Marja M. Ho-dac-Pannekeet

Peritoneal Membrane Failure in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

A review is given of the conditions associated with peritoneal membrane failure, and the possible causes. Ultrafiltration failure is the most important manifestation. It is mostly associated with high transport rates of low molecular weight solutes suggesting the presence of a large vascular surface area. Enlargement of the peritoneal surface area can be functional (effective surface area: more perfused microvessels) or anatomic (more microvessels). The former is likely to be present in some patients in the beginning of peritoneal dialysis, and also during peritonitis. The latter can develop in long-term peritoneal dialysis.

Treatment of severe ultrafiltration failure with nonglucose dialysis solutions in patients with and without peritoneal sclerosis

Introduction. Ultrafiltration failure (UFF) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients is a reflection of changes in the peritoneal membrane, which can include mesothelial damage, neoangiogenesis, and occasionally, peritoneal fibrosis. These structural changes are probably induced by the use of bioincompatible dialysis solutions. Therefore, we investigated the effects of the treatment with a combination of nonglucose dialysis solutions in patients with severe UFF. Methods. Ten patients with UFF (net ultrafiltration <400 mL/4 h on 3.86% glucose) were treated with a combination of glycerol and icodextrin with or without amino acid-based dialysis solutions for 3 months. Four of them were diagnosed with encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (PS), proven by peritoneal biopsies. Standard peritoneal permeability analyses (SPA), using 3.86% glucose, were performed, and dialysate CA125 appearance rate (AR-CA125) was analysed at the start, after 6 weeks and after 12 weeks. PS and non-PS patients were compared. Results. One patient underwent transplant after 6 weeks, one was withdrawn from PD because of clinical signs of encapsulating PS before the 3-month period ended. PS patients had been treated with PD for a longer duration than the non-PS patients (102 versus 52 months, P = 0.05), but no differences in baseline transport parameters or AR-CA125 were present. During the study, no differences were observed for transport characteristics when the results of the whole group at 6 and 12 weeks were compared to baseline. For the non-PS patients, however, a significant increase in the transcapillary ultrafiltration rate (from 2.2 mL/min to 2.6 mL/min, P < 0.05) and a decrease in the MTAC creatinine (from 14.3 mL/min to 12.6 mL/min, P < 0.05) were found after 6 weeks of glucose-free treatment. Free-water transport, measured as the maximum dip in the dialysate-to-plasma ratio of sodium and as the transport through the ultrasmall pores in the first minute, tended to improve, but this difference did not reach significance. In addition, the AR-CA125 increased significantly (from 2.8 U/min to 16.1 U/min, P < 0.05). Continued treatment did not reach statistical difference even after 3 months. No changes were observed in the PS patients. Conclusions. In the present study, an improvement of UFF in the non-PS patients was obtained by withdrawal of glucose-based dialysis solutions. The abnormalities in PS patients are probably irreversible. Early withdrawal of glucose-based dialysis solutions or at least a marked reduction in glucose exposure should be considered in UFF patients, but the identification of the patients who would benefit most needs further studies.