmentation in CT Scans

Ivana Išgum; Marius Staring; Annemarieke Rutten; M. Prokop; Max A. Viergever; B. van Ginneken

A novel atlas-based segmentation approach based on the combination of multiple registrations is presented. Multiple atlases are registered to a target image. To obtain a segmentation of the target, labels of the atlas images are propagated to it. The propagated labels are combined by spatially varying decision fusion weights. These weights are derived from local assessment of the registration success. Furthermore, an atlas selection procedure is proposed that is equivalent to sequential forward selection from statistical pattern recognition theory. The proposed method is compared to three existing atlas-based segmentation approaches, namely (1) single atlas-based segmentation, (2) average-shape atlas-based segmentation, and (3) multi-atlas-based segmentation with averaging as decision fusion. These methods were tested on the segmentation of the heart and the aorta in computed tomography scans of the thorax. The results show that the proposed method outperforms other methods and yields results very close to those of an independent human observer. Moreover, the additional atlas selection step led to a faster segmentation at a comparable performance.


IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging | 2011

Evaluation of Registration Methods on Thoracic CT: The EMPIRE10 Challenge

K. Murphy; B. van Ginneken; Joseph M. Reinhardt; Sven Kabus; Kai Ding; Xiang Deng; Kunlin Cao; Kaifang Du; Gary E. Christensen; V. Garcia; Tom Vercauteren; Nicholas Ayache; Olivier Commowick; Grégoire Malandain; Ben Glocker; Nikos Paragios; Nassir Navab; V. Gorbunova; Jon Sporring; M. de Bruijne; Xiao Han; Mattias P. Heinrich; Julia A. Schnabel; Mark Jenkinson; Cristian Lorenz; Marc Modat; Jamie R. McClelland; Sebastien Ourselin; S. E. A. Muenzing; Max A. Viergever

EMPIRE10 (Evaluation of Methods for Pulmonary Image REgistration 2010) is a public platform for fair and meaningful comparison of registration algorithms which are applied to a database of intra patient thoracic CT image pairs. Evaluation of nonrigid registration techniques is a nontrivial task. This is compounded by the fact that researchers typically test only on their own data, which varies widely. For this reason, reliable assessment and comparison of different registration algorithms has been virtually impossible in the past. In this work we present the results of the launch phase of EMPIRE10, which comprised the comprehensive evaluation and comparison of 20 individual algorithms from leading academic and industrial research groups. All algorithms are applied to the same set of 30 thoracic CT pairs. Algorithm settings and parameters are chosen by researchers expert in the con figuration of their own method and the evaluation is independent, using the same criteria for all participants. All results are published on the EMPIRE10 website (http://empire10.isi.uu.nl). The challenge remains ongoing and open to new participants. Full results from 24 algorithms have been published at the time of writing. This paper details the organization of the challenge, the data and evaluation methods and the outcome of the initial launch with 20 algorithms. The gain in knowledge and future work are discussed.


International Journal of Computer Vision | 2009

Adaptive Stochastic Gradient Descent Optimisation for Image Registration

Stefan Klein; Josien P. W. Pluim; Marius Staring; Max A. Viergever

We present a stochastic gradient descent optimisation method for image registration with adaptive step size prediction. The method is based on the theoretical work by Plakhov and Cruz (J. Math. Sci. 120(1):964–973, 2004). Our main methodological contribution is the derivation of an image-driven mechanism to select proper values for the most important free parameters of the method. The selection mechanism employs general characteristics of the cost functions that commonly occur in intensity-based image registration. Also, the theoretical convergence conditions of the optimisation method are taken into account. The proposed adaptive stochastic gradient descent (ASGD) method is compared to a standard, non-adaptive Robbins-Monro (RM) algorithm. Both ASGD and RM employ a stochastic subsampling technique to accelerate the optimisation process. Registration experiments were performed on 3D CT and MR data of the head, lungs, and prostate, using various similarity measures and transformation models. The results indicate that ASGD is robust to these variations in the registration framework and is less sensitive to the settings of the user-defined parameters than RM. The main disadvantage of RM is the need for a predetermined step size function. The ASGD method provides a solution for that issue.


Medical Image Analysis | 2010

Adaptive local multi-atlas segmentation: Application to the heart and the caudate nucleus

Eva M. van Rikxoort; Ivana Išgum; Yulia Arzhaeva; Marius Staring; Stefan Klein; Max A. Viergever; Josien P. W. Pluim; Bram van Ginneken

Atlas-based segmentation is a powerful generic technique for automatic delineation of structures in volumetric images. Several studies have shown that multi-atlas segmentation methods outperform schemes that use only a single atlas, but running multiple registrations on volumetric data is time-consuming. Moreover, for many scans or regions within scans, a large number of atlases may not be required to achieve good segmentation performance and may even deteriorate the results. It would therefore be worthwhile to include the decision which and how many atlases to use for a particular target scan in the segmentation process. To this end, we propose two generally applicable multi-atlas segmentation methods, adaptive multi-atlas segmentation (AMAS) and adaptive local multi-atlas segmentation (ALMAS). AMAS automatically selects the most appropriate atlases for a target image and automatically stops registering atlases when no further improvement is expected. ALMAS takes this concept one step further by locally deciding how many and which atlases are needed to segment a target image. The methods employ a computationally cheap atlas selection strategy, an automatic stopping criterion, and a technique to locally inspect registration results and determine how much improvement can be expected from further registrations. AMAS and ALMAS were applied to segmentation of the heart in computed tomography scans of the chest and compared to a conventional multi-atlas method (MAS). The results show that ALMAS achieves the same performance as MAS at a much lower computational cost. When the available segmentation time is fixed, both AMAS and ALMAS perform significantly better than MAS. In addition, AMAS was applied to an online segmentation challenge for delineation of the caudate nucleus in brain MRI scans where it achieved the best score of all results submitted to date.


Medical Physics | 2007

A rigidity penalty term for nonrigid registration.

Marius Staring; Stefan Klein; Josien P. W. Pluim

Medical images that are to be registered for clinical application often contain both structures that deform and ones that remain rigid. Nonrigid registration algorithms that do not model properties of different tissue types may result in deformations of rigid structures. In this article a local rigidity penalty term is proposed which is included in the registration function in order to penalize the deformation of rigid objects. This term can be used for any representation of the deformation field capable of modelling locally rigid transformations. By using a B-spline representation of the deformation field, a fast algorithm can be devised. The proposed method is compared with an unconstrained nonrigid registration algorithm. It is evaluated on clinical three-dimensional CT follow-up data of the thorax and on two-dimensional DSA image sequences. The results show that nonrigid registration using the proposed rigidity penalty term is capable of nonrigidly aligning images, while keeping user-defined structures locally rigid.


Frontiers in Neuroinformatics | 2013

Fast Parallel Image Registration on CPU and GPU for Diagnostic Classification of Alzheimer's Disease

Denis P. Shamonin; Esther E. Bron; Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt; Marion Smits; Stefan Klein; Marius Staring

Nonrigid image registration is an important, but time-consuming task in medical image analysis. In typical neuroimaging studies, multiple image registrations are performed, i.e., for atlas-based segmentation or template construction. Faster image registration routines would therefore be beneficial. In this paper we explore acceleration of the image registration package elastix by a combination of several techniques: (i) parallelization on the CPU, to speed up the cost function derivative calculation; (ii) parallelization on the GPU building on and extending the OpenCL framework from ITKv4, to speed up the Gaussian pyramid computation and the image resampling step; (iii) exploitation of certain properties of the B-spline transformation model; (iv) further software optimizations. The accelerated registration tool is employed in a study on diagnostic classification of Alzheimers disease and cognitively normal controls based on T1-weighted MRI. We selected 299 participants from the publicly available Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database. Classification is performed with a support vector machine based on gray matter volumes as a marker for atrophy. We evaluated two types of strategies (voxel-wise and region-wise) that heavily rely on nonrigid image registration. Parallelization and optimization resulted in an acceleration factor of 4–5x on an 8-core machine. Using OpenCL a speedup factor of 2 was realized for computation of the Gaussian pyramids, and 15–60 for the resampling step, for larger images. The voxel-wise and the region-wise classification methods had an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 88 and 90%, respectively, both for standard and accelerated registration. We conclude that the image registration package elastix was substantially accelerated, with nearly identical results to the non-optimized version. The new functionality will become available in the next release of elastix as open source under the BSD license.


IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging | 2009

Registration of Cervical MRI Using Multifeature Mutual Information

Marius Staring; U. Van der Heide; Stefan Klein; Max A. Viergever; Jpw Josien Pluim

Radiation therapy for cervical cancer can benefit from image registration in several ways, for example by studying the motion of organs, or by (partially) automating the delineation of the target volume and other structures of interest. In this paper, the registration of cervical data is addressed using mutual information (MI) of not only image intensity, but also features that describe local image structure. Three aspects of the registration are addressed to make this approach feasible. First, instead of relying on a histogram-based estimation of mutual information, which poses problems for a larger number of features, a graph-based implementation of alpha-mutual information (alpha-MI) is employed. Second, the analytical derivative of alpha-MI is derived. This makes it possible to use a stochastic gradient descent method to solve the registration problem, which is substantially faster than non-derivative-based methods. Third, the feature space is reduced by means of a principal component analysis, which also decreases the registration time. The proposed technique is compared to a standard approach, based on the mutual information of image intensity only. Experiments are performed on 93 T2-weighted MR clinical data sets acquired from 19 patients with cervical cancer. Several characteristics of the proposed algorithm are studied on a subset of 19 image pairs (one pair per patient). On the remaining data (36 image pairs, one or two pairs per patient) the median overlap is shown to improve significantly compared to standard MI from 0.85 to 0.86 for the clinical target volume (CTV, p = 2 ldr10-2), from 0.75 to 0.81 for the bladder (p = 8 ldr 10-6), and from 0.76 to 0.77 for the rectum (p = 2 ldr 10-4). The registration error is improved at important tissue interfaces, such as that of the bladder with the CTV, and the interface of the rectum with the uterus and cervix.


Medical Image Analysis | 2011

Semi-automatic construction of reference standards for evaluation of image registration

Keelin Murphy; van B Bram Ginneken; Stefan Klein; Marius Staring; de Bj Hoop; Max A. Viergever; Jpw Josien Pluim

Quantitative evaluation of image registration algorithms is a difficult and under-addressed issue due to the lack of a reference standard in most registration problems. In this work a method is presented whereby detailed reference standard data may be constructed in an efficient semi-automatic fashion. A well-distributed set of n landmarks is detected fully automatically in one scan of a pair to be registered. Using a custom-designed interface, observers define corresponding anatomic locations in the second scan for a specified subset of s of these landmarks. The remaining n-s landmarks are matched fully automatically by a thin-plate-spline based system using the s manual landmark correspondences to model the relationship between the scans. The method is applied to 47 pairs of temporal thoracic CT scans, three pairs of brain MR scans and five thoracic CT datasets with synthetic deformations. Interobserver differences are used to demonstrate the accuracy of the matched points. The utility of the reference standard data as a tool in evaluating registration is shown by the comparison of six sets of registration results on the 47 pairs of thoracic CT data.

Collaboration


Dive into the Marius Staring's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stefan Klein

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Josien P. W. Pluim

Eindhoven University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Berend C. Stoel

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Denis P. Shamonin

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jan Stolk

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Floris F. Berendsen

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge