Mark A. Hemphill-Haley
Humboldt State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mark A. Hemphill-Haley.
Tectonophysics | 2003
Lee M. Liberty; Mark A. Hemphill-Haley; Ian P. Madin
Abstract The Portland metropolitan area historically is the most seismically active region in Oregon. At least three potentially active faults are located in the immediate vicinity of downtown Portland, with the Portland Hills Fault (PHF) extending directly beneath downtown Portland. The faults are poorly understood, and the surface geologic record does not provide the information required to assess the seismic hazards associated with them. The limited geologic information stems from a surface topography that has not maintained a cumulative geologic record of faulting, in part, due to rapid erosion and deposition from late Pleistocene catastrophic flood events and a possible strike-slip component of the faults. We integrated multiple high-resolution geophysical techniques, including seismic reflection, ground penetrating radar (GPR), and magnetic methods, with regional geological and geophysical surveys to determine that the Portland Hills Fault is presently active with a zone of deformation that extends at least 400 m. The style of deformation is consistent with at least two major earthquakes in the last 12–15 ka, as confirmed by a sidehill excavation trench. High-resolution geophysical methods provide detailed images of the upper 100 m across the active fault zone. The geophysical images are critical to characterizing the structural style within the zone of deformation, and when integrated with a paleoseismic trench, can accurately record the seismic history of a region with little surface geologic exposure.
Geological Society of America Bulletin | 2013
Kate Clark; Ursula Cochran; Kelvin Berryman; Glenn P. Biasi; R. Langridge; Pilar Villamor; Timothy D. Bartholomew; Nicola Litchfield; D. Pantosti; S. Marco; R. Van Dissen; Gillian M. Turner; Mark A. Hemphill-Haley
A sedimentary sequence that was highly sensitive to fault rupture–driven changes in water level and sediment supply has been used to extract a continuous record of 22 large earthquakes on the Alpine fault, the fastest-slipping fault in New Zealand. At Hokuri Creek, in South Westland, an 18 m thickness of Holocene sediments accumulated against the Alpine fault scarp from ca. A.D. 800 to 6000 B.C. We used geomorphological mapping, sedimentology, and paleoenvironmental reconstruction to investigate the relationship between these sediments and Alpine fault rupture. We found that repeated fault rupture is the most convincing mechanism for explaining all the features of the alternating peat and silt sedimentary sequence. Climate has contributed to sedimentation but is unlikely to be the driver of these cyclical changes in sediment type and paleoenvironment. Other nontectonic causes for the sedimentary alternations do not produce the incremental increase in basin accommodation space necessary to maintain the shallow-water environment for 6800 yr. Our detailed documentation of this near-fault sedimentary basin sequence highlights the advantages of extracting paleoearthquake records from such sites—the continuity of sedimentation, abundance of dateable material, and pristine preservation of older events.
New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics | 2010
Nicola Litchfield; Russell Van Dissen; Mark A. Hemphill-Haley; Dougal B. Townsend; David Heron
Abstract An important component of quantifying seismic hazard and risk in regions such as Wellington is to characterise both the long-term rate of occurrence of the regions major earthquake-generating active faults, as well as potential interactions between faults (e.g., the potential for earthquake triggering). This paper describes paleoseismic data from two trenches (Ohariu Valley) and a natural streambank exposure (Horokiri valley) c. 24 km apart, which constrain the timing and size of recent surface rupture events on the northeast striking Ohariu Fault c. 6 km northwest of Wellington City. One event is recorded at all three sites and radiocarbon age constraints indicate it correlates with the 1050–1000 cal. years BP event previously identified elsewhere along the fault. A younger, smaller (decimetre-scale) event is recorded in one of the Ohariu Valley trenches, and the timing is constrained by two radiocarbon ages to post-310 cal. years BP. This event may either be a small, primary Ohariu Fault rupture, or a triggered event associated with a large earthquake on a nearby fault. If it is a triggered rupture, then a possible mechanism is dynamic triggering associated with one of the recent large-great earthquakes on the Wellington (post-300 yr), Wairarapa (AD1855), or Awatere (AD1848) Faults. Small rupture events do not necessarily contribute to the recurrence interval classification of the Ministry for the Environment Active Fault Guidelines, but they could be important for sensitive structures crossing the fault and for lifelines crossing multiple active faults.
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America | 2018
Nicola Litchfield; Pilar Villamor; Russ Van Dissen; Andrew Nicol; Philip M. Barnes; David J. A. Barrell; Jarg R. Pettinga; Robert Langridge; Timothy A. Little; Joshu J. Mountjoy; William Ries; J. V. Rowland; Clark Fenton; Mark W. Stirling; Jesse Kearse; Kelvin Berryman; Ursula Cochran; Kate Clark; Mark A. Hemphill-Haley; Narges Khajavi; Katie E. Jones; Garth Archibald; Phaedra Upton; Cameron Asher; Adrian Benson; Simon C. Cox; Caleb Gasston; Dan Hale; Brendan Hall; Alexandra E. Hatem
Multiple (>20 >20 ) crustal faults ruptured to the ground surface and seafloor in the 14 November 2016 M w Mw 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake, and many have been documented in detail, providing an opportunity to understand the factors controlling multifault ruptures, including the role of the subduction interface. We present a summary of the surface ruptures, as well as previous knowledge including paleoseismic data, and use these data and a 3D geological model to calculate cumulative geological moment magnitudes (M G w MwG ) and seismic moments for comparison with those from geophysical datasets. The earthquake ruptured faults with a wide range of orientations, sense of movement, slip rates, and recurrence intervals, and crossed a tectonic domain boundary, the Hope fault. The maximum net surface displacement was ∼12 m ∼12 m on the Kekerengu and the Papatea faults, and average displacements for the major faults were 0.7–1.5 m south of the Hope fault, and 5.5–6.4 m to the north. M G w MwG using two different methods are M G w MwG 7.7 +0.3 −0.2 7.7−0.2+0.3 and the seismic moment is 33%–67% of geophysical datasets. However, these are minimum values and a best estimate M G w MwG incorporating probable larger slip at depth, a 20 km seismogenic depth, and likely listric geometry is M G w MwG 7.8±0.2 7.8±0.2 , suggests ≤32% ≤32% of the moment may be attributed to slip on the subduction interface and/or a midcrustal detachment. Likely factors contributing to multifault rupture in the Kaikōura earthquake include (1) the presence of the subduction interface, (2) physical linkages between faults, (3) rupture of geologically immature faults in the south, and (4) inherited geological structure. The estimated recurrence interval for the Kaikōura earthquake is ≥5,000–10,000 yrs ≥5,000–10,000 yrs , and so it is a relatively rare event. Nevertheless, these findings support the need for continued advances in seismic hazard modeling to ensure that they incorporate multifault ruptures that cross tectonic domain boundaries.
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America | 1999
Mark A. Hemphill-Haley; Ray J. Weldon
Oregon Geology | 2003
Ivan G. Wong; Mark A. Hemphill-Haley; Lee M. Liberty; Ian P. Madin
Archive | 2010
R. Van Dissen; Patricia M. Barnes; John Beavan; Jim Cousins; G. Dellow; C. Francois-Holden; B. Fry; R. Langridge; Nicola Litchfield; Timothy A. Little; Graeme H. McVerry; D. Ninis; David A. Rhoades; Russell Robinson; W. Saunders; Pilar Villamor; K. Wilson; P. Barker; Kelvin Berryman; R. Benites; H. Brackley; Brendon A. Bradley; R. Carne; Ursula Cochran; Mark A. Hemphill-Haley; A. King; Geoffroy Lamarche; Neville Palmer; N. Perrin; N. Pondard
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America | 2018
Jesse Kearse; Timothy A. Little; Russ Van Dissen; Philip M. Barnes; Robert Langridge; Joshu J. Mountjoy; Will Ries; Pilar Villamor; Kate Clark; Adrian Benson; Geoffroy Lamarche; Matthew Hill; Mark A. Hemphill-Haley
Quaternary Geochronology: Methods and Applications | 2013
Mark A. Hemphill-Haley; Thomas L. Sawyer; Peter L. K. Knuepfer; Steven L. Forman; Ivan G. Wong
Archive | 2009
R. Van Dissen; Kelvin Berryman; A. King; Terry Webb; H. Brackley; Patricia M. Barnes; John Beavan; R. Benites; P. Barker; R. Carne; G. Dellow; B. Fry; Mark A. Hemphill-Haley; C. Francois; Geoffroy Lamarche; R. Langridge; Nicola Litchfield; Timothy A. Little; Graeme H. McVerry; D. Ninis; Neville Palmer; N. Perrin; N. Pondard; W.R. Stephenson; Russell Robinson; Pilar Villamor; K. Wilson