Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Mark A. Morgan is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Mark A. Morgan.


American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 1992

Severity of asthma and perinatal outcome

Jordan H. Perlow; Douglas Montgomery; Mark A. Morgan; Craig V. Towers; Manuel Pronto

Abstract OBJECTIVE : Our objective was to determine the impact of asthma and its severity, as determined by medication requirements, on perinatal outcome. STUDY DESIGN : A case-controlled study was conducted. Among 30,940 live births at Long Beach Memorial Medical Center Womens Hospital, 183 deliveries occurred between Jan. 1, 1985, and Dec. 31, 1990, that were coded for the diagnosis of asthma. Eighty-one that required the chronic use of medications to control their disease were identified. Thirty-one patients were steroid dependent and 50 were non-steroid-medication dependent. A control group was randomly selected (excluding maternal transports), and selected perinatal variables were compared between groups. RESULTS : When compared with controls, steroid-dependent asthmatics were at significantly increased risk for gestational (1.5% vs 12.9%) and insulin-requiring diabetes (0% vs 9.7%). Preterm delivery and preterm premature ruptured membranes occurred significantly more often in both asthmatic groups. Overall cesarean section rate was significantly increased in the non-steroid-medication-dependent asthmatic group when compared with controls (56.0% vs 30.0%). Delivery by primary cesarean section was significantly more common in the steroid-dependent group (38.7% vs 19.2%), and a strong trend was noted among the non-steroid-medication-dependent patients (34.0% vs 19.2%). Cesarean delivery for fetal distress was also more common in these two asthmatic groups. Neonates born to both groups of asthmatic pregnant women were significantly more likely to be of birth weight CONCLUSIONS : Perinatal outcome is compromised in the pregnancy complicated by chronic medication-dependent asthma. The extent is variable and is associated with disease severity, as measured by medication requirements. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:963–7.)


American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 1992

Perinatal outcome in pregnancy complicated by massive obesity

Jordan H. Perlow; Mark A. Morgan; Douglas Montgomery; Craig V. Towers; Manuel Porto

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the impact of massive obesity during pregnancy, defined as maternal weight >300 pounds, on perinatal outcome. STUDY DESIGN: A case-controlled study was conducted. Between Jan. 1, 1986, and Dec. 31, 1990, 111 pregnant women weighing >300 pounds who were delivered at Long Beach Memorial Womens Hospital were identified with a perinatal data base search. A control group matched for maternal age and parity was selected, and perinatal variables were compared between groups. To control for potential confounding medical complications, massively obese patients with diabetes and/or chronic hypertension antedating the index pregnancy were excluded from the obese group, and the data were reanalyzed. The Student t test x2, and Fishers exact statistical analysis were used where appropriate. RESULTS: Massively obese pregnant women are significantly more likely to have a multitude of adverse perinatal outcomes, including primary cesarean section (32.4% vs 14.3%, p = 0.002), macrosomia (30.2% vs 11.6%, pp = 0.0001), intrauterine growth retardation (8.1% vs 0.9%, p = 0.03), and neonatal admission to the intensive care unit (15.6% vs 4.5%, p = 0.01). They also are significantly more likely to have chronic hypertension (27.0% vs 0.9%, p < 0.0001) and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (19.8% vs 2.7%, p = 0.0001). However, when those massively obese pregnant women with diabetes and/or hypertension antedating pregnancy are excluded from analysis, no statistically significant differences in perinatal outcome persisted. CONCLUSION: Massively obese pregnant women are at high risk for adverse perinatal outcome; however, this risk appears to be related to medical complications of obesity. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:958–62.)


Obstetrics & Gynecology | 1998

The effects of carbohydrate restriction in patients with diet-controlled gestational diabetes.

Carol A. Major; M. Joann Henry; Margarita de Veciana; Mark A. Morgan

Objective To determine the effect of carbohydrate restriction on perinatal outcome in patients with diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods Women with diet-controlled GDM were divided non-randomly into two groups based on their dietary carbohydrate content: those with low dietary carbohydrate content (below 43%) and those with high dietary carbohydrate content (exceeding 45%). Subjects kept dietary accounts and were followed with daily fasting and postprandial glucose assessments. Subjects also were tested daily for urinary ketones. Glycosylated hemoglobin, mean fasting and postprandial glucose values, incidence of macrosomia and large for gestational age (LGA) infants, cesarean deliveries for cephalopelvic disproportion and macrosomia, and need for insulin therapy were compared between the groups. Results The two groups were identical in terms of demographic characteristics. Significant reductions in the postprandial glucose values were seen among subjects in the low-carbohydrate group (P < .04). Fewer subjects in the low-carbohydrate group required the addition of insulin for glucose control (P < .047; relative risk [RR] 0.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02, 1.00). The incidence of LGA infants was significantly lower in the low-carbohydrate group (P < 0.35; RR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05. 0.91). Subjects in the low carbohydrate group also had a lower rate of cesarean deliveries for cephalopelvic disproportion and macrosomia (P < .037; RR 0.15; 95% CI 0.04, 0.94). Conclusion Carbohydrate restriction in patients with diet-controlled GDM results in improved glycemic control, less need for insulin therapy, a decrease in the incidence LGA infants, and a decrease in cesarean deliveries for cephalopelvic disproporftion and macrosomia.


American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 1995

The impact of amniotic fluid volume assessed intrapartum on perinatal outcome

Colleen Baron; Mark A. Morgan; Thomas J. Garite

OBJECTIVE Our purpose was to determine the value of routine intrapartum amniotic fluid volume assessment on perinatal outcome. STUDY DESIGN Patients admitted for labor and delivery who were ultimately delivered between January 1988 and June 1989 with a gestational age > or = 26 weeks and who had an intrapartum amniotic fluid index composed the study group. The amniotic fluid index was determined by the four-quadrant technique on admission to labor and delivery. Oligohydramnios was defined as an amniotic fluid index < or = 5 cm (n = 170), borderline oligohydramnios as an amniotic fluid index 5.1 to 8.0 cm (n = 261), and normal amniotic fluid volume as an amniotic fluid index 8.1 to 20 cm (n = 336). Nine patients with an amniotic fluid index > 20 cm were excluded from data analysis. The oligohydramnios and borderline oligohydramnios groups were compared with the normal group with regard to antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum variables. RESULTS The groups had similar maternal age, parity, gestational age at delivery, and antenatal complications. Meconium-stained amniotic fluid occurred significantly less often in the oligohydramnios group compared with the normal group (relative risk 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.49 to 0.92). However, variable decelerations occurred significantly more often in the oligohydramnios group compared with the normal group (relative risk 1.44, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.87), and cesarean delivery for fetal distress also occurred significantly more often (relative risk 6.83, 95% confidence interval 1.55 to 30.4). There was no difference in Apgar scores or neonatal complications between groups. The efficacy of intrapartum-determined oligohydramnios predicting cesarean delivery for fetal distress gave a sensitivity of 78%, a specificity of 74%, a positive predictive value of 33%, and a negative predictive value of 95%. CONCLUSION The amniotic fluid index for detecting intrapartum oligohydramnios is a valuable screening test for subsequent fetal distress requiring cesarean delivery.


American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 1994

Gestational diabetes: Does the presence of risk factors influence perinatal outcome?

Jonathan W. Weeks; Carol A. Major; Margarita de Veciana; Mark A. Morgan

OBJECTIVE Our purpose was to determine whether gestational diabetics with risk factors for gestational diabetes have worse glucose tolerance and poorer birth outcomes than those without risk factors. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a nonconcurrent cohort study of gestational diabetics identified by universal screening and delivered from Jan. 1, 1990, to Dec. 31, 1992. Multiple gestations and patients with chronic medical conditions were excluded. The following risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus were abstracted: obesity (> 80 kg), family history of diabetes, previous gestational diabetes mellitus, and previous macrosomic, stillborn, or anomalous fetus. Patients with one or more risk factors were compared with those without risk factors. A group of low-risk nondiabetic patients served as controls. The incidences of A2 diabetes mellitus, cesarean section, neonatal macrosomia, and shoulder dystocia were the outcome variables of interest. RESULTS Selective screening would have failed to detect 43% of gestational diabetics. Twenty-eight percent of the missed gestational diabetics would have required insulin (class A2). When compared with controls, patients with gestational diabetes mellitus were at increased risk for macrosomia (26% vs 11%, p < 0.01), cesarean section (37% vs 15%, p < 0.01), and shoulder dystocia (9% vs 2%, p < 0.05). Patients with and without risk factors did not differ in mean maternal age, gestational age at delivery, birth weight, incidence of requiring insulin, macrosomia, or cesarean delivery. The similarities between those with and without risk factors remained after stratification by maternal age (> or = 30 years). CONCLUSION Gestational diabetics are at increased risk for adverse birth outcomes compared with low-risk controls. Class A2 diabetes mellitus and fetal macrosomia with its attendant risks are equally prevalent among patients with and without risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus. Because > 40% of cases will be missed with selective screening, universal screening should be favored for detection of gestational diabetes mellitus.


American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 1995

The “dangerous multipara”: Fact or fiction?

Julianne S. Toohey; Kirk A. Keegan; Mark A. Morgan; Jennifer Francis; Shari Task; Margarita deVeciana

OBJECTIVE Our purpose was to compare the intrapartum complication incidence among grand multiparous women with that of age-matched control multiparous women. STUDY DESIGN A total of 382 grand multiparous women (para > or = 5) were compared with 382 age-matched control subjects (para 2 to 4), all delivering between July 1989 and September 1991. Intrapartum complications classically associated with grand multiparity (abruptio placentae, dysfunctional labor, fetal malpresentation, postpartum hemorrhage, and shoulder dystocia) were compared. RESULT Both groups had comparable antepartum complications and gestational ages at delivery. The overall intrapartum complication incidence for grand multiparous women was 33% (127/382 patients), not significantly different from that of the control multiparous women, 27% (103/382). Grand multiparity was associated with an increased incidence of macrosomia (16% vs 11%) and a decreased incidence of operative delivery (14% vs 21%). Macrosomia increased the incidence of intrapartum complications from 31% to 46% (p < 0.03) in the grand multiparous patients, and a trend was observed in the multiparous patients, from 26% to 37%. However, when properly controlled, this was noted to be a confounding variable and was not related to parity. CONCLUSIONS In a largely Hispanic population grand multiparous patients do not have an increased incidence of intrapartum complications.


American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 1995

Antepartum surveillance for a history of stillbirth: When to begin?

Jonathan W. Weeks; Tamerou Asrat; Mark A. Morgan; Michael P. Nageotte; Steven J. Thomas; Roger K. Freeman

OBJECTIVE A history of stillbirth is universally accepted as an indication for antepartum fetal heart rate testing. Our goal was to examine when fetal testing should begin in an otherwise healthy patient with a history of stillbirth. STUDY DESIGN This is a nonconcurrent cohort study of patients who were seen for antepartum surveillance from January 1979 to December 1991 with a history of stillbirth as the only indication for testing. Subsequent pregnancies were evaluated for adverse outcomes and abnormal antepartum test results. RESULTS There was one case of recurrent stillbirth among the 300 study patients. Nineteen patients (6.4%) had one or more positive antepartum surveillance tests (positive contraction stress test or biophysical profile < or = 4). Three patients (1%) had positive tests before 32 weeks, all of whom were subsequently delivered without incident at term. Three patients were delivered for positive tests at < 36 weeks, one by cesarean section for fetal distress. We could not detect a relationship between the gestational age of the previous stillborn and the incidence of abnormal tests or fetal distress in subsequent pregnancies. CONCLUSION Antepartum surveillance should begin at > or = 32 weeks in the healthy pregnant woman with a history of stillbirth.


American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 1995

Naturally occurring insulin autoantibodies in neonates of normal pregnancies and their relationship to insulinemia and birth weight

Sarah R. Wellik; Margarita de Veciana; Mark A. Morgan; Kathleen Berkowitz; Edward R Arquilla

OBJECTIVE The objectives of this study were to determine whether insulin autoantibodies are present in umbilical cord blood from normal pregnancies, determine whether cord blood insulin autoantibody levels correlate with respective maternal levels at delivery, determine whether cord blood insulin autoantibody levels are related to cord blood or maternal insulin levels, and to determine what relationship neonatal birth weight has with either cord blood insulin autoantibody and insulin levels or maternal insulin autoantibody and insulin levels. STUDY DESIGN Paired umbilical cord and maternal serum samples were taken from 70 normal subjects at delivery. Measurements of serum insulin autoantibody (competitive charcoal radiobinding assay) and insulin (radioimmune inhibition assay) levels were performed. Multiple linear regression analysis and paired t tests were used for data analyses. RESULTS Neonatal insulin autoantibody levels (120 nU/ml) were more than two times higher than maternal levels (49 nU/ml) (p < 0.001). No correlation was observed between neonatal and maternal insulin autoantibody levels (r = 0.14, p = 0.25). A positive correlation of both neonatal and maternal insulin with birth weight was observed (r = 0.28, p < 0.02; and r = 0.36, p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that the insulin autoantibody levels in fetal cord blood are not related to maternal levels in normal uncomplicated pregnancies. In addition, insulin levels in both maternal and neonatal circulations were positively correlated with increased birth weight in the normal pregnancies studied.


American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 1995

Preterm premature rupture of membranes and abruptio placentae: Is there an association between these pregnancy complications?

Carol A. Major; Margarita de Veciana; David F. Lewis; Mark A. Morgan


/data/revues/00029378/v179i4/S000293789870211X/ | 2011

Recurrence of gestational diabetes: Who is at risk?

Carol A. Major; Margarita deVeciana; Jonathan W. Weeks; Mark A. Morgan

Collaboration


Dive into the Mark A. Morgan's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carol A. Major

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Douglas Montgomery

Long Beach Memorial Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jordan H. Perlow

Long Beach Memorial Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Roger K. Freeman

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge