Marja-Liisa Swahn

Effect of low daily doses of mifepristone on ovarian function and endometrial development.

The effects of low daily doses of the antiprogestin mifepristone (RU 486) on ovarian and endometrial function were studied. The study included one control cycle, three treatment cycles and one follow-up cycle. During the treatment cycles, either 0.1 (n = 5) or 0.5 (n = 5) mg of mifepristone was administered once daily. Urine samples were collected three times weekly during the control and treatment cycles and pregnanediol glucuronide and oestrone glucuronide and luteinizing hormone (LH) were quantified by radioimmunoassay. Blood samples for cortisol measurement were collected once weekly and for serum glycodelin at the onset of menstruation. An endometrial biopsy was obtained in the mid-luteal phase in the control cycle and in the first and third treatment cycles and analysed by morphometric and histochemical methods. Binding of Dolichus biflorus agglutinin (DBA) lectin was measured and expression of progesterone and oestrogen receptors and glycodelin were analysed immunohistochemically. All cycles studied were ovulatory with an LH peak and elevated pregnanediol glucuronide concentrations. Follicular development seemed normal as judged by ultrasound examination. The length of the menstrual cycle and the menstrual bleeding were not significantly altered. Following administration of 0.5 mg mifepristone/day, endometrial development appeared to be slightly retarded and glandular diameter was significantly reduced. Furthermore, significant decreases in DBA lectin binding and endometrial expression of glycodelin were observed. Daily doses of 0.1 mg did not have any significant effect on the endometrium. No differences in oestrogen or progesterone receptor immunoactivity between control and treatment cycles were seen. This study provides further evidence that endometrial function is sensitive even to doses of antiprogestin that are low enough not to disturb ovulation. It remains to be established whether these effects are sufficient to prevent implantation.

Effect of post-coital contraceptive methods on the endometrium and the menstrual cycle

Study objective. To evaluate the effect of treatment with ethinylesteradiol‐levonorgestrel or danazol on ovarian function, gonadotrophin release and endometrial development during the time when a pregnancy may occur following unprotected intercourse.

Vascular changes in the human endometrium following the administration of the progesterone antagonist RU 486

Eleven healthy women were assigned to one of two groups. They received 50 mg RU 486 orally per day either on cycle days 7 to 10 (preovulatory group n = 5) or on cycle days 20 to 23 (postovulatory group, n = 6). An endometrial biopsy was taken on the fourth day of the RU-treatment in the preovulatory group and on the second (n = 2) or fourth (n = 4) treatment day in the postovulatory group. Biopsies from 34 untreated women representing matched samples from early and mid preovulatory phase (n = 10) and mid and late postovulatory phase (n = 24) were used as control. The ultrastructure of the endometrial capillaries was investigated by morphometric methods. The administration of RU 486 during the preovulatory phase did not modify the vascular structure. However, when given in the postovulatory phase, necrosis occurred in the capillary endothelial cells with and without regressive changes of the adjacent stroma. The area and diameter of the capillary lumen and the area of the adventitia was smaller than in the control material (p less than 0.01). The result of the study suggests that RU 486, when administered in the postovulatory phase, directly affects the capillary vessels of the endometrium.

Contraceptive efficacy of low doses of mifepristone

OBJECTIVE To determine whether a 5-mg dose of mifepristone is sufficient to prevent pregnancy. DESIGN Clinical study. SETTING Academic research center. SUBJECT(S) Healthy, fertile, sexually active female volunteers. INTERVENTION Volunteers received a 5-mg dose of mifepristone once weekly, starting on cycle day 2, for up to 6 months. This was their only contraceptive method. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Number of pregnancies. RESULT(S) The treatment resulted in a significant decrease in pregnancy rate without affecting the menstrual cycle or causing disturbing side effects. CONCLUSION(S) A low dose of mifepristone, which does not inhibit ovulation, reduces fertility significantly by affecting the endometrium. However, the contraceptive effect needs to be improved for the drug to compete with other contraceptive methods.

Hormonal and surgical treatments for endometriosis and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer

Whether hormonal or surgical treatment of endometriosis is associated with risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Endometriosis as a prognostic factor for cancer survival

Studies have shown an increased risk of malignancies in women with endometriosis. Little is known about the impact of endometriosis on cancer survival. We investigated whether the survival after a diagnosis of a malignancy differs in women with a previously diagnosed endometriosis compared to other women. Women with a first time diagnosis of a malignancy in 1969–2005, were identified using the National Swedish Cancer Register (NSCR). By use of the National Swedish Patient Register (NSPR) we identified all women with a diagnosis of endometriosis during the same period and linked these patients with the data from the NSCR. The cohort comprised 4,278 women with endometriosis and a malignancy, and 41,831 randomly selected matched women without endometriosis. Cox regression was used for all calculations to obtain crude and adjusted cause specific mortality rates, measured as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 46,109 women entered the study. There was a statistically significant better survival for women with endometriosis for all malignancies combined (HR = 0.92) and for breast cancer (HR = 0.86) and ovarian cancer (HR = 0.81) specifically. For breast cancer the survival enhancing effect in women with endometriosis decreased with increasing parity. There was poorer survival in malignant melanoma for women with endometriosis (HR = 1.52). The survival in a malignancy is better in women with a previously diagnosed endometriosis compared to women without endometriosis especially for breast and ovarian cancers. The prognosis of malignant melanoma is poorer in women with endometriosis.

Plasma levels of antiprogestin RU 486 following oral administration to non-pregnant and early pregnant women

RU 486 is a synthetic steroid which acts as an antiprogestin at the receptor level. The clinical usefulness of the compound for menstrual regulation and termination of early pregnancy is currently being evaluated. The aim of the present study was to determine the plasma levels of RU 486 following the oral administration of the compound to 42 pregnant and 10 non-pregnant women. The levels of RU 486 were measured by a radioimmunoassay method which uses chromatography on Sephadex LH 20 columns. The identity of the compound assayed as RU 486 was confirmed, but the presence of small amounts of two highly cross-reacting metabolites (monodemethyl and didemethyl RU 486) in the analyzed fractions could not be excluded. Following the ingestion of a single tablet containing 25 and 50 mg of the compound, a peak plasma value of approximately 3.5 to 4.0 mumol/l in both the pregnant and non-pregnant subjects was reached one to two hours later. The half-lives of elimination were about 20 hours in both the pregnant and the non-pregnant women. Following the repeated oral administration of 50, 100 or 200 mg of RU 486 daily for four days, maximum plasma levels of 2.9, 4.5 and 5.4 mumol/l, respectively, were found. Thus, the increase in plasma levels was not directly proportional to the increase in the dose. No accumulation of RU 486 in the plasma was found, even when the duration of treatment was prolonged to six days. The data partly explain the reported lack of relation between ingested dose and frequency of induced abortion and they may be useful for designing future studies on the use of compound to prevent implantation, induce menstruation or terminate an early pregnancy.

Oral administration of RU 486 and 9-methylene PGE2 for termination of early pregnancy

It has been shown that the antiprogestin RU 486 increases the sensitivity of the early pregnant human uterus to the stimulatory action of prostaglandin E analogues administered vaginally or intramuscularly. To examine if RU 486 also increases uterine sensitivity to a PGE analogue given orally, two investigative approaches were used in the present study: 1) direct registration of uterine contractions before and after administration of 9-methylene PGE2 in untreated and RU-486-treated early pregnant women; and 2) an efficacy trial involving treatment of pregnant women (amenorrhea of 49 days or less) with 25 mg RU 486 twice daily for three or four days followed by 2.5, 5.0 or 10 mg 9-methylene PGE2, or 600 mg RU486 followed by 10 mg 9-methylene PGE2 administered on day 3 and 4. The results showed that oral 9-methylene PGE2 had a clear stimulatory effect on uterine contractility which was further increased by pretreatment with RU 486. Following 2.5, 5.0 or 10.0 mg 9-methylene PGE2, the frequency of complete abortion was the same, or approximately 80%. The success rate is higher than that generally reported for RU 486 treatment alone. If 600 mg RU 486 was complemented with 10 mg 9-methylene PGE2 administered on both days 3 and 4, the frequency of complete abortion increased to 95%. Side effects were of a mild nature and generally occurred following administration of 9-methylene PGE2. The results of the present study indicate that a combined treatment based on oral administration of both the antiprogestin and the prostaglandin analogue can be developed into a highly effective and simple method to terminate early pregnancy.

Mode of Action of RU 486

RU 486 is a 19-norsteroid which has a specific high affinity binding to the progesterone and glucocorticoid receptor. It is generally accepted that RU 486 acts as a pure progesterone antagonist almost without agonistic activity. RU 486 acts mainly directly on the target organ, such as the endometrium, but also to some extent indirectly through an effect on the pituitary gonadotrophin secretion. The effect of RU 486 during the menstrual cycle is dependent on time of treatment. Treatment before ovulation will result in a prolongation of the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle, while treatment during the mid- and late luteal phase will invariably induce bleeding, often followed by a second bleeding episode at the expected time of menstruation. The only treatment period which does not influence the menstrual cycle is treatment immediately following ovulation. Treatment during the proliferative phase has no effect on endometrial morphology but inhibits follicular development and delays oestrogen and LH surge. Treatment on the first days following ovulation has no effect on ovarian steroid concentration, but will significantly delay endometrial development, cause a change in the concentration of oestrogen and progesterone receptor concentration enzyme activity and production of substances thought to be progesterone dependent. The change in endometrial development is sufficient to prevent implantation. In mid- and late luteal phase, treatment with RU 486 will result in endometrial shedding in spite of normal progesterone levels. Post-ovulatory treatment with RU 486 will also significantly change uterine contractility. In early pregnancy, withdrawal of progesterone inhibition will result in uterine contractility and a significant increase in the sensitivity of the myometrium to prostaglandin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Termination Of Early Pregnancy With Ru 486 (Mifepristone) In Combination With A Prostaglandin Analogue (Sulprostone)

The antiprogestin RU 486 (mifepristone) has been shown to induce abortion when administered in early pregnancy, but the rate of incomplete abortion is high, around 40%. As blockage of the progesterone receptor increases the myometrial sensitivity to prostaglandins, a combination of RU 486 and a prostaglandin E2‐analogue was tested for termination of pregnancy. One hundred and sixteen women, with a gestational length of less than 49 days from the first day of the last menstrual period, were treated with a daily dose of 50 or 100 mg RU 486 for 3 to 6 days, complemented with an intramuscular dose of 0.25 mg sulprostone (16‐phenoxy‐PGE2‐sulfonylamide) on the last day of RU 486 treatment. The results confirmed that a reduction of treatment duration to 3 days is just as effective for inducing abortion (91% complete abortion) as a 4–6‐day treatment regimen (95% complete abortion). Six patients had an incomplete abortion and in one the pregnancy continued unaffected. Side effects included intense uterine pain after the prostaglandin administration (16%), vomiting associated with the antiprogestin intake (9%) and after the prostaglandin administration (9%). One woman needed emergency curettage due to heavy bleeding. Six percent of the treated patients had a decrease in hemoglobin exceeding 20 g/l during the first week but no patient needed blood transfusion. No serious side effects were recorded.