Marjorie Lee White

Learn, see, practice, prove, do, maintain: an evidence-based pedagogical framework for procedural skill training in medicine.

Acquisition of competency in procedural skills is a fundamental goal of medical training. In this Perspective, the authors propose an evidence-based pedagogical framework for procedural skill training. The framework was developed based on a review of the literature using a critical synthesis approach and builds on earlier models of procedural skill training in medicine. The authors begin by describing the fundamentals of procedural skill development. Then, a six-step pedagogical framework for procedural skills training is presented: Learn, See, Practice, Prove, Do, and Maintain. In this framework, procedural skill training begins with the learner acquiring requisite cognitive knowledge through didactic education (Learn) and observation of the procedure (See). The learner then progresses to the stage of psychomotor skill acquisition and is allowed to deliberately practice the procedure on a simulator (Practice). Simulation-based mastery learning is employed to allow the trainee to prove competency prior to performing the procedure on a patient (Prove). Once competency is demonstrated on a simulator, the trainee is allowed to perform the procedure on patients with direct supervision, until he or she can be entrusted to perform the procedure independently (Do). Maintenance of the skill is ensured through continued clinical practice, supplemented by simulation-based training as needed (Maintain). Evidence in support of each component of the framework is presented. Implementation of the proposed framework presents a paradigm shift in procedural skill training. However, the authors believe that adoption of the framework will improve procedural skill training and patient safety.

Hyperventilation in Pediatric Resuscitation: Performance in Simulated Pediatric Medical Emergencies

OBJECTIVE: To examine the hypothesis that pediatric resuscitation providers hyperventilate patients via bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation during performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), quantify the degree of excessive ventilation provided, and determine if this tendency varies according to provider type. METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was conducted of 72 unannounced, monthly simulated pediatric medical emergencies (“mock codes”) in a tertiary care, academic pediatric hospital. Responders were code team members, including pediatric residents and interns (MDs), respiratory therapists (RTs), and nurses (RNs). All sessions were video-recorded and reviewed for the rate of BVM ventilation, rate of chest compressions, and the team members performing these tasks. The type of emergency, location of the code, and training level of the team leader were also recorded. RESULTS: Hyperventilation was present in every mock code reviewed. The mean rate of BVM ventilation for all providers in all scenarios was 40.6 ± 11.8 breaths per minute (BPM). The mean ventilation rates for RNs, RTs, and MDs were 40.8 ± 14.7, 39.9 ± 11.7, and 40.5 ± 10.3 BPM, respectively, and did not differ among providers (P = .94). All rates were significantly higher than the recommended rate of 8 to 20 BPM (per Pediatric Advanced Life Support guidelines, varies with patient age) (P < .001). The mean ventilation rate in cases of isolated respiratory arrest was 44.0 ± 13.9 BPM and was not different from the mean BVM ventilation rate in cases of cardiopulmonary arrest (38.9 ± 14.4 BPM; P = .689). CONCLUSIONS: Hyperventilation occurred in simulated pediatric resuscitation and did not vary according to provider type. Future educational interventions should focus on avoidance of excessive ventilation.

Impact of Just-in-Time and Just-in-Place Simulation on Intern Success With Infant Lumbar Puncture.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Simulation-based skill trainings are common; however, optimal instructional designs that improve outcomes are not well specified. We explored the impact of just-in-time and just-in-place training (JIPT) on interns’ infant lumbar puncture (LP) success. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled pediatric and emergency medicine interns from 2009 to 2012 at 34 centers. Two distinct instructional design strategies were compared. Cohort A (2009–2010) completed simulation-based training at commencement of internship, receiving individually coached practice on the LP simulator until achieving a predefined mastery performance standard. Cohort B (2010–2012) had the same training plus JIPT sessions immediately before their first clinical LP. Main outcome was LP success, defined as obtaining fluid with first needle insertion and <1000 red blood cells per high-power field. Process measures included use of analgesia, early stylet removal, and overall attempts. RESULTS: A total of 436 first infant LPs were analyzed. The LP success rate in cohort A was 35% (13/37), compared with 38% (152/399) in cohort B (95% confidence interval for difference [CI diff], −15% to +18%). Cohort B exhibited greater analgesia use (68% vs 19%; 95% CI diff, 33% to 59%), early stylet removal (69% vs 54%; 95% CI diff, 0% to 32%), and lower mean number of attempts (1.4 ± 0.6 vs 2.1 ± 1.6, P < .01) compared with cohort A. CONCLUSIONS: Across multiple institutions, intern success rates with infant LP are poor. Despite improving process measures, adding JIPT to training bundles did not improve success rate. More research is needed on optimal instructional design strategies for infant LP.

Severe contrast reaction emergencies high-fidelity simulation training for radiology residents and technologists in a children's hospital.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Severe reactions to radiographic contrast agents can be life threatening, and although they are rare, effective recognition and management are essential to improving outcomes. A high-fidelity radiology simulation course for radiology residents and technologists focusing on severe contrast reactions and immediate treatments was designed to test the hypothesis that knowledge would improve with this educational intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective pretest and posttest study design was used. Residents and technologists worked in teams of three to five members. Learning objectives focused on demonstrating when and how to use basic life support skills and epinephrine auto-injectors. Each resident and technologist was administered a pretest prior to the start of the case scenarios and a posttest following the debriefing session. Scores from the pretest and posttest for the residents and technologists were compared using a paired-samples t test. RESULTS Nineteen radiology residents and 11 radiology technologists participated. The average test scores were higher and improved significantly following the simulation experience for both the radiology residents (57% vs 82%, P < .001) and technologists (47% vs 72%, P = .006). Anonymous evaluations demonstrated that the experience was well received by residents and technologists, with 97% of learners (29 of 30) rating the experience as extremely or very helpful. Important learning themes included the knowledge of epinephrine auto-injector use and basic life support skills. DISCUSSION High-fidelity simulation for radiology residents and technologists focusing on epinephrine auto-injector use and basic life support skills during the first 5 minutes of a severe contrast reaction can significantly improve recognition and knowledge in treating patients having severe contrast reactions.

Radiologic resident educationSevere Contrast Reaction Emergencies: High-fidelity Simulation Training for Radiology Residents and Technologists in a Children's Hospital

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Severe reactions to radiographic contrast agents can be life threatening, and although they are rare, effective recognition and management are essential to improving outcomes. A high-fidelity radiology simulation course for radiology residents and technologists focusing on severe contrast reactions and immediate treatments was designed to test the hypothesis that knowledge would improve with this educational intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective pretest and posttest study design was used. Residents and technologists worked in teams of three to five members. Learning objectives focused on demonstrating when and how to use basic life support skills and epinephrine auto-injectors. Each resident and technologist was administered a pretest prior to the start of the case scenarios and a posttest following the debriefing session. Scores from the pretest and posttest for the residents and technologists were compared using a paired-samples t test. RESULTS Nineteen radiology residents and 11 radiology technologists participated. The average test scores were higher and improved significantly following the simulation experience for both the radiology residents (57% vs 82%, P < .001) and technologists (47% vs 72%, P = .006). Anonymous evaluations demonstrated that the experience was well received by residents and technologists, with 97% of learners (29 of 30) rating the experience as extremely or very helpful. Important learning themes included the knowledge of epinephrine auto-injector use and basic life support skills. DISCUSSION High-fidelity simulation for radiology residents and technologists focusing on epinephrine auto-injector use and basic life support skills during the first 5 minutes of a severe contrast reaction can significantly improve recognition and knowledge in treating patients having severe contrast reactions.

Transfer of simulated lumbar puncture training to the clinical setting.

Objective To show that with a combination of evidence-based didactic and hands-on skill demonstration, pediatric interns will be able to correctly perform lumbar punctures (LPs) on neonates in the actual clinical setting. Methods Twenty-three pediatric and internal medicine/pediatric first year residents attended a 1-hour course during their orientation. The course consisted of an evidence-based presentation, reviewing anatomy, indications, complications, and techniques for performing LPs, including a video presentation, followed by hands-on practice of LPs. All interns were anonymously surveyed preintervention and postintervention. The survey results were compared for each learner. After the intervention, interns were individually assessed by a single investigator using a standardized checklist during an LP of an actual pediatric patient during their first year of residency. Results Pretest and posttest knowledge improved by approximately 12% (P < 0.05). Preintervention confidence and experience were low among learners. Twenty-one of 23 interns completed a follow-up assessment of an LP on an actual pediatric patient. The average on the assessment was 9.7 ± 1.1 of 11 (88% ± 10%). The average number of LP attempts was 1.4 ± 0.5. The steps most frequently missed were preparing the supplies and performing the LP with the bevel of the needle parallel to the spinal ligament, with only 48% of interns performing each of these steps correctly. Conclusions A task trainer–based course improved the confidence and knowledge about an important pediatric procedure. This confidence and knowledge can translate to actual clinical practice. Further investigations are necessary to support this knowledge and skill translation.

Randomized Trial Comparing Two Mass Casualty Triage Systems (JumpSTART versus SALT) in a Pediatric Simulated Mass Casualty Event

Abstract Purpose. Several field triage systems have been developed to rapidly sort patients following a mass casualty incident (MCI). JumpSTART (Simple Triage and Rapid Transport) is a pediatric-specific MCI triage system. SALT (Sort, Assess, Lifesaving interventions, Treat/Transport) has been proposed as a new national standard for MCI triage for both adult and pediatric patients, but it has not been tested in a pediatric population. This pilot study hypothesizes that SALT is at least as good as JumpSTART in triage accuracy, speed, and ease of use in a simulated pediatric MCI. Methods. Paramedics were invited and randomly assigned to either SALT or JumpSTART study groups. Following randomization, subjects viewed a 15-minute PowerPoint lecture on either JumpSTART or SALT. Subjects were provided with a triage algorithm card for reference and were asked to assign triage categories to 10 pediatric patients in a simulated building collapse. The scenario consisted of 4 children in moulage and 6 high-fidelity pediatric simulators. Injuries and triage categories were based on a previously published MCI scenario. One investigator followed each subject to record time and triage assignment. All subjects completed a post-test survey and structured interview following the simulated disaster. Results. Forty-three paramedics were enrolled. Seventeen were assigned to the SALT group with an overall triage accuracy of 66% ±15%, an overtriage mean rate of 22 ± 16%, and an undertriage rate of 10 ± 9%. Twenty-six participants were assigned to the JumpSTART group with an overall accuracy of 66 ± 12%, an overtriage mean of 23 ±16%, and an undertriage rate of 11.2 ± 11%. Ease of use was not statistically different between the two systems (median Likert value of both systems = 2, p = 0.39) Time to triage per patient was statistically faster in the JumpSTART group (SALT = 34 ± 23 seconds, JumpSTART = 26 ± 19 seconds, p = 0.02). Both systems were prone to cognitive and affective error. Conclusion. SALT appears to be at least as good as JumpSTART in overall triage accuracy, overtriage, or undertriage rates in a simulated pediatric MCI. Both systems were considered easy to use. However, JumpSTART was 8 seconds faster per patient in time taken to assign triage designations. Key words: mass casualty triage; pediatric; simulation

Variability in quality of chest compressions provided during simulated cardiac arrest across nine pediatric institutions.

AIM The variability in quality of CPR provided during cardiac arrest across pediatric institutions is unknown. We aimed to describe the degree of variability in the quality of CPR across 9 pediatric institutions, and determine if variability across sites would be affected by Just-in-Time CPR training and/or visual feedback during simulated cardiac arrest. METHODS We conducted secondary analyses of data collected from a prospective, multi-center trial. Participants were equally randomized to either: (1) No intervention; (2) Real-time CPR visual feedback during cardiac arrest or (3) Just-in-Time CPR training. We report the variability in median chest compression depth and rate across institutions, and the variability in the proportion of 30-s epochs of CPR meeting 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for depth and rate. RESULTS We analyzed data from 528 epochs in the no intervention group, 552 epochs in the visual feedback group, and 525 epochs in the JIT training group. In the no intervention group, compression depth (median range 22.2-39.2mm) and rate (median range 116.0-147.6 min(-1)) demonstrated significant variability between study sites (p<0.001). The proportion of compressions with adequate depth (0-11.5%) and rate (0-60.5%) also varied significantly across sites (p<0.001). The variability in compression depth and rate persisted despite use of real-time visual feedback or JIT training (p<0.001). CONCLUSION The quality of CPR across multiple pediatric institutions is variable. Variability in CPR quality across institutions persists even with the implementation of a Just-in-Time training session and visual feedback for CPR quality during simulated cardiac arrest.

Paramedic King Laryngeal Tube Airway Insertion versus Endotracheal Intubation in Simulated Pediatric Respiratory Arrest

Abstract Introduction: Pediatric endotracheal intubation (ETI) is difficult and can have serious adverse events when performed by paramedics in the prehospital setting. Paramedics may use the King Laryngeal Tube airway (KLT) in difficult adult airways, but only limited data describe their application in pediatric patients. Objective: To compare paramedic airway insertion speed and complications between KLT and ETI in a simulated model of pediatric respiratory arrest. Methods: This prospective, randomized trial included paramedics and senior paramedic students with limited prior KLT experience. We provided brief training on pediatric KLT insertion. Using a random allocation protocol, participants performed both ETI and KLT on a pediatric mannequin (6-month old size) in simulated respiratory arrest. The primary outcomes were 1) elapsed time to successful airway placement (seconds), and 2) proper airway positioning. We compared airway insertion performance between KLT and ETI using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. Subjects also indicated their preferred airway device. Results: The 25 subjects included 19 paramedics and 6 senior paramedic students. Two subjects had prior adult KLT experience. Airway insertion time was not statistically different between the KLT (median 27 secs) and ETI (median 31 secs) (p = 0.08). Esophageal intubation occurred in 2 of 25 (8%) ETI. Airway leak occurred in 3 of 25 (12%) KLT, but ventilation remained satisfactory. Eighty-four percent of the subjects preferred the KLT over ETI. Conclusions: Paramedics and paramedic students demonstrated similar airway insertion performance between KLT and ETI in simulated, pediatric respiratory arrest. Most subjects preferred KLT. KLT may provide a viable alternative to ETI in prehospital pediatric airway management.

Multidisciplinary Simulation in Pediatric Critical Care: The Death of a Child

Health care providers are trained to care for the living. They may complete their education and enter the workforce without ever experiencing the death of a patient. Inexperience with the different roles of the multidisciplinary health care team is common. Moreover, the death of a child has a profound effect on parents and staff. In such situations, the expertise of the multidisciplinary team can make a difference. A multidisciplinary education project that uses high-fidelity simulation based on pediatric death and dying was developed to provide an experience during which health care practitioners could practice communicating with families about the death of their child and dealing with different grief reactions.