Marjaana Sianoja
University of Tampere
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Marjaana Sianoja.
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology | 2017
Ulla Kinnunen; Taru Feldt; Jessica de Bloom; Marjaana Sianoja; Kalevi Korpela; Sabine A. E. Geurts
This 1-year follow-up study (N = 841) investigated the relationship between boundary crossing behavior from work to nonwork and work-related rumination (i.e., affective rumination, problem-solving pondering, and lack of psychological detachment from work during off-job time). This relationship is important to examine as work-related rumination is a risk factor for poor recovery and ill-health over time. The aims were twofold: first, to examine these relationships in terms of temporal ordering, and, second, to show how individual differences regarding stability and change of boundaries from work to nonwork are reflected in work-related rumination across time. The structural equation modeling analyses lent support to the hypothesized normal causation model compared with the reversed causation and reciprocal models. However, only the cross-lagged relationship between high boundary crossing behavior at T1 and lack of psychological detachment at T2 was significant. Through latent profile analysis, 6 subgroups of boundary crossing behavior across time were identified. Over 70% of the employees belonged to the stable (low, moderate, high) and about one-third to the changing (mostly increasing) boundary crossing subgroups. Employees in the 2 stable (high and moderate) boundary crossing subgroups reported less psychological detachment and more problem-solving pondering during off-job time than did those in the low boundary crossing subgroup. Employees in the change groups reported simultaneous expected changes, especially in their problem-solving pondering. No effects on affective rumination were found. Thus frequent boundary crossing behavior from work to nonwork plays a different role regarding the various forms of work-related rumination during nonwork.
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology | 2017
Marjaana Sianoja; Christine J. Syrek; Jessica de Bloom; Kalevi Korpela; Ulla Kinnunen
Only few studies so far have examined recovery from work during workday breaks. In this intervention study, based on the effort-recovery model and the conservation of resources theory, we examined how to enhance recovery during lunch breaks. More specifically, we examined the within-person effects of lunchtime park walks and relaxation exercises on employees’ levels of concentration, strain, and fatigue experienced at the end of a working day. We moreover tested whether detachment from work and enjoyment experienced during lunch breaks transmitted the effects of these activities to well-being outcomes. Participants in the park walk (n = 51) and relaxation (n = 46) groups were asked to complete a 15-min exercise during their lunch break on 10 consecutive working days. Afternoon well-being, lunchtime detachment, and lunchtime enjoyment were assessed twice a week before, during, and after the intervention, altogether for 5 weeks. Multilevel analysis results showed that park walks at lunchtime were related to better concentration and less fatigue in the afternoon through enjoyment. Relaxation exercises were related to better concentration in the afternoon via detachment. In addition, relaxation exercises were directly linked to lower levels of strain and fatigue in the afternoon. Our study suggests that on days on which employees engage in recovering activities during lunch breaks, they experience higher levels of well-being at the end of a working day. These results add to the theory-based knowledge on recovery during workday breaks and highlight the importance of breaks for organizational practices.
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology | 2017
Ulla Kinnunen; Taru Feldt; Marjaana Sianoja; Jessica de Bloom; Kalevi Korpela; Sabine A. E. Geurts
ABSTRACT The aim of this 2-year longitudinal study was to identify long-term patterns of work-related rumination in terms of affective rumination, problem-solving pondering, and lack of psychological detachment from work during off-job time. We also examined how the patterns differed in job demands and well-being outcomes. The data were collected via questionnaires in three waves among employees (N = 664). Through latent profile analysis (LPA), five stable long-term patterns of rumination were identified: (1) no rumination (n = 81), (2) moderate detachment from work (n = 228), (3) moderate rumination combined with low detachment (n = 216), (4) affective rumination (n = 54), and (5) problem-solving pondering (n = 85), both combined with low detachment. The patterns differed in the job demands and well-being outcomes examined. Job demands (time pressure, cognitive and emotional demands) were at the highest level across time in patterns 3–5 and lowest in pattern 1. Patterns 3 and 4 were associated with poorer well-being outcomes (higher job exhaustion and more sleeping problems, and lower work engagement) across time. By contrast, pattern 5 showed positive outcomes, especially high level of work engagement. Thus, the different patterns of work-related ruminative thoughts suggest diverse relationships with job demands and well-being.
Work & Stress | 2018
Marjaana Sianoja; Ulla Kinnunen; A. Mäkikangas; Asko Tolvanen
ABSTRACT To test the direct and moderator effects of the stressor–detachment model from a long-term perspective, we investigated whether workload and detachment are related to changes in exhaustion and sleep difficulties over one year. We also examined whether detachment attenuates the relationship between high workload and these outcomes both cross-sectionally and over time. Questionnaire data with 1722 respondents at Time 1 and 1182 respondents at Time 2 were collected. We used a latent change score approach to analyse the data in order to identify intra-individual change among the studied constructs. Our results showed that high workload and low detachment at baseline were related to an increase in exhaustion over one year. Additionally, an increase in workload and a decrease in detachment were related to a simultaneous increase in exhaustion over time. Low detachment, but not high workload, was related to an increase in sleep difficulties over time, and a decrease in detachment across one year was related to a simultaneous increase in sleep difficulties. A high level of detachment only attenuated the relationship between workload and exhaustion at baseline. Our results underline the significance of poor psychological detachment as a risk factor for the development of strain outcomes over time.
Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology | 2016
Marjaana Sianoja; Ulla Kinnunen; Jessica de Bloom; Kalevi Korpela; Sabine A. E. Geurts
Journal of Environmental Psychology | 2017
Kalevi Korpela; Tapio Nummi; Liudmila Lipiäinen; Jessica de Bloom; Marjaana Sianoja; Tytti Pasanen; Ulla Kinnunen
Journal of Environmental Psychology | 2017
Jessica de Bloom; Marjaana Sianoja; Kalevi Korpela; Martti T. Tuomisto; Ansa Lilja; Sabine A. E. Geurts; Ulla Kinnunen
Landscape and Urban Planning | 2017
Kalevi Korpela; Jessica de Bloom; Marjaana Sianoja; Tytti Pasanen; Ulla Kinnunen
Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology | 2017
Pedro Torrente; Ulla Kinnunen; Marjaana Sianoja; Jessica de Bloom; Kalevi Korpela; Martti T. Tuomisto; Petra Lindfors
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology | 2018
Michelle Van Laethem; Debby G. J. Beckers; Jessica de Bloom; Marjaana Sianoja; Ulla Kinnunen